reviewed by Thompson
et al.
(1)] was exploited by Rubner andHeubner in Europe and Lusk (all of whom studied with Voit)and Howland in the United States in the early 20th century, toprovide the
fi
rst widely cited reference values for energyexpenditure in infants and children. Atwater, who also workedwith Voit, used calorimetry to provide estimates of the energyvalue of fat, carbohydrate, and protein, thus allowing recom-mendations to be made regarding dietary intake related toenergy expenditure. Harris and Benedict (2) developed predic-tive equations for energy expenditure based on age, weight,and height. Revised equations have been developed byScho
fi
eld (3) and others. Talbot (4), in Boston, publishedenergy expenditure data in the 1930s that contributed signi
fi
-cantly to the recommendations made by the Food and Agri-culture Organization and the World Health Organization forenergy requirements in childhood. The methodological errorsinherent in these measurements of energy expenditure and theirapplicability to infants in particular were not addressed untilthe advent of the doubly labeled water technique to measureenergy expenditure in free-living individuals developed byLifson in the early 1950s and
fi
rst adapted in humans bySchoeller and van Santen (5) in the 1980s. Many investigators,including Shepherd, Butte, Lucas, Sinclair, Putet, Heim, Rob-erts, Schanler, Dewey, and others, have since provided accu-rate and precise determinations of energy expenditure in preg-nant women, premature and mature infants, and children. Themost recent recommendations from the Institute of Medicineregarding energy intakes in infancy and childhood use data forenergy requirements derived by these investigators and others,and these newest values are in fact lower than previousrecommendations.
Macronutrients and micronutrients.
The interaction be-tween iron and Hb, and the harmful effects of persistentanemia, have long been appreciated. In 1928 Mackay added toour understanding of the role of iron in human health, when hereported that supplementing the diet of infants with iron re-duced the incidence of respiratory and diarrheal disease. Sincethen, these
fi
ndings have been largely con
fi
rmed, in spite of methodological challenges to the original research (6, 7). Onthe basis of these
fi
ndings, along with the observation that ironde
fi
ciency was (and still remains) the most prevalent singlenutrient de
fi
ciency, infant formulas were forti
fi
ed with iron. Inthe 1970s Murray
et al.
(8) found increased rates of infectionin anemic Somali subjects who were given iron supplements,thus causing concern that supplementing infant formulas withiron could make children more susceptible to infection (9).Miller, however, showed in rats, that administration of iron toinfected iron-de
fi
cient animals resulted in an increased deathrate, but this was not the case in iron-suf
fi
cient animals. TheAmerican Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition con-cluded the evidence was insuf
fi
cient to warrant changing rec-ommendations for the use of iron-forti
fi
ed formulas (10) andhas reaf
fi
rmed those recommendations repeatedly.Along with the pioneering work of Oski
et al.
(11), Siimes
et al.
(12), and others on the consequences of iron de
fi
ciency,we now better understand at the cellular and molecular levelhow iron participates in brain function. Studies have shownthat persistent iron de
fi
ciency in infancy (even in the absenceof anemia) may have deleterious effects on psychomotor de-velopment. Lozoff
et al.
(13), Walter
et al.
(14), Hurtado
et al.
(15), and many others con
fi
rmed and extended these
fi
ndings.The importance of early iron status (along with other environ-mental factors) on long term development was establishedwhen it was shown that, even after iron nutriture was restoredto acceptable levels, infants who were severely anemic hadworse psychomotor developmental outcomes 10 y after treat-ment than their iron-suf
fi
cient counterparts (16). Althoughthere is still debate about the optimal levels of iron forti
fi
cationof infant formulas, iron forti
fi
cation of commercially producedinfant cereals is now common, and iron-rich complementaryfoods are encouraged to reduce the still-high prevalence of ironde
fi
ciency in both developed and developing nations. Theidenti
fi
cation of iron-binding ligands (as well as other mineral-binding ligands) in human milk that enhance the absorption of iron from breast milk, along with other recently elucidatedcomponents of the biology of iron absorption, storage, andrelease are also major, recent advances in the science of humannutrition (17).
HFE,
the candidate gene responsible for hered-itary hemochromatosis, was identi
fi
ed in 1996 (18). Althoughhereditary hemochromatosis is not a disorder of infancy andchildhood, this discovery will ultimately lead to importanttreatments for this disorder and potentially other disorders of iron disposition that affect infants and children.The importance of zinc was realized rather late in compar-ison to other nutrients (19). In 1961, Prasad
et al.
(20) pursuedthe hypothesis that zinc de
fi
ciency was a major cause of adolescent nutritional dwar
fi
sm, a condition found mostly inMiddle Eastern countries. This line of investigation promptedmore research into the role of zinc in growth and development.In 1974, Moynihan (21) discovered that acrodermatitis entero-pathica, a genetic disorder that was often fatal, was caused byzinc de
fi
ciency. Zinc ligands and cellular zinc transportershave now been described by Cousins (22), Lonnerdal
et al.
(23), and a number of other investigators, informing our un-derstanding of the pathogenesis of this disorder. The absenceof zinc from early parenteral nutrition regimens and the sub-sequent development of symptoms of zinc de
fi
ciency in pa-tients supported by these solutions reemphasized the criticalrole of zinc in human nutrition. During the 1970s and 1980s,Hambidge and others (24, 25) showed that zinc de
fi
ciency inchildren resulted in stunting. This led to studies by Bhutta
et al.
(26), Black (27), and others that showed that daily supplementsof zinc in the diets of zinc-de
fi
cient children in developingcountries enhanced linear growth, reduced the risk of acutediarrhea, and reduced the prevalence of pneumonia andmalaria.We now know that zinc, like iron, also participates incognitive functioning. During the 1960s and 1970s, McLardy(28) as well as Hu and Friede (29) reported on components of the brain that are particularly enriched with zinc. During thesame period, Henkin
et al.
(30) showed that severe zincde
fi
ciency impaired the neuromotor and cognitive performanceof adults. Concurrently, Hambidge
et al.
(31) reported thatoffspring of pregnant mothers with acrodermatitis entero-pathica had a high incidence of brain malformations. Morerecently, Sandstead
et al.
(32) have demonstrated that zinc
763
HISTORY OF NUTRITION AND FLUID THERAPY
Add a Comment