/  16
 
THE SOUTH AFRICAN
www.arttimes.co.za August 2008 Issue 8 Vol 3 RSA Home subscription 180 p.a August print & distrib. 8 000 copies Available worldwide
ART
TIMES
PROFESSIONAL
T  
L
Y   
 A
   U
 
P       
R       
    Q
O
        N
D
         E
   U
      L
     L
C
   T
     E
     Z
,
By Johan MyburgThe visual arts have always
beneted from patronage.
In Medieval times the church wasthe grand patron. Many papal
whims contributed to some of 
the greatest art ever created byMichelangelo and his peers. And
during the Renaissance amboy
-
ant individuals and or families
such as the De Medici’s became
synonymous with the proliferationof the visual arts. Today corporate
sponsorship has taken over the
role of institutions offering vitalsupport for the visual arts.Although these tokens of support
and patronage are laudable andindispensable, determining the
nature of the relationship betweenthe benefactors and the arts
become increasingly important. To
what extent have patrons of the
arts become patronising? Would
one be able to speak of a truly
symbiotic relationship betweensponsorship and the arts? What
constitutes the mutual benet of 
this relationship? And is reciprocityregarded important at all?
In South Africa we have witnessedthe devastating effects of theabrupt end of the Brett Kebble Art
Awards. And recently we have
witnessed the end of the SasolWax Art Award. No self-respecting
corporate institution would operate
oblivious to the importance of 
sustainability.
But when it comes to support for 
the arts, sustainability seems to
become a ckle enterprise. Sup
-
port for the arts could be dishedout and cancelled at the drop of a hat, so it seems. If the chair of the board has a air for the arts,
sponsorship becomes an avenue
for corporate social investment.
Should the chair retire, the supportdwindles or dries up completely.
If one takes into considerationmutual respect (from the sponsor 
towards the arts and artists, and
from the art world towards the
sponsor) the question ariseswhether the patron is consult-ing the art world in establishingsponsorship and in withdrawingsponsorship. This could be thecase in establishing the award or 
competition or form of support. Butthe termination of support seems
to be a unilateral decision.The pope has another scheme inmind and the work on the SistineChapel comes to a halt.In an age with accountability andtransparency as buzzwords, itseems odd that the visual artshave to be treated as a minor  – sponsorship will decide what
is benecial for the arts. Theywill decide the amount of pocket
money that could be allocated tothe arts. While the arts sheepishlydo their best to promote the image
of the sponsor, honouring the
obligation to produce quality workso that the sponsor could cash in
on publicity and a polished proleas ‘supporters of the arts’.Perhaps the time has come for the
art world to enter proper negotia-
tions with sponsors to secure a fair deal for both. The arts need spon
-sors. Sponsors need an aestheticquality to be associated with.No one needs to be reliant on theother.
 Artists are professional people
and need to be taken seriously.By Patrick Burnett
You’ve heard of retreading old tyres,
but how about taking your unwanted
pieces of art down to the local deal
-
ership for a bit of recycling?
While you’re doing it you would alsobe making a statement on the evils
of capitalism and the selshnessof art that hides out on the walls of 
private collections.
 A group of Johannesburg artists
have launched a “creativerecycling” project that will takeprivately owned art and recondition
it into public works – an idea that if 
nothing else has stoked debate inthe art world. The Joburg Art Bin, the
concept of a group of artists knownas Empty Ofce and consisting of 
Landi Raubenheimer, Paul Cooper and Brenden Grey, and supportedby The Bag Factory artist studio, isbeing described by organisers
as a “gesture of resistance to theprivatization of contemporary art”.
The collective recently issued a callto private collectors to dump works
of art between 18 July and 2 August.
A debate on the concept was alsoheld on July 4.
The concept of retreading old arthas raised concerns ranging from afeeling that the project is
a tongue-in-cheek indulgence, to
worries about the implications of 
tampering with art that is locatedin historical, social and politicalcontexts.But the organisers have explained
their efforts in the following terms:
“The premise behind the project is
to problematize the fetishization,
instrumentalization, commoditization
and privatization of art by generat
-
ing public art from the physicaldetritus of privately owned pieces
which have been destroyed by their owners.”They hope to explore how the
“meaning and form of a privatelyowned art object transforms when
it is reworked by another artist andre-imagined in a public context”.The proposal is that the recycled
art will be used in a series of public
art works to be installed in central
Johannesburg in preparation for 
Joburg Art Week and the JoburgArt Fair 2009. Artists will work incollaboration with those who drop
off work.
Grey said the project was askingquestions about why artists madethe work they did and who sawthat work and was interested in thedialogue and debate around thesequestions. He said work was not
being defaced but recycled and
reconstructed. The Bag Factory
education ofcer Bronwyn Lace said
a panel discussion had been heldon July 4 to discuss the project. “Itwas a heated debate and no clear answers were reached...The debatedid raise many questions though
as to the validity of art in the publicrealm, whether much of it is trulytransformative in nature, the reasonsfor collecting etc.” Lace said some
works had already been depositedbut was not able to give details onwhat would be done with them.
 Antoinette Murdoch, CEO of the
Joburg Art Bank, which has dropped
off some art works, said about 10
pieces had been handed over. Shesaid while it was “an interestingidea”, the bank would not be in-volved in re-purposing the work andsaw it more as a convenient way “to
get rid of what you don’t want andre-purpose something”. “If it doesnothing else but to generate a lot of debate then that is fabulous becauseI’m so sick and tired of people notdebating. If new voices can be heard
and people are saying what they
think then I think that’s fabulous.”
Strike down capitalism: dump your old art
Painting by Richard Hart :
The illusive deeper of Rita’s girls
, Oil on canvass, was one of the works on
Bigwood 2 
held at
 ArtSpace Durban. For more work see: www.artspacedurban.co.za The show will travel to whatiftheworld gallery soon
SASOL snuffs Wax Award
“When it comes to support for the arts,
sustainability seems to become a fckle
enterprise. Support for the arts could bedished out and cancelled at the drop of a hat.” 
 
Page 2South African Art Times. August 2008
Custom Stretched CanvassesHand made EaselsPainting & print stretching 
Artist: Ann Gadd
ArtStuff now available on the Garden RouteCall Paul Tunmer 083 2610084Tel: 021 448 2799 Fax: 021 448 2797artstuff@webmail.co.za www.artstuff.co.za
Free delivery within Cape area
The South African
 
Art Times
August 2008www.arttimes.co.za
Published monthly by
Global Art Information
PO Box 15881 Vlaeberg,8018, Cape TownTel. 021 424 7733Fax. 021 424 7732
Editor: Gabriel Clark-Brown
editor@arttimes.co.za
Advertising: Leone Rouse
leo@arttimes.co.za
Subscriptions: Bastienne Klein
subs@arttimes.co.zaNews: press@arttimes.co.zaShows: show@arttimes.co.zaArtwork: art@arttimes.co.zaLayout: Wrong side of the bed 
Deadlines for news, articles and
classieds 20th of each monthThe Art Times is published in the rst
week of each month. News and ad-vertising material need to be with thenews and marketing managers by the15th- 20th of each month.Newspaper rights:
The newspaper re-serves the right to reject any material thatcould be found offensive by its readers.Opinions expressed in the SA Art Times
do not necessarily represent the ofcial
viewpoint of the editor, staff or publisher,while inclusion of advertising featuresdoes not imply the newspaper’s endorse-ment of any business, product or service.Copyright of the enclosed material in this publication is reserved.Views published in this Newspaper 
do not necessary reect those of the
Publisher.
SUBSCRIPTIONS
NAMIBIA
Call John at:Tel: +264 81 1286585
ZIMBABWE
Gallery Delta110 Livingstone Avenue,Greenwood Park, Harare,Tel/fax: (263-4) 792135ael@twinarts.co.zwGet your free copydelivered to your door 
www.arttimes.co.za
By Patrick Burnett
City ofcials, the police andmembers of the community involved
in tracking down thieves that stolethe Waterwitch statues in Athlone
scooped the bulk of praise in aCity of Cape Town civic awards
ceremony held in early July.
Life-sized bronze statues of struggle
heroes Robbie Waterwitch and
Coline Williams, MK cadres killed
in an explosion outside the AthloneMagistrate’s Court on July 23, 1989,
were brazenly stolen in March from
opposite the Athlone police station.The thieves, who attempted to
sell the statues for scrap metal,
apparently attached ropes to the
gures and then toppled them withthe help of a bakkie, before loadingthem up and driving away. A City of 
Cape Town task team - dubbed theCopperheads - tracked down 300kg
of the carved-up statues and 10
suspects were arrested.
However, four months later the
suspects have yet to have their dayin court.
Investigating ofcer Detective Gary
Jacobs said investigations in the
case had been concluded. Of the 10original arrests, ve suspects hadbeen released due to insufcent
evidence.He said it was expected that the
case would be transferred from the
Athlone Magistrate’s Court to theWynberg Regional Court, where a
trial date would be set. Of the ve
accused, all were out on bail andhad yet to plead in the case.Cape Town mayor Helen Zille,
speaking at the civic awards func
-tion, held to recognise extraordinary
acts of service, said the balance of 
the awards were to acknowledge the
efforts of those involved in bringingto book the thieves of the
monument.
Zille reserved special thanks for 
Rens Bindeman, a private individualthat helped in tracking down thethieves.
She also made special mention of 
Arthur October, who had headedthe Copperheads’ response unit untilhe died recently in a car accident.
She said October, the staff of the
Copperheads and its head Pieter van Dalen had gone “beyond the call
of duty, with almost no resources, tocatch the criminals responsible for the memorial’s theft, and to take theght against cable theft in general to
the thieves and illegal scrapdealers.”
She also recognised the efforts of 
the SAPS in making themselvesavailable.“They went above and beyond the
call of duty in service to the com
-
munity of Athlone and of Cape Town
in general, and we want to give them
formal recognition for their efforts.”
Waterwitch heroes win acclaim
One of the praised heroes: Pieter van Dalen member of the crack “Copperheads” unit whose team’sinvestigation recovered the sculpture within 3 days of theft. Photo: Neil Baynes of allround photography.comEditorials from publishers shouldalways be yawned at: what do they
know about art, let alone passion,love and beauty that artists sacri-
ce through their struggle, homecomforts and material gain. Themost beautiful thing art publishers
like is a meager salary and a wildly
wonderful relationship with their 
readers. In this regard I am thrilled
to have received a wonderfulresponse from your readers ques
-
tionnaires, that range from very
good, to irritation on late editions.The readers survey has pointedus into good directions, there is
an overwhelming 90% request for 
more pictures!, no we wont switchto newsprint, and yes we wouldlike to include more dialogue withartists and community members,as well as more international news.
We would like to facilitate for the
lastminute.commers and announceour winners next month, as many
folk are still lling out their question
-naires.
I would like to thank everyone for 
your support, I hardly write editori-als, but I believe that the paper 
should, like a work of art speak for itself. Having said this, one coulddivide the paper into 3-4 different
taste groups and produce a paper 
for many groups that see them
-
selves apart from the other, maybe
its not so bad then, that we learn tosee what others are doing.Please do watch our website. We
are thinking of making a SA ArtMedia feed. A local clipping agency
estimated that they wouldn’t getmore than 100 art related mediaclippings per month- two weeksinto the contract I received a phonecall to say, ooops they have clipped
over 800 so far -can I update theservice? - see these daily feeds on
www.arttimes.co.za
Editorial
Be sure to catch the love at The Rupert Art Foundation - who will bring a
collection of 27 original Auguste Rodin bronzes to the Rupert Museum in
Stellenbosch - opening 21 August.
 
South African Art Times. August 2008 Page 3
By Patrick BurnettA row has erupted between East-ern Cape art enthusiasts and theNelson Mandela Bay municipality
over the auction of art works from
he Nelson Mandela MetropolititanArt Museum, which is run by themunicipality.he municipality maintains that theart works sold did not belong to themuseum and that stringent proce-
dures were followed in disposingof them, but a former director of 
he museum has questioned theseclaims.In a statement dealing with theauction, which took place inJuly and raised over R30,000,municipal spokesperson LourensSchoeman said the museum had
“scrupulously” followed SouthAfrican Museum Association(Sama) professional guidelines on
disposals.“The process was started twoyears ago when a public appeal
was made for owners to remove
heir artworks or to give the art
museum information about them,”
said Schoeman. He said the
works earmarked for disposal had
been advertised via Sama, who
had posted information to all its
members.
 After consulting the budget andtreasury, the works had nallybeen sent for auction. Schoeman
said the sale had not been moti-
vated by nancial difculties, but
that the museum had been “des-perate to liberate storage space
which had been taken up for many
years by artworks abandoned atthe museum”.But one art administrator in the
province said: “I am very con
-cerned about what is happening to
collections in South Africa. Thereare ominous rumblings of things
being lost and destroyed. There
is a lack of interest in anythingfrom the colonial period, butthese works are also a part of the
rainbow nation.”And Clayton Holliday, a previous
director of the King George VI
Art Gallery, which became theNelson Mandela Metropolititan ArtMuseum, said the works had beenowned by the council and become
the responsibility of the gallery.“Like lost waifs and strays they
were taken in, most restored and
once beautiful again, became partof our heritage.”
Holliday said he had recognised
most the works out up for auction
when he had seen them two days
before the sale. However, he said
he had not recognised two 32cmby 22cm Victorian landscapes byW. Manners (1892), which musthave been acquired by the gallery
after he had left. “They should
never have been sold,” he said.“That art was sold to ‘liberate
storage space’, sold for R33,500,
should make the community rest-
less and uncomfortable. How safe
are our collections and what are
the safeguards for the future?”
He said there should be “concern”
about the disposal of items fromthe musuem and about the care of 
all heritage material.Holliday said while Schoeman
had said the sale had followed
Sama guidelines, he had not seenthese even though he had been
a life member of the association.
Schoeman had not responded to
requests for information about theguidelines at the time of nalisingthis article, but a Sama ofcialconrmed the existence of the
guidelines.
Holliday said he was not satised
that advertising had only beendone through Sama because onlypaid up members received Samapublications.“I never saw the advert or I mighthave responded,” he said.Holliday also raised questionsabout a hanging sculptor in theCity Hall by Edouardo Villa, whichhe said had been destroyed.In addition, he asked how a FrankRogaly painting in the OperaHouse by Neil Rodger had been
removed from its place of honour.
‘Space liberating’ auction causes concern in Eastern Cape
Work by Photographer Stephen
Shore entitled:
Memphis,Tennessee, December 1973
Inuential photographer Stephen
Shore - invited by the newly
formed Roger Ballen Foundation
will be hosting workshops as well
as exhibit in South Africa.
For more details see Page 14or go to www.rogerballen.org

Share & Embed

More from this user

Add a Comment

Characters: ...

Art Timesleft a comment

Good to see our favourate Art Newspaper online at last