Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
1Center for American Progress | Clearly Constitutional
Clearly Constitutional
A Primer on the Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act
Ian Millhiser January 18, 2011
Introduction
Nearly hree dozen judges have now considered challenges o he landmark  Aordable Care Ac and he overwhelming majoriy o hese cases have beendismissed. Neverheless, a single oulier judge in Virginia has embraced he meri-less argumens agains he new healh care law and anoher judge in Florida alsoappears poised o break wih he overwhelming consensus o his colleagues. Wih only a ew excepions, hese lawsuis principally challenge he AordableCare Ac’s minimum coverage provision—he provision requiring mos Americanso eiher carry healh insurance or pay slighly more income axes—alsely arguingha Congress lacks he consiuional auhoriy o enac such a provision. I is rueha Congress’s auhoriy is limied o an iemized lis o powers conained in heex o he Consiuion isel, bu while Congress’s powers are no unlimied, hey are sill quie sweeping. Tere is no doub ha he Aordable Care Ac s wihinhese enumeraed powers in hree ways, as his issue brie will demonsrae.
Congress has broad power to regulate the national economy
 A provision o he Consiuion known as he “commerce clause” gives Congresspower o “regulae commerce … among he several saes.” And here is a longline o Supreme Cour decisions holding ha Congress has broad power o enaclaws ha subsanially aec prices, markeplaces, or oher economic ransacions.Because healh care comprises approximaely 17 percen o he naional economy,i is impossible o argue ha a bill regulaing he naional healh care marke doesno  wihin Congress’s power o regulae commerce.
 
2Center for American Progress | Clearly Constitutional
Neverheless, opponens o he Aordable Care Ac claim ha a person who doesno buy healh insurance is no engaged in any economic “aciviy” and hereorecanno be compelled o perorm an undesired ac. Even i hese opponens werecorrec ha he uninsured are no acive paricipans in he healh care mar-ke—and hey are acive, o course, every ime hey become ill and seek medicalcare—nohing in he Consiuion suppors his novel heory. Indeed, his heory appears o have been invened solely or he purpose o his liigaion. Congresshas enaced counless laws which would be orbidden under his exra-consiu-ional heory:
•
Guns
:
Presiden George Washingon signed a law ha required much o hecounry o purchase a rearm, ammuniion, and oher equipmen in case hey needed o be called up or miliia service. Many o he members o Congress who voed or his mandae were members o he Philadelphia Convenion ha wroe he Consiuion.
•
Civil rights
:
Te Civil Righs Ac o 1964 compelled business owners o engagein ransacions hey considered undesirable—hiring and oherwise doing busi-ness wih Arican Americans.
•
Insurance mandates
:
Te Aordable Care Ac is no even he only ederal law requiring someone o carry insurance. Te Price-Anderson Ac o 1957 requiresnuclear power plans o purchase liabiliy insurance and he Flood DisaserProecion Ac requires many homeowners o carry ood insurance.
•
Other mandates
:
Oher laws require individuals o perorm jury service, le ax reurns, and regiser or selecive service.
 The minimum coverage provision is the keystone that holds theAffordable Care Act together
Te Consiuion also gives Congress he power “[]o make all laws which shall benecessary and proper or carrying ino execuion” is power o regulae inersaecommerce. As Supreme Cour Jusice Anonin Scalia explains, his means ha“where Congress has he auhoriy o enac a regulaion o inersae commerce, ipossesses every power needed o make ha regulaion eecive.Te ac eliminaes one o he insurance indusrys mos abusive pracices—deny-
 
3Center for American Progress | Clearly Constitutional
ing coverage o paiens wih pre-exising condiions. Tis ban canno uncion i paiens are ree o ener and exi he insurance marke a will. I paiens can waiunil hey ge sick o buy insurance, hey will drain all he money ou o an insur-ance plan ha hey have no previously paid ino, leaving nohing lef or he reso he plan’s consumers.Seven saes enaced a pre-exising condiions law wihou also passing an insur-ance coverage requiremen, and all seven saes saw healh insurance premiumsspiral ou o conrol. In some o hese saes, he individual insurance marke col-lapsed. Tere is a way ou o his rap, however. Massachusets enaced a minimumcoverage provision in 2006 o go along wih is pre-exising condiions provisionand he resuls were boh sriking and immediae. Massachusets’ premiums rap-idly dropped by 40 percen.In oher words, because he only way o make he pre-exising condiions law eecive is o also require individuals o carry insurance, ha requiremen easily passes Scalia’s es.Te link beween he minimum coverage provision and he Aordable Care Ac’sinsurance regulaions also ses his law aside rom oher hypoheical laws requir-ing individuals o purchase oher goods or services. Te naional marke or veg-eables will no collapse i Congress does no require people o purchase broccoli,nor will Americans cease o be able o obain auomobiles absen a law requiringhe purchase o cars rom General Moors. Accordingly, a cour decision uphold-ing he Aordable Care Ac would no provide a preceden enabling Congress ocompel all Americans o purchase broccoli or cars, despie he law’s opponens’claims o he conrary.
Congress has broad leeway in how it raises money
Congress also has he auhoriy o “lay and collec axes” under he Consiuion.Tis power o ax also suppors he minimum coverage provision, which works by requiring individuals who do no carry healh insurance o pay slighly moreincome axes. axpayers who reuse insurance mus pay more in axes while hose who do carry insurance are exemp rom his new ax. For his reason, he law isno dieren han dozens o longsanding ax exempions, including he morgageineres ax deducion, which allows people who ake ou home morgages o pay lower axes han people who do no.
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more