Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this

Table Of Contents

0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1


|Views: 172|Likes:
Published by rsmallwood395895
The best document to select examination methods for the non-intrusive inspection of fixed equipment.
The best document to select examination methods for the non-intrusive inspection of fixed equipment.

More info:

Published by: rsmallwood395895 on Jan 18, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Comments may be sent by e-mail to
For subscription orders or information about subscription terms, please use
Comprehensive information about DNV services, research and publications can be found at
, or can be obtained from DNV, Veritas-veien 1, NO-1322 Høvik, Norway; Tel +47 67 57 99 00, Fax +47 67 57 99 11.
© Det Norske Veritas. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including pho-tocopying and recording, without the prior written consent of Det Norske Veritas.Computer Typesetting (FM+SGML) by Det Norske Veritas.Printed in Norway
If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of Det Norske Veritas, then Det Norske Veritas shall pay compensation to such personfor his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum compen-sation shall never exceed USD 2 million.In this provision "Det Norske Veritas" shall mean the Foundation Det Norske Veritas as well as all its subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees, agents and any other acting on behalf of DetNorske Veritas.
DET NORSKE VERITAS (DNV) is an autonomous and independent foundation with the objectives of safeguarding life, prop-erty and the environment, at sea and onshore. DNV undertakes classification, certification, and other verification and consultancyservices relating to quality of ships, offshore units and installations, and onshore industries worldwide, and carries out researchin relation to these functions.DNV Offshore Codes consist of a three level hierarchy of documents:
Offshore Service Specifications.
Provide principles and procedures of DNV classification, certification, verification and con-sultancy services.
Offshore Standards.
Provide technical provisions and acceptance criteria for general use by the offshore industry as well asthe technical basis for DNV offshore services.
 Recommended Practices.
Provide proven technology and sound engineering practice as well as guidance for the higher levelOffshore Service Specifications and Offshore Standards.DNV Offshore Codes are offered within the following areas:A)Qualification, Quality and Safety MethodologyB)Materials TechnologyC)StructuresD)SystemsE)Special FacilitiesF)Pipelines and RisersG)Asset OperationH)Marine OperationsJ)Wind Turbines
Amendments and Corrections
This document is valid until superseded by a new revision. Minor amendments and corrections will be published in a separatedocument normally updated twice per year (April and October).For a complete listing of the changes, see the “Amendments and Corrections” document located at:http://webshop.dnv.com/global/, under category “Offshore Codes”.The electronic web-versions of the DNV Offshore Codes will be regularly updated to include these amendments and corrections.
Recommended Practice DNV-RP-G103, October 2007Introduction Page 3
Executive summary
Pressure vessels and pressure systems are required to undergoperiodic, statutory inspection to ensure continued safe and reli-able operation. Traditionally this has been achieved by meansof an internal visual inspection (IVI), however, there can bevery high costs associated with shutting down a vessel (loss of production), isolating it and preparing it for entry. Indeed,these costs can be much higher than the cost of the inspectionitself. Furthermore, the mechanical disturbances involved inpreparing the vessel for internal inspection and reinstating itmay adversely affect its future performance. Finally, and byno means least, man access may also be hazardous. There can,therefore, be significant advantages if inspections are per-formed from the outside of the vessel without breaking con-tainment i.e. non-invasively. However, there needs to be abalance between achieving these benefits and obtaining theinformation required to ensure continued safe and reliableoperation.While it may often be the preferred option, non-intrusiveinspection (NII) represents a relatively new approach by com-parison to IVI and many engineers responsible for inspectionplanning have yet to build up experience with and confidencein its application. In addition, there are a wide variety of tech-niques available, each with its own specific capabilities andlimitations.This has been recognised by industry and has led to the devel-opment of a number of guidance documents aimed at assistingplant operators to plan and justify NII. This recommendedpractice is intended to bring these documents together under asingle cover, and to provide a consistent and logical approachat all stages of the non-intrusive inspection process.This recommended practice is primarily intended for thosewith responsibilities in the planning, implementation andacceptance of vessel inspections. It is aimed at the inspectionof welded vessels constructed from metals, and related items,fittings and connections associated with them, although thedocument is equally applicable to forged/spun metal pressurevessels, which contain no welds, as well as storage tanks andlarge diameter pipelines. Although not intended to be coveredby this document, some aspects of this recommended practicemay also be applicable to vessels manufactured from othermaterials and plant items other than pressurised equipment, inwhich case some of the general principles developed may wellstill apply.The recommended practice provides guidance for:i)determining when NII is appropriate in principleii)information requirements to plan for NIIiii)defining the requirements for the NII method(s) to beselectediv)selecting methods that meet the requirementsv)evaluating the results of the inspectionvi)documentation requirements.
This recommended practice is based on a number of precedingdocuments and as such the permission of the previous authorsto incorporate their work is hereby gratefully acknowledged.In particular, we would like to thank members of the HOIS col-laborative project for their contributions and comments duringthe production of the recommended practice, Mitsui Babcock for their permission to incorporate elements of the GSP235report covering aspects of the inspection planning procedureand summary of inspection methods, and ESR Technology Ltdfor compiling the original text for this recommended practice.

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
Carlos Padilla liked this
MphilipT liked this
Santoplan liked this
siens2304 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->