Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1


Ratings: (0)|Views: 21 |Likes:
Published by alanbwilliams

More info:

Published by: alanbwilliams on Jan 23, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





, when they accuse one of something criminal, - they neveraccuse you of violating a "Law". They can't Their private "Lawyer-club meetings" are convened "in the interest of justice", and/or"discretion" under the "Administration (collection of debt) of Code".
That's why, - even if you go out and flat-out killsomeone, - they will not accuse you of "Murder". They willaccuse you of violation of some "Code Title number andsection number" which stands for murder.What they refer to as "criminal" is actually "civil-criminal". It is really a "Contract penalty" or penal Codeviolation, being "administered" to fiction persons under
presumption that you (We) are enjoying some "Benefit, Privilege,Title of Nobility, or opportunity offered" by government corporation.The "It Ain't Me" letter raises "rebuttable presumption" that you(the real live natural man), are not the fiction person Defendant -despite the similar name. The important issue here is the distinctionbetween "real" versus "fiction". The fact that the fiction's name isspelled in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, is only prima facie evidence that itis the fiction.The main issue is that you are nor the fiction Defendant of aLegislature. You are real flesh & blood natural of GOD.Example, - we had a man go into court, but he argued the namespelling (small letters vs. Capital letters). The tricky Lawyer-Judgefinally said "Well then, what is your name?". He gave his nameverbally (making a contract with the court). The sneaky tricky Judgethen said "Let the record show the Defendant is Mr. Blank 'also knownas' Mr. BLANK." She had Just by-passed the "real. vs. fiction" issue.Do NOT get hung-up
on the
spelling". That is secondary. The mainissue is - are you real natural flesh and Blood of GOD, or a fictioncorporate "person" of government, and a "subject" therefore.
When they called his case, - What our Man should have saidis "Which one? The real man or the fiction? . And repeatedthat phrase over and over, regardless how many times anddifferent ways they tried to call him.Enjoying the "Title of Nobility" as "Person" and/or"subject" is a privilege granted from government and
makesyou liable and subject to to' government "Code of Conduct" for"subjects". The lawyers presume that everyone is enjoying the benefitof corporate fiction subject" (14th Amendment, "slave on governmentplantation") status and therefore owes a debt back to government(excise Tax) in return for the privilege/Benefit being enjoyed.
When one returns or "rejects" all government papers,refuses to enter a "Plea", and refuses to "Post Bail orBond" (for 48 hours Riverside County vs. McLaughlin), andDenies by WRITTEN AFFIDAVIT that he is the fiction

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->