Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Filed Respondents Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Filed Respondents Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Ratings: (0)|Views: 176 |Likes:
Published by Kurt W. Wanfried
Madison County and Oneida County v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York Respondents Brief
Madison County and Oneida County v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York Respondents Brief

More info:

Published by: Kurt W. Wanfried on Feb 04, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/04/2011

pdf

text

original

 
No. 10-72
IN THE
Ouprente
court of tbe
iffititeb
ibtatto
MADISON COUNTY AND ONEIDA COUNTY, NEW YORK
Petitioners,
V.
ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK,
Respondent.
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Court of Appealsfor the Second Circuit
RESPONDENTS BRIEF lN OPPOSITION
RICHARD
G.
TARANTO
FARR & TARANTO
1150 18th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 775-0184
PETER
D.
CARMEN
MEGHAN MURPHY BEAICMAN
ONEIDA NATIONLEGAL DEPARTMENT
5218 Patrick RoadVerona, NY 13478
(315) 361-8687
MICHAEL
R.
SMITH
Counsel of Record
DAVID
A.
REISER
ZUCICERMAN SPAEDER
LLP
1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 778-1800
msmith@zuckerman.com
Counsel for Respondent
WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. -
(202) 789-0096 -
WASHINGTON,
D. C.
20002
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABLE OF AUTHORITIES
NTRODUCTION
STATEMENT
REASONS FOR DENYING THE PETITION
I. THE RULING ON SOVEREIGN
IMMUNITY FROM TAX
FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS DOES
NOT WARRANT REVIEW
A.
The Second Circuit Correctly FollowedThis Court's Decisions
1
B.
Sherrill
Did Not Involve, or Alter theLaw on, Sovereign Immunity from
Suit
1
C.
Yakima
Did Not Involve, or Alter theLaw on, Sovereign Immunity from
Suit
4
D.
There Is No Basis for Revisiting theIssue to Consider Judicially Imposinga New Limit on Immunity
5
II. THE DISESTABLISHMENT QUESTION
WAS NOT DECIDED BELOW ANDDOES NOT WARRANT REVIEW
1
CONCLUSION
5
 
9
g
m
9
A
 
w
J
n
9
P
C
q
i
s
n
L
'
c
w
e
V
u
9
-
w
6
V
o
O
g
m
9
y
°
i
a
r
j
8
o
E
9
.
D
Z
p
A
mD
E
p
d
DD
L
M
N
p
s
.
1
g
E
D
9
t
p
.
C
g
n
0
9
g
 
0
(
D
Mv
4m
L
6
N
O
0W
g
C
S
g
I
I
9
D
S
pw
V

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->