Beyond-IR: Remote Controls for Home Entertainment

By: Jim Davis, Senior Product Marketing Engineer, Cypress Semiconductor Corp.

Does your home entertainment system look anything like the below photo? Do you have a TV in your bedroom that you have
to reach at odd-angles from your bed to control with your line-of-sight IR remote control? Am I the only one that’s amazed that
st
we’re in the 21 century and reliant on a near 30-year old, one-way, line-of-sight-limited technology to control our bleeding
edge consumer electronics products like our multi-thousand dollar plasma big-screen TVs and other entertainment systems? I
don’t think I am—and that’s why you’re still reading.

Figure 1 – Example of a Multi-Component Home Entertainment System

The alternative to infrared remote control technologies is RF-based remote controls. RF-based remote controls overcome
three major limitations of infrared technologies: line-of-sight and range; one-way communications; and high power
consumption. Let’s take a look at each of these limitations and attempt to better understand why the primary interface to our
home entertainment, the remote control, continues to be based on a 1980s era technology and how this will change, especially
with the introduction of the RF4CE consortium and standards.

Line-of-Sight and Range

The most apparent limitation we all deal with on a regular basis with our infrared remote controls is the need for a line-of-sight
connection. This connection is fragile in that it is broken if the receiver is accidentally pushed back into the entertainment
center enough to cover the optical IR receiver. Even if you just want to turn the TV off, you have to walk right up to the
receiver with the remote to toggle the power. What happens in these same scenarios when the remote is no longer restricted
by line-of-sight? You no longer have to care about where the receiver is or where the remote is in relation to the receiver.

Radio frequency technologies for remote controls, unlike Infrared, have physical characteristics that allow these control signals
to penetrate line-of-sight obstructions such as walls, blankets, and home entertainment centers. Just as with a WiFi network
connection, the beauty is that users are not tethered to a desk and can travel throughout the home while still maintaining a
connection to the network. RF remotes work in much the same way. In addition, RF technologies allow for greater range then
typical IR remotes (1~5m of range). RF technologies can easily reach 20-to-50m with the same operating characteristics of
the IR remote control. And depending on the application, this range can easily be extended with a slight increase in power.

Beyond-IR Remote Controls for Home Entertainment Page 1 of 3

Published in Digital Home DesignLine (http://www.digitalhomedesignline.com/howto/218000081) June 2009

[+] Feedback
One-Way Communications
The next feature-limiting characteristic of IR remotes that RF technologies easily overcome is one-way communications. Most
of us don’t even realize this is a limitation of IR remotes primarily due to the fact that RF remotes are still not very common for
home entertainment systems. Once the line-of-sight and range limitation has been addressed, users will quickly discover a
need for the remote to provide feedback regarding the system being controlled. For example, say you want to find a particular
song stored in your audio system. With a one-way system you must either remember exactly how many next-song button
clicks to press from the current song playing or listen to opening of each song before clicking to the next. Ideally, users would
prefer to scroll through their music, perhaps selecting the next song from an abbreviated list shown on the remote. Another
feature enabled by bi-directional communications – a feature every family needs – is a pager function to locate the remote
control. Rather than spending searching for a misplaced remote or operating the receiver manually, users could instead have
the remote sound off to reveal its location. And this is just one of the new possibilities and innovations a bi-directional
communication link can enable for controlling home entertainment system.

Let’s now consider an example apart from the home entertainment system that would also benefit from these same RF remote
control features—the garage remote control. How many times have you driven away from your garage thinking more about
where you’re headed, what your first meeting is at work, or whether you’re going to be late just to realize that you don’t
remember if you shut the garage behind you. The most paranoid among us immediately turn around and return to the house
just to realize that as a part of our normal day-to-day routines we have pushed the garage remote button just like we do every
day as we backed away from the house. In contrast, imagine a remote that could display the status of the garage and whether
it is shut or open? With a bi-directional communications feature, this could easily be accomplished. In addition, it serves as a
differentiating feature for which many consumers might be willing to upgrade.

Power Consumption
Typical IR remote controls require battery replacement at least once per year. Multiplying the number of home entertainment
system remotes by the number of batteries in each remote (typically two AA/AAA batteries) and we’re disposing on the order
of millions of batteries each year. Further, due to the high power consumption of IR technologies, IR remotes require multiple
large batteries, which impacts the minimum form factor. The lower power consumption of RF remote controls, on the other
hand, can take advantage of smaller batteries such as the CR2032 coin-cell. The use of a smaller, single cell enables
removes battery constraints, allowing for better hand-fitting, sleeker form factors. The table below compares a typical IR
remote control’s power consumption to that of a leading RF technology. In this table, it’s clear to see that a low-power RF
technology could easily and significantly increase the lifetime of the batteries in home entertainment remote controls. In
addition, longer operating life also translates to fewer support calls and RMAs for the home entertainment system
manufacturer due to failures in identifying problems with their systems ultimately being a result of failed power sources (i.e.
drained batteries). For both the consumer and the manufacturer, a system with greater battery life such as RF remote controls
is a huge win-win.

Feature Cypress CyFi Infrared

Low-Power RF

Energy Per Button Press 66.7 uC 250 mC

(Measured in Coulombs)

Battery Life 2+ years 8 weeks

(CR2032, 100 press/day)

Figure 2 - Power Consumption (RF vs. IR)

RF4CE: The Consortium Bringing Remotes into the 21st Century

Why, with all of the benefits that RF has over infrared, have we not seen this technology take off? Two reasons are usually
cited: cost (including added design complexity) and the fact that IR is an incumbent standard. From a manufacturer’s
perspective in the consumer electronics market, price is king. The lower a manufacturer can drive their cost when building
millions of a product, the less the manufacture has to charge to make a sustainable profit.

Beyond-IR Remote Controls for Home Entertainment Page 2 of 3

Published in Digital Home DesignLine (http://www.digitalhomedesignline.com/howto/218000081) June 2009

[+] Feedback
In response to this, the RF4CE consortium is working to establish a standard RF interface for consumer electronics products
which, in turn, will commoditize the electronic components to meet this standard. This means, when it comes to the RF
interface itself, few features other than compliance to the standard and measures of who can comply more effectively will truly
separate the RF component offerings thus leading to the prime discriminator: price.

The second, and probably the most logical reason why RF has not taken off in the consumer electronics market is that IR is
the de-facto standard for remote control communications. It’s simple, relatively cheap, and everyone except for a small few of
consumer electronics manufacturers utilize IR technologies for remote controls. An entire market of universal remote controls
has evolved based on this and many of the same companies that design the core entertainment system devices develop
devices for the universal remote control market. This alone has a spiral-effect of preventing RF from entering the remote
control space. However, this changes as a large group of the world’s major consumer electronics manufacturers and their
suppliers continue to team together to form the RF4CE consortium to once and for all upgrade the world’s home entertainment
centers primary interface, the remote control.

In March of 2009, the ZigBee Alliance and the RF4CE Consortium jointly announced an agreement to deliver a standardized
specification for RF-based remote controls—ZigBee RF4CE. In this way, major consumer electronics manufacturers have
made a clear statement that RF for remote controls is necessary, can be achieved at reasonable cost and effect, and, through
a public partnership, can be standardized to continue minimizing the number of remote controls we have in front of our
couches. RF for remote controls will quickly become a simple add-on component thanks to both the ZigBee RF4CE standards
development and its supporting manufacturers.

Cypress Semiconductor
198 Champion Court
San Jose, CA 95134-1709
Phone: 408-943-2600
Fax: 408-943-4730
http://www.cypress.com

© Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, 2007. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation assumes no responsibility for the
use of any circuitry other than circuitry embodied in a Cypress product. Nor does it convey or imply any license under patent or other rights. Cypress products are not warranted nor intended
to be used for medical, life support, life saving, critical control or safety applications, unless pursuant to an express written agreement with Cypress. Furthermore, Cypress does not authorize
its products for use as critical components in life-support systems where a malfunction or failure may reasonably be expected to result in significant injury to the user. The inclusion of
Cypress products in life-support systems application implies that the manufacturer assumes all risk of such use and in doing so indemnifies Cypress against all charges.

PSoC Designer™, Programmable System-on-Chip™, and PSoC Express™ are trademarks and PSoC® is a registered trademark of Cypress Semiconductor Corp. All other trademarks or
registered trademarks referenced herein are property of the respective corporations.

This Source Code (software and/or firmware) is owned by Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (Cypress) and is protected by and subject to worldwide patent protection (United States and
foreign), United States copyright laws and international treaty provisions. Cypress hereby grants to licensee a personal, non-exclusive, non-transferable license to copy, use, modify, create
derivative works of, and compile the Cypress Source Code and derivative works for the sole purpose of creating custom software and or firmware in support of licensee product to be used
only in conjunction with a Cypress integrated circuit as specified in the applicable agreement. Any reproduction, modification, translation, compilation, or representation of this Source Code
except as specified above is prohibited without the express written permission of Cypress.

Disclaimer: CYPRESS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH REGARD TO THIS MATERIAL, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Cypress reserves the right to make changes without further notice to the materials described
herein. Cypress does not assume any liability arising out of the application or use of any product or circuit described herein. Cypress does not authorize its products for use as critical
components in life-support systems where a malfunction or failure may reasonably be expected to result in significant injury to the user. The inclusion of Cypress’ product in a life-support
systems application implies that the manufacturer assumes all risk of such use and in doing so indemnifies Cypress against all charges.

Use may be limited by and subject to the applicable Cypress software license agreement.

Beyond-IR Remote Controls for Home Entertainment Page 3 of 3

Published in Digital Home DesignLine (http://www.digitalhomedesignline.com/howto/218000081) June 2009

[+] Feedback