Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
SGP Poland

SGP Poland

Ratings: (0)|Views: 204|Likes:
Published by Kim Murphy-Stewart
An excellent little paper on bio-fuel production at a farm scale level. Describes a model of production similar in scale to whanau or hapu sized operations
An excellent little paper on bio-fuel production at a farm scale level. Describes a model of production similar in scale to whanau or hapu sized operations

More info:

Published by: Kim Murphy-Stewart on Feb 07, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/28/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Europe & CIS: Poland
Small Scale Biofuel Productionfor Farming, Poland
Themes
Innovative technology applications
Renewable energyInstitutional capacity developmentPolicy and legislationAwareness,culture and practices
PROJECT DATA
Name:
Small Scale Production of Biofuel from Rape Seed for Farming
Implementing organizations:
Polish Biomass Association (POL-BIOM), BARKA Foundation,Village for the XXI Century  Foundation (NGOs)
Location:
rural northwestern Poland
SGP contribution:
$28,581 (one planning and three projectgrants)
Start date:
 July 2000
ENERGY OVERVIEW
Energy resource:
biofuel
Technology:
small-scale oil extraction from rapeseed
Application:
 tractor farming
Sector:
agriculture
Cost per installation:
$10,000 - $11,000
Total energy provided:
1 hectare of rape straw yields the equivalent of 800 dm
3
of diesel,sufficient tofarm 6.7 hectares
Number served:
installations in four farming communities
BACKGROUND
In northwestern Poland,the majority of land used to belong tostate farms. Farmers were at that time paid by the state, andplayed a dominant role in rural communities.In the 1990s,statefarms were dissolved.These farmers lost not only their jobs, butalso their previous status and the social organization to which they had been accustomed. For many, adjusting to new condi- tions has been difficult, and problems such as alcoholism haveincreased.Farmers also face economic and political barriers to obtaining the energy needed to earn a living. Fuel is necessary to run tractors to farm the land, but small farmers have very little cashfor most of the year until their crop is harvested. Fossil fuels,including the diesel that farmers use to power their tractors,are very expensive in Poland.This results in a reduced intensity of agricultural production,making farming less profitable than itcould be.Oil crises in Europe have stimulated research on biofuel alter-natives to petroleum-based fuels used for transportation.Many European countries now produce biofuel from rapeseeds andvegetables. In the Czech Republic, biofuel is widely used, and
An installation for the small-scale production of rapebiofuel (Poland).
many manufacturers of diesel engines,in particular tractor man-ufacturers, have accepted its use. However, in Poland taxes on the sale of biofuels make them very expensive to produce and they cannot compete with fossil fuels.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Overview
This project demonstrated the production and use of biofuel at the individual farm level. By growing rapeseed and making their own fuel, small farmers reduce their dependence on the pur-chase of highly priced diesel.Each biofuel installation requires agroup of farmers to purchase the equipment and share therapeseed fuel products.Thus, the production of biofuel helpsfarmers begin to work together again, helping to restore thesocial fabric of communities.Implementation:Early efforts to test the small-scale productionof biofuel were unsuccessful, but provided key lessons that led to later success.Initially, SGP in Poland supported a group of 50farmers who agreed to split the installation costs with SGP, togrow rapeseed on their land, and to be trained to make anduse the biofuel.After all farmers were trained and it came time to pay for the equipment,only one farmer was willing to pay asagreed.Taking this experience into account, SGP sought anoth-er setting in which to test the biofuel installation, and found itin the BARKA Foundation for Mutual Aid in northwesternPoland. BARKA is made up of formerly homeless farmers whonow live and work together. These farmers agreed to growrapeseed on their land, and to test the biofuel in their tractors.This meant accepting some risk that the biofuel would damage their equipment. A small, low-cost fuel making installation wasdesigned by the PROMAR Multi-Trade company, which manu-factures vegetable oil extractor presses using materials availablein Poland. Once the installation was operational, BARKA farm-
1
 
Europe & CIS: Poland
ers then began educating other farmers about its possibilities.During the summer of 2002, 3-10 groups of farmers came tovisit per week,some having traveled over 400 km.In November 2002, BARKA demonstrated the technology at an internation-al fair in the town of Poznan,which drew 600 farmers and busi-nesspeople.So far, four installations have been produced, including thedemonstration site at BARKA.One is the result of another SGPproject being implemented by the Village for the XXI Century Foundation in northern Poland where there is a high level of unemployment among farmers.The project supports farmersin developing their own association to produce, manage anddistribute biofuel among them.The fuel cannot be sold,since sofar there are no standards set for small-scale biofuel produc- tion, but instead is shared by farmers informally. A third installa- tion was purchased by a single, wealthy individual farmer whocould afford the entire cost himself.The fourth installation wassold to a group of farmers in southwestern Poland, but thesefarmers purchased it at double the price of the installations atBARKA and Village for the XXI Century Foundation.
Technology
To produce rapeseed, farmers grow rape straw on their land.A small scale installation, adapted from a vegetable oil press, isused to extract oil from rapeseeds.After the oil is extracted,itmust undergo re-esterification, sedimentation, and filtrationbefore it can be used as fuel.The process of biofuel productionhas several by-products: rape oilcake, which can be used as asupplement to fodder for livestock, and glycerin, which can besold to chemical or pharmaceutical companies.The biofuel ismixed with diesel,at a 50-50 or 75-25 ratio, and used in regu-lar tractor engines. During the summer, even 100% biofuel may be used.The biofuel from one hectare of rape straw can beused to work 6.7 hectares of farmland.
Environmental Benefits
The reduced use of diesel results in fewer carbon dioxide emis-sions, thereby lessening the impact on the global climate. For afarm that uses biofuel to farm all of its land, diesel use for trac- tors is reduced by 50-75%. In addition, excess rape straw canbe used as cooking fuel, replacing coal or oil.
Local Livelihood Benefits
Poverty alleviation: 
Farmers save money in several ways through this project, thereby freeing up cash for other purposes. First, the need to buy diesel is reduced by 50-75% if all farming isdone via biofuel. Second, the oilcake produced in the biofuelextraction process supplements animal fodder, thereby reduc-ing the need to purchase livestock feed.Third,if farms producebiofuel on a regular basis, the glycerin they produce in theprocess can be sold via long-term contracts with pharmaceuti-cal or chemical companies. Finally, if excess straw is used for cooking,this reduces the need to purchase coal or oil for cook-ing.
Social empowerment: 
Although the first SGP biofuel projectfailed due to a low level of community trust and organization,efforts since then have been much stronger, and are helpingrestore farmers’ confidence and ability to take part in collabo-rative efforts.
Capacity Development
In addition to training farmers in the technical aspects of pro-ducing and using biofuel, these projects are building farmers’capacity to undertake their own initiatives.This capacity may also serve to support other environmental and community efforts in the future.
Partners
The BARKA Foundation for Mutual Aid is a large farmer’sorganization that operates a farm at Chudobczyce in north-western Poland. BARKA’s involvement in the project has beencritical, since it was at BARKA that the first successful demon-stration of biofuel was conducted. BARKA’s efforts to educateother farmers about biofuel have also been central. PROMAR, the manufacturer of the first installation,is another partner.
LESSONS LEARNED
Environmental Management
These projects demonstrate the possibilities of small scale pro-duction of biofuel; most biofuel production is done at a muchlarger scale. This potential continues to be tested at the farmlevel through an on-going SGP project. So far, projects haveshown that rapeseed oil can provide power for farming almostseven times the amount of land on which rape str aw is grown.However, one of the main lessons from experience is that vari-ations in the quality of the rapeseed oil produced at a smallscale create the risk that diesel motors may be damaged.So far, this is being addressed by farmers accepting this risk, growingrape straw on their own lands, and sharing the biofuel withoutoffering it for sale .
Barrier Removal
Technical: 
The design of a small scale biofuel production systemhas reduced barriers for farmers to access the equipment.Theinstallations are produced by a company, which makes it possi-ble for farmers to order the equipment if they can meet thecost.
Financial: 
Since farmers no longer need to buy so much dieselfuel, financial barriers to purchasing additional farming equip-ment,seed,or other materials to help improve their crop yieldsare reduced. Purchasing the equipment itself usually requires anumber of farmers to share costs.
Institutional/Cultural: 
The production and use of biofuel bringsfarmers together to undertake initiatives to improve their ownsituation together. Given the legacy of a centralized governmentregime, and the poverty and isolation that farmers have expe-rienced since then, the project’ impact at this level is perhapsgreater than would otherwise have been expected. Although the future activities of these farmers would need to be trackedin order to determine this, the assumption is that these expe-riences in collaboration and project management will help
2

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->