Confusion Over Nazism in Conspiracy Theories

1. I have seen a fair number of conspiracy documentaries which unmask the Money-
Changers to varying degrees, and consider them a great public service. However, one
unfortunate feature they all share in common is the parroting of the propaganda that
employs REFERENCES TO HITLER OR NAZISM AS A SYNONYM FOR
ULTIMATE EVIL. I find it ironical in the extreme that people who, whilst they have
awoken to the Money-Changers and profess enmity for them, are at the same time so
willing to adopt an absurd fiction cooked up by a media that they are well aware is a
wholly owned subsidiary of that very enemy. It should come as no surprise to anyone,
who stops to consider for a moment, that a media controlled by jews should put forward
the idea that their greatest nemesis, namely the Third Reich, is used as a synonym for
ultimate evil. The idea of thwarting the Money-Changers whilst feeding off of their
propaganda is a losing proposition.

2. And in another, perhaps more ironical way, this idea is diametrically opposite from the
truth, inasmuch as the Führer—along with Henry Ford, William Jenings Bryan, John
Hylan, mayor of NYC 1917-25, and Charles Lindbergh Sr. R-MN—was amongst the first
to recognise the Money-Changers and speak out against them. And, in those early days
when such ideas were perceived as irrational paranoia, he professed at every opportunity
his determination to root them out and destroy them. There is every reason to believe that
the Führer had plans to extend this immeasurable benefit to the recesses of the world,
where the Money-Changers might fly like roaches, through diplomacy, covert action or
overt pressure, once the war had been concluded. Mein Kampf and his speeches make his
intentions toward Money-Changers abundantly clear. THOSE WHO
THOUGHTLESSLY NUMBER HITLER AMONGST THE MONEY-CHANGERS
can have only the vaguest familiarity with history, and could not possibly have ever
cracked open Mein Kampf.

3. Another trait shared by many of these conspiracy documentaries is the USE OF THE
WORD ‘FASCIST/FASCISM’ TO DESCRIBE THE PREDATORY CORPORATE
HEGEMONY that is one of the symptoms of the furtherance of the Money-Changers’
agenda. This is only another nonsensical manifestation of the jewish idea of using their
mortal enemy as a synonym for ultimate evil. Observe: the environment in which
corporate power can be wielded destructively is that of a so-called ‘free’-market system,
which is to say, they are free to behave at will, without limit. Conversely, an environment
that imposes regulations and limits on corporate behaviour is called Socialism, that is, a
government restrains corporations from preying on the citizenry. I don’t know how much
clearer the Third Reich could be in declaring themselves than to use the word
‘Socialist/Socialism’ in the very name of their political party. The various corporations of
Germany, far from controlling Hitler, were, in fact, harnessed by him to the service of the
state. So the idea that unrestrained, predatory corporate power can be linked in any way
with Fascism stands reason on its head.

4. We have all heard that famous American MONEY-CHANGERS FINANCED THE

THIRD REICH. These are simply lies designed to conceal a dreadful truth that, were it
ever admitted, would subvert the Jewish Conspiracy by providing an object lesson: how a
nation starting from the worst depression can, if it casts off the Money-Changer yoke,
rebuild its economy through its own efforts, and achieve superpower status.

I learned the following from The Third Reich in Power, by Richard Evans. You will not
be surprised to learn that it is written by a hostile author, with the typical English anti-
Reich sentiments. So what I say here cannot be regarded as apologist fantasy. The Third
Reich, under finance minister Hjalmar Schact, financed its revitalisation efforts (1933-
1937) through ‘an ingenious scheme for deficit financing’ involving so-called ‘Mefo-
bills’ which ‘were guaranteed by the state and discounted by the Reichsbank,’ and
covered by printing money. To counter the inflationary effects, this programme was
replaced in 1937 with point tax vouchers and non-interest bearing treasury notes. The
Reich debt soared, but the Führer and his ministers considered that it would be paid by
territorial expansion. I don’t pretend to understand any of this witchcraft, but the point is
that it plainly involved no borrowing from Money-Changers, and created a fiat money
—beyond the influence and profit of Money-Changers—to fund the nation’s efforts.

The Third Reich did not follow the example of the US and Britain by allowing its
currency to depreciate. Thus, inflation was kept in check, but Deutschland’s trade balance
went into deficit. To counter this, Schact instituted restrictions to keep trade bilateral,
where imports were only permitted with nations that had accepted exports to an equal
degree. Incidentally, the modern US could improve its situation by adopting this wise
policy.

5. Finally, I have seen some of these conspiracy documentaries cite EUGENICS AND
NAZI IDEAS OF ARYAN SUPREMACY AS A POSSIBLE ELEMENT OF THE
MONEY-CHANGERS’ AGENDA. But, the idea that these two diametrically opposed
philosophies could actually share the same racial theory is sheer madness, and only
another consequence of conspiracies’ topsy-turvy confusion of Money-Changers with the
Third Reich. It has been my experience that there are far too many pseudo-historians
practicing without a licence. The slightest examination of the Money-Changers through
history turns up an incredible number of jews, which quashes any chance that it is mere
coincidence. The propaganda that has represented jews to us as harmless little oddkins is
a stupendous master stroke of deception, for they are, in fact, the true masters behind the
scenes, and there can be no doubt whatever that the Money-Changers’ agenda is just
another way of saying the Jewish Conspiracy. As such, the idea that they could be
harbouring racial theories having any connexion whatever to those of the Third Reich is
utterly beyond the pale. Persons of Aryan blood who comfort themselves with some idea
that they will prosper in the New World Order are making a big mistake, which naturally
suggests that these erroneous ideas are no accident, but disinformation tailored to lull the
only group that poses a real threat to their designs.