Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Today we face a huge problem of Islamic extremism. Extremism is
nothing new in religion but the simple scale of the problem we face from
the above and its threat to our way of life is daunting. There is also good
reason to believe that this particular threat is bigger than Communism or
National Socialism. There are two reasons for this:
The second reason is the one we shall deal with first. Religion through
its very nature is personal, even if practised in the public sphere. The
personal relationship enjoyed by most Moslems with their god Allah
and the promise of eternal salvation, makes the religion one of the
most quixotic to understand and defeat in any war being fought in its
name. Unlike a political ideology like Communism and Nazism, no
political tracts exist to guide the ideologue but a book called the
Koran; a series of utterances supposed to come from Allah himself via
the angel Gabriel and from the mouth of the faith’s founder,
Mohammed, an illiterate living in the 7th Century after Christ. Such
tracts are notoriously contradictory, as is the Christian Bible and most
of either, must be taken on faith. Faith in its very nature, is therefore a
matter of personal belief and interpretation, so if any ideology exists
as such in any such religion, it has no fixed agenda or crystallised
version unlike written political tracts like Mein Kampf1 and Das
Kapital2.
1
in far greater numbers than those outside the faith. Christianity itself
waged war in similar disagreements and European history is pitted
with faith wars of great cruelty and only the Age of Reason, the
Renaissance and the removal of power from the clerics and secular
revolution like the French in 1789, allowed Europe to establish a
series of modern nation states free of religious and monarchical
control. The monarchies remain in places like Britain, Holland and
Spain but these have hardly any authority in the Parliamentary
democracies thus established and act instead, rather like the Tribunes
of the People in the Roman Republic to protect the modern citizen
against the forces of tyranny and despotism. England in particular
enjoys a well-established system of constitutional titular monarchy,
now under threat from the increasingly totalitarian European Union.
2
from the Byzantines remained largely in the former owners’ hands,
while the Moslem elite lived off the benefits in profits, land and
taxation. Likewise, within what was once the Persian Sassanian
Empire, Arab elites ruled through compliant natives rather than take a
direct interest in governing as the Executive concerned with the
minutiae of daily goings on.
3
felt with such gusto in the Caliphate, that arose in the 700s AD, from
the Arab conquests: family rivalries were to be the death knell of any
intentions by the elite to foster a pan-Arabist agenda. The powerful
mawali clientele wanted to be a major influence within the umma or
community of Islam and they achieved this so well, that they largely
superseded Arab dominance in the faith to a point that Islam was no
longer, simply an Arabist religion and therefore a mark of racial
superiority with a racially superior faith.
However, one has to say that Islam itself has not gone through its
‘Age of Reason’ and its modern ‘Renaissance’ upon the world stage is
rather one of unreason. Around the late 1920s the Moslem
Brotherhood was formed by Arabist thinkers such as Hassan al-Banna
looking for a way to throw off the colonial yoke of European rule and
return Islam, to a purer unadulterated form of religion. One of its
members was violently anti-British Amin al-Husseini, a close friend
and ally of Adolf Hitler who actively aided the Nazi recruitment of
Moslem SS men to fight against the Russians and the allies. Although
al-Husseini was allowed to return by the British after the defeat of
Hitler and ‘forgiven’, the Nazi background remained within his psyche
to the point that he still dreamed of an Arab-Islamic dominated world
or a reborn Ottoman Empire.
4
fighting another form of racist Socialism directly descended and still
influenced by Nazism and Hitler. This is the true nature of extremist
Islam and if further proof be needed, its hate figures are Jews and
indeed all peoples that are not Arabic or at least not Moslem that it
regards as untermensch4, or a sub-species of humanity that it is
perfectly in order to kill, subdue, abuse and enslave for its grandiose
dream of an Islamic lebensraum5 or Greater Global Caliphate that
would in effect be Islam’s Greater Reich. It has also been noted that
members of extreme groups in Britain and Europe have been attracted
to this form of Fascism due to the powerful attraction of its National
Socialist style ideology and anti-Semitism. The plain truth is that
Wahabism is a religious form of Nazism. Ironically Rightist parties
like the BNP6 are fighting this with everything they have and it is not
just to gain votes but a genuine concern for the future of their country.
One can detest the BNP but they are the only ones that seem to
have grasped the threat that we face to our European Civilisation. As
one married to a coloured woman one views this with concern. In a
recent poll carried out by a respected national pollster, 55-60% of the
British subjects that took part in the survey and not being told the anti
immigration policies they were being asked to comment on, were
standard BNP ideology, supported them. When they were told it was
BNP, the support declined rapidly. If matters do not improve one can
easily see greatly increased support for the BNP by voters sick of
wishy-washy amoral politics riddled with Political Correctness.
4
Translated as ‘sub-men’.
5
Ibid ‘Greater place to live’.
6
British Nationalist Party.
5
Chapter 2
Hitler’s Legacy
Nazi Doctrine was based upon the superiority of the Aryan ‘Race’.
These ideas that are anathema to us today, saw the human race divided
into superior blonde-haired, white supermen and a helotised race of
sub-men or untermensch to be enslaved for the service of the superior.
This was in a nutshell the very basis of Hitler’s crude ideology, that
although it borrowed much from evolutionists like Darwin, corrupted
it in such a way that it became something he and his fellow thinkers
never intended. Like all such political doctrine, the state replaced God
as the progenitor and provider of the masses and the cult of the Great
Leader became in effect, the Godhead of the New Order.
The Left by the way, are actually bigger covert racists than the
Nazis, since they like to have racial minorities within their ‘care’ in
order to ‘save’ them from their wicked white ‘oppressors’. One knows
of several instances where successful decent black men and women
have been ignored and regarded as ‘Uncle Toms’, simply for
supposedly having sold out to the white ‘racist overlord’. The recent
2007 scandal in the BBC, wherein it refused to transmit the story of
brave black British soldier, Private Beharry VC, whose courage saved
several manned Warrior armoured vehicles while seriously wounded
himself, is a glaring example of this patronising covert racism.
6
‘Racism’ actually means to protect one’s own race. Many
academics now dispute the idea of ‘race’. There are certainly
differences in blood groups, skin colour and types, facial features etc
that are familiar characteristics of ‘races’ but even here one must be
careful: especially in the light of the latest DNA discoveries in genetic
science. The plain truth is that the modern human is a composite
mongrel originating from several ‘races’. For example it was
estimated that one in ten English people have black ancestors and this
is not surprising considering our activities in the abolished slave trade.
To be blunt, many a seafarer and soldier far from home, decided to
ease his loneliness by taking up and mating with a buxom wench in
some far-flung part of the Empire. Indeed if it were not for the fact
that humans did not interbreed, the human race would indeed be in a
very sorry condition: survival relies on diversity and the ability this
gives for the human race to flourish in hostile climates. It is literally
all in the genes. Modern conceptions of extremist, either Left or Right
of ‘Racism’ are just plain stupid in fact.
7
Our own societies are still being attacked by the Left, in order to
change the system from within through grand schemes of social
engineering and political policies that seek to undermine and do away
with the old. Its modern form is a ‘philosophy’ of post Marxist
‘Political Correctness’, a truly Orwellian attempt at imposing change
through thought and speech. The trouble is that it does not work but
merely stores up problems for the future, as it frustrates the democratic
rights and privileges of the very ‘Society’ it seeks to replace. It is fully
intended to of course, however human beings have certain innate traits
and characteristics that it has taken millions of years to evolve, simply
in order to survive. These are Evolutionary paradigms of course and
any attempt to interfere is bound to fail, especially if human beings try
to enforce their own highly subjective ideological forms of
‘evolutionary’ theory. One simply cannot change human nature
through banning thought, word and deed.
The proof comes from the history of the individual fighting for
survival in a hostile environment: it is therefore, the fully equipped,
self-reliant human being that survives best through mating with other
humans with ‘good genes’, and so diversifying the DNA pool that will
protect his descendants from disease and spread his ‘type’ in
competition with other ‘types’, with similar strong genetic
characteristics, to produce a stronger and better adapted human being.
As we have seen, social engineering schemes reliant upon clap-trap
political theories of ‘race’ and ‘empowerment of the masses’, are just
so much patent rubbish. It is also why democracy has been so utterly
successful, since it encourages the individual to co-operate with others
of like-minded enlightened self interest to the benefit of all in Society:
strong men and women of high moral intent and free thinkers striving
towards a better world. This is no dew-eyed theory either as the
unbounded success of the United States and even little Switzerland,
has shown abundantly.
This does not mean to say that we should all open up our nation-
states to mass illegal uncontrolled migration either. The deliberate
attempt to deconstruct the nation-state through such means, as the
European and American elites have been craftily doing, is nothing
short of the politics of insanity: this process is rightfully resented by
the populations of those countries affected by this evil. A nation-state
is far more than just the plaything of a corrupt wealthy elite and its
rather flaky theories. The nation State has successfully contained
8
within its borders whole peoples with a common culture and ‘racial’
identity.
In short the Arab has always regarded himself as distinct from his
fellow humans. The Arab as we have seen is desperately proud of his
lineage, as is evidenced by his attempts to keep Islam a purely Arab
religion at the beginning of the Caliphate after Mohammed’s death.
9
Modern Arab speaking tribes in Dafur may not be racially pure in the
sense that Hitlerian theories posited but they certainly see themselves
as a distinct ‘race’ with a distinct ‘Arab’ religion and language,
supported by ideas similar in practice to the Nazis.
However we shall finish this chapter with the Nazi architect and
War Minister, Albert Speer’s description of Hitler’s attitude to the
Moslems speak for themselves, ‘Hitler had been much impressed by a
scrap of history he had learned from a delegation of distinguished
Arabs. When the Mohammedans attempted to penetrate beyond
France into Central Europe during the eighth century, his visitors had
told him, they had been driven back at the Battle of Tours. Had the
Arabs won this battle, the world would be Mohammedan today. For
theirs was a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword
and subjugating all nations to that faith. The Germanic peoples would
have become heirs to the religion. Such a creed was perfectly suited to
the Germanic temperament. Hitler said that the conquering Arabs,
because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been
unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the
country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so
that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at
the head of this Mohammedan Empire.7’
7
Albert Speer, Inside the Third Reich, Chap 7, p96, Obersalzberg. Trans: Richard and Clara Winston,
Macmillan Company, New York, 1970.
10
Chapter 3
Koranism
Put simply, those people in Christianity and Islam that state, that
they are doing God’s Will are actually denying His omnipotence. This
surely is a form of Atheism, since we are reducing the Unity of
Unlimited Reality called God to a limited human condition, rather
than the unconditioned state of Being understood by Kant? By
reducing God the Eternal Unity of Unlimited, Unconditional Reality to
a human level, it is placing a limited experience and interpretation on
a limitless Being and is therefore a subjective experience of God, a
Being that we can neither prove nor disprove the existence of? What
one is trying to convey, is that such claims to be doing the ‘Will of
God’ are false, in that they place limitations upon the Supreme
Omnipotence of a Being that may or may not exist and whose
Beingedness is predicated upon a Necessity that can only be inferred,
not proven!
11
we create from such limited human subjectivity, is a god of our own
limited concepts of creation and therefore unreal due to the
philosophical theorems explained above. They are also blasphemous.
Now one has thought long and hard and perhaps neologisms should
be brought into play here. We shall call these ‘Biblism’ for Christians
and ‘Koranism’ for Moslems. These two words will be utilised to
described the activities of those above that believe they are doing the
‘Will of God’. This argument is similar in meaning to the one about
Churchiality and Christianity: that merely going to Church every
Sunday does not make one a good Christian. However it is ‘Koranism’
that interests us here in the philosophical arguments we are about to
express below. We shall now define ‘Koranism’: A state of mind that
takes the Koran literally as the ‘Word of God’ in spite of
contradictions and corrupted transmissions down the ages. The Koran
began life as an oral tradition and these historically are notoriously
difficult to maintain in their exactitude, with personal interpretations
and anecdotes handed down by the teller from generation to
generation. The Moslems always say the Koran is uncorrupted: this is
utter nonsense!
8
D.P. Henige (1974), The Chronology of Oral Tradition, Quest for a Chimera, Oxford. Esoteric group
like the Moslems? Author’s note.
12
instance, a person may want to present his life in a manner other
people will admire.9
Mohammed was illiterate and his first converts were his own
family. His transmission of what was to become the Koran, was
therefore oral until later written down by his followers and not finally
in its ‘finalised’, permanent form until some years after his death. A
board of scholars appears to have been assembled to produce a
definitive version by the Caliph Uthman 644-56AD.
13
denial, violence and abuse to ensure cohesion among their ‘flock’ as
well. It also aids the cause that both Left and Moslems seem incapable
of admitting the truth to themselves or others. Both share and exploit
the ‘victim hood of society’ scenario: or to put it another way, ‘It is
everybody else’s fault but mine!’ The gunman who wiped out 32 lives
in Virginia recently blamed everybody else but his own acute feelings
of inadequacy. The Moslems that attacked the Twin Towers in New
York blamed American Society, rather than the real cause of their
grievances; their religion and Moslem totalitarianism in their own
lands and refusal to do anything about it, except bite the hand that
feeds most Moslem regimes in the Middle East, namely American
dollars, without which these spoilt brats and offspring of oil wealthy
plutocrats would have still been pushing goats and camels in the
Arabian deserts. American influence has made these lands what they
are today and far from encouraging Moslem ‘dishonour’, kept in
check much of the extreme forms of Islamic rule.
14
Crusades appals many Christians today that see the Bible in a very
different light to those that stormed the Holy Land in the 1200s AD.
Likewise, many decent Moslems today are horrified at what is being
done in the name of their religion.
15
Chapter 4
16
We have advanced much in technological and scientific discovery
since the days of Kant. I believe that it is possible to look at God in a
different way based upon those discoveries. For example we appear to
live in a Multiverse rather than a Universe: thousands of them! How
does one get one’s mind round that one? The further we advance in
knowledge, the more life seems to become a mystery of Unlimited
Reality that threatens our own perceptions, within our own limited
realities. We need God more than ever to reassure our ignorant timid
minds: the Reality of Omniscience and Omnipotence of Love that is
the Limitless One True God: a Being so incredible that we simply
cannot possibly conceive of Him or his wishes, although from time to
time he may give a hint of what He expects of us. Is that not better than
any of the above self-made little gods described above? It will also
preserve peace and give faith back its respectability!
God Bless!
17
Guy Leven-Torres 21st April 2007
18