Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Popular So Calif Radio Preacher Teaches Error Re Marriage in the Bible

Popular So Calif Radio Preacher Teaches Error Re Marriage in the Bible

Ratings: (0)|Views: 44|Likes:
Published by Lee Tyler
KBRT's Bob Dutko appears to be teaching false visions, idolatries and delusions of his own mind, for he apparently teaches that the Word of God declares that the Biblical polygyny of Abraham, Jacob/Israel, Gideon and King David is as much sin as is homosexuality or adultery.
KBRT's Bob Dutko appears to be teaching false visions, idolatries and delusions of his own mind, for he apparently teaches that the Word of God declares that the Biblical polygyny of Abraham, Jacob/Israel, Gideon and King David is as much sin as is homosexuality or adultery.

More info:

Published by: Lee Tyler on Feb 13, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/30/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Popular So Calif Radio Preacher Teaches Error Re Marriage in The Bible THIS POST CONTAINS SEXUALLY EXPLICIT AND ADULT BIBLESCRIPTURES AND INFORMATION ABOUT HUMAN SEXUALITY AND THISPOST CONTAINS SEXUALLY EXPLICIT AND ADULT BIBLE SCRIPTURESABOUT HUMAN SEXUALITY AND IF SUCH SCRIPTURES OFFEND ORUPSET YOU, YOU SHOULD NOT READ IT TO SEE THE FALSEHOODS ANDERRORS BOB DUTKO APPEARS TO BE PRESENTING DURING HIS RADIOBROADCASTS.
COPYRIGHT © 2/4/2011 This file, in its entirety, may be posted on or copied off of computer networkslike Internet or WWW by anyone so inclined as long as it is not changed andthe author is acknowledged.By L. Tyler
2/4/11 - - - This file/document may be found in the Files section at thefollowing:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group MarriageDivorceRemarriageJesus2http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MarriageDivorceRemarriageJesus
http://biblicalmaturity.yuku.com/forums/66
http://groups.google.com/group/MarriageDivorceRemarriageInJesus
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SexProbsAndRecoveryInJesus
We know that it is a grave and deadly sin to teachsomething as the Word of God and it isn't His Word.***
Jeremiah 14:
13
But I said, “Alas, Sovereign LORD!The prophets keep telling them, ‘You will not see thesword or suffer famine. Indeed, I will give you lastingpeace in this place.’” 
14
Then the LORD said to me, “Theprophets are prophesying lies in my name. I have notsent them or appointed them or spoken to them. Theyare prophesying to you false visions, divinations,idolatries and the delusions of their own minds.
15
Therefore this is what the LORD says about the prophetswho are prophesying in my name: I did not send them,yet they are saying, ‘No sword or famine will touch thisland.’ Those same prophets will perish by sword andfamine. [NIV]KBRT's Bob Dutko appears to be teaching false visions,
 
idolatries and delusions of his own mind, for heapparently teaches that the Word of God declares thatthe Biblical polygyny of Abraham, Jacob/Israel, Gideonand King David is as much sin as is homosexuality oradultery. We saw Jehovah-Jesus mightily bless andpersonally visit (Genesis 17) Abraham the polygynist(Genesis 16). We see the Angel of the Lord save the lifeof Abraham's second wife in polygyny, Hagar, andmightily bless her (Genesis 16). We see Jehovah-Jesusbless polygynist Jacob (Genesis 35 & 48). We seeJehovah-Jesus bless polygynist David (2 Samuel 7; 1Chronicles 14 & 17).For the rest of this, seeDutkoTeachesErrorReMarriageInOT.html in the Filessection of this group or the groups listed aboveLet's see if Bob Dutko is any where or way close to theTruth. Consider the following where he correctly teachesthat it is sin and sinful for males and/or females to - -[1] have sexual relations
 
with
(denuding, revealing, showingand/or uncovering <Strong's
 
1540>
the genitalia
 
<Strong's 6172>
 
of)
one's close relative (Lev 18:6);[2] have sexual relations with
(denuding, revealing, showingand/or uncovering <Strong's
 
1540>
the genitalia
 
<Strong's 6172>
 
of)
one's mother (Lev 18:7), with your father's wife (8;20:11; Ez 22:10; 1 Cor 5:1), with your sister or step-sister (9; 20:17), with your son's daughter or yourdaughter's daughter (10), with your father's wife'sadopted daughter (11; 20:17), with your father's sister(
you should not uncover
<1540>
the nakedness
<6172> v.
12; 20:19),with your mother's sister (13; 20:19), with your aunt -
 
your father's brother's wife (14; 20:20), with yourdaughter-in-law (15; 20:12), with your brother's wife(16; 20:21), with a woman and her daughter (17;20:14), with your wife's son's daughter or her daughter'sdaughter (17), with a wife as a rival to her sister (18),with your wife while she is menstruating (19; 20:18; Ez18:6; 22:10), with someone else's wife (20; 20:10; Ez22:11), with someone who is not your own maritalpartner (1 Cor 6:9); with a man in the same way as witha woman (22; 20:13; Rom 1:26,27; 1 Cor 6:9; 1 Tim1:10), with any animal (23), with one's mother-in-law(Dt 27:23), with a prostitute (19:29; 1 Cor 6:9); with awoman in the same way as with a man (Ezek 23:19,20;Rom 1:26,27; 1 Tim 1:10);[3] press, handle and/or squeeze the breasts and/ornipples of a woman who is not your own heterosexualmarital partner (Ezek 23:3, 8,21: Strong's {4600} and{6213});[4] to lay
bare, uncover and make known the genitalia<Strong's6172> (Ezek 23:10, 18) of a woman who is not your own heterosexualmarital partner ("
These uncovered
<1540>
her nakedness
<6172>"
).If Leviticus and Ezekiel are specific and graphic enough to upset the faint of heart,consider how specific the Greek original is in Romans 1:
26 Their females exchanged natural sex relations<5446+5540>* for thosethat are contrary to God's design<3844+5449>*; 27likewise/so/equally/similarly/IN THE SAME WAY<3668>* having left the Goddesigned/made physiological/biological functions/use of the female, themales were inflamed in their evil desire for that which is forbidden<3715>*to do with each other<1519>*, males in/with/by malesworking/doing/performing genitals<2716+808>* and receiving inthemselves the recompense which was fit for their error.
It's pretty clear that the Bible is quite specific and graphic. Bob Dutko is okay up to thispoint, but then he totally misses the mark when it comes to the polygamy of Abraham,

Activity (4)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
waltdisne liked this
R Tyler liked this
Lee Tyler liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->