Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Compromis-Problem for the 2011 Jessup Moot Court Competition

Compromis-Problem for the 2011 Jessup Moot Court Competition

Ratings: (0)|Views: 183|Likes:
Published by iamyni

More info:

Published by: iamyni on Feb 17, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/17/2011

pdf

text

original

 
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICECOMPROMISBETWEEN THE STATE OF ARDENIA (APPLICANT)AND THE STATE OF RIGALIA (RESPONDENT)TO SUBMIT TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICETHE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE STATESCONCERNING THE ZETIAN PROVINCES jointly notified to the Court on 17 September, 2010COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICECOMPROMISENTRE L’ÉTAT D’ARDENIA (DEMANDEUR)ET L’ÉTAT DE RIGALIA (DÉFENDEUR)VISANT À SOUMETTRE ÀLA COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICELES DIFFÉRENDS QUI OPPOSENT LES DEUX ÉTATSEN CE QUI CONCERNE LES PROVINCES ZÉTIENNESnotifié conjointement à la Cour le 17 septembre 2010
 
JOINT NOTIFICATIONADDRESSED TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE COURT:
The Hague, 17 September 2010On behalf of the State of Ardenia ("the Applicant") and the State of Rigalia ("the Respondent"),in accordance with Article 40(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, we have thehonor to transmit to you an original of the Compromis for submission to the International Courtof Justice of the Differences between the Applicant and the Respondent concerning the ZetianProvinces, signed in The Hague, The Netherlands, on the seventeenth day of September in theyear two thousand and ten.Ambassador of the State of ArdeniaAmbassador of the State of Rigaliato the Kingdom of The Netherlandsto the Kingdom of The Netherlands
 
COMPROMISSUBMITTED TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE BYTHE STATE OF ARDENIA AND THE STATE OF RIGALIAON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THEM CONCERNINGTHE ZETIAN PROVINCES
The State of Ardenia and the State of Rigalia
,
Considering 
that differences have arisen between them concerning the legality of Predator Dronestrikes against Zetians in Ardenia and Rigalia and other matters;
 Recognizing 
that the Parties concerned have been unable to settle these differences bynegotiation;
 Desiring 
further to define the issues to be submitted to the International Court of Justice(hereinafter referred to as "the Court") for settling this dispute;
 In furtherance thereof 
the Parties have concluded the following Compromis:
 Article 1
The Parties submit the questions contained in the Compromis (together with Clarifications tofollow) to the Court pursuant to Article 40(1) of the Statute of the Court.
 Article 2
It is agreed by the Parties that the State of Ardenia shall act as Applicant and the State of Rigaliaas Respondent, but such agreement is without prejudice to any question of the burden of proof.
 Article 3
(a)The Court is requested to decide the Case on the basis of the rules and principles of general international law, as well as any applicable treaties.(b)The Court is also requested to determine the legal consequences, including the rights andobligations of the Parties, arising from its Judgment on the questions presented in theCase.
 Article 4
(a)All questions of procedure and rules shall be regulated in accordance with the provisionsof the Official Rules of the 2011 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot CourtCompetition.(b)The Parties request the Court to order that the written proceedings should consist of Memorials presented by each of the Parties not later than the date set forth in the OfficialSchedule of the 2011 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->