Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Baldwin v Costner: Amended Complaint

Baldwin v Costner: Amended Complaint

Ratings: (0)|Views: 695 |Likes:
Published by nowdoucit

More info:

Published by: nowdoucit on Feb 23, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/23/2011

pdf

text

original

 
IN
 
THE
 
UNITED
 
STATES
 
DISTRICT
 
COURT
 
FOR
 
THE
 
EASTERN
 
DISTRICT
 
OF
 
LOUISIANA
  
SPYRIDON
 
C.
 
CONTOGOURIS
 
and
 
:
 
CIVIL
 
ACTION
 
STEPHEN
 
A.
 
BALDWIN
 
:
  
:
 
NO.
 
10
4609
 
VERSUS
 
:
  
:
 
SECTION
 
“F”(1)
 
WESTPAC
 
RESOURCES,
 
LLC,
 
PATRICK
 
:
 
JUDGE
 
FELDMAN
 
N.
 
SMITH,
 
KEVIN
 
M.
 
COSTNER
 
:
 
and
 
RABOBANK,
 
N.A.
 
:
 
MAG.
 
JUDGE
 
SHUSHAN
  
:
  
:
  
:
  
FIRST
 
AMENDED
 
COMPLAINT
  
TO
 
THE
 
JUDGES
 
OF
 
THE
 
UNITED
 
STATES
 
DISTRICT
 
COURT
 
FOR
 
THE
 
EASTERN
 
DISTRICT
 
OF
 
LOUISIANA:
  
Spyridon
 
C.
 
Contogouris
 
and
 
Stephen
 
A.
 
Baldwin
 
amend
 
their
 
Original
 
Complaint
 
as
 
follows
 
and
 
with
 
respect
 
respresent:
 
I.
  
This
 
is
 
an
 
action
 
for
 
misrepresentation
 
in
 
connection
 
with
 
the
 
sale
 
of 
 
securities
 
brought
 
pursuant
 
to
 
15
 
U.S.C.
 
§78j,
 
17
 
C.F.R.
 
§17.240.10b
5.
 
Plaintiffs
 
also
 
seek
 
recission
 
of 
 
and/or
 
damages
 
in
 
connection
 
with
 
a
 
certain
 
sale
 
of 
 
membership
 
interests
 
in
 
Ocean
 
Therapy
 
Solutions,
 
LLC,
 
a
 
Louisiana
 
limited
 
liability
 
company,
 
pursuant
 
to
 
Articles
 
1949
 
and
 
1953
 
of 
 
the
 
Louisiana
 
Civil
 
Code.
 
Case 2:10-cv-04609-MLCF-SS   Document 28-2    Filed 02/22/11   Page 1 of 57
 
2
  
PARTIES
 
AND
 
JURISDICTIONAL
 
ALLEGATIONS
 
II.
  
Plaintiff 
 
Spyridon
 
C.
 
Contogouris
 
(“Contogouris”)
 
is
 
a
 
person
 
of 
 
the
 
full
 
age
 
of 
 
majority
 
and
 
a
 
citizen
 
of 
 
this
 
state
 
domiciled
 
in
 
Orleans
 
Parish,
 
Louisiana.
 
III.
  
Plaintiff 
 
Stephen
 
A.
 
Baldwin
 
(“Baldwin”)
 
is
 
a
 
person
 
of 
 
the
 
full
 
age
 
of 
 
majority
 
who
 
is
 
a
 
citizen
 
and
 
domiciliary
 
of 
 
the
 
State
 
of 
 
New
 
York.
 
IV.
  
Made
 
defendant
 
herein
 
is
 
WestPac
 
Resources,
 
LLC
 
(“WestPac”),
 
which
 
upon
 
information
 
and
 
belief 
 
is
 
a
 
Delaware
 
limited
 
liability
 
company
 
which
 
has
 
its
 
principal
 
place
 
of 
 
business
 
in
 
the
 
State
 
of 
 
California.
 
V.
  
Also
 
made
 
defendant
 
herein
 
is
 
Patrick
 
N.
 
Smith
 
(“Smith”),
 
a
 
person
 
of 
 
the
 
full
 
age
 
of 
 
majority,
 
who,
 
upon
 
information
 
and
 
belief,
 
is
 
a
 
citizen
 
and
 
domiciliary
 
of 
 
the
 
State
 
of 
 
California.
 
VI.
  
Also
 
made
 
defendant
 
herein
 
is
 
Kevin
 
M.
 
Costner
 
(“Costner”),
 
a
 
person
 
of 
 
the
 
full
 
age
 
of 
 
majority,
 
who,
 
upon
 
information
 
and
 
belief,
 
is
 
a
 
citizen
 
and
 
domiciliary
 
of 
 
the
 
State
 
of 
 
California.
 
Case 2:10-cv-04609-MLCF-SS   Document 28-2    Filed 02/22/11   Page 2 of 57
 
3
  
VII.
  
Also
 
made
 
defendant
 
is
 
Rabobank,
 
N.A.,
 
a
 
national
 
banking
 
association
 
believed
 
to
 
be
 
organized
 
and
 
existing
 
under
 
the
 
laws
 
of 
 
a
 
state
 
other
 
than
 
Louisiana
 
which
 
at
 
all
 
times
 
pertinent
 
had
 
its
 
principal
 
place
 
of 
 
business
 
in
 
the
 
State
 
of 
 
California.
 
Upon
 
information
 
and
 
belief,
 
Rabobank,
 
N.A.
 
had
 
minimum
 
contacts
 
with
 
the
 
State
 
of 
 
Louisiana
 
and
 
is
 
subject
 
to
 
the
 
personal
 
jurisdiction
 
of 
 
this
 
Court.
 
VIII.
 
At
 
all
 
times
 
pertinent
 
herein,
 
WestPac
 
was
 
owned,
 
managed,
 
dominated
 
and
 
controlled
 
by
 
defendants
 
Smith
 
and/or
 
Costner.
 
IX.
  
This
 
Court
 
has
 
jurisdiction
 
as
 
this
 
action
 
arises
 
under
 
the
 
laws
 
of 
 
the
 
United
 
States
 
of 
 
America.
 
28
 
U.S.C.
 
§1331.
 
As
 
there
 
is
 
complete
 
diversity
 
among
 
plaintiffs
 
and
 
defendants,
 
jurisdiction
 
also
 
arises
 
under
 
28
 
U.S.C.
 
§1332.
 
The
 
matter
 
in
 
controversy
 
exceeds
 
$75,000.00
 
exclusive
 
of 
 
interest
 
and
 
costs.
 
Plaintiffs
 
bring
 
state
 
law
 
claims
 
under
 
this
 
Court’s
 
diversity
 
and/or
 
pendant
 
and/or
 
ancillary
 
jurisdiction.
 
X.
  
Venue
 
is
 
proper
 
in
 
this
 
district
 
pursuant
 
to
 
28
 
U.S.C.
 
§1391.
 
Case 2:10-cv-04609-MLCF-SS   Document 28-2    Filed 02/22/11   Page 3 of 57

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->