11-02-26 Letter To Prof Erwin Chemerinsky Regarding Widespread Corruption of The US Courts S

Human Rights Alert Digitally signed
by Joseph Zernik
DN: cn=Joseph
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Zernik, o, ou,
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net email=jz12345@e
arthlink.net, c=US
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Date: 2011.02.26
13:50:08 +02'00'
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
11-02-26 Letter to Prof Erwin Chemerinsky regarding widespread corruption of the US courts
1) On February 26, Joseph Zernik wrote:

Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:53:40
To: "Chemerinsky, Erwin" <EChemerinsky@law.uci.edu>

From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net>
Subject: Fraud and corruption in the US courts from coast to coast - a call for action by legal scholars
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean

School of Law
University of California, Irvine
Dear Prof Chemerinsky:
Thanks for your response! I would not write to you, unless I admired your courage in standing up to the
corrupt Los Angeles County justice system during the Rampart scandal (1998-2000) and its aftermath,
and your lifelong commitment as a civic leader in California and beyond.
Isn't it time that a legal scholar of your standing would explain to the People what is going on in
the US courts?
* Perhaps you could explain to the People: What is going on in the US District Court, Central
District of California, where you reside, under Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (regardless of
your position or mine regarding gays in the military)?
• The first judgment in the case was issued by US Judge GEORGE SCHIAVELLI in 2006, in
favor of the USA. It as listed in the Judgment Index of the Court. However, the Clerk of the US
District Court TERRY NAFISI refuses to certify the first, Judge SCHIAVELLI judgment.
• Consequently, the case was listed as "closed".
• The first judgment was never overturned through any judicial proceedings.
• Later, Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS appeared in the same case, with no assignment order.
• In 2010 Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS issued in the same case the second, opposing judgment,
in favor of Log Cabin Republicans. The second judgment was NOT listed in the Judgment
Index of the Court. The Clerk of the US District Court TERRY NAFISI refuses to certify the
second judgment as well.
Under such circumstances, the second, Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS Judgment in Log Cabin
Republicans v USA et al must be deemed fraud on its face, and a void, not voidable judgment.
Conduct of Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS and Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI should be deemed
willful misconduct.
* Perhaps you could explain to the People: What is going on in the US Court of Appeals, 9th
Circuit, where you reside, under Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al?
• The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, is today running an appeal from the second, uncertified,
void not voidable Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS judgment.
• The Clerk of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, MOLLY DWYER refuses to certify the
docket of the appeal in this case.
z Page 2/2 February 26, 2011
• All decisions of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, in this appeal are unsigned and were
served with not certificate of authentication/attestation by Clerk MOLLY DWYER.
• The US Court of Appeals refuses to explain why it would not dismiss, for lack of jurisdiction,
the appeal from a void not voidable judgment.
Under such circumstances, the ongoing appeal from the 2010 Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS Judgment in
Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al must be deemed fraud on its face, and a void, not voidable appeal.
Conduct of Circuit Judges Circuit Judges WILLIAM CANBY, JR and EDWARD LEAVY as well as Clerk
of the Court MOLLY DWYER should be deemed willful misconduct.
* Perhaps you could explain to the People: Where are the missing records of the Supreme
Court of the United State, where you have appeared multiple times?
• The Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER routinely issues "Notices" of denial of petitions
and applications in cases pertaining to civil rights, where the notices are unsigned, or signed in
a false and deliberately misleading manner.
• The notices are never accompanied by service of any form of judicial record of the denial.
• Multiple attempts to access the paper court records of SCOTUS, to inspect and to copy failed
to discover any judicial record of the denials in numerous such cases.
• Multiple attempt to access the electronic court records of SCOTUS, to inspect and to copy, in
numerous such cases, were denied.
• The Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER refuses to explain, which form of records the
Supreme Court of the United States maintains, which are deemed by the Clerk of the US
Supreme Court valid and effectual, good faith and credit judicial records.
It should be noted in this regard, that the United Nations Crime Prevention Center Report (2001) lists
"missing court records" as a cardinal sign of judicial corruption.
Under such circumstances, the conduct of Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER should be deemed
willful misconduct.
* US Legal Scholars could make a difference under conditions of widespread corruption of the
state and federal courts.
• Past public pronouncements by you, by Prof DAVID BURCHAM, and by Prof LAURENCE
TRIBE, linked below, are admired, but they were few and far between. Moreover, they only
addressed conditions in the state courts.
• The more recent public pronouncement by over 100 law professors, also linked below,
regarding conditions in the Supreme Court of the United States, was admirable. However, it
was remarkably subtle in view of the widespread corruption of the US courts.
Pronouncement by leading legal experts of your standing, regarding conditions that prevail today in the
state and federal courts in the United States, could make a difference. Conditions in the US courts are
unprecedented, for at least a century. A century ago, conditions in the US courts were described in the
US Congress as a "burlesque".
There is no doubt that fraud in the design and operation of the public access and case management
systems (PACER and CM/ECF) of the US District Courts and US Courts of Appeals features
prominently in corruption of the federal courts. Likewise, there is no doubt that fraud in the design and
operation of the online public access system of the Supreme Court of the United States, coupled with
its secretive case management system, feature prominently in conditions that today prevail in the
highest court of the land.
In the past, you claimed that as a constitutional scholar, you are unfamiliar with the details of court
administration. However, there is no doubt that the validity, integrity, and transparency of court records
are at the foundation of Fair Hearing/Due Process and the Human, Constructional, and Civil Rights of
the People.
Surely you realize the key role of the widespread corruption of the US courts in the disintegration of the
socio-economic development and civil society in the United States under our watch.
Truly,
Joseph Zernik, PhD

Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice
systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert
focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice
system in the United States.
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends
must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when
innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative,
delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice
systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation
aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated
by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings
and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."
More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (2010)
____
2) At 12:18 AM 2/26/2011, PROF ERWIN CHEMERINSKY wrote:
PLEASE TAKE ME OFF YOUR MAILING LIST!

____
3) On February 25, 2011 Joseph Zernik wrote:

From: joseph zernik [jz12345@earthlink.net]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 2:05 PM
To: joseph zernik
Subject: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius constitutional challenge to Obamas

healthcare law is part of a pattern of fraud in the US courts from coast to coast.
Henry Hudson, Jed Rakoff, Virginia Phillips

United States Judges
Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius constitutional challenge to Obamas healthcare law is

part of a pattern of fraud in the US courts from coast to coast.
US judges consistently undermine the rule of law in the United States. Media and legal
scholars fail to expose the fraud and inform the people.
Los Angeles, February 25 in Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius, Judge Henry Hudson of

the US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, purported to preside in litigation of a
constitutional challenge to Obamas health care law. A recent Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) response by the US Department of Justice has confirmed the case as another example
of fraud on the court: [[i]]
* Judge Hudson appeared in the case with no assignment order;

* No judgment was ever entered in the case,
* US DOJ provided false and deliberately misleading records instead of the requested
electronic certificates of authentication by the Clerk of the Court (NEFs Notices of Electronic
Filing).
As was previously documented: [[ii]]
* No valid summons was found in the case docket, only summons, which was missing the
seal of the court. The US law requires that the summons be issued with a signature of the clerk
of the court and under the seal of the court. Absent valid summons, the litigation is invalid from
its start.
* No valid record of execution or waiver of execution of the service of summons was found in
the docket. Absent valid execution within the time prescribed by law, the case should have
been dismissed by the court.
* The Minutes, which were found in the case docket, listed no name of a Deputy Clerk, and
should therefore be deemed invalid.
* Requests, which were filed with the Clerk of the US Court, for copies of missing critical
litigation records and for the NEFs remain unanswered. [[iii],[iv]]
With it, litigation of the Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius joins the pattern, which was
previously seen in litigation of cases of the highest policy significance:
* SEC v Bank of America Corporation by Judge Jed Rakoff in the US District Court, New
York [[v],[vi],[vii],[viii]]
* Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al by Judge Virginia Phillips in the US District Court in
California. [[ix],[x][xi],[xii]]
The pattern in these cases and others, of fraud in the US courts from coast, to coast is not
partisan.
However, based on review of numerous cases in the US courts from coast to coast, a patter
does emerges:
* US judges consistently collude with large financial institutions in undermining banking

regulation and in bankrupting the United States;
* US judges consistently collude with government and large corporations in abuse of the
rights of the people;
* US judges consistently undermine the rule of law in the United States;
* Corruption of the offices of the clerks, from the US District Courts, through the US Courts of
Appeals, to the US Supreme Court is essential part of this conduct; [[xiii]]
* Fraud related to electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the clerks is essential
to the fraud in the courts, as is the case in fraud related to foreclosure cases (robo signatures);
* Attorneys for the US agencies (DOJ, SEC) readily participate in the charades;
* US media report such cases, without ever informing the public that the litigation records in
these cases could never be deemed valid pursuant to the US law, and
* Legal scholars in the US fail to expose the fraud or speak up.
LINKS:
[i] 11-02-16 Re: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court,
Eastern District of Virginia Constitutional challenge to the Obama Health Care Law - US DOJ
FOIA Request and Response (145-FOI-10449)
[ii] 11-01-13 Press Release: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius in the US District Court -
Constitutional Challenge to the Obama Health Care Law Appears as Deliberately Invalid
Litigation
[iii] 11-01-13 Re: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court
Eastern District of Virginia - Constitutional challenge to Obama's Healthcare law - Request for
Certification of the PACER Docket
[iv] 11-01-13 Re: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District
Court Eastern District of Virginia - Constitutional challenge to Obama's Healthcare law -
Request for Litigation Records from the Clerk of the Court
[v] 10-12-19 RE: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-
cv-06829) - Addendum to Request for Investigation-impeachment of Judge Rakoff and Clerk
Krajick
[vi] 11-01-10 Request for investigation/impeachment proceedings, in re: US Judge JED
RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York,
Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-
06829)
[vii] 11-01-10 Request for investigation/impeachment proceedings, in re: US Judge JED
RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York,
Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-
06829)
[viii] 11-02-05 Request No 2 for Impeachment of Judge JED RAKOFF Clerk RUBY KRAJICK,
US District Court, Southern District of New York, in Re Conduct of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-
02228)
[ix] 10-12-06 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (2:04-cv-08425) at the US District Court, Central
District of California: Dont Ask Dont Tell Evidence of Another Pretense Litigation by Judge
Virginia Phillips
[x] 10-12-07 Press Release: Request for investigation, impeachment proceedings where
appropriate, in re TERRY NAFISI Clerk of the US Court, Central District of California-s
[xi] 11-01-08 Press Release: Dont Ask Dont Tell' - Motion to Intervene, Requesting the US
Court of Appeals to Dismiss the Appeals from an Uncertified Judgment
[xii] 11-02-09 Press Release: Dont Ask, Dont Tell the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists
on Conducting a Pretense Appeal from a Pretense Judgment of the US District Court
[xiii] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER

11-02-26 Letter To Prof Erwin Chemerinsky Regarding Widespread Corruption of The US Courts S

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

11-02-26 Letter To Prof Erwin Chemerinsky Regarding Widespread Corruption of The US Courts S

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Human Rights Alert Digitally signed

1) On February 26, Joseph Zernik wrote:

To: "Chemerinsky, Erwin" <EChemerinsky@law.uci.edu>

Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean

Dear Prof Chemerinsky:

• Consequently, the case was listed as "closed".

Joseph Zernik, PhD

2) At 12:18 AM 2/26/2011, PROF ERWIN CHEMERINSKY wrote:

PLEASE TAKE ME OFF YOUR MAILING LIST!

3) On February 25, 2011 Joseph Zernik wrote:

Subject: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius constitutional challenge to Obamas

Henry Hudson, Jed Rakoff, Virginia Phillips

Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius constitutional challenge to Obamas healthcare law is

Los Angeles, February 25 in Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius, Judge Henry Hudson of

* Judge Hudson appeared in the case with no assignment order;

As was previously documented: [[ii]]

previously seen in litigation of cases of the highest policy significance:

* US judges consistently collude with large financial institutions in undermining banking

You might also like