Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Comparison Between DDC and LCC Classification

Comparison Between DDC and LCC Classification

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2,269 |Likes:
Published by emmy_line

More info:

Published by: emmy_line on Feb 26, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/01/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Comparison DDC between LCCClassification
Besides its frequent revision, DDC's main advantage over its chief American  rival,  theLibrary  of  Congress  Classificationsystemdeveloped shortly afterward, is its simplicity. Thanks to the use of purenotation,  a  mnemonics  system  and  a  hierarchical  decimal  placesystem, it is generally easier to use.
[
]
DDC and UDC are more flexible than Library of Congress Classificationbecause of greater use of facets (via auxiliary tables) whileLibrary of  Congress Classificationis almost totally enumerative.DDC's decimal system means that it is less hospitable to the additionof new subjects, as opposed to Library of Congress Classification,which has 21 classes at the top level. DDC notations can be muchlonger compared to other classification systems.Another disadvantage of DDC is that it was developed in the 19thcentury essentially by one man and was built on a top-down approachto classify all human knowledge, which makes it difficult to adapt tochanging fields of knowledge. The Library of Congress Classificationsystem was developed based mainly on the idea of literary warrant;classes were added (by individual experts in each area) only whenneeded for works owned by the Library of Congress. As a result, whilethe Library of Congress Classification system was able to incorporatechanges and additions of new branches of knowledge, particularly inthe  fields  of  engineering  and  computer  science  (the  greaterhospitability of the Library of Congress Classification was also a factor),DDC has been criticized for being inadequate in covering those areas.It is asserted that, as a result, most major academic libraries in the USdo not use the DDC because the classification of works in those areasis not specific enough, although there are other reasons that may trulybe more weighty, such as the much lower expense of using a unique"pre-packaged" catalog number instead of having highly skilled staff members engaging in the time-consuming development of catalognumbers.The Library of Congress Classification system is not without problems.For example, it is highly US-centric because of the nature of thesystem, and it has been translated into far fewer languages than DDCand UDC.

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->