Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Definitions
• “Achieving commercial success in ways that honor ethical values and
respect people, communities and the natural environment.” Business for
Social Responsibility
• Current Pressures
Page 5
Recent Evidence of CSR Interest
• An Internet search turns up 15,000 plus
response to “corporate citizenship”
• Journals increasingly “rate” businesses (and
NGOs) on socially responsive criteria:
▫ Best place to work
▫ Most admired
▫ Best (and worst) corporate reputation
Reasons for CSR Activities
• CSR activities are important to and even expected
by the public
▫ And they are easily monitored worldwide
• CSR activities help organizations hire and retain the
people they want
• CSR activities contributes to business performance
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Carroll’s Four Part Definition
• CSR encompasses the economic, legal, ethical
and discretionary (philanthropic) expectations
that society has of organizations at a given point
in time
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Carroll’s Four Part Definition
Understanding the Four Components
Responsibility Societal Examples
Expectation
REQUIRED of Be profitable.
Economic business by Maximise sales revenue.
society Minimize costs (administrative, production, marketing)
Source: Carroll (1979)) Make wise strategic decisions.
Be attentive to dividend policy
Philanthropic Responsibilities
Be a good corporate citizen.
Ethical Responsibilities
Be ethical.
Legal Responsibilities
Obey the law.
Economic Responsibilities
Be profitable.
Pyramid of CSR
Corporate Social Responsibility
Do more than Integrate
required; e.g. social
engage in objectives
philanthropic and
Fight social giving business
responsibility goals
initiatives
Maximize
firm’s
profits to the Balance
exclusion of profits and
all else social
objectives
Do what it
takes to Comply; do
make a what is legally Articulate
profit; skirt required Lead the
social value
the law; fly industry and
objectives
below other businesses
social radar with best
practices
Spectrum of CSR
Economic
Social
Social and Financial Performance
A Multiple Bottom-Line Perspective
World-wide critical events
and issues
• 1984 Union Carbide in Bhopal, India - environment
• 1995 Shell in North Sea (Brent Spar) - environment
• 1995 Shell in Nigeria (Ogoni) - distribution of resources
• 1996 BP in Colombia - security forces & complicity
• 2000 Mars, Cadbury, Hershey, Ivory Coast - child labour
• 2000 Chiquita, Del Monte etc., C. America - association
• 2000 Adidas in Pakistan - child labour
• 2002 Talisman in Sudan - complicity in repression
• 2000s Nokia, Motorola, Congolese Coltan - forced labour
• 2010 BP, Gulf of Mexico-Oil Spill
The Global Compact
•Human Rights
▫Human Rights within sphere of influence
▫Complicity with rights violations - repression & conflict
•Labour
▫The right to collective bargaining & freedom of association
▫Eliminate forced and compulsory labour
▫To effectively abolish child labour
▫To end discrimination in the workplace
•Environment
▫To support a precautionary approach to the environment
▫Promote greater environmental responsibility
▫Encourage the diffusion of environmentally friendly technology
•Anti- Corruption
▫Work against all forms of corruption, including extortion and bribery
Who are the Stakeholders?
Anyone who affects or is affected by an organisation
Freeman
Who’s Involved?
• Responsibility to all Stakeholders
Shareholders, Investment Banks, Analysts
Board of Directors, C-Suite, Employees
Customers
Environment
Suppliers & Partners
Community
Non-governmental organizations (NGO’s)
21
Number in 2007: 38
Driven by Expectations
• Soaring expectations mean that compliance
is no longer enough
▫ Compliance only gets you onto the playing field
▫ Meeting high expectations for:
Mitigating harm
Creating positive change
• Nike
▫ “Yes, we do hold you responsible”
▫ One in five consumers will pay more for a product labeled as social,
ethical or environmental. Cone/Roper Study, 2000
• Stakeholder Activism
Presentation to be followed by a case study.