Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
9Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Memo in Support of Motion to Declare Orders & Judgments Void

Memo in Support of Motion to Declare Orders & Judgments Void

Ratings:
(0)
|Views: 384|Likes:
Published by earthica

More info:

Published by: earthica on Mar 03, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/16/2013

pdf

text

original

 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
 
Star: Hills & Alan Gjurovich,
temporary mailing location,care of: [ P.O BOX  71537  Bakersfield, California]non domestic, without the US
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN CASE
#:
S-1500-CV-271292-SPC;
 
Star: Hills,  Alan Gjurovich                  RELATED #'s S-1500-CL-237061-KTC;#'s S-1500-CV-625552-WDPplaintiffs,MEMORANDUM  OF  POINTS  &  AUTHORITIES-VS-                                     OF Alan Gjurovich & Star: Hills IN  SUPPORT  OFGMAC MORTGAGE LLC,                  MOTION FOR RULING, DECLARATION &President  NICK  CANALE Jr.;            ORDER IN COURTS EQUITY JURISDICTIONERIC A. FELDSTEIN, (CEO OF         THAT ORDERS  & JUDGMENT ETC. IN CASEGMAC MORT. LLC);                            S-1500-CL- 237061-KTC ARE VOIDKERN COUNTY SHERIFF DONNY   AS  A  MATTER  OF  LAWYOUNGBLOOD (contractor)Et Al,defendants.                     HEARING DATE: 3 /18 / 2011;________________________________ DEPT.: 7; TIME:  8:30  A.M. 
INTRODUCTION  &  STATEMENT  OF  FACTS
 
FACTS  IN  THE  RECORD  IN  CASES #:S-1500-CV-271292-SPC; S-1500-CL-237061-KTC------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Plaintiffs (hereafter Alan & Star) hereby incorporate by Reference as if fully set forth hereinthe  contents  of their “INTRODUCTION & STATEMENT OF FACTS; FACTS  IN THERECORD IN CASE #:“S-1500-CV-271292-SPC” in the prior filed Motion for Recusal in thisCase, which is made a part hereof this Supporting Memorandum. Star & Alan filed a Noticeof Related Action in this Case on 12/13/10  referring this Court
o related Unlawful  Detainer  (hereafter U.D.)Case#:S-1500-CL-237061-KCT, in which Defendants purport  to have  obtained 
Page
1
of 14
PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DECLARE JUDGMENT VOID
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
 
a  Valid Judgment  for  Possession  of  the  Home  of  Star  &  Alan, which  in  fact  is
 
shown inthe Records of  this Court  to  be Void  as  a  matter of  California  Law, as  set  forth
hereafter.In this Case #: S-1500-CV-271292-SPC, in  Dept. 7 on  12/20/2010, on  the  prior EmergencyEx Parte  Motion  of  Plaintiffs, for  a  Temporary  Restraining  Order Counsel
GANDY 
for
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC,(hereafter GMAC) Et Al stated on  the record in his oral argument that  Star & Alan are Making a “Collateral  Attack” on  the  alleged  “prior  Judgment” in U.D.#:S-1500-CL-237061-KTC,GMAC, Apparently contending that  the Action can  not  stand, & theonly remedy was an Appeal from the alleged Judgment. Judge Lampe stated the Court in theother case was co-equal & he had  no power  to  set  aside  the  alleged  Judgments  as  Void.  It is well & long settled Law that a Void Order or Judgment  may be Set Aside by any Court  when& where  the  matter arises & the Voidness  is  pointed  out  to  the  Court.  Furthermore, Whenthe  Void  Order  or  Judgment  is  pointed  out, 
 
the  Court  then  has  a  Mandatory  Duty  to 
 
Declare  it  Void  on  the  Record,as  is  set  forth  more  fully  hereafter  in  Court  Rulings  in this  Memorandum. The  said  alleged “Judgment” is  not  a  “final” “Judgment” &  is Void  on  its  Face  or  Void  on the face of the Record, as set forth hereafter, AS ONE COURT  STATED, CITED HEREIN, IT  IS  NOT   EVEN  A  JUDGMENT  AT  ALL, HENCE  PLAINTIFFS REFERENCES THROUGH OUT THEIR PAPERS FILED IN ALL CASES TO THE  PRE-FIX TERM:“ALLEGED”“JUDGMENT ” Exhibits 1 & 2 attached hereto from the Courts ownRecords in Cases #'s:S-1500-CV-265552-WDP & S-1500-CL-237061-KTC SHOW  ON  THEIRFACE THAT THE U.D.COURT, A COURT OF LIMITED JURISDICTION  & EXPRESSLY DESIGNATED  BY  THE  CALIFORNIA  STATE  LEGISLATURE  AS  A “SPECIALPROCEEDING” UNDER CALIF. C.C.P. SECT. 85 &86 (a)(4),  HAD  NO  JURISDICTION   UNDER THE CONTROLLING  STATUTE 
,
CALIFORNIA C.C.P. SECT.1161a  (b)(3)TO  GRANT A JUDGMENT  ALLEGEDLY  ENTERED ON  THE  DATE OF 11/19/09,  NOR  TO
Page
2
of 14
PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DECLARE JUDGMENT VOID
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
 
ISSUE  SUBSEQUENT  WRITS  OF  POSSESSION, AS  IT  WAS  AN  IMPOSSIBILITY  AT LAW FOR ALLEGED PLAINTIFF  TO SHOW  THEY  HAD  PERFECTED THE  ALLEGEDTITLE  TO  THE  HOME  &  PROPERTY  OF  Star: Hills [3018  LINDEN  AVENUE,BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA]  which SAID Exhibits are  hereby  incorporated  by  referenceas  if  fully  set  forth  herein, &  are  hereby  made  a  part  of   this  Memorandum  &  Motion,which  Star  &  Alan  hereby  Request  the  Court  to  take  Mandatory  Judicial  Notice  of  as  apart  of  the  Courts  own  Case  files  &  Official  Records, Pursuant  to  Express  MandatoryProvisions  of  Calif. Evid. Code  Sect. 450-459. The  alleged  Order Dismissing Case #:S-1500-CV-265552-WDP is Void  on  its  face  as  the  same  Judge  Palmer  &  same  Court  had previously  Sustained  a  General  Demurrer  finding  that  no  Cause  of  Action  was  stated  inthe Complaint  on  the  Date  of  May  7, 2009,  with  20  days  leave  to Amend (see  DefendantsExhibit # 1  Register  of  Actions / Docket  (hereafter R.O.A.) attached  to  their  Request  for Judicial  Notice  filed  in  Support  of  their Demurrer, which  the  Court  is Required to takeMandatory Judicial Notice of  under Calif. Evid. Code Sect. 450-459, as  it  is this  Courts  ownRecord  in  the Computer  &  in  the Courts  File  in  this Case. A copy of  said  5/7/09  Entry  insaid  Court  R.O.A. is  attached  hereto  as  Exhibit  3, showing  the  Courts  prior entry of  anOrder  Sustaining  a  General  Demurrer & Granting  20  days  leave  to  Amend  the  PlaintiffsComplaint; the purported  subsequent  hearing  referred  to  as  a “Case  Management / Trial” hearing  before  said  Judge  Palmer  was  due  to  a  Clerical  Error  of  the  Judicial  Council Judge who Ruled on Plaintiffs Motion to Disqualify Judge  Palmer, wherein he stated  the Casewas  sent back to Palmer for  the  per-scheduled “Case Management/Trial” apparently not being aware  Judge  Palmer  had  previously  sustained  a  General  Demurrer  &  there  was  going  tobe
 
no  trial 
 
, based  on  Palmer's  finding  of   no  Causes  of  Action  stated  in  the Complaint 
 
 that could  be  tried  in  the  Case. Said  Clerical  Error  has  yet  to  be  corrected in  the Case  by
Page
3
of 14
PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DECLARE JUDGMENT VOID

Activity (9)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
computax53 liked this
Peggy Hill liked this
caljics liked this
Cyril Richards liked this
ddllaa liked this
ddllaa liked this
ddllaa liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->