Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Human Psycho Physiology Macroscopic Information Entanglement and the Placebo Effect Tiller 2006

Human Psycho Physiology Macroscopic Information Entanglement and the Placebo Effect Tiller 2006

|Views: 23|Likes:
Published by Alexander Price

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Science
Published by: Alexander Price on Mar 03, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





THE JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINEVolume 12, Number 10, 2006, pp. 1015–1027©Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Human Psychophysiology, Macroscopic InformationEntanglement, and the Placebo Effect
For the past 20 years, the magnitude of the “placebo effect” in double-blind, medical experiments has stronglyincreased. This paper asks why and how. Starting with the human “psychophysiologic principle,” two uncon-scious and one conscious biofeedback examples are given to demonstrate how malleable we humans are to ourexpectations and our intentions and how strong our psychoenergetic forces can be relative to conventional chem-ical forces. Ending with several experimental examples wherein a therapeutically processed device and an un-processed device are critically compared, one finds strong evidence to propose that an information entangle-ment process is converting the unprocessed device to a functional replica of the processed device in that itstherapeutic efficacy is comparable to that of the treatment device. Furthermore, arguments are provided to in-dicate that a practitioner’s biofield is capable of expanding the range of diagnostic capability of commercialmeasurement instruments so that the practitioner/device hybrid system becomes a potent psychoenergetic in-strument for diagnostic and treatment purposes. In between, a theoretical model is provided, based on the au-thor’s extensive experimental psychoenergetic research on long-range interconnectivity between objects, be-tween humans and between humans and objects, to show how long-range, quantitative coupling can occurbetween our normal atom/molecule level of physical reality and a second, unique level of physical reality whosephysics can be modulated by psychoenergetic forces. It is the material qualities of this duplex physical realitythat convert a seemingly inert object/device (placebo) into a synergistically active element in double-blindplacebo experiments.
n 1999, Enserink 
wrote a short but very interesting arti-cle concerning how greatly the magnitude of the placeboeffect in double-blind pharmacologic studies had grown inthe previous 15 years. He pointed out that “when compa-nies started testing drugs for obsessive-compulsive disorderback in the mid-1980’s, the placebo response rate was al-most zero. As time went on, this response rate began to creepupward, up to a point where one could reasonably concludethat some clinical trials failed because of high placebo re-sponse rates. A very recent meta-analysis of 19 antidepres-sant drug trials revealed that the “placebo effect” on aver-age accounted for 75% of the effect of 
Although many believe that these data represent a kind of soft underbelly that both academic and industry researchersare more comfortable leaving out of sight. Others are fasci-nated by the power of the placebo effect, viewing it not asa problem but as a possible source of insight into mentalhealth. Going even further, what is it saying about the
laws of nature, as distinct from our metaphysical as-sumptions about them, and
has the magnitude of theplacebo effect increased so remarkably in the last 20 years?Because of all this, a question worth posing is the fol-lowing: Has something very fundamental been happening inour universe over the past couple of decades at a cosmic orglobal level that significantly enhances the connectivity be-tween objects, between humans plus between humans and
The William A. Tiller Foundation for New Science, Payson, AZ.
objects? If so, the day of “clean” double-blind medical ex-periments is over! This paper is dedicated to exploring thisissue and to providing a possible explanation of how a sup-posedly inert object (placebo) can be stimulated to act as adynamic treatment.As background for what is to follow, two items of infor-mation need to be supplied. From an overly simplistic view-point, one could say that, for the past
400 years, estab-lishment science has dealt with multiple aspects of thereaction equationMASS
ENERGYEquation 1awith each term being convertible to the other via Einstein’s,E
, equation (E
energy, m
mass, and c is the ve-locity of electromagnetic (EM) light traveling through vac-uum). Our research shows that psychoenergetic sciencedeals with the expanded reaction equationMASS
CONSCIOUSNESS.Equation 1bThe term “consciousness,” here, is used to mean a uniquequality of nature that is ultimately convertible to energy ormass rather than to the typical dictionary usage of beingawake, aware, etc. Perhaps, instead of asking what con-sciousness
we should ask what consciousness
!When we do this, we almost immediately see that con-sciousness manipulates information in the form of numbers,alphabet letters and, most generally, symbols. Thus, Equa-tion 1b becomes more revealing when we phrase it in theformatMASS
CONSCIOUSNESS.Equation 1cFor the past 50 years or so, establishment science has rec-ognized the existence of a quantitative relationship betweeninformation in units of “bits” and the thermodynamic qual-ity, entropy, in units of calories per unit temperature.
Forthe past
150 years, entropy has been recognized as a veryimportant contribution to the thermodynamic free energyfunctions of Helmholtz
and Gibbs.
Thus, information inEquation 1c is intimately connected to energy and also toconsciousness, as we will see in the next section, and is avery important bridge between the two. Because one cannotdefine either information or consciousness as spatially vary-ing qualities or forces, spacetime is not the appropriate ref-erence frame (RF) for their utilization so one sees that ourRF for describing the manifold expressions of nature mustbe expanded beyond spacetime. A new and viable RF ca-pable of dealing with Equation 1c will be described later.The next background question to be asked is “How con-scious are humans?” and here we extract some useful in-sights from Nørretranders.
Here, one learns that, just at thefive physical senses level, (1) the information bandwidth (inbits per second) of the human
1 milliontimes that of the
. Thus, we are mostly unconsciousliving organisms at this stage in our evolutionary process;(2) the human unconscious accesses, processes, manipulatesand edits
50 million bits/second. It then sends small (lessthan 50 bits/sec) kernels of this edited information to theconscious for experiencing, (3) these particular kernels of information are only of the types that this conscious brainhad heretofore given
; and (4) all the rest of the in-formation appears to be “dumped.” Thus, giving some work,idea, concept, etc.,
appears to be a necessary pre-cursor for our unconscious to feed us expanded informationcontent in that particular area. One might conclude from thisthat, to grow in overall conscious awareness, one needs togive meaning to more things or, at least, not to reject suchthings out-of-hand as being worthless to our personality self.It has been suggested that a brief glossary, explainingsome of the unfamiliar terms, would be helpful in makingthe paper more user friendly, as follows.
Thermodynamic Free Energy
: This is a quality of sub-stance (per unit volume or per mole) that defines its po-tential for doing work. This quality includes both energyand entropy contributions and their dependence on thethermodynamic intensive variables of temperature, pres-sure, concentration of chemical species plus electric,magnetic, and gravitational fields, et cetera.2.
: This is labeled an intention imprinted electrical de-vice that has been programmed with a specific intentionby humans acting from a deep meditative state. The spe-cific intention is designed to change a particular mater-ial property in a given direction and to a given degree.The “black box” electrical device is the host for one spe-cific intention.3.
 IIED-Conditioned Space
: Electrically turning on an IIEDin any space, slowly but steadily, outputs some presentlyunknown quality into that space, which appears to activatean indwelling consciousness present in both the space andthe measurement instruments occupying that space. Theconsequence of an abundant supply of this quality appearsto
our normal, electric, atom/molecule level of physical reality with a unique, second level of physical re-ality apparently consisting of magnetic information waves.It is this second level of physical reality that becomes
to the particular intention imbedded in the IIED. Becauseof this coupling, the measurement instruments read notonly our normal level of physical reality but also an addi-tional contribution from this magnetic information wavelevel. The magnitude of this second contribution dependsupon the strength of this coupling coefficient, which growswith time until it plateaus at a value that satisfies the in-tention imprinted into the IIED.
: A postulated particle, from a higher dimen-sional domain than spacetime (so it does not have rela-tivity theory constraints) that can travel both faster andslower than the velocity of electromagnetic (EM) light.It acts as the
between the electric particle sub-stance of our normal level of physical reality and the mag-netic, information wave substance of this second level of physical reality.5.
 D-space and R-space
: Tiller has proposed that we replaceour present spacetime RF for viewing the manifold ex-pressions of nature with a duplex RF for physical realityimbedded in three higher dimensional domains for thelarger reality. This duplex RF consists of two, four-di-mensional, reciprocal subspaces, one of which is space-time. The spacetime-subspace is the RF for electric par-ticles, atoms, and molecules and is labeled direct spaceor D-space, whereas the reciprocal-subspace is the RF formagnetic information wave substance and is labeled rec-iprocal space or R-space.6.
Gauge Theory
: The concept of a gauge was introducedin 1918 by Herman Weyl to mean a standard of lengthwhereby the gravitational force could be formulated interms of the curvature of space and the various geome-tries involved. In general, gauge theories were con-structed to relate the properties of the four known fun-damental forces of nature (gravity, electromagnetism, thelong-range nuclear force, and the short-range nuclearforce) to the various symmetries of nature.7.
 EM Gauge Symmetry
: The most familiar symmetries weknow of are spatial or geometric in appearance, like thehexagonal symmetry of a snowflake. An invariance inthe snowflake pattern occurs when it is rotated by 60°,so it is called six-fold symmetric (360°/6). In general, thestate of this type of symmetry can be defined as an
of pattern that is observed when some uniquetransformation is applied to it (e.g., the 60°rotation of asnowflake or a 90°rotation of a square).One example of a nongeometric symmetry is the chargesymmetry of EM. For the case of a collection of electricdipoles or magnetic dipoles, if the individual charges aresuddenly reversed in sign, the
of the ensemble isunchanged so the electric forces or the magnetic forces re-main unchanged, they are invariant to this type of trans-formation and is a
symmetry (happening every-where at once). For a
symmetry to be observed, thisbehavior must remain invariant even when the transfor-mation takes place at each separate point of spacetime.When this occurs, something new must be added and thatnew thing is a new force. The theory of electric and mag-netic fields was the first gauge theory with local symme-try and thus the EM force came into being.Maxwell’s theory of EM is a classic one, but a relatedsymmetry can be demonstrated in quantum field theory.In the quantum theory of electrons, a change in the elec-tric potential entails a change in the
of the elec-tron wave, which is inaccessible to direct measurement,so any phase angle can be added to or subtracted fromthe electron field and the results of all experiments willremain invariant. This electron phase angle is thus la-beled an inner space symmetry variable.8.
U(1) and SU(2) Gauge States
: In our normal, electricatom/molecule level, there is only one internal space vari-able that needs to be specified, the electron phase-angle,for a complete mathematical description of a material,and this is the 1 in the Group Theory label, U(1). In our
magnetic information wave level of physical re-ality, the magnetic monopole phase-angle is the internalspace variable that needs to be specified. Thus, it is alsoa U(1) gauge state in this isolation case. However, whenthese two unique levels of reality are
, now thecoupled system has
correlated internal space vari-ables (phase-angles) to be specified, so the Group The-ory label shifts to SU(2).
A relevant beginning to this section is with Gustav Fech-ner who, in 1860, wrote a book entitled
 Elements of Psy-chophysics
wherein he wrote “Not only does the world in-fluence the mind but the mind influences the world.” By
1910, Johannes Schultz, via combining various ideas from(1) his medical research, (2) hypnosis, and (3) concepts fromyogic methods, developed an inner self-management proce-dure that he labeled “autogenic training,”
a self-generatedor self-motivated training for attaining a variety of stableemotional/mental states. By the
1960s, Elmer and AlyceGreen
had deeply studied voluntary control of 
human states, both psychological and physiological, andstrongly promoted the “psychophysiologic principle”whereinEvery change in the human physiological state is ac-companied by an appropriate change in the mental-emotional state, conscious or unconscious, and con-versely every change in the human mental-emotionalstate, conscious or unconscious, is accompanied by anappropriate change in the physiological state.The Greens, along with others, went on to show that theinstrumental monitoring and display, continuous in time, of a particular human physiological parameter can allow an at-tentive human to voluntarily modify the magnitude of thisparameter and thereby alter one’s own physiologic activity,behavior, or process of consciousness. This work and thatof others led to the use of biofeedback as an important med-ical therapeutic procedure. It also generated serious suspi-cion in some concerning the validity of the long-held, un-stated assumption of establishment science that

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->