Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's MSJ. Docket Doc 29

Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's MSJ. Docket Doc 29

Ratings: (0)|Views: 111|Likes:
Published by D B Karron, PhD

More info:

Published by: D B Karron, PhD on Mar 08, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/29/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Case 1:08-cv-10223-NRB Document 29 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 19
UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURTSOUTHERNDISTRICTOFNEWYORKUNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA,Plaintiff,
-v.-
DANIELB.KARRON,Defendant.08Civ.10223(NRB)(DFE)
\J
~
en
m
o
-n
"
-
(')
~
MEMORANDUMOFLAWINOPPOSITIONTOPLAINTIFF'SMOTION
FOR
SUMMARYJUDGEMENT
DB
Karron
ProSe
348EastFultonStreetLongBeach,
NY
11561Voice:2126868748Cell:
9176740828
Email:drdbkarron@gmail.com
Page1of41
 
Case 1:08-cv-10223-NRB Document 29 Filed 08/23/10 Page 2 of 19
Contents
I)PreliminaryStatement72)Background
11
3)Argument
12
Overview
of
ComplaintClaims
12
1stClaim:FALSECLAIMSACT,
31
U.S.C.§3729(a)(l)[Pre-FERAFalseClaim]
12
2nd
Claim:FALSECLAIMSACT,
31
U.S.C.
§
3729(a)(2)[Pre-FERAFalseRecord]
12
3rdClaim:CONVERSION
[of
misappropriatedfundstopersonalgain]
12
4thClaim:UNJUSTENRICHMENT
12
5thClaim:
FRAUD
12
6thClaim:PAYMENTMADEUNDERMISTAKE
OF
FACT12Overview
of
OpposingPoints
of
Argument
13
Point
I.
KarronOverfundingandCofoundingrendermootPlaintiff'sclaims.
Dec!.a/Dunlevy
Ex.
1.
Inmainpartthegovernmentsunderlyingaccountingisfalse;beingcopiedfromHayes,and
or
beingmadeup.Karron'sbonafide
tax
paidsalaryandprojectfundingvitiatetheallegations
of
fraud.
13
PointII.ThereexistsnoCommonLawFraudelements
in
theBEAconviction;ThePlaintifffailstoaverthefullparticularsintheComplaintorMemorandum
of
Law
13
Point
III.
IncongruentMensReaElements
of
§
666BEAconvictionand
§
3729FCAprecludes
§
3731FCAProcedureforStatutoryCollateralEstoppel.SummaryJudgmentbyResJudicataandCivilCollateralEstoppelareimpossible.Thesingleelement
of
conviction,knowingmisapplication
of
grantfunds,withoutafinding
of
fraud,forpurposesotherwisebenefitingthePlaintiffarenotthesameissues,elements,allegations,
or
claims,ortransactionsrequiredbythelaw
13
Point
IV.
MonstrousCivilPenaltiesandDamagesdemanded(asmuchas$5M+)are42
X
thecriminalrestitution,significantlygreaterthantheCampbellrule.Thecivilpenaltyiscriminal.This
is
aconstitutionalchallengebecauseitinfringes
on
theDefendant'srightsunderthe5
th
DoubleJeopardyandDueProcess(SummaryJudgmentshortcircuitsDue
Process),
EminentDomain(failuretoJustCompensateDefendantforseizedrealandintellectualproperty),
8
th
Amendment(Cruelandunusualpunishments)
13
PointV.OtherissuesraisedbyPlaintiffandansweredasspacepermits
13
PointVI.
Non
Movantsevidenceisadmissibleattrial,mustbeconsideredastruefordecidingeligibility
of
summaryjudgment,and,interpretation
oflaw
mustbeconsidered
in
lightmostbeneficialtonon-moveant;thereisnoremainingbasisforSummaryJudgment.
13
Point
I.
KarronFunding
of
ProjectmakesallfiscalreportingerrorsharmlesstoPlaintiff.14Page2
of
41
 
Case 1:08-cv-10223-NRB Document 29 Filed 08/23/10 Page 3 of 19
a)
Karron'sSalary14
b)
Karron'scontribution14
c)
Overfundingand
FCA
14
Point
II.
NoCommonLawFraudBasis
15
A.
i.
ii.
B.
i.
ii.
C.
1.
Elements
of
fraud15Definitions
of
Fraud15Theparticulars
of
Common
Law
fraudconsist
of
nineelements16Plaintiffdoes
not
specifyrequiredelements
of
fraud
to
allegeCommonFraud16CommonLawEstoppelcannotapply
without
fullparticulars16"Benefit
of
the
Bargain"frauddamages17
CUNY
CISDD
Subcontract:Option
or
Obligation?19
CUNY
CISDD
NYUMCand
KEY
CASI
TEAM
MEMBERS
21
PointIII.Incongruent
MensRea
ElementsbetweenCriminalandCivilStatutesPrecludeCollateralEstoppelandSummaryJudgment
21
a)
Takingrefugein
ALLISON
Wonderland
22
b)
FERA
RetroactivelyAmends
FCA200923
c)FERA
RetroactivityUnconstitutional
23
d)
FERA
retroactivityApplies
to
Claims,
Not
Cases
23
e)
Retroactivity,Legally
False
fromKirk
v.
Schindleralsofalse24
f)
FCAClaimsDisputed
25
g)
31
USCS
§
3731(e)FCAStatutoryCEProcedure
25
h)TheMickmanandLamannaLimitation
26
i)
LiabilityDoesNotEqualDamages
27j)TheDefendant'sConvictionunder18U.S.c.§666(a)(1)(A)
[BEA]
28
a)2.
Intent
to
Defraud
Is
Not
An
Element
Of
Section666(a)(1)(A)
29
b)
Section666(a)(1)(A)prohibitsembezzling,stealing,obtainingbyfraud,converting,
or
intentionallymisapplyingfunds.Thefirst
four
prohibitionscoveranypossibletaking
of
money
for
one's
own
use
or
benefit.Intentionalmisapplication,inorder
to
avoidredundancy,mustmeanintentionalmisapplication
for
otherwiselegitimatepurposes30
Point
IV.
MonstrousCivilPenaltiesandDamagesUnconstitutional..
32
1.
A42timesdamagesandpunitiveratio
32
2.
DoubleJeopardyandthe
BEA
andthe
FCA
32
3.
ForensicAccountingdoes
not
support
the
Plaintiff'slosscontention34
Page
3
of
41

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->