- 2 -3.
KPMG LLP provides to its clients,
inter alia
, professional services in interstatecommerce in the fields of accounting, auditing, tax, management, and financial and businessconsulting under its famous name and mark KPMG.4.
Upon information and belief, Defendants offer similar professional services ininterstate commerce, including accounting, auditing, tax, management and financial and businessconsulting services. Defendants advertise and promote those services at their websiteWWW.KBLLC.COM.5.
Upon information and belief, the Individual Defendants control and direct thebusiness and operations of KBMG, derive financial benefit from the use of the name and mark KBMG and were instrumental in Defendants’ selection of the name and mark KBMG.6.
Plaintiffs bring this action seeking,
inter alia
, a judgment that Defendants have:(i) infringed the federally registered KPMG Marks by,
inter alia
, using the name and mark KBMG, which is likely to cause confusion, mistake and deception in violation of § 32 of the
Lanham Act,
15 U.S.C. § 1114; (ii) violated Plaintiffs’ rights under the federal unfair competitionlaw codified at § 43(a) of the
Lanham Act
, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) by,
inter alia
, using falsedesignations of origin, including KBMG, that are likely to cause confusion, mistake or deceptionas to the affiliation, connection or association with Plaintiffs; (iii) diluted the distinctive qualityof Plaintiffs’ valuable rights in the KPMG Marks in violation of § 43(c) of the
Lanham Act
, 15U.S.C. § 1125(c); (iv) diluted the distinctive quality of Plaintiffs’ valuable rights in the KPMGMarks in violation of New York General Business Law 360-I; and (v) engaged in unfaircompetition and trademark infringement in violation of the common law of New York.7.
Defendants’ acts have caused and continue to cause irreparable damage and injuryto Plaintiffs for which Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law. Plaintiffs seek injunctive
Case 1:11-cv-01583-MGC Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 2 of 28
Add a Comment