Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Is the Quran the Word of God

Is the Quran the Word of God

Ratings: (0)|Views: 792 |Likes:
Published by asadghalib1

More info:

Published by: asadghalib1 on Mar 11, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/16/2012

pdf

text

original

 
http://debate.org.uk/topics/history/debate/debate.htm
"Is the Qur'an the Word of God?"
Jay SmithA. IntroductionA. The Problems with the Islamic Traditions
1. The Sources2. Late Datesa. Writingb. Agec. Scripts3. Credibility4. Contradictions5. Similarities6. Proliferation7. Isnad8. Storytelling
B. An Internal Critique of the Qur'an
9. The Qur'an's Makeupa. Inimitabilityb. Structural weaknessesc. Literary defectsd. Universalitye. Interpolation10.Talmudic Sources in the Qur'ana. The story of Cain and Abelb. The story of Abrahamc. The Story of Solomon and Sheba
11.
Scientific Peculiarities in the Qur'an 12.A Possible Solution ("Salvation History")
1
 
http://debate.org.uk/topics/history/debate/debate.htm
C. An External Critique of the Qur'an
13.Hijra14.Qibla15.The Jews16.Mecca17.Dome of the Rock18.Muhammad19.'Muslim' and 'Islam'20.Qur'an
B. Can We Use These Non-Muslim Sources?C. ConclusionD. References CitedA: Introduction
In August of 1995 I was invited to debate the motion, "Is the Qur'an the Word of God?" with Dr.Jamal Badawi. The debate took place at Trinity College, Cambridge, and after our papers hadbeen presented the debate was opened to the floor for an hour of questions from both theMuslims and Christians present. Below is the content of the paper, which I gave at the debate,as well as further material, which I used in the question and answer period, and further data,which has come out since the time of the debate. Because of the interest shown in the topic, wehave put this paper along with ten other apologetical papers, and certain Muslim rebuttals to thematerial, as well as a number of the popular 99 Truth Tracts on a web-site, on the internet(please use the following call number to access them:http://www.domini.org/debate/home.htm).Our hope is that with the material on this web site the debate can continue around the world,and help to enliven the dialogue already begun by the Cambridge debate.(Note: I have tried to footnote those statements which could prove to be contentious, or whichwould stimulate the readers to look for further data. I have used the Harvard model, whichcommences with the author's name, followed by the date of publication, and page number). Letus then begin our study.Islam claims that the Qur'an is not only God's Word, but that it is the final revelation given tohumanity. It comes from the "Mother of all books" according to sura 43:2-4. Muslims maintainthat the Qur'an is an exact word-for-word copy of God's final revelation, which is found on theoriginal tablets that have always existed in heaven. They point to sura 85:21-22, which says,"Nay this is a glorious Qur'an, (inscribed) in a tablet preserved." Islamic scholars contend thatthis passage refers to the tablets which were never created. They believe that the Qur'an is anidentical copy of the eternal heavenly book, even so far as the punctuation, titles and divisionsof chapters are concerned.According to Muslim tradition, these revelations' began to be sent down (Tanzil or Nazil) (sura17:85), to the lowest of the seven heavens in the month of Ramadan, during the night of power or destiny (lailat al Qadr) (Pfander, 1910:262). From there they were revealed to Muhammad ininstallments, as need arose, via the angel Gabriel (sura 25:32). Consequently, every letter and
2
 
http://debate.org.uk/topics/history/debate/debate.htm
every word is free from any human influence, which gives the Qur'an an aura of authority, evenholiness, and with such, its integrity.Most westerners have accepted these claims from Muslims at face value. They have never hadthe ability to argue their veracity, because the claims could neither be proved nor disproved, astheir authority was derived solely from the Qur'an itself (dispelling any attempt to wrest from thepages of the Bible fulfilled prophecies of Deuteronomy 18, John 14, 16; and perhaps others).There has also been a reticence to question the Qur'an and the prophet due to the adverseresponse directed upon those who were brave enough to attempt it in the past. The fact is thatfor too long westerners have been content to assume that the Muslims had evidence and datato substantiate their claims.It is only now, as secular scholars of Islam (known as "Orientalists") re-examine the Islamicsources, that evidence is being uncovered which puts into question much of what we have beenled to believe concerning Muhammad and his revelation,' the Qur'an.The findings of these scholars indicate that the Qur'an was not revealed to just one man, butwas a compilation of later redactions (or editions) formulated by a group of men, over thecourse of a few hundred years (Rippin 1985:155; and 1990:3,25, 60). In other words, the Qur'anwhich we read today is not that which was in existence in the mid-seventh century, but wasmore than likely a product of the eighth and ninth centuries (Wansbrough 1977:160-163). It wasat this time, the Orientalists say, particularly in the ninth century, that Islam took on its classicalidentity and became that which is recognizable today. Consequently, the formative stage of Islam, they contend, was not within the lifetime of Muhammad but evolved over a period of 200-300 years (Humphreys 1991:71, 83-89).Source material for this period, however, is sparse. Essentially the only sources which had beenavailable to the historians were Muslim sources. What is more, outside the Qur'an,' the sourcesare all late. Prior to 750 A.D. we have no verifiable Muslim documents which can give us awindow into this formative period of Islam (Wansbrough 1978:58-59). Nothing exists with whichto corroborate Muslim Tradition' material (that is, Islamic history based on their traditions). Later documents simply draw upon earlier documents, which no longer exist today (if indeed theyexisted at all) (Crone 1987:225-226; Humphreys 1991:73). This classical period (around 800A.D.) describes the earlier period, but from its own viewpoint, much like an adult, writing abouttheir childhood will tend to remember those areas which were pleasant. Thus, the account iscoloured, and biased, and as such cannot be accepted as authentic by historical scholars (refer to Crone's studies on the problems of the traditions,' especially those which were dependent onlocal storytellers, in Meccan Trade....1987, pp.203-230 and Slaves on Horses, 1980, pp. 3-17).Consequently, the demarcation line between what the historian will accept and that whichMuslim Traditions maintain is growing further apart for the following reasons: Islam, according toorthodox Muslim scholars, gives complete credence to divine intervention for its revelation.Muslim Tradition asserts that Allah sent down his revelation to Muhammad via the angel Gabriel(Jibril) over a period of twenty-two years (610-632 A.D.), in which time many of the laws andtraditions which delineate that which we define as Islam were formulated and worked out.Yet it is this scenario which secular historians are balking at today, as it presupposes that in theearly seventh century, Islam, a religion of immense sophistication, of intricate laws andtraditions was formulated in a backward' nomadic culture and became fully functional in onlytwenty two years.
3

Activity (4)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
John Wideman liked this
Rahul Raj liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->