Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
See Premium Plans
 
 
Report of the Special Counselto theSpecial Committee on Investigation ofCapital Projects of the Department of Parksand Recreation
March 11, 2011Robert P. TroutGloria B. SolomonTROUT CACHERIS,
PLLC
 
 
 
T
ABLE OF
C
ONTENTS
 Page
 INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................... 1SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION........................................................................................... 16A. How It Began........................................................................................................ 16B. The Authorizing Resolution.................................................................................. 17C. The Special Counsel Resolution........................................................................... 20D. Methodology......................................................................................................... 211. Document collection and review .............................................................. 222. Skinner’s testimony before the Council.................................................... 243. Depositions and interviews....................................................................... 25E. Limitations of the Investigation............................................................................ 28LEGAL BACKGROUND............................................................................................................ 30A. The Council Approval Requirement..................................................................... 30B. Laws Governing District Procurements................................................................ 32C. Local, Small and Disadvantaged Businesses........................................................ 34D. Memoranda of Understanding.............................................................................. 35CHRONOLOGY OF KEY EVENTS........................................................................................... 37FACTS AND ANALYSIS............................................................................................................ 41I. BACKGROUND: DPR, WALKER JONES, DEANWOOD, ANDTHE BANNEKER-REGAN TEAM............................................................................ 41A. DPR’s Inability to Move Capital Projects Forward.............................................. 41B. DPR Looked to Other Agencies for Help with Construction............................... 45C. Walker Jones......................................................................................................... 471. The Banneker/Regan Associates team...................................................... 50
Search
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
    • Notes
    Load more