Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Intolerance and the Politicization of Science at the Smithsonian: The Discredited Souder Sternberg Report

Intolerance and the Politicization of Science at the Smithsonian: The Discredited Souder Sternberg Report

Ratings: (0)|Views: 31 |Likes:
Published by AAMAN00
This “official” government document, pushed forward by Republican and Intelligent Design supporter Mark Souder, has since been thoroughly discredited and the emails contained in the appendix amazingly contradict many of the statements made in this “official” report. (See also the appendix containing the emails on my Scribd account as well)
This “official” government document, pushed forward by Republican and Intelligent Design supporter Mark Souder, has since been thoroughly discredited and the emails contained in the appendix amazingly contradict many of the statements made in this “official” report. (See also the appendix containing the emails on my Scribd account as well)

More info:

Published by: AAMAN00 on Mar 14, 2011
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/26/2012

pdf

 
 
U
NITED
S
TATES
H
OUSE OF
R
EPRESENTATIVES
 C
OMMITTEE ON
G
OVERNMENT
R
EFORM
 D
ECEMBER
2006________________________________________________
I
NTOLERANCE AND THE
P
OLITICIZATION OF
S
CIENCE AT THE
S
MITHSONIAN
 
S
MITHSONIAN 
S
OP
O
FFICIALS
P
ERMIT THE 
D
EMOTION AND
ARASSMENT OF 
S
CIENTIST 
S
KEPTICAL OF 
D
ARWINIAN 
VOLUTION 
 
________________________________________________
 
S
TAFF
R
EPORT
 P
REPARED FOR
 T
HE
H
ON
.
 
M
ARK
S
OUDER
 C
HAIRMAN
,
 
S
UBCOMMITTEE ON
C
RIMINAL
J
USTICE
,D
RUG
P
OLICY AND
H
UMAN
R
ESOURCES
 D
ECEMBER
11,
 
2006
 
T
ABLE OF
C
ONTENTS
 ________________________________________________
E
XECUTIVE
S
UMMARY
……………………………………………………………………3I
NTRODUCTION
……………………………………………………………………………8A
 
C
HRONOLOGY OF
R
ETALIATION
……………………………………………………...101.
 
E
VIDENCE OF
H
ARASSMENT AND A
H
OSTILE
W
ORK
E
NVIRONMENT
………102.
 
E
VIDENCE OF AN
I
NTENT TO
D
ISCRIMINATE AGAINST
S
CIENTISTS BASEDON
T
HEIR
O
UTSIDE
A
CTIVITIES
 
R
EGARDING
E
VOLUTION
……………...183.
 
E
VIDENCE OF
H
OSTILITY
B
ASED ON
A
NTI
-
RELIGIOUS AND
P
OLITICAL
M
OTIVATIONS
…………………………………………………………...213.
 
E
VIDENCE OF A
C
AMPAIGN TO
S
MEAR
D
R
.
 
S
TERNBERG BY
G
OVERNMENT
O
FFICIALS
……………………………………………………………….22T
HE
S
MITHSONIAN
R
ESPONSE
:
 
S
TONEWALLING
R
ATHER
T
HAN
A
CTION
…………….26R
ECOMMENDATIONS
…………………………………………………………………….28A
PPENDIX
…………………………………………………………………...
ATTACHMENT
 
 
E
XECUTIVE
S
UMMARY
 
In January 2005, an opinion piece published in the
Wall Street Journal
first raised publicawareness about disturbing allegations that officials at the Smithsonian Institution’sNational Museum of Natural History (NMNH) had retaliated against museum ResearchAssociate (RA) Richard Sternberg because he allowed publication of an article favoringthe theory of intelligent design in a biology journal.
1
A well-published evolutionarybiologist with two doctorates in biology, Dr. Sternberg claimed that after publication of the article, his colleagues and supervisors at the NMNH subjected him to harassment anddiscrimination in an effort to force him out as a Research Associate.In November of 2004, Dr. Sternberg filed a complaint with the U.S. Office of SpecialCounsel (OSC), the agency charged with “protecting federal employees and applicantsfrom prohibited personnel practices, especially reprisal for whistleblowing.” The OSCeventually found evidence to corroborate Dr. Sternberg’s complaint, concluding that “[i]tis... clear that a hostile work environment was created with the ultimate goal of forcing”Dr. Sternberg out of the Smithsonian. Despite this finding, the OSC was unable to pursueits investigation due to a question of jurisdiction. In August of 2005, subcommittee staff initiated their own investigation into the possible mistreatment of Dr. Sternberg by theSmithsonian. During their investigation, staff met with Dr. Sternberg and seniorSmithsonian officials, and reviewed internal emails provided by the Smithsonian inresponse to requests from the subcommittee.
The staff investigation has uncovered compelling evidence that Dr. Sternberg’s civiland constitutional rights were violated by Smithsonian officials. Moreover, theagency’s top officialsSecretary Lawrence Small and Deputy Secretary SheilaBurkehave shown themselves completely unwilling to rectify the wrongs that weredone or even to genuinely investigate the wrongdoing. Most recently, Burke andSmall have allowed NMNH officials to demote Dr. Sternberg to the position of Research Collaborator, despite past assurances from Burke that Dr. Sternberg wasa “Research Associate in good standing” and would be given “full and fairconsideration” for his request to renew his Research Associateship.
2
The failure of Small and Burke to take any action against such discrimination raises seriousquestions about the Smithsonian’s willingness to protect the free speech and civilrights of scientists who may hold dissenting views on topics such as biologicalevolution.
Major findings of this staff investigation include:
 
Officials at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History created ahostile work environment intended to force Dr. Sternberg to resign his positionas a Research Associate in violation of his free speech and civil rights.
There is
1
 
David Klinghoffer, “The Branding of a Heretic,”
The Wall Street Journal
, January 28,2005.
2
Letter from Sheila Burke to Rep. Mark Souder, May 3, 2006.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->