Sen. Joe schneier says bill will disproportionately hurt the most disadvantaged students. He says the bill puts a greater burden on those who teach Language Arts and Mathematics. Bill would make it harder for principals to get rid of ineffective teachers, he says.
Sen. Joe schneier says bill will disproportionately hurt the most disadvantaged students. He says the bill puts a greater burden on those who teach Language Arts and Mathematics. Bill would make it harder for principals to get rid of ineffective teachers, he says.
Sen. Joe schneier says bill will disproportionately hurt the most disadvantaged students. He says the bill puts a greater burden on those who teach Language Arts and Mathematics. Bill would make it harder for principals to get rid of ineffective teachers, he says.
I am a Level III, National Boards Certified Teacher
with a Master's Degree in the subject I teach. I have taught at APS for 8 years, and choose to work at a very challenging school on the West Side of Albuquerque. I agree with you that this state desperately needs a revolution in education.
Teachers, like myself, welcome accountability and
accurate, fair evaluations of our work. We would love there to be more efficient mechanisms in place for principals to be able to get rid of the few ineffective teachers who make the rest of us look bad. However, SB 502 is not the answer. When it was approved in the Senate on Friday night, my heart sank. I can only hope it will be stopped before it passes the House of Representatives.
There are very harmful provisions in this bill that will
defeat it's own purpose. It needs to be thought through a great deal more, altered, and amended before it will be ready for implementation. Here is my assessment as to why this is the wrong legislation for New Mexico. SB 502 will disproportionately hurt the most disadvantaged students in New Mexico. Currently, some of our best teachers choose to work in the most challenging schools with the most disadvantaged students. They choose these schools because they believe in living a life of service to kids who need them most. They are aware of the sad fact that children in low-income communities are very far behind their peers in the more affluent communities and score far lower on standardized tests. These teachers go above and beyond to try to remedy this, however, in spite of their tremendous efforts teachers have little control over student test scores. If SB 502 passes, excellent teachers, many with Masterʼs degrees and National Boards Certifications, could easily find jobs at the schools in more affluent communities and, alarmingly, many will do so to ensure steady employment. When a teacherʼs career is tied to student scores, even if it is only a percentage of that teacherʼs “effectiveness” rating, what incentive does a teacher have to stay in a challenging school? For me, I hope my love of these children is enough to keep me in a tough school, and take my chances with their test scores.
SB 502 puts a greater burden on those who teach Language Arts and Mathematics than on other teachers. The teacherʼs job will depend on student scores on the NMSBA test, which the teacher never sees before testing days, does not score, and does not get results of for many months. Students are not accountable to these tests because there is no grade. They sometimes draw pictures on them by filling in bubbles that will create an image or pattern, rather than actually try to answer the questions. Teachers cannot tell the student not to do this, only to do his best. If the student wants to make a pretty pattern out of the dots, the teachers have to bite their tongues. This studentʼs test score does not reflect the Language Arts or Mathematics teacherʼs ability to teach.
How will SB 502 legitimize studentsʼ test scores in Elective classes? SB 502 states that subjects that are not on the NMSBA will be assessed through a district based assessment, or one written by the teacher and approved by the superintendent. Currently, teachers are developing Standards Based assessments for all courses, (including Electives) to use in their classrooms. These could be approved by the superintendant, however, in many of these tests (Art, Home Economics, or Physical Education), the student must be observed executing skills learned in the course. Will the State of New Mexico trust teachers to collect their own data and present it to the Superintendent? Or will someone in the Superintendentʼs office come to each school to observe and assess each PE student in the district individually on his/her fitness level, flexibility, ball throwing, running time, basket shooting, physical strength, and teamwork?
The “effectiveness” of Special Education teachers would not be measured by any of the student assessment provisions in SB 502. SB 502 does not account for the evaluation of the Special Education teachers who do not teach subjects, but rather have caseloads of students they help to become proficient in their core courses. Once the student gains proficiency, they are exited from that Special Education program. Other Special Education Teachers, by definition, will never be deemed “effective” under SB 502, because their students are intentionally those who score low on the standardized tests, and when they improve, they are no longer in that teacherʼs class.
SB 502 will hurt morale and cause strife between teachers at a school. Because of the huge difference in the way teachers will be assessed, Language Arts teachers will be pitted against Performing Arts teachers, and Special Education teachers. Some use a high-stakes standardized test over which they have no control, another teacher writes his/her own test and scores it his/herself, and some are exempt entirely. This will destroy the community and rapport in schools where, currently, teachers work together on the behalf of students. This teamwork will be destroyed if SB 502 is implemented in New Mexico.
Thank you for taking your time to think about this important issue, Alyssa Agranat Albuquerque