Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
See Premium Plans
 
 No. 10-16696Argued December 6, 2010(Reinhardt, Hawkins, N. Smith)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
_________________________ KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees
,v.EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
Defendants
,andDENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al.,
Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants
.
 
_________________________ On Appeal From The United States District CourtFor The Northern District Of CaliforniaNo. CV-09-02292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker)____________________________________________________ 
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO VACATE STAY PENDINGAPPEAL OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES KRISTIN M. PERRY ET AL.
____________________________________________________ D
AVID
B
OIES
 J
EREMY
M.
 
G
OLDMAN
 T
HEODORE
H.
 
U
NO
 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP333 Main StreetArmonk, New York 10504(914) 749-8200T
HEODORE
B.
 
O
LSON
 
Counsel of Record 
M
ATTHEW
D.
 
M
C
G
ILL
 A
MIR 
C.
 
T
AYRANI
 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20036(202) 955-8500T
HEODORE
J.
 
B
OUTROUS
,
 
J
R 
.C
HRISTOPHER 
D.
 
D
USSEAULT
 E
NRIQUE
A.
 
M
ONAGAS
 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP333 South Grand AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90071(213) 229-7804
Attorneys for Plaintiffs-AppelleesKristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo
Case: 10-16696 03/17/2011 Page: 1 of 14 ID: 7685573 DktEntry: 326
 
 
i
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................1
 
ARGUMENT.............................................................................................................1
 
CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................9
 
Case: 10-16696 03/17/2011 Page: 2 of 14 ID: 7685573 DktEntry: 326
 
 
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIESPage(s)Cases
 
Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona
,520 U.S. 43 (1997) .................................................................................................3
Ben-Shalom v. Marsh
,881 F.2d 454 (7th Cit. 1989)..................................................................................6
Demosthenes v. Baal 
,495 U.S. 731 (1990) ...................................................................................... 1, 2, 3
Doe v. Gallinot 
,657 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1981)................................................................................5
High Tech Gays v. Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office
,895 F.2d 563 (9th Cir. 1990)..............................................................................6, 7
Lawrence v. Texas
,538 U.S. 558 (2003)...............................................................................................6
Lockyer v. City & County of San Francisco
,95 P.3d 459 (Cal. 2004)..........................................................................................5
Nken v. Holder 
,129 S. Ct. 1749 (2009) .................................................................................. 3, 4, 7
Perry v. Schwarzenegger 
,628 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2011)............................................................................1, 4
United States v. United Mine Workers of Am.
,30 U.S. 258 (1947) .................................................................................................2
United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization
,487 U.S. 72 (1988) .................................................................................................2
Woodward v. United States
,871 F.2d 1068 (Fed. Cir. 1989)..............................................................................6
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
,118 U.S. 356 (1886)...............................................................................................9
Case: 10-16696 03/17/2011 Page: 3 of 14 ID: 7685573 DktEntry: 326
Search
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
    • Notes
    Load more