Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Federal Food Safety Oversight

Federal Food Safety Oversight

Ratings: (0)|Views: 165|Likes:
Published by Patricia Dillon

More info:

Published by: Patricia Dillon on Mar 18, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/18/2011

pdf

text

original

 
 
United States Government Accountability Office
 
GAO
Report to Congressional Committees
FEDERAL FOODSAFETY OVERSIGHTFood Safety WorkingGroup Is a PositiveFirst Step butGovernmentwidePlanning Is Needed toAddressFragmentation
March 2011GAO-11-289
 
 
United States Government Accountability Office
Accountability • Integrity • Reliability
Highlights ofGAO-11-289, a report tocongressional committees
March 2011
FEDERAL FOOD SAFETY OVERSIGHT
Food Safety Workin
g
Group Is a Positive First Stepbut Governmentwide Plannin
g
Is Needed to AddressFra
g
mentation
Why GAO Did This Study
For more than a decade, GAO hasreported on the fragmented nature of federal food safety oversight and howit results in inconsistent oversight,ineffective coordination, andinefficient use of resources. In 2007,GAO added this issue to its high-risklist. In March 2009, the Presidentestablished the Food Safety WorkingGroup (FSWG) to coordinate federalefforts and establish food safety goalsto make food safer.Section 21 of Public Law 111-139mandated that GAO identifyprograms, agencies, offices, andinitiatives with duplicative goals andactivities. This review examines: (1)steps, if any, that the FSWG has takento increase collaboration amongfederal food safety agencies, and (2)options we and others have identifiedto reduce fragmentation, overlap, andpotential duplication in food safetyoversight. GAO reviewed informationabout the FSWG and alternativeorganizational structures for foodsafety, and conducted interviews.
What GAO Recommends
GAO recommends that the Directorof OMB, in consultation with thefederal food safety agencies, developa governmentwide performance planfor food safety that includes resultsoriented goals and performancemeasures for food safety oversightand a discussion about strategies andresources. OMB declined to commenton a draft of this report. USDA andHealth and Human Services providedtechnical comments.
What GAO Found
Creation of the FSWG elevated food safety as a national priority,demonstrated strong commitment and top leadership support, and wasdesigned to foster interagency collaboration on this cross-cutting issue. TheFSWG includes officials from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), theU.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Office of Management andBudget (OMB), and other federal agencies. Through the FSWG, federalagencies have taken steps designed to increase collaboration in some areasthat cross regulatory jurisdictions––in particular, improving produce safety,reducing
Salmonella
contamination, and developing food safety performancemeasures.However, the FSWG has not developed a governmentwide performance planfor food safety that provides a comprehensive picture of the federalgovernment’s food safety efforts. When GAO added food safety oversight to itshigh-risk list in 2007, it said that what remains to be done is to develop agovernmentwide performance plan for food safety that is mission based,results oriented, and provides a cross-agency perspective. Officials from OMB,FDA, and USDA told us that the FSWG’s July 2009 “key findings” represent thegovernmentwide plan for food safety. However, most of the goals outlined inthe key findings are not results oriented and do not include performancemeasures. Further, the FSWG has not provided information about theresources that are needed to achieve its goals. Our prior work has identifiedresults oriented goals and performance measures and a discussion of strategies and resources as standard elements of performance plans.GAO and other organizations have identified options to reduce fragmentationand overlap in food safety oversight in the form of alternative organizationalstructures, but a detailed analysis of their advantages, disadvantages, andpotential implementation challenges has yet to be conducted. GAO hassuggested that Congress consider commissioning the National Academy of Sciences or a blue ribbon panel to conduct a detailed analysis of alternativeorganizational structures for food safety. Some of the alternativeorganizational structures include a single food safety agency, a food safetyinspection agency, a data collection and risk analysis center, and acoordination mechanism led by a central chair. GAO recognizes thatreorganizing federal food safety responsibilities would be a complex processthat could have short-term disruptions and transition costs. GAO and otherorganizations have regularly paired proposals for alternative food safetyorganizations with calls for comprehensive, unified, risk-based food safetylegislation. New food safety legislation that was signed into law in January2011 strengthens a major part of the food safety system; however, it does notapply to the federal food safety system as a whole or create a new risk-basedfood safety structure.
ViewGAO-11-289or key components.For more information, contact Lisa Shames at(202) 512-3841 or shamesl@gao.gov.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->