Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
9Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Infosys Technologies: The Implementation Challenges of Knowledge Management Initiatives case solutions

Infosys Technologies: The Implementation Challenges of Knowledge Management Initiatives case solutions

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2,274 |Likes:
Published by mahtaabk

More info:

Published by: mahtaabk on Mar 20, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/15/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
Management Information Systems
Case Analysis:
 
Infosys Technologies: The implementation challenges of knowledge management initiatives
Indian Institute of ManagementKozhikode
Submitted By:
Kavya SS PGP/14/276 Kritika Gupta PGP /14/277Kulbhushan Baghel PGP/14/278 Lokesh Singh PGP /14/279Mahtaab Kajla PGP/14/280
Submitted to: Dr.Radhakrishna Pillai R
 
 
1
Management Information Systems| 20/08/2010 
Q1. Why do you think the knowledge management system at Infosys faced such seriousimplementation challenges? Defend your answer with examples from the case.Answer:
When we dole out monetary incentives to promote any scheme, it leads to unplannedand uncontrolled growth leading to management problems. This sometimes leads toinefficiency and dilution in quality ultimately resulting in loss of credibility.The knowledge management (KM) group of Infosys first thought that by promoting the KShopwith Knowledge Currency Units (KCU), which could be accumulated and exchanged formonetary rewards, would increase the knowledge sharing on the portal. But this led to overcontribution which resulted in employees experiencing information overload and consequently,higher search costs for reusable knowledge. Secondly, the explosive growth in the no. of contributions began to place a heavy burden on the limited number of volunteer reviewers.This lead to a lax in the quality control of the shared knowledge, which resulted in knowledgedegradation. Also when questionable articles began to be rated consistently higher, thecredibility of the rating system itself came into question. There was also a fear that one of thecore values of the organization involving
the company’s asking culture would deteriorate.
Q2. What steps did the KM group at Infosys take to improve participation in the KMsystem? Why were some of these initiatives counterproductive? The KM groupresponded with corrective initiatives. Do you think these will succeed? Why or why not?Answer:
To increase participation in the in the KM system, the KM group at Infosys introduced
“the knowledge currency unit (KCU)” incentive. According to the scheme, the employees who
contributed or reviewed contributions to KShop would be awarded KCUs which employeescould accumulate and exchange for monetary rewards and prizes. Also to motivate theemployees, their cumulative KCUs were displayed on a scoreboard on KShop which increasedtheir visibility and hence their standing in the organization. This served to becounterproductive as an extremely large number of employees started contributing materialdue to the monetary gain which got published irrespective of its quality thus leading to highersearch costs and deplorable quality.The most important of corrective actions was to distance the knowledge sharing from themonetary incentives to protect the spirit of community in the company by reducing the numberof KCUs awarded for reviewing contributions and increasing the minimum standard for cashingthe KCU points. They reevaluated the KCU score so that the contributions were reviewed not only by volunteer reviewers and colleagues, but also by the end users. They also began todemand tangible proofs for any high ratings to increase the accountability of the reviewers.These initiatives would work as this would lead to contributions and reviews by only seriousemployees who genuinely wanted to share knowledge.

Activity (9)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Renee Solange liked this
Daniel Marin liked this
Daniel Marin liked this
Gloria Ramirez liked this
Sims AlumniCell liked this
Sina H. liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->