LINCOLN V DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, Et Al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - DCCD Guilford 10d Lincoln - PDF - Merged

m
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
co
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
w.
HONORABLE ANDREW J. GUILFORD, JUDGE PRESIDING; COURTROOM 100
CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT
Bo
CHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN III,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
F og No. SACV 10-1573-AG(PLAx)
he
DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL INFORMATION

SYSTEMS INC., ET AL
T
Defendant(s) .
of
REPORTER'S DAILY TRANSCRIPT OF PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS

SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2011
ds
ien
Fr
DENISE PADDOCK
CSR 10199, CMRS, RMR, CRR
transcripts@ocrecord.com
U.S. DISTRICT COURT REPORTER
m
A P PEA RAN C E S
co
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN
SACV 10-1573-AG(PLAx)
IN BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF: Philip J Berg
w.
Law Offices of Philip J Berg
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
610-825-3134
Fax: 610-834-7659
Bo
Email: philjberg@gmail.com
IN BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT: Orly Taitz:

Law Offices of Dr. Orly Taitz
og
26302 La Paz, Suite 211
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
949-683-5411
Email: drtaitz@yahoo.com
F
William C Haggerty
Ford, Walker, Haggerty & Behar
he
1 World Trade Ctr, 27th Floor
Long Beach, CA 90831-2700
562-983-2500
Email: bill@fwhb.com
T
Jonathan A Ross
Bradley and Gmelich
700 N Brand Blvd, 10th Floor
of
Glendale, CA 91203-1202
818-243-5200
Fax: 818-243-5266
Email: jross@bglawyers.com
ds
ien
Fr
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
1
m
1 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA; MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2011
co
2 THE CLERK: Item 7, SACV 10-1573-AG(PLAx):
3 Charles Edward Lincoln, III v Daylight Chemical Information
w.
Systems, Inc., et al.
09:49 5 MR. ROSS: Good morning, Your Honor.
6 Jonathan Ross on behalf of Defendants Yosef Taitz
Bo
7 and Daylight Chemical Information Systems.
8 MR. BERG: Philip Berg on behalf of the Plaintiff,
og
9 Charles Lincoln, subject to the ruling on my pro hac vice,
09:49 10 Your Honor.

F
11 MR. HAGGERTY: William Haggerty, Your Honor,
12 substituting in on behalf of Lewis Brisbois for Orly Taitz

he
13 and the Law Offices of Orly Taitz.
14 I apologize to the court. The substitution was

T
09:49 15 electronically filed but not filed directly here with this
16 department, so I don't think that you have the signed

of
17 substitution.
18 THE CLERK: We're just waiting for the e-mail

ds
19 copies, Judge. He was going to send it when he got back to
095020 his office.

ien
21 THE COURT: All right. We have a couple of items
22 to address today.
23 I would like to address the pending petition for

Fr
24 pro hac vice admission.
095025 I also want to engage in our normal scheduling

2
m
1 conference where we set a trial date and make those kinds of
co
2 determinations.
3 And before I do that, I would like to ask what is
w.
the likelihood that this will continue to be a federal
09:50 5 action?
6 Mr. Berg, there was a motion to dismiss brought
Bo
7 against your RICO claims. I granted that motion, but granted
8 leave to amend. If -- if this is in federal court, only
og
9 based on that RICO claim, it is in federal court by a very
0950 10 thin thread.

F
11 When I asked you about this the last time you were
12 here, I must say I was very puzzled when you said there was a
he
13 malicious prosecution claim, which I think would have nothing
14 to do with federal jurisdiction.

T
0951 15 MR. BERG: You're right and I apologize,
16 Your Honor.
of
17 THE COURT: So what is the likelihood that this
18 will remain in my court?

ds
19 MR. BERG: If the RICO claim -- we have to file an
0951 20 amended complaint. We have two more weeks to do that,

ien
21 Your Honor, and I anticipate a motion to dismiss after that.
22 If the RICO claim is out, then we still have a case
23 here -- and I wasn't up on it last time -- based on

Fr
24 diversity, Your Honor.
0951 25 Charles Lincoln resides in Texas and the other

3
m
1 actions are here in California, so we would have diversity
co
2 jurisdiction.
3 THE COURT: Any response from the defense about
w.
diversity jurisdiction?
09:51 5 And to be honest, let me say this. I'm going from
6 memory now, Mr. Berg, so I could be wrong. I don't think
Bo
7 your original complaint alleged diversity. I think the
8 defense anticipated a diversity claim and kind of talked
og
9 about it, even though it wasn't clearly set forth in your
0952 10 complaint.
F
11 Your failure to set it forth made me think that we
12 weren't facing diversity issues.

he
13 Yes.
14 MS. TAITZ: I didn't have a chance to introduce

T
0952 15 myself, and I'm Orly Taitz and I'm representing
16 Appealing Dentistry.
of
17 I would like to state that diversity was not in the
18 complaint; it was not in the first amended complaint either.

ds
19 And it came about just now and I have already presented this
095220 court with evidence that Mr. Lincoln ran for office here in
ien
21 the State of California last year when he filed his
22 complaint.
23 In order to run for office, he had to file a -- the

Fr
24 document's showing he's the permanent resident of California.
095225 Additionally, he filed numerous legal actions as a

4
m
1 resident of California.
co
2 Third, Mr. Lincoln was sanctioned nearly a quarter
3 of a million dollars in the state of Texas. 150,000
w.
THE COURT: What does that have to do with
09:53 5 diversity?
6 MS. TAITZ: His main occupation is filing this type
Bo
7 of lawsuits. He was prevented
8 THE COURT: My understanding of diversity you're
og
9 not fitting into.
0953 10 MS. TAITZ: If I -- if I can get leeway of just a

F
11 moment.
12 He is not allowed to file any lawsuits in the state

he
13 of Texas. His main occupation is filing lawsuits, so he has
14 no job in the state of Texas; he has no business in the state

T
0953 15 of Texas. He is not allowed to file his -- his -- his only
16 occupation is filing these type of frivolous lawsuits. He

of
17 was prevented
18 THE COURT: I gave you some leeway here. You're

ds
19 still not talking diversity to me. You're talking all sorts
095320 of other things, but that last little bit of information

ien
21 isn't helping me in a diversity analysis.
22 MS. TAITZ: For diversity he needs to be resident
23 of the state of Texas. He needs to reside there.

Fr
24 THE COURT: I understand and nothing that you said
095425 provided any evidence to me at all that he wasn't living in

5
m
1 Texas -- or residing in Texas.
co
2 MS. TAITZ: His own complaint shows --
3 THE COURT: Now you're back to something that's
w.
relevant. The first issues were relevant when you were
09:54 5 saying that his complaint says this, but when you went off on
6 that sanction deal you lost me on diversity.
Bo
7 Let's try and focus here.
8 MS. TAITZ: All I tried to state is that he has no
og
9 occupation in the state of Texas because he is not allowed to
0954 10 work there. His only occupation is filing lawsuits. He was

F
11 told he is not allowed to file in the state of Texas, federal
12 or state court.
he
13 THE COURT: I understand.
14 MS. TAITZ: But also, according to his complaint,

T
0954 15 he has been residing in California during this year.
16 THE COURT: Okay. You said that at the beginning

of
17 and I got that. That will be very relevant to a diversity
18 analysis.
ds
19 So, Mr. Berg, you're going -- someone will be
095420 filing a complaint, an amended complaint, and we will look at

ien
21 the jurisdiction issue first. First we'll look at whether
22 RICO is going to survive a second motion to dismiss; and, in
23 doing that, please understand two big cases

Fr
24 MR. BERG: I do understand them now.
095525 THE COURT: -- Iqbal/Twombly. If you Google them

6
m
1 you will get tens of thousands of hits and that's all that
co
2 district courts are paying attention to these days.
3 MR. BERG: Your Honor, I did that as soon as I left
w.
here last time and I apologize.
09:55 5 THE COURT: We'll check and see if RICO still
6 survives and if it doesn't on the diversity issue, we'll then
Bo
7 have to look at the diversity issue.
8 You've gotten a preview of some of the things we
og
9 might hear on the diversity issue.
0955 10 That's not before me now. I was just thinking

F
11 maybe we would get some early determination that you were
12 going to state court, which is a very good court across the

he
13 street.
14 This court is very protective of federal

T
0955 15 jurisdiction. The law requires that I be protective of
16 federal jurisdiction.
of
17 From a federalist point of view the law requires
18 that I allow state courts to make rulings in matters where

ds
19 state courts have traditionally made rulings.
095620 So those will all be thoughts that I have in mind.

ien
21 Okay. Now let's turn to the pro hac vice
22 application.
23 Mr. Berg, you have filed a letter on February 24th,

Fr
24 2011.
095625 You're aware of that letter?

7
m
1 MR. BERG: Yes, Your Honor.
co
2 THE COURT: All right. I -- I think that letter is
3 an ex parte communication and so I am not going to accept the
w.
letter or pay heed to the arguments made in that.
09:56 5 You requested that the letter be sealed if it be
6 filed. I am not going to file it. I am not, therefore,
Bo
7 going to seal it but I am also not going to read it.
8 It's an ex parte communication.
og
9 MR. BERG: Your Honor, on that topic, I think we
0956 10 have -- a major problem has developed further by a filing at

F
11 7:30 this morning by Orly Taitz.
12 THE COURT: When I was taking the bench I heard

he
13 there was a filing at 7:30. I don't know what's in it.
14 You might realize, Counsel, or maybe you don't,

T
0957 15 that 6:00, 7:00 on Friday I'm getting ready for the hearing
16 here today. Over the weekend I'm reading things for the
of
17 hearing here today and when I get to court on Monday morning
18 I'm getting ready for, you know, 30 different hearings, so I

ds
19 did not read what was filed at 7:30.
095720 How does that create a problem?

ien
21 MR. BERG: Well, it creates a problem because
22 Orly Taitz has now continued to do what she's done ongoing.
23 In the -- on the page

Fr
24 THE COURT: Let me ask you this.
095725 MR. BERG: Yes.

8
m
1 THE COURT: Are you directing your argument to
co
2 whether I should read your February 24th letter?
3 That's the issue I'm raising. I've told you my
w.
ruling on that.
09:57 5 Do you wish to address that further?
6 MR. BERG: It probably doesn't matter in light of
Bo
7 what she filed this morning.
8 THE COURT: Okay. Then I'll stand by my ruling.
og
9 The letter will not be read or considered. I
0957 10 consider it to be an ex parte communication.

F
11 If I were to file it, I would not seal it. I would
12 not seal it.

he
13 MR. BERG: Okay.
14 THE COURT: So granting your wishes, I will not

T
0958 15 file it. Therefore, I will not seal it and I will also not
16 consider it.
of
17 MR. BERG: Let me -- let me just think that through
18 for a moment, only because of what she filed this morning.

ds
19 I believe that Orly Taitz has overstepped her
095820 bounds and the matter that the ex parte letter deals
ien
21 with -- a matter that is not public. It's a matter that is
22 private until the matter is resolved.
23 It deals with the disciplinary proceedings in

Fr
24 Pennsylvania.
095825 THE COURT: Well, are the existence of the

9
m
1 disciplinary proceedings --
co
2 MS. TAITZ: (Shakes head.)
3 THE COURT: You don't need to shake your head,
w.
Counsel.
09:58 5 Are the existence of the disciplinary proceedings
6 private? The existence is public.
Bo
7 MR. BERG: Once it is scheduled, that part is
8 public.
og
9 THE COURT: So the hearing has been scheduled.
0958 10 MR. BERG: Yes.

F
11 THE COURT: So the answer to my question is, yes,
12 the existence of the proceedings are public.

he
13 MR. BERG: Correct.
14 THE COURT: Is there anything you describe in your

T
0959 15 letter other than the fact that the proceeding's going
16 forward?
of
17 MR. BERG: No, but the problem --
18 THE COURT: Okay. But then I can't -- why would I

ds
19 seal it, Counsel?
095920 Let me also tell you something, and I would think

ien
21 all of you would understand the First Amendment to the
22 Constitution and public access to our courts, and I'm just
23 not inclined to seal things.

Fr
24 I think it leaves the impression with the public
095925 that the court is doing something behind closed doors. I

10
m
1 believe in a very open courtroom and I am not inclined to
co
2 seal documents unless extremely good cause is shown, and you
3 haven't shown me good cause for sealing your letter.
4 But, Your Honor -- now I remember
w.
MR. BERG: Okay.
09:59 5 the --
6 THE COURT: We're getting off track. Again, I want
Bo
7 to focus on the motion pro hac vice and I want to focus on
8 the scheduling conference.
og
9 MR. BERG: Based on that and my thoughts, because I
0959 10 now remember the full content of that letter, which goes to a
F
11 resolution, I would like it not to be read, not to be filed.
12 THE COURT: Your letter to me?

he
13 MR. BERG: To you.
14 THE COURT: It sounds like we're in agreement.

T
1000 15 MR. BERG: Okay.
16 THE COURT: Done.

of
17 MR. BERG: Now, the next part of this, though, is
18 that the filing this morning at 7:30 -- and I happened to

ds
19 check the docket -- Ms. Orly Taitz has overstated. I
100020 believe, Your Honor, and I don't have it with me. Maybe
ien
21 THE COURT: Let me ask, what do the papers go to?
22 Again, Ms. Taitz, I don't -- it's hard for me to
23 read things filed at 7:30.

Fr
24 What does the issue go to?
100025 MS. TAITZ: I was not planning for you to

11
m
1 read it at 7:30.
co
2 This is actually in writing what I was planning to
3 present here in court. As you stated the parties need to
w.
provide information in regards to the disciplinary hearing.
10:00 5 So I provided -- I called
6 THE COURT: Why did you wait until 7:30 to provide
Bo
7 that?
8 MS. TAITZ: I had to travel to Arizona. I was
og
9 meeting with a government --
1000 10 THE COURT: That doesn't matter. This court is

F
11 important too.
12 MS. TAITZ: I was not planning to make it --

he
13 THE REPORTER: I can't hear you very well.
14 THE COURT: Why don't you step to the microphone.

T
1000 15 Step aside, Mr. Berg.
16 MS. TAITZ: It was just a written version of what I

of
17 was planning to provide here, pursuant to your orders,
18 Your Honor. You asked to provide the court with the status
ds
19 information in regards to disciplinary board hearing against
1001 20 Mr. Berg in the superior court of Pennsylvania.

ien
21 THE COURT: All right.
22 MS. TAITZ: I called them and they provided a copy
23 of the petition for discipline against him. They provided

Fr
24 his answer. And as part of his answer the -- they also
1001 25 provided a sworn affidavit by his paralegal, Lisa Liberi,

12
m
1 that states that she is his paralegal, that she's been
co
2 working with him since 2006.
3 The case --
w.
THE COURT: Okay. So you filed additional
10:01 5 information on the pro hac vice motion.
6 MS. TAITZ: Yes, yes.
Bo
7 THE COURT: That's what I need to know.
8 Mr. Berg, I'm sorry to interrupt you. I just
og
9 wanted to see if this was relevant to the two matters here
1001 10 today, the scheduling conference and the pro hac vice motion.
F
11 MR. BERG: I think the order was for me to supply
12 data by last week, last -- I'm sorry -- Thursday or Friday.

he
13 So first off, hers would be late; but I don't
14 believe you've directed Ms. Taitz to file responses.

T
1002 15 THE COURT: Go ahead.
16 MR. BERG: I believe it was just for me to file a

of
17 response.
18 And what Ms. Taitz did, according to an excerpt of

ds
19 her letter here -- and I think, Your Honor, she has
100220 overstepped, because the proceedings I'm talking about, part

ien
21 is public and part are private -- the fact of a hearing is
22 public.
23 Your Honor, in the response she filed today she

Fr
24 says, in part "judge on this case requested" -- "Taitz called
100225 Mare," M-a-r-e -- M-a-r-c-e (ph), "Marcee Sloan and advised

13
m
1 her that Attorney Berg filed a pro hac vice in a federal
co
2 district court in California and the judge on this case
3 requested an update regarding the status of the disciplinary
4 board hearing against Berg."
w.
10:02 5 I believe, and I have not had time to check it,
6 Your Honor --
Bo
7 THE COURT: Can I sum up and say you don't believe
8 I should review those papers in determining your pro hac vice
og
9 application?
1003 10 MR. BERG: Yes, that's part of it, Your Honor; but
F
11 the other part --
12 THE COURT: Okay. So that's request No.1.

he
13 I just need to know what we're discussing. You
14 folks have a tendency to unravel into a million different

T
1003 15 aspects of your feud with each other.
16 We're focusing now on your pro hac vice.

of
17 You say I should not read those papers.
18 I will consider your request.

ds
19 What is the next point?
100320 MR. BERG: But the problem is, I believe -- and

ien
21 we'll check it further -- that she conveyed to the
22 disciplinary board that she was calling on your behalf,
23 Your Honor, because those documents that were sent to her

Fr
24 should not have been sent to her because they were
100325 confidential documents; and I believe if you had gotten them

14
m
1 or you had read them that they would not become part of the
co
2 record because --
3 THE COURT: You've made a request that I not
w.
consider the documents. Are you also making another request
10:03 5 to this court?
6 MR. BERG: I'm making a request that this court
Bo
7 find out how they got those materials, because by getting
8 those materials she's now filed it and it's now allover the
og
9 Internet. This has been published and it's spread -- because
1004 10 that's what she does.

F
11 This document has been filed in your case and
12 already it's allover the Internet, and I think that by doing

he
13 that she violated her oath as an attorney because she knows
14 the disciplinary board proceedings are private. And also I

T
1004 15 believe she conveyed that she was calling on your behalf,
16 Your Honor, and I would like the court to make that inquiry
of
17 because if she was filing on your behalf I think sanctions
18 should go against her.

ds
19 THE COURT: I will take that request under
100420 consideration.
ien
21 Is there anything else you would like to say on
22 your pro hac vice motion?
23 MR. BERG: No. On my motion I submitted, I

Fr
24 believe that -- I would request this court to grant me pro
100425 hac vice in this case.

15
m
1 There is a public record. There is a disciplinary
co
2 proceeding pending, but until the matter is resolved I am
3 still in good standing. I have been practicing law now for
4 40 -- well, 39 and a half years, Your Honor, and I've had --
w.
10:05 5 this matter is before the court at that time.
6 THE COURT: All right. Now, when you say that, an
Bo
7 attorney can be in good standing with the sanction orders
8 that have been imposed against you?
og
9 MR. BERG: No -- yes, I am in good standing. There
1005 10 is -- no sanction order has been against me in this

F
11 proceeding.
12 THE COURT: Can an attorney be in good standing

he
13 when a court has said, "This court has grown weary of
14 Mr. Berg's continuous and brazen disrespect towards this

T
1005 15 court and his own clients. Mr. Berg's own actions including
16 the instant motion for reconsideration serve to divert

of
17 judicial resources from legitimate matters, and this court
18 cannot in good conscience allow this conduct to go

ds
19 unpublished"?
100520 Now, my question is -- it's a legal question -- I

ien
21 don't mean to prejudge or preload.
22 Can you be in good standing when a judge has issued
23 such a statement?
Fr
24 MR. BERG: Where are you reading from? What case
100525 is that, Your Honor, if I may?

16
m
1 THE COURT: I believe that is the Holsworth versus
co
2 Berg case out of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
3 MR. BERG: That that case has long been
w.
resolved, Your Honor.
10:06 5 THE COURT: Okay. So just --
6 MR. BERG: Okay.
Bo
7 THE COURT: Let's be clear: Your answer's, "Yes,
8 Your Honor, I can be in good standing despite that order."
og
9 MR. BERG: Yes, Your Honor.
1006 10 THE COURT: And you can say, "Your Honor" -- you're
F
11 in practice for many decades; along the way a judge might
12 sanction you and that does not make you not in good standing.
he
13 I'm just asking that question and I think I just
14 gave your answer.

T
1006 15 MR. BERG: Yes.
16 THE COURT: Okay. All right.

of
17 Anything else, then, on the good standing issue?
18 And also the way you just phrased your answer a few
ds
19 moments ago, it -- are you conceding that it's possible
100620 following this disciplinary matter you would not be in good

ien
21 standing?
22 MR. BERG: No.
23 THE COURT: That's not possible?

Fr
24 MR. BERG: I guess it's possible.
100625 THE COURT: Well, if the ruling goes against you,

17
m
1 you would then not be in good standing because you would then
co
2 not be allowed to practice; right?
3 MR. BERG: Well, if the ruling would go against me,
w.
then there is a whole -- there's a whole -- remember, in this
10:07 5 United States of America you're innocent until proven guilty.
6 There's a process. That would be a hearing. After that
Bo
7 hearing there's an appeal process and then there is another
8 appeal process.
og
9 THE COURT: Okay. Let me ask you this -- I ' l l
1007 10 leave it at that.

F
11 MR. BERG: Your honor -- and until the final appeal
12 is over, there's -- no action is taken.

he
13 THE COURT: All right. Is your client here in
14 court today?
T
1007 15 MR. BERG: No, he is not.
16 THE COURT: Okay, that's fine. Clients don't need

of
17 to be here in court.
18 MR. BERG: I had asked him to be here.

ds
19 THE COURT: Part of my concern is my -- frankly,
100720 should I even be allowing you to make an appearance? because

ien
21 the pro hac vice is not granted. But I also think in the
22 United States you're innocent until proven guilty and so I'm
23 allowing you to make your appearances until we make a ruling

Fr
24 on that.
100725 All right. Anything else on the pro hac vice, and

18
m
1 the answer is no?
co
2 MR. BERG: No.
3 THE COURT: All right. Let's turn then to the
w.
defense, focusing only on the pro hac vice. I've read your
10:07 5 papers; they are voluminous. There are some sanction orders.
6 Let me ask you, can an attorney be a member in good
Bo
7 standing and eligible to practice before a court after a
8 sanction order has issued with those words?
og
9 MS. TAITZ: I don't know the rules of the
1008 10 Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

F
11 THE COURT: Well, the rules of this court are what
12 I just said. He has to be in good standing.

he
13 Do you think it's possible he could be in good
14 standing after such a sanction order is issued?

T
1008 15 MS. TAITZ: I'm sorry, Your Honor, I don't know the
16 answer.
of
17 THE COURT: Okay. Good answer.
18 MS. TAITZ: But if I might state, the sanction

ds
19 proceedings are open to the public. I have called the
100820 disciplinary board, I have talked to the secretary of the

ien
21 board, and I talked to the coordinator. As a matter of fact,
22 I asked if I can travel to the hearing and they said, yes, it
23 is open to the public.

Fr
24 So Mr. Berg's statement that this is not open, it's
100825 not true.

19
m
1 They posted on the Website an announcement that
co
2 there is a hearing by the disciplinary board.
3 I have called, I have stated that Mr. Berg --
w.
what's written in the papers -- asked for pro hac vice. The
10:09 5 judge on the case wants to know the status of the case and
6 she has e-mailed me a copy of the complaint and a copy of his
Bo
7 answer. But what is most troubling and what this individual
8 has done for the last year and a half he is working with a
og
9 convicted document forger, a woman by the name of --
1009 10 THE COURT: All right. So you believe that if

F
11 someone hires a document forger they cannot be in good
12 standing to practice before their home state?

he
13 That's the standard I'm applying here.
14 MS. TAITZ: Well, that's why there are proceedings

T
1009 15 against Mr. Berg. The disciplinary board of the Supreme
16 Court of Pennsylvania has suggested from --

of
17 THE COURT: I'm not hearing a yes-or-no answer to
18 my question.
ds
19 MS. TAITZ: Well, they have asked the probation
101020 department to forward the file to them, so there is a

ien
21 notation in her file that it was forwarded to the Supreme
22 Court of Pennsylvania. They found this out just recently,
23 and I believe that more evidence is going to be coming and

Fr
24 there might be more charges against Mr. Berg with the
101025 disciplinary board of Pennsylvania.

20
m
1 So it is my understanding that that particular
co
2 hearing was postponed to March. They are providing more
3 evidence. My understanding is that his -- that there will be
w.
sanctions against Mr. Berg and that's why I'm asking this
10: 10 5 honorable court not to grant Mr. Berg pro hac vice until the
6 disciplinary action against him is resolved.
Bo
7 THE COURT: Now, when you say that, are you
8 conceding that your opposition to his pro hac vice depends on
og
9 that disciplinary hearing and nothing else?
1011 10 MS. TAITZ: Well, this -- Your Honor, you have --

F
11 THE COURT: Boy, it sure would be nice if you could
12 say "yes" or "no" and then give an explanation, but I'll

he
13 listen to the explanation.
14 MS. TAITZ: Actually, it doesn't because he was

T
1011 15 already sanctioned twice by the federal court system.
16 THE COURT: So it seems to me your argument should

of
17 be if I can't deny it based on the previous sanctions then
18 don't grant it until I hear the results of the hearing.

ds
19 MS. TAITZ: Actually, that might be one answer.
10 11 20 Another answer is you have a right to deny pro hac vice based
ien
21 on the fact that he was already sanctioned twice.
22 THE COURT: You didn't hear what I said.
23 That's exactly what I just said.

Fr
24 Okay. Go ahead.
10 11 25 Anything else on the pro hac vice?

21
m
1 MS. TAITZ: Just to give an idea of the level of
co
2 malice that I have experienced coming from Mr. Berg, not only
3 he's using a convicted document forger, Lisa Liberi, who is
w.
currently on probation until March 21st
10: 12 5 THE COURT: Do you think when I, in this court,
6 find someone guilty of forging documents, it's then my
Bo
7 responsibility to make sure they never get another job?
8 MS. TAITZ: No, that's not what I'm saying.
og
9 What I'm saying, Your Honor, is that the history of
101210 filings and pleadings filed by Mr. Berg in a case that is

F
11 somewhat related to this in Pennsylvania, shows that not only
12 this woman was convicted, they continued filing forged

he
13 documents of perjured affidavits.
14 He is claiming that she is working in his office in

T
101215 Pennsylvania while she is on probation, not allowed to live
16 there in Pennsylvania. According to the terms of her

of
17 probation, this woman can reside only in California or
18 New Mexico and she had to file an affidavit with the

ds
19 disciplinary board saying that she is right there in
101320 Pennsylvania working in his office. And that is related to a

ien
21 prior case where there was misconduct by him and he is using
22 her to sort of support his point.
23 So it's not only that this woman was convicted of

Fr
24 forgery before. This is an ongoing conduct that is
101325 greatly -- greatly undermines the court and that caused

22
m
1 enormous emotional distress and financial damages to a lot of
co
2 people.
3 THE COURT: Well, believe me, this court is very
w.
firm in its opposition to perjury and I think it's decisions
10: 13 5 regularly reflect that; but it seems to me you're making a
6 "guilt by association" argument; is that correct?
Bo
7 MS. TAITZ: No. No. If you --
8 THE COURT: You're not saying Mr. Berg filed those
og
9 fraudulent documents?
101310 MS. TAITZ: Yes. Yes, he did. Mr. Berg has filed
F
11 a perjured affidavit.
12 THE COURT: Well, then what does that have to do

he
13 with this other woman?
14 MS. TAITZ: Well, in his perjured -- in his

T
101415 disciplinary proceeding a complaint was filed because he
16 didn't answer to the

of
17 THE COURT: So maybe I should focus on what
18 Mr. Berg has done rather than what someone he has hired
ds
19 MS. TAITZ: Oh, I am just saying that not only he
101420 is committing perjury, he is subordinating perjury by using a

ien
21 document forger who is concurring with him in her sworn
22 affidavit. Both of them have filed sworn affidavits with the
23 disciplinary board of Pennsylvania saying that, indeed, he

Fr
24 has responded to his client, that the client accused him of
101425 defrauding her, that his case was dismissed because he didn't

23
m
1 file proper motion and that he defrauded her and for a year
co
2 kept lying to her and telling her that the case is going on.
3 THE COURT: Okay.
w.
MS. TAITZ: So he committed perjury by saying, no,
10: 14 5 I provided this information to the client, and he brought a
6 statement from this -- from this forger, this woman who has
Bo
7 ten felony convictions in forgery and theft and is not
8 allowed to reside in Pennsylvania, who filed a statement
og
9 saying I am his assistant in his office, and, yes, Mr. Berg
101510 filed proper documents and called the -- the -- the client
F
11 and didn't do anything wrong.
12 THE COURT: Okay. Let me ask this. Mr. Berg says

he
13 that you told the disciplinary folks in Pennsylvania that you
14 were calling on my behalf.

T
101515 Is that true?
16 MS. TAITZ: No, that's not what I said.

of
17 THE COURT: Okay. I'll take your answer, "no."
18 You're denying that.

ds
19 Let me just say to all parties here, please be very
101520 careful about what you attribute to this court. You have
ien
21 absolute First Amendment rights to talk about this case and I
22 wouldn't be surprised if on the Internet you're already doing
23 that.
Fr
24 Just be very careful, particularly when you're
101525 talking to folks like disciplinary boards about what you say

24
m
1 about what this court has done.
co
2 If I see people are gathering information or using
3 misstatements about this court to their advantage that's
w.
something I'm going to have to deal with.
10: 15 5 Do you have anything further to say on the issue of
6 the pro hac vice application?
Bo
7 MS. TAITZ: Yes.
8 THE COURT: I've read all your papers. They're
og
9 very thorough, very complete. I've read them all completely.
101610 You can see I've tabbed them.

F
11 Anything else on the pro hac vice applications?
12 MS. TAITZ: Yes. Pro hac vice was not granted to

he
13 Mr. Berg, and specifically you issued a notice saying you
14 declined to grant it and therefore the client

T
101615 THE COURT: Now I'm confused.
16 What pro hac vice wasn't granted?

of
17 MS. TAITZ: It was not granted. You stated that
18 you declined to grant until there is a hearing, until you

ds
19 know what's happening with the disciplinary board in
101620 Pennsylvania.
ien
21 THE COURT: Well, that's sort of what I said, but
22 go ahead.
23 MS. TAITZ: Therefore the client, Mr. Lincoln, was

Fr
24 supposed to be here in court.
101625 THE COURT: I've already ruled on that. He need

25
m
1 not be here.
co
2 Go ahead.
3 MS. TAITZ: I have filed one more motion.
w.
Mr. Lincoln is ordered in contempt of court and
10: 16 5 THE COURT: What's the motion? Is that pending
6 before me right now?
Bo
7 MS. TAITZ: Yes, it was -- it was filed.
8 THE COURT: When did you file this?
og
9 MS. TAITZ: I think it was two weeks ago on the
101710 20th.
F
11 THE COURT: The motion is what?
12 MS. TAITZ: To extend $150,000 of sanctions against

he
13 Mr. Lincoln that were assessed against him by the chief
14 judge of the Western District of Texas.

T
101715 THE COURT: No. I'm not the enforcement arm for
16 that court. I enforce my own orders.

of
17 So you'll have to go back to that court.
18 All right.
ds
19 Anything else on the motion pro hac vice?
101720 MR. HAGGERTY: No, Your Honor.

ien
21 MR. BERG: Just a brief response.
22 Ms. Taitz was alluding to facts that don't exist at
23 this time. I mean, she's talking about a document being

Fr
24 forged and submitting documents
101725 THE COURT: Okay.

26
m
1 MR. BERG: Thank you.
co
2 THE COURT: Let me ask this.
3 I'm troubled by getting filings at 7:30 in the
w.
morning and Ms. Taitz talking about this motion and that
10: 17 5 motion.
6 What would the parties think if I issued an order
Bo
7 that you need to seek leave of this court before you filed a
8 document?
og
9 Do you have anything to say about that, Mr. Berg?
101810 MR. BERG: I would encourage that.

F
11 THE COURT: All right.
12 And, Ms. Taitz, or any defendant?

he
13 MR. ROSS: Yes, Your Honor.
14 Jonathan Ross on behalf of Defendant Yosef Taitz

T
101815 and Daylight Chemical.
16 THE COURT: Do you understand what I'm considering

of
17 to propose? We're now here at a scheduling conference
18 determining how this case will progress.

ds
19 The volume of documents, right and left, including
101820 at 7:30 this morning, make it difficult for the court to keep
ien
21 up. I find some of the documents unnecessary.
22 What about an order that you must first have leave
23 of this court before you file anything?

Fr
24 MR. ROSS: Well, Your Honor, my concern is solely
101825 as to my clients. We've only filed one motion, the original

27
m
1 motion to dismiss which the court granted outside of one
co
2 cause of action quantum meruit, but not as to --
3 THE COURT: So you oppose that idea?
w.
MR. ROSS: As to my client I oppose that idea. We
10: 18 5 have not been abusive.
6 THE COURT: Other defendants?
Bo
7 MS. TAITZ: I oppose because I have experience with
8 Mr. Berg in Pennsylvania where we -- I asked
og
9 THE COURT: Mr. Berg is willing to submit to an
101910 order from me hold on. Hold on. That's another little
F
11 thing. You have to wait until I finish talking. I'm doing
12 most of the listening but occasionally I get to talk.

he
13 Mr. Berg agreed to submit to an order from me that
14 there will be no filings without my approval.

T
101915 Go ahead.
16 MS. TAITZ: What Mr. Berg does, in reality, he

of
17 submitted in Pennsylvania and then he continued filing
18 emergency letters.
ds
19 THE COURT: He wouldn't be allowed to do that under
101920 the ruling I've made and he said he would accept it.
ien
21 MR. ROSS: He accepted it there and then he
22 continued filing emergency letters.
23 THE COURT: Then he would be sanctioned.

Fr
24 Do you have anything else to say about my proposal
101925 that leave of court be obtained before filing something?

28
m
1 MS. TAITZ: I'm just concerned because my -- my
co
2 problem was that he -- as a matter of fact, I understand I
3 understand that his assistant is the one that was filing
w.
those emergency letters. They were voluminous, and as I
10: 19 5 said -- I asked for it. The judge there in Pennsylvania
6 granted and -- as a matter of fact, he was not allowed to
Bo
7 file anything until the issue of jurisdiction is resolved.
8 THE COURT: Okay. Now we're getting off track.
og
9 I will not yet impose that order but I am going to
1020 10 consider that order based on the filings I get in the future.
F
11 So be alert to the fact that we may ultimately
12 impose that order.

he
13 We now turn to the scheduling conference, Counsel,
14 and we do have lots of other folks out here and I apologize

T
1020 15 to you all that these initial matters have taken some time.
16 But moving along, I see both sides agree that this

of
17 is a jury trial and they have proposed that it be tried on
18 May 12th, 2012, and they are talking about a five- to six-day
ds
19 trial.
102020 Is that the agreement of the parties?

ien
21 MS. TAITZ: No, Your Honor, because it was
22 agreement was reached before you dismissed the case. Now
23 there is no case.
Fr
24 Depending on what will be filed and what will be --
102025 THE COURT: So what do you propose for

29
m
1 a trial date?
co
2 MS. TAITZ: I believe we need to postpone
3 THE COURT: Okay. We're at a scheduling
w.
conference.
10:20 5 My order says a trial date will be set at the
6 scheduling conference, so we will set a trial date.
Bo
7 What do the defense propose? I thought the defense
8 was in agreement that it would be March 12th.
og
9 MR. HAGGERTY: I am in agreement with that,
1021 10 Your Honor.

F
11 Bill Haggerty on behalf of the Law Offices of Orly
12 Taitz and Orly Taitz as an individual.

he
13 However, we are waiting a second amended complaint.
14 THE COURT: I understand.

T
1021 15 MR. HAGGERTY: And I don't
16 THE COURT: That is often the case.

of
17 MR. HAGGERTY: So I don't know. If we're just
18 talking about a quantum meruit claim it's going to be less

ds
19 than five or six days.
1021 20 THE COURT: Okay.

ien
21 MR. HAGGERTY: If there's 12 or 13 causes of action
22 that somehow he is able to plead, it might go to five or
23 six days, so it is difficult at this time to let Your Honor

Fr
24 know if I agree with that.
1021 25 THE COURT: Okay. I understand. Fair enough.

30
m
1 That parallels what Ms. Taitz said.
co
2 Ms. Bredahl, is March 12th a Tuesday?
3 THE CLERK: No, it's a Monday.
w.
THE COURT: We start our trials on Tuesday.
10:21 5 We're going to start this trial on March 13th,
6 2012.
Bo
7 We are going to set it for six days. It will be a
8 jury trial.
og
9 The pretrial conference -- and you want to write
1022 10 this down -- will take place on --

F
11 THE CLERK: February 27th.
12 THE COURT: -- February 27th, 2012.

he
13 And the discovery cutoff will be --
14 THE CLERK: December 13th.

T
1022 15 THE COURT: December 13th, 2011.
16 If you fill in those dates on the front page of the

of
17 scheduling order which is available here when you check in,
18 it will produce other dates and it will also produce other

ds
19 rules on how to conduct the litigation.
102220 So I urge you -- in fact, I order you to be

ien
21 familiar with the dates produced by that scheduling order
22 besides what we've just done here.
23 Now, I'll say to you and I'll say to everyone else

Fr
24 in the courtroom here on a scheduling conference, when
102225 parties appear for scheduling conference I also order them to

31
m
1 discuss the resolution of this case when they leave.
co
2 You will not have a trial in this court unless
3 you've appeared before a third party mediator to discuss
w.
settlement.
10:22 5 Now is a good time to begin those discussions,
6 perhaps even to settle the case as you leave. So I'm
Bo
7 ordering the parties here to talk to Mr. Berg and discuss the
8 possibilities of how this case might be resolved and also to
og
9 discuss what third party mediator might be involved as the
1023 10 trial date of May 13th approaches.

F
11 All right. I'm going to take the --
12 MR. BERG: Your Honor

he
13 THE COURT: Yes.
14 MR. BERG: you said May 13th.

T
1023 15 THE COURT: I meant March 13.
16 MR. BERG: I apologize.

of
17 THE COURT: No, no, please. That was a good point.
18 Mr. Berg, I'm going to take the matter of your pro

ds
19 hac vice admission under submission and rule on that shortly.
102320 I did have a question. I believe somewhere I read

ien
21 that Mr. Lincoln was an extern to numerous federal judges.
22 Is that true?
23 MR. BERG: That is correct.

Fr
24 THE COURT: So he was an extern to Judge Reinhardt.
102325 Do you know when?

32
m
1 MR. BERG: I don't have that in front of me,
co
2 Your Honor.
3 THE COURT: And do you know what other federal
w.
judge he was an extern to?
10:23 5 MR. BERG: I'm not sure. I can get that to you
6 later today.
Bo
7 THE COURT: That's not important.
8 So we've argued the admission of the pro hac vice,
og
9 we've set our trial date, and Mr. -- I'm sorry, was it
1024 10 Mr. Ross?

F
11 MR. ROSS: Yes, Your Honor, me?
12 MR. HAGGERTY: Haggerty.

he
13 THE COURT: Oh, Mr. Haggerty, there you are.
14 Mr. Haggerty, if after the motion to dismiss, the

T
1024 15 case gets extremely simplified and you want to move up the
16 trial date, just bring it up as soon as we get a resolution

of
17 on the motion to dismiss.
18 So I'm hearing what you're saying.

ds
19 I find that efficiency is promoted by at least
102420 having a date to aim at, and in all fairness it's best to aim
ien
21 at a worst-case scenario I shouldn't say worst-case
22 scenario -- the scenario of a large complaint.
23 If you want to move up the trial date after -- when

Fr
24 and if you succeed in narrowing the complaint, I'll look at
102425 such motions.

33
m
1 Anything further from the parties, then?
co
2 ALL RESPONSE: No, Your Honor.
3 Thank you.
w.
THE COURT: Okay.
10:24 5 (End of proceedings.)
6 ***
Bo
7 Certificate
8 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and
og
9 co rre ct transcript of the stenographically recorded
10 proceedings in the above matter.

F
11 Fees charged for this transcript, less any circuit
12 fee redu ction and/or deposit, are in conformance wi th the

he
13 regula tions of the judicial confe ren ce of the United States.

Den lOse Paddock
Di<.ll ol~ "" r><o:J b;r Don ;" PaMo:,
~"o"''"o'". _'~''.'OO"""oo.''',"om,. ~",_.
i "'K"" I' m"!lp!O . .... t~ ;,<lo:umon t
14 lo:"'i:"""n"A M,CoI t om;"

c...:., M1Dl .ll1 6J'JDJ_0l OO' 03/22/2011
DENISE PADDOCK, CMRS, RMR, CRR, CSR 10199 DATE
T
15
16
of
17
18
ds
19
20
21
ien
22
23
Fr
24
25

022811 DCCD GUILFORD 10D LINCOLN
1
m
$ absolute [1] <10:15> - 28:11 appear [1] <10:22> -
3
23:21 alleged [1] <09:51> - 30:25
$150,000 [1] <10:17> -
abusive [1] <10:18> - 3:7 appearance [1]
25:12
co
30 [1] <09:57> - 7:18 27:5 allow [2] <09:56> - <10:07> - 17:20
39 [1] <10:04> - 15:4 accept [2] <09:56> - 6:18 <10:05>, 15:18 appearances [1]
0 7:3 <10:19>, 27:20 allowed [9] <09:53> - <10:07> - 17:23
4 accepted [1] <10:19> - 4:12 <09:53>, 4:15 appeared [1] <10:22> -
022811 [1] - 2:2 27:21 <09:54>, 5:9 <09:54>, 31:3
access [1] <09:59> - 5:11 <10:06>, 17:2 application [3]
w.
03/22/2011 [1] - 40 [1] <10:04> - 15:4
33:14 9:22 <10:12>, 21:15 <10:15>, <09:56> - 6:22 <10:03>,
according [3] <09:54> 23:8 <10:19>, 27:19 13:9 <10:16>, 24:6
5 <10:20>, 28:6
1 - 5:14 <10:02>, 12:18 applications [1]
<10:12>, 21:16 allowing [2] <10:07> - <10:16> - 24:11
accused [1] <10:14> - 17:20 <10:07>, 17:23 applying [1] <10:09> -
Bo
555 [1] - 2:4
1 [2] - 2:12 <10:03>, 562-983-2500 [1] - 22:24 alluding [1] <10:17> - 19:13
13:12 2:13 action [5] <09:50> - 2:5 25:22 approaches [1]
10-1573-AG(PLAx <10:07>, 17:12 <10:10>, amend [1] <09:50> - <10:23> - 31:10
[3] - 1:10, 2:2 <09:49>, 2:8
1:2
6 20:6 <10:18>, 27:2 approval [1] <10:19> -
<10:21>, 29:21 amended [4] <09:51> - 27:14
10199 [2] - 1:24, actions [3] <09:51> - 2:20 <09:52>, 3:18 argued [1] <10:24> -
og
33:14 610-825-3134 [1] - 3:1 <09:52>, 3:25 <09:54>, 5:20 <10:21>, 32:8
10D [2] - 1:4, 2:2 2:5 <10:05>, 15:15 29:13 argument [3] <09:57> -
10th [1] - 2:16 610-834-7659 [1] - additional [1] <10:01> Amendment [2] 8:1 <10:11>, 20:16
12 [2] - 2:4 <10:21>, 2:6 - 12:4 <09:59> - 9:21 <10:15>, <10:13>, 22:6
29:21 6:00 [1] <09:57> - 7:15 additionally [1] 23:21 arguments [1] <09:56>
12th [3] <10:20> -
F
<09:52> - 3:25 America [1] <10:07> - - 7:4
28:18 <10:21>, 29:8 7 address [3] <09:50> - 17:5 Arizona [1] <10:00> -
<10:21>, 30:2 1:22 <09:50>, 1:23 ANA [2] - 1:17 <09:49>, 11:8
13 [2] <10:21> - 29:21
he
<09:57>, 8:5 1:1 arm [1] <10:17> - 25:15
7 [1] <09:49> - 1:2
<10:23>, 31:15 admission [3] <09:50> analysis [2] <09:53> - aside [1] <10:00> -
700 [1] - 2:16
13th [5] <10:21> - 30:5 - 1:24 <10:23>, 31:19 4:21 <09:54>, 5:18 11:15
7:00 [1] <09:57> - 7:15
<10:22>, 30:14 <10:22>, <10:24>, 32:8 Andorra [1] - 2:4 aspects [1] <10:03> -
30:15 <10:23>, 31:10 7:30 [9] <09:56> - 7:11
advantage [1] <10:15> ANDREW [1] - 1:4 13:15
<09:57>, 7:13 <09:57>,
<10:23>, 31:14 - 24:3 announcement [1] assessed [1] <10:17> -
7:19 <10:00>, 10:18
T
150,000 [1] <09:53> - advised [1] <10:02> - <10:09> - 19:1 25:13

<10:00>, 10:23 <10:00>,
4:3 12:25 answer [14] <09:58> - assistant [2] <10:15> -
11:1 <10:00>, 11:6
19444-2531 [1] - 2:5 affidavit [4] <10:01> - 9:11 <10:01>, 11:24 23:9 <10:19>, 28:3
<10:17>, 26:3 <10:18>,
11:25 <10:13>, 21:18 <10:06>, 16:14 <10:06>, association [1]
26:20
2 16:18 <10:07>, 18:1
of
<10:13>, 22:11 <10:14>, <10:13> - 22:6

22:22 <10:08>, 18:16 <10:08>, attention [1] <09:55> -
8 affidavits [2] <10:12> - 18:17 <10:09>, 19:7 6:2
2006 [1] <10:01> - 12:2
21:13 <10:14>, 22:22 <10:09>, 19:17 <10:11>, Attorney [1] <10:02> -
2011 [4] - 1:18
818-243-5200 [1] - ago [2] <10:06> - 16:19 20:19 <10:11>, 20:20 13:1
<09:49>, 1:1 <09:56>,
2:17 <10:17>, 25:9 <10:14>, 22:16 <10:15>, attorney [4] <10:04> -
6:24 <10:22>, 30:15
ds
818-243-5266 [1] - agree [2] <10:20> - 23:17 14:13 <10:05>, 15:7

2012 [3] <10:20> -
2:17 28:16 <10:21>, 29:24 answer's [1] <10:06> - <10:05>, 15:12 <10:07>,
28:18 <10:21>, 30:6
agreed [1] <10:19> - 16:7 18:6
<10:22>, 30:12
20th [1] <10:17> - 9 27:13 anticipate [1] <09:51> attribute [1] <10:15> -
agreement [5] <10:00> - 2:21 23:20
25:10
ien
- 10:14 <10:20>, 28:20 anticipated [1] available [1] <10:22> -

211 [1] - 2:9 90831-2700 [1] - 2:13 <10:20>, 28:22 <10:21>, <09:52> - 3:8 30:17
21st [1] <10:12> - 21:4 91203-1202 [1] - 2:16 29:8 <10:21>, 29:9 apologize [5] <09:49> - aware [1] <09:56> -
24th [2] <09:56> - 6:23 92691 [1] - 2:9 ahead [5] <10:02> - 1:14 <09:51>, 2:15 6:25
<09:57>, 8:2 949-683-5411 [1] - 12:15 <10:11>, 20:24 <09:55>, 6:4 <10:20>,
26302 [1] - 2:9 2:10 <10:16>, 24:22 <10:16>, 28:14 <10:23>, 31:16 B
27th [3] - 2:12 <10:22>, appeal [3] <10:07> -
25:2 <10:19>, 27:15
30:11 <10:22>, 30:12
A
Fr
aim [2] <10:24> - 32:20 17:7 <10:07>, 17:8

28 [2] - 1:18 <09:49>, <10:07>, 17:11 based [6] <09:50> - 2:9
AL [1] - 1:13
1:1 Appealing [1] <09:52> <09:51>,2:23 <09:59>,
able [1] <10:21> - al [1] <09:49> - 1:4
alert [1] <10:20> - - 3:16 10:9 <10:11>, 20:17
29:22

2
m
<10:11>, 20:20 <10:20>, <10:01>, 12:8 <10:02>, chief [1] <10:17> - - 28:1
C
28:10 13:1 <10:02>, 13:4 25:13 concurring [1] <10:14>
Beach [1] - 2:13 <10:06>, 16:2 <10:09>, circuit [1] - 33:11 - 22:21
co
become [1] <10:03> - 19:3 <10:09>, 19:15 CA [3] - 2:9, 2:13, claim [6] <09:50> - 2:9 conduct [3] <10:05> -
14:1 <10:10>, 19:24 <10:10>, 2:16 <09:51>, 2:13 <09:51>, 15:18 <10:13>, 21:24
begin [1] <10:22> - 20:4 <10:10>, 20:5 California [7] <09:51> - 2:19 <09:51>, 2:22 <10:22>, 30:19
31:5 <10:11>, 21:2 <10:12>, 3:1 <09:52>, 3:21 <09:52>, 3:8 <10:21>, conference [11]
beginning [1] <09:54> 21:10 <10:13>, 22:8 <09:52>, 3:24 <09:52>, 29:18 <09:50> - 2:1 <09:59>,
- 5:16 <10:13>, 22:10 <10:14>, 4:1 <09:54>, 5:15 claiming [1] <10:12> - 10:8 <10:01>, 12:10
w.
BEHALF [2] - 2:3, 22:18 <10:15>, 23:9 <10:02>, 13:2 <10:12>, 21:14 <10:18>, 26:17 <10:20>,
2:8 <10:15>, 23:12 <10:16>, 21:17 claims [1] <09:50> - 28:13 <10:20>, 29:4
behalf [9] <09:49> - 1:6 24:13 <10:18>, 26:9 CALIFORNIA [3] - 2:7 <10:21>, 29:6 <10:21>,
<09:49>, 1:8 <09:49>, <10:18>, 27:8 <10:18>, 1:2, 1:17 <09:49>, 1:1 clear [1] <10:06> - 16:7 30:9 <10:22>, 30:24
1:12 <10:03>, 13:22 27:9 <10:19>, 27:13 cannot [2] <10:05> - clearly [1] <09:52> - <10:22>, 30:25, 33:13
Bo
<10:04>, 14:15 <10:04>, <10:19>, 27:16 <10:23>, 15:18 <10:09>, 19:11 3:9 confidential [1]
14:17 <10:15>, 23:14 31:7 <10:23>, 31:18 careful [2] <10:15> - CLERK [5] <09:49> - <10:03> - 13:25
<10:18>, 26:14 <10:21>, berg [2] <09:50> - 2:6 23:20 <10:15>, 23:24 1:2 <09:50>, 1:18 conformance [1] -
29:11 <10:00>, 11:15 case [26] <09:51> - <10:21>, 30:3 <10:22>, 33:12
Behar [1] - 2:12 berg's [1] <10:08> - 2:22 <10:01>, 12:3 30:11 <10:22>, 30:14 confused [1] <10:16> -
behind [1] <09:59> - 18:24 <10:02>, 12:24 <10:02>, client [8] <10:07> - 24:15
og
9:25 Berg's [2] <10:05> - 13:2 <10:04>, 14:11 17:13 <10:14>, 22:24 conscience [1]
bench [1] <09:57> - 15:14 <10:05>, 15:15 <10:04>, 14:25 <10:05>, <10:14>, 23:5 <10:15>, <10:05> - 15:18
7:12 best [1] <10:24> - 15:24 <10:06>, 16:2 23:10 <10:16>, 24:14 consider [5] <09:57> -
BERG [49] <09:49> - 32:20 <10:06>, 16:3 <10:09>, <10:16>, 24:23 <10:18>, 8:10 <09:58>, 8:16
1:8 <09:51>, 2:15 big [1] <09:55> - 5:23 19:5 <10:12>, 21:10 27:4 <10:03>, 13:18 <10:03>,
<10:13>, 21:21 <10:14>,
F
<09:51>, 2:19 <09:55>, Bill [1] <10:21> - 29:11 clients [3] <10:05> - 14:4 <10:20>, 28:10
5:24 <09:55>, 6:3 bill@fwhb.com [1] - 22:25 <10:14>, 23:2 15:15 <10:07>, 17:16 consideration [1]
<09:56>, 7:1 <09:56>, 7:9 2:14 <10:15>, 23:21 <10:18>, <10:18>, 26:25 <10:04> - 14:20
bit [1] <09:53> - 4:20 26:18 <10:20>, 28:22
he
<09:57>, 7:21 <09:57>, closed [1] <09:59> - considered [1]
7:25 <09:57>, 8:6 Blvd [1] - 2:16 <10:20>, 28:23 <10:21>, <09:57> - 8:9
9:25
<09:58>, 8:13 <09:58>, board [12] <10:01> - 29:16 <10:22>, 31:1 CMRS [2] - 1:24, considering [1]
8:17 <09:58>, 9:7 11:19 <10:02>, 13:4 <10:22>, 31:6 <10:23>,
33:14 <10:18> - 26:16
<09:58>, 9:10 <09:58>, <10:03>, 13:22 <10:04>, 31:8 <10:24>, 32:15 coming [2] <10:10> - Constitution [1]
9:13 <09:59>, 9:17 14:14 <10:08>, 18:20 <10:24>, 32:21
19:23 <10:11>, 21:2 <09:59> - 9:22
T
<09:59>, 10:4 <09:59>, <10:08>, 18:21 <10:09>, cases [1] <09:55> - committed [1] <10:14> contempt [1] <10:16> -
10:9 <10:00>, 10:13, 19:2 <10:09>, 19:15 5:23 - 23:4 25:4
10:15 <10:00>, 10:17 <10:10>, 19:25 <10:13>, caused [1] <10:13> - committing [1] content [1] <09:59> -
<10:02>, 12:11 <10:02>, 21:19 <10:14>, 22:23 21:25 <10:14> - 22:20 10:10
12:16 <10:03>, 13:10 <10:16>, 24:19 causes [1] <10:21> - continue [1] <09:50> -
of
communication [3]
<10:03>, 13:20 <10:03>, boards [1] <10:15> - 29:21 <09:56> - 7:3 <09:56>, 2:4
14:6 <10:04>, 14:23 23:25 CENTRAL [1] - 1:2 7:8 <09:57>, 8:10 continued [4] <09:57>
<10:05>, 15:9 <10:05>, bounds [1] <09:58> - certificate [1] - 33:7 complaint [16] <09:51> - 7:22 <10:12>, 21:12
15:24 <10:06>, 16:3 8:20 certify [1] - 33:8 - 2:20 <09:51>, 3:7 <10:19>, 27:17 <10:19>,
<10:06>, 16:6 <10:06>, boy [1] <10:11> - 20:11 chance [1] <09:52> - <09:52>, 3:10 <09:52>, 27:22
ds
16:9 <10:06>, 16:15 Bradley [1] - 2:15 3:14 3:18 <09:52>, 3:22 continuous [1]
<10:06>, 16:22 <10:06>, Brand [1] - 2:16 charged [1] - 33:11 <09:54>, 5:2 <09:54>, 5:5 <10:05> - 15:14
16:24 <10:06>, 17:3 brazen [1] <10:05> - charges [1] <10:10> - <09:54>, 5:14 <09:54>, conveyed [2] <10:03> -
<10:07>, 17:11 <10:07>, 15:14 19:24 5:20 <10:09>, 19:6 13:21 <10:04>, 14:15
17:15 <10:07>, 17:18 Bredahl [1] <10:21> - CHARLES [1] - 1:6 <10:14>, 22:15 <10:21>, convicted [4] <10:09>
<10:07>, 18:2 <10:17>, Charles [3] - 1:3
ien
30:2 29:13 <10:24>, 32:22 - 19:9 <10:11>, 21:3

25:21 <10:17>, 26:1 brief [1] <10:17> - <09:49>, 1:9 <09:51>, <10:24>, 32:24 <10:12>, 21:12 <10:13>,
<10:18>, 26:10 <10:23>, 25:21 2:25 complete [1] <10:16> - 21:23
31:12 <10:23>, 31:14 bring [1] <10:24> - check [5] <09:55> - 6:5 24:9 convictions [1]
<10:23>, 31:16 <10:23>, 32:16 <10:00>, 10:19 <10:02>, completely [1] <10:16> <10:14> - 23:7
31:23 <10:23>, 32:1 Brisbois [1] <09:49> - 13:5 <10:03>, 13:21 - 24:9 coordinator [1]
<10:23>, 32:5 <10:22>, 30:17 conceding [2] <10:06>
1:12 <10:08> - 18:21
Fr
Berg [31] - 2:3, 2:4 brought [2] <09:50> - CHEMICAL [1] - 1:13 - 16:19 <10:10>, 20:8 copies [1] <09:50> -
<09:49>, 1:8 <09:51>, 3:6 Chemical [3] - 1:3 concern [2] <10:07> -
2:6 <10:14>, 23:5 1:19
<09:54>, 5:19 <09:56>, <09:49>, 1:7 <10:18>,
business [1] <09:53> - 17:19 <10:18>, 26:24 copy [3] <10:01> -
6:23 <10:01>, 11:20 4:14 26:15 concerned [1] <10:19> 11:22 <10:09>, 19:6

3
m
correct [4] <09:58> - <10:17>, 25:15 <10:17>, 9:22 <10:18> - 27:6 24:19
9:13 <10:13>, 22:6 25:25 <10:17>, 26:2 CR [1] - 2:2 Defendants [1] discipline [1] <10:01> -
<10:23>, 31:23, 33:9 <10:18>, 26:11 <10:18>, create [1] <09:57> - <09:49> - 1:6 11:23
co
Counsel [4] <09:57> - 26:16 <10:18>, 27:3 7:20 defense [5] <09:51> - discovery [1] <10:22> -
7:14 <09:58>, 9:4 <10:18>, 27:6 <10:18>, creates [1] <09:57> - 3:3 <09:52>, 3:8 <10:07>, 30:13
<09:59>, 9:19 <10:20>, 27:9 <10:19>, 27:19 7:21 18:4 <10:21>, 29:7 discuss [4] <10:22> -
28:13 <10:19>, 27:23 <10:20>, CRR [2] - 1:24, 33:14 defrauded [1] <10:14> 31:1 <10:22>, 31:3
couple [1] <09:50> - 28:8 <10:20>, 28:25 CSR [2] - 1:24, 33:14 - 23:1 <10:23>, 31:7 <10:23>,
1:21 <10:20>, 29:3 <10:21>, Ctr [1] - 2:12 defrauding [1] <10:14> 31:9
w.
COURT [107] - 1:1, 29:14 <10:21>, 29:16 cutoff [1] <10:22> - - 22:25 discussing [1] <10:03>
1:25 <09:50>, 1:21 <10:21>, 29:20 <10:21>, 30:13 DENISE [2] - 1:24, - 13:13
<09:51>, 2:17 <09:51>, 29:25 <10:21>, 30:4 33:14 discussions [1]
<10:22>, 30:12 <10:22>,
3:3 <09:53>, 4:4 <09:53>, D Dentistry [1] <09:52> - <10:22> - 31:5
4:8 <09:53>, 4:18 30:15 <10:23>, 31:13 3:16 dismiss [6] <09:50> -
Bo
<09:54>, 4:24 <09:54>, <10:23>, 31:15 <10:23>, deny [2] <10:11> - 2:6 <09:51>, 2:21
5:3 <09:54>, 5:13 31:17 <10:23>, 31:24 DAILY [1] - 1:17 20:17 <10:11>, 20:20 <09:55>, 5:22 <10:18>,
<09:54>, 5:16 <09:55>, <10:23>, 32:3 <10:23>, damages [1] <10:13> - denying [1] <10:15> - 27:1 <10:24>, 32:14
5:25 <09:55>, 6:5 32:7 <10:24>, 32:13 22:1 23:18 <10:24>, 32:17
<09:56>, 7:2 <09:57>, <10:24>, 33:4 data [1] <10:02> - department [2] dismissed [2] <10:14>
7:12 <09:57>, 7:24 court [47] <09:49> - 12:12 <09:49> - 1:16 <10:10>, - 22:25 <10:20>, 28:22
og
<09:57>, 8:1 <09:57>, 8:8 1:14 <09:50>, 2:8 date [9] <09:50> - 2:1 19:20 disrespect [1] <10:05>
<09:58>, 8:14 <09:58>, <09:50>, 2:9 <09:51>, <10:20>, 29:1 <10:20>, deposit [1] - 33:12 - 15:14
8:25 <09:58>, 9:3 2:18 <09:52>, 3:20 29:5 <10:21>, 29:6 describe [1] <09:58> - distress [1] <10:13> -
<09:58>, 9:9 <09:58>, <09:54>, 5:12 <09:55>, <10:23>, 31:10 <10:24>, 22:1
9:14
9:11 <09:58>, 9:14 6:12 <09:55>, 6:14 32:9 <10:24>, 32:16 despite [1] <10:06> - DISTRICT [3] - 1:1,
<09:59>, 9:18 <09:59>, <09:57>, 7:17 <09:59>, <10:24>, 32:20 <10:24>,
F
16:8 1:2, 1:25
10:6 <10:00>, 10:12 9:25 <10:00>, 11:3 32:23 District [2] <10:06> -
determination [1]
<10:00>, 10:14 <10:00>, <10:00>, 11:10 <10:01>, DATE [1] - 33:14 <09:55> - 6:11 16:2 <10:17>, 25:14
10:16 <10:00>, 10:21 11:18 <10:01>, 11:20 dates [3] <10:22> -
he
determinations [1] district [2] <09:55> -
<10:00>, 11:6 <10:00>, <10:02>, 13:2 <10:03>, 30:16 <10:22>, 30:18 <09:50> - 2:2 6:2 <10:02>, 13:2
11:10 <10:00>, 11:14 14:5 <10:03>, 14:6 <10:22>, 30:21
diversity [17] <09:51> -
determining [2]
<10:01>, 11:21 <10:01>, <10:04>, 14:16 <10:04>, Daylight [3] - 1:3 <10:03> - 13:8 <10:18>, 2:24 <09:51>, 3:1
12:4 <10:01>, 12:7 14:24 <10:05>, 15:5 <09:49>, 1:7 <10:18>,
<09:51>, 3:4 <09:51>, 3:7
26:18
<10:02>, 12:15 <10:03>, <10:05>, 15:13 <10:05>, 26:15 developed [1] <09:56> <09:52>, 3:8 <09:52>,
T
13:7 <10:03>, 13:12 15:15 <10:05>, 15:17 DAYLIGHT [1] - 1:13 3:12 <09:52>, 3:17
- 7:10
<10:03>, 14:3 <10:04>, <10:07>, 17:14 <10:07>, days [4] <09:55> - 6:2 different [2] <09:57> - <09:53>, 4:5 <09:53>, 4:8
14:19 <10:05>, 15:6 17:17 <10:08>, 18:7 <10:21>, 29:19 <10:21>, <09:53>, 4:19 <09:53>,
7:18 <10:03>, 13:14
<10:05>, 15:12 <10:06>, <10:08>, 18:11 <10:10>, 29:23 <10:21>, 30:7
difficult [2] <10:18> - 4:21 <09:53>, 4:22
16:1 <10:06>, 16:5 20:5 <10:11>, 20:15 DCCD [1] - 2:2 <09:54>, 5:6 <09:54>,
of
26:20 <10:21>, 29:23

<10:06>, 16:7 <10:06>, <10:12>, 21:5 <10:13>, deal [2] <09:54> - 5:6 directed [1] <10:02> - 5:17 <09:55>, 6:6
16:10 <10:06>, 16:16 21:25 <10:13>, 22:3 <10:15>, 24:4 <09:55>, 6:7 <09:55>, 6:9
12:14
<10:06>, 16:23 <10:06>, <10:15>, 23:20 <10:15>, deals [2] <09:58> - directing [1] <09:57> - divert [1] <10:05> -
16:25 <10:07>, 17:9 24:1 <10:15>, 24:3 8:20 <09:58>, 8:23 15:16
8:1
<10:07>, 17:13 <10:07>, <10:16>, 24:24 <10:16>, decades [1] <10:06> - directly [1] <09:49> - docket [1] <10:00> -
25:4 <10:17>, 25:16
ds
17:16 <10:07>, 17:19 16:11 10:19

1:15
<10:07>, 18:3 <10:08>, <10:17>, 25:17 <10:17>, December [2] <10:22> disciplinary [22] document [7] <10:04>
18:11 <10:08>, 18:17 26:7 <10:18>, 26:20 - 30:14 <10:22>, 30:15 <09:58> - 8:23 <09:58>, - 14:11 <10:09>, 19:9
<10:09>, 19:10 <10:09>, <10:18>, 26:23 <10:18>, decisions [1] <10:13> - 9:1 <09:58>, 9:5 <10:00>, <10:09>, 19:11 <10:11>,
19:17 <10:10>, 20:7 27:1 <10:19>, 27:25 22:4 11:4 <10:01>, 11:19 21:3 <10:14>, 22:21
<10:11>, 20:11 <10:11>, <10:22>, 31:2
declined [2] <10:16> - <10:17>, 25:23 <10:18>,
ien
<10:02>, 13:3 <10:03>,

20:16 <10:11>, 20:22 Court [4] - 2:4 <10:08>, 24:14 <10:16>, 24:18 13:22 <10:04>, 14:14 26:8
<10:12>, 21:5 <10:13>, 18:10 <10:09>, 19:16 DEFENDANT [1] - <10:04>, 15:1 <10:06>, document's [1]
22:3 <10:13>, 22:8 <10:10>, 19:22
2:8 16:20 <10:08>, 18:20 <09:52> - 3:24
<10:13>, 22:12 <10:14>, courtroom [2] <09:59> defendant [1] <10:18> <10:09>, 19:2 <10:09>, documents [11]
22:17 <10:14>, 23:3 - 10:1 <10:22>, 30:24 - 26:12 19:15 <10:10>, 19:25 <09:59> - 10:2 <10:03>,
<10:15>, 23:12 <10:15>, COURTROOM [1] - Defendant [1] <10:18> <10:10>, 20:6 <10:11>, 13:23 <10:03>, 13:25
23:17 <10:16>, 24:8 1:4
Fr
- 26:14 20:9 <10:13>, 21:19 <10:03>, 14:4 <10:12>,

<10:16>, 24:15 <10:16>, courts [4] <09:55> - Defendant(s) [1] - <10:14>, 22:15 <10:14>, 21:6 <10:12>, 21:13
24:21 <10:16>, 24:25 6:2 <09:56>, 6:18 1:15 22:23 <10:15>, 23:13 <10:13>, 22:9 <10:15>,
<10:16>, 25:5 <10:17>, <09:56>, 6:19 <09:59>,
defendants [1] <10:15>, 23:25 <10:16>, 23:10 <10:17>, 25:24
25:8 <10:17>, 25:11

4
m
<10:18>, 26:19 <10:18>, 3:20 <09:54>, 4:25 2:9 <09:51>, 2:14 fill [1] <10:22> - 30:16 future [1] <10:20> -
26:21 <10:10>, 19:23 <10:10>, <09:54>, 5:11 <09:55>, final [1] <10:07> - 28:10
dollars [1] <09:53> - 20:3 6:14 <09:55>, 6:16 17:11
co
4:3 ex [4] <09:56> - 7:3 <10:02>, 13:1 <10:11>, financial [1] <10:13> - G
done [6] <09:57> - 7:22 <09:56>, 7:8 <09:57>, 20:15 <10:23>, 31:21 22:1
<10:00>, 10:16 <10:09>, 8:10 <09:58>, 8:20 <10:23>, 32:3 fine [1] <10:07> - 17:16
19:8 <10:14>, 22:18 exactly [1] <10:11> - federalist [1] <09:55> - gathering [1] <10:15> -
finish [1] <10:19> -
<10:15>, 24:1 <10:22>, 20:23 6:17 24:2
27:11
30:22 excerpt [1] <10:02> - fee [1] - 33:12 Glen [1] - 2:4
firm [1] <10:13> - 22:4
w.
doors [1] <09:59> - 12:18 fees [1] - 33:11 Glendale [1] - 2:16
first [6] <09:52> - 3:18
9:25 exist [1] <10:17> - felony [1] <10:14> - Gmelich [1] - 2:15
<09:54>, 5:4 <09:54>,
down [1] <10:22> - 25:22 23:7 5:21 <10:02>, 12:13 Google [1] <09:55> -
30:10 existence [4] <09:58> - feud [1] <10:03> - <10:18>, 26:22
5:25
Dr [1] - 2:8 8:25 <09:58>, 9:5 13:15 First [2] <09:59> - 9:21 government [1]
Bo
<09:58>, 9:6 <09:58>, <10:00> - 11:9
dr_taitz@yahoo. few [1] <10:06> - 16:18 <10:15>, 23:21
com [1] - 2:10 9:12 file [17] <09:51> - 2:19 fitting [1] <09:53> - 4:9 grant [5] <10:04> -
during [1] <09:54> - experience [1] <10:18> <09:52>, 3:23 <09:53>,
14:24 <10:10>, 20:5
five [3] <10:20> - 28:18
- 27:7 <10:11>, 20:18 <10:16>,
5:15 4:12 <09:53>, 4:15 <10:21>, 29:19 <10:21>,
experienced [1] <09:54>, 5:11 <09:56>,
24:14 <10:16>, 24:18
29:22
granted [8] <09:50> -
E <10:11> - 21:2 7:6 <09:57>, 8:11 Floor [2] - 2:12, 2:16
og
explanation [2] <09:58>, 8:15 <10:02>, 2:7 <10:07>, 17:21
focus [4] <09:54> - 5:7
12:14 <10:02>, 12:16 <10:16>, 24:12 <10:16>,
<10:11> - 20:12 <10:11>, <09:59>, 10:7 <10:14>,
e-mail [1] <09:50> - 20:13 <10:10>, 19:20 <10:10>, 24:16 <10:16>, 24:17
22:17
1:18 extend [1] <10:17> - 19:21 <10:13>, 21:18 <10:18>, 27:1 <10:20>,
focusing [2] <10:03> -
e-mailed [1] <10:09> - 25:12 <10:14>, 23:1 <10:17>, 28:6
13:16 <10:07>, 18:4
19:6 granting [1] <09:58> -
F
extern [3] <10:23> - 25:8 <10:18>, 26:23 folks [4] <10:03> -
early [1] <09:55> - 6:11 31:21 <10:23>, 31:24 <10:20>, 28:7 8:14
13:14 <10:15>, 23:13
Eastern [1] <10:06> - <10:23>, 32:4 filed [28] <09:49> - greatly [2] <10:13> -
<10:15>, 23:25 <10:20>,
16:2 1:15 <09:52>, 3:21 21:25
he
extremely [2] <09:59> - 28:14
EDWARD [1] - 1:6 10:2 <10:24>, 32:15 <09:52>, 3:25 <09:56>, grown [1] <10:05> -
following [1] <10:06> -
Edward [1] - 1:3 6:23 <09:56>, 7:6 15:13
16:20
efficiency [1] <10:24> - guess [1] <10:06> -
F <09:57>, 7:19 <09:57>, Ford [1] - 2:12
16:24
32:19 8:7 <09:58>, 8:18 foregoing [1] - 33:8
either [1] <09:52> - <09:59>, 10:11 <10:00>, GUILFORD [2] - 1:4,
forged [2] <10:12> -
T
3:18 facing [1] <09:52> - 10:23 <10:01>, 12:4 2:2

21:12 <10:17>, 25:24
electronically [1] 3:12 <10:02>, 12:23 <10:02>, guilt [1] <10:13> - 22:6
forger [5] <10:09> -
<09:49> - 1:15 fact [8] <09:59> - 9:15 13:1 <10:04>, 14:8 guilty [3] <10:07> -
19:9 <10:09>, 19:11
eligible [1] <10:08> - <10:02>, 12:21 <10:08>, <10:04>, 14:11 <10:12>, 17:5 <10:07>, 17:22
<10:11>, 21:3 <10:14>,
18:7 18:21 <10:11>, 20:21 21:10 <10:13>, 22:8 <10:12>, 21:6
of
22:21 <10:14>, 23:6

Email [4] - 2:6, 2:10, <10:19>, 28:2 <10:20>, <10:13>, 22:10 <10:14>,
forgery [2] <10:13> -
2:14, 2:18 28:6 <10:20>, 28:11 22:15 <10:14>, 22:22 21:24 <10:14>, 23:7 H
emergency [3] <10:19> <10:22>, 30:20 <10:15>, 23:8 <10:15>,
forging [1] <10:12> -
- 27:18 <10:19>, 27:22 facts [1] <10:17> - 23:10 <10:16>, 25:3 21:6 hac [26] <09:49> - 1:9
<10:19>, 28:4 25:22 <10:17>, 25:7 <10:17>,
forth [2] <09:52> - 3:9 <09:50>, 1:24 <09:56>,
failure [1] <09:52> -
ds
emotional [1] <10:13> 26:7 <10:18>, 26:25

<09:52>, 3:11 6:21 <09:59>, 10:7
- 22:1 3:11 <10:20>, 28:24
forward [2] <09:59> - <10:01>, 12:5 <10:01>,
encourage [1] <10:18> fair [1] <10:21> - 29:25 filing [14] <09:53> - 4:6
9:16 <10:10>, 19:20 12:10 <10:02>, 13:1
- 26:10 fairness [1] <10:24> - <09:53>, 4:13 <09:53>,
forwarded [1] <10:10> <10:03>, 13:8 <10:03>,
End [1] <10:24> - 33:5 32:20 4:16 <09:54>, 5:10
- 19:21 13:16 <10:04>, 14:22
enforce [1] <10:17> - familiar [1] <10:22> - <09:54>, 5:20 <09:56>,
ien
frankly [1] <10:07> - <10:04>, 14:25 <10:07>,

25:16 30:21 7:10 <09:57>, 7:13
17:19 17:21 <10:07>, 17:25
enforcement [1] Fax [2] - 2:6, 2:17 <10:00>, 10:18 <10:04>,
fraudulent [1] <10:13> <10:07>, 18:4 <10:09>,
<10:17> - 25:15 February [4] <09:56> - 14:17 <10:12>, 21:12
- 22:9 19:4 <10:10>, 20:5
engage [1] <09:50> - 6:23 <09:57>, 8:2 <10:19>, 27:17 <10:19>,
Friday [2] <09:57> - <10:10>, 20:8 <10:11>,
1:25 <10:22>, 30:11 <10:22>, 27:22 <10:19>, 27:25
7:15 <10:02>, 12:12 20:20 <10:11>, 20:25
enormous [1] <10:13> 30:12 <10:19>, 28:3
frivolous [1] <09:53> - <10:16>, 24:6 <10:16>,
FEBRUARY [2] -
Fr
- 22:1 filings [4] <10:12> -

4:16 24:11 <10:16>, 24:12
ET [1] - 1:13 1:18 <09:49>, 1:1 21:10 <10:17>, 26:3
front [2] <10:22> - <10:16>, 24:16 <10:17>,
et [1] <09:49> - 1:4 federal [11] <09:50> - <10:19>, 27:14 <10:20>,
30:16 <10:23>, 32:1 25:19 <10:23>, 31:19
evidence [4] <09:52> - 2:4 <09:50>, 2:8 <09:50>, 28:10
full [1] <09:59> - 10:10 <10:24>, 32:8

5
m
Haggerty [7] - 2:11, <09:51>, 2:24 <09:55>, INFORMATION [1] - 15:17, 33:13 29:18, 33:11
2:12 <09:49>, 1:11 6:3 <09:56>, 7:1 <09:56>, 1:13 jurisdiction [7] letter [13] <09:56> -
<10:21>, 29:11 <10:24>, 7:9 <09:59>, 10:4 initial [1] <10:20> - <09:51> - 2:14 <09:51>, 6:23 <09:56>, 6:25
co
32:12 <10:24>, 32:13 <10:00>, 10:20 <10:01>, 28:15 3:2 <09:51>, 3:4 <09:54>, <09:56>, 7:2 <09:56>, 7:4
<10:24>, 32:14 11:18 <10:02>, 12:19 innocent [2] <10:07> - 5:21 <09:55>, 6:15 <09:56>, 7:5 <09:57>, 8:2
HAGGERTY [7] <10:02>, 12:23 <10:03>, 17:5 <10:07>, 17:22 <09:55>, 6:16 <10:20>, <09:57>, 8:9 <09:58>,
<09:49> - 1:11 <10:17>, 13:6 <10:03>, 13:10 inquiry [1] <10:04> - 28:7 8:20 <09:59>, 9:15
25:20 <10:21>, 29:9 <10:03>, 13:23 <10:04>, 14:16 jury [2] <10:20> - 28:17 <09:59>, 10:3 <09:59>,
<10:21>, 29:15 <10:21>, 14:16 <10:04>, 15:4 instant [1] <10:05> - <10:21>, 30:8 10:10 <10:00>, 10:12
w.
29:17 <10:21>, 29:21 <10:05>, 15:25 <10:06>, 15:16 <10:02>, 12:19
<10:24>, 32:12 16:4 <10:06>, 16:8 Internet [3] <10:04> - K letters [3] <10:19> -
half [2] <10:04> - 15:4 <10:06>, 16:9 <10:06>, 14:9 <10:04>, 14:12 27:18 <10:19>, 27:22
<10:09>, 19:8 16:10 <10:08>, 18:15 <10:15>, 23:22 <10:19>, 28:4
hard [1] <10:00> - <10:11>, 20:10 <10:12>, keep [1] <10:18> - level [1] <10:11> - 21:1
interrupt [1] <10:01> -
Bo
10:22 21:9 <10:17>, 25:20 26:20 Lewis [1] <09:49> -
12:8
head [2] <09:58> - 9:2 <10:18>, 26:13 <10:18>, kept [1] <10:14> - 23:2 1:12
introduce [1] <09:52> -
<09:58>, 9:3 26:24 <10:20>, 28:21 kind [1] <09:52> - 3:8 Liberi [2] <10:01> -
3:14
hear [4] <09:55> - 6:9 <10:21>, 29:10 <10:21>, kinds [1] <09:50> - 2:1 11:25 <10:11>, 21:3
involved [1] <10:23> -
<10:00>, 11:13 <10:11>, 29:23 <10:23>, 31:12 knows [1] <10:04> - light [1] <09:57> - 8:6
31:9
20:18 <10:11>, 20:22 <10:23>, 32:2 <10:24>, 14:13 likelihood [2] <09:50>
Iqbal/Twombly [1]
og
heard [1] <09:57> - 32:11 <10:24>, 33:2 <09:55> - 5:25 - 2:4 <09:51>, 2:17
7:12 honor [1] <10:07> - issue [9] <09:54> - L Lincoln [9] - 1:3
hearing [17] <09:57> - 17:11 5:21 <09:55>, 6:6 <09:49>, 1:9 <09:51>,
7:15 <09:57>, 7:17 HONORABLE [1] - <09:55>, 6:7 <09:55>, 6:9 2:25 <09:52>, 3:20
Lafayette [1] - 2:5
<09:58>, 9:9 <10:00>, 1:4 <09:57>, 8:3 <10:00>, <09:53>, 4:2 <10:16>,
large [1] <10:24> -
honorable [1] <10:10>
F
11:4 <10:01>, 11:19 10:24 <10:06>, 16:17 32:22 24:23 <10:16>, 25:4
<10:02>, 12:21 <10:02>, - 20:5 <10:15>, 24:5 <10:20>, <10:17>, 25:13 <10:23>,
last [8] <09:50> - 2:11
13:4 <10:07>, 17:6 28:7 31:21
<09:51>, 2:23 <09:52>,
<10:07>, 17:7 <10:08>, I LINCOLN [2] - 1:6,
he
issued [5] <10:05> - 3:21 <09:53>, 4:20
18:22 <10:09>, 19:2 15:22 <10:08>, 18:8 2:2
<09:55>, 6:4 <10:02>,
<10:09>, 19:17 <10:10>, <10:08>, 18:14 <10:16>, Lisa [2] <10:01> -
idea [3] <10:11> - 21:1 12:12 <10:09>, 19:8
20:2 <10:11>, 20:9 24:13 <10:17>, 26:6 11:25 <10:11>, 21:3
<10:18>, 27:3 <10:18>, late [1] <10:02> - 12:13
<10:11>, 20:18 <10:16>, issues [2] <09:52> - listen [1] <10:11> -
27:4 law [3] <09:55> - 6:15
24:18 <10:24>, 32:18 3:12 <09:54>, 5:4 20:13
III [2] - 1:6, 1:3 <09:55>, 6:17 <10:04>,
T
hearings [1] <09:57> - Item [1] <09:49> - 1:2 listening [1] <10:19> -
important [2] <10:00> - 15:3
7:18 items [1] <09:50> - 27:12
11:11 <10:23>, 32:7 Law [4] - 2:4, 2:8
heed [1] <09:56> - 7:4 1:21 litigation [1] <10:22> -
impose [2] <10:20> - <09:49>, 1:13 <10:21>,
helping [1] <09:53> - 30:19
28:9 <10:20>, 28:12 29:11
4:21 J live [1] <10:12> - 21:15
of
imposed [1] <10:05> - lawsuits [5] <09:53> -

hereby [1] - 33:8 living [1] <09:54> -
15:8 4:7 <09:53>, 4:12
Hill [1] - 2:5 4:25
impression [1] <09:53>, 4:13 <09:53>,
hired [1] <10:14> - job [2] <09:53> - 4:14 look [4] <09:54> - 5:20
<09:59> - 9:24 4:16 <09:54>, 5:10
22:18 <10:12>, 21:7 <09:54>, 5:21 <09:55>,
INC [1] - 1:13 least [1] <10:24> -
hires [1] <10:09> - Jonathan [3] - 2:15 6:7 <10:24>, 32:24
Inc [1] <09:49> - 1:4 32:19
ds
19:11 <09:49>, 1:6 <10:18>,

leave [7] <09:50> - 2:8 lost [1] <09:54> - 5:6
inclined [2] <09:59> - 26:14
history [1] <10:12> - <10:07>, 17:10 <10:17>,
lot [1] <10:13> - 22:1
9:23 <09:59>, 10:1 jross@bglawyers.
21:9 26:7 <10:18>, 26:22 lots [1] <10:20> - 28:14
including [2] <10:05> - com [1] - 2:18
hits [1] <09:55> - 6:1 <10:19>, 27:25 <10:22>, lying [1] <10:14> - 23:2
15:15 <10:18>, 26:19 JUDGE [1] - 1:4
hold [2] <10:19> - 31:1 <10:22>, 31:6
indeed [1] <10:14> - Judge [2] <09:50> -
M
ien
27:10 leaves [1] <09:59> -

22:23 1:19 <10:23>, 31:24
Holsworth [1] <10:06> 9:24
individual [2] <10:09> judge [8] <10:02> -
- 16:1 leeway [2] <09:53> -
- 19:7 <10:21>, 29:12 12:24 <10:02>, 13:2 made [5] <09:52> -
home [1] <10:09> - 4:10 <09:53>, 4:18
information [6] <10:05>, 15:22 <10:06>, 3:11 <09:56>, 6:19
19:12 left [2] <09:55> - 6:3
<09:53> - 4:20 <10:00>, 16:11 <10:09>, 19:5 <09:56>, 7:4 <10:03>,
honest [1] <09:51> - <10:18>, 26:19
11:4 <10:01>, 11:19 <10:17>, 25:14 <10:19>, 14:3 <10:19>, 27:20
3:5 legal [2] <09:52> - 3:25
<10:01>, 12:5 <10:14>,
Fr
Honor [37] <09:49> - 28:5 <10:23>, 32:4 mail [1] <09:50> - 1:18
23:5 <10:15>, 24:2 <10:05>, 15:20
1:5 <09:49>, 1:10 judges [1] <10:23> - mailed [1] <10:09> -
Information [2] - 1:3 legitimate [1] <10:05>
<09:49>, 1:11 <09:51>,
31:21 19:6
<09:49>, 1:7 - 15:17
2:16 <09:51>, 2:21 judicial [2] <10:05> - main [2] <09:53> - 4:6
less [2] <10:21> -

6
m
<09:53>, 4:13 million [2] <09:53> - <10:02>, 12:11 <10:02>, one [5] <10:11> - 20:19
N
major [1] <09:56> - 4:3 <10:03>, 13:14 12:16 <10:03>, 13:10 <10:16>, 25:3 <10:18>,
7:10 mind [1] <09:56> - 6:20 <10:03>, 13:20 <10:03>, 26:25 <10:18>, 27:1
co
malice [1] <10:11> - misconduct [1] 14:6 <10:04>, 14:23 name [1] <10:09> - <10:19>, 28:3
21:2 <10:13> - 21:21 <10:05>, 15:9 <10:05>, 19:9 ongoing [2] <09:57> -
malicious [1] <09:51> - Mission [1] - 2:9 15:24 <10:06>, 16:3 narrowing [1] <10:24> 7:22 <10:13>, 21:24
2:13 misstatements [1] <10:06>, 16:6 <10:06>, - 32:24 open [4] <09:59> - 10:1
MARCE [1] <10:02> - <10:15> - 24:3 16:9 <10:06>, 16:15 nearly [1] <09:53> - 4:2 <10:08>, 18:19 <10:08>,
12:25 moment [2] <09:53> - <10:06>, 16:22 <10:06>, need [8] <09:58> - 9:3 18:23 <10:08>, 18:24
w.
Marcee [1] <10:02> - 4:11 <09:58>, 8:18 16:24 <10:06>, 17:3 <10:00>, 11:3 <10:01>, oppose [3] <10:18> -
12:25 moments [1] <10:06> - <10:07>, 17:11 <10:07>, 12:7 <10:03>, 13:13 27:3 <10:18>, 27:4
March [6] <10:10> - 16:19 17:15 <10:07>, 17:18 <10:07>, 17:16 <10:16>, <10:18>, 27:7
20:2 <10:12>, 21:4 Monday [2] <09:57> - <10:07>, 18:2 <10:17>, 24:25 <10:17>, 26:7 opposition [2] <10:10>
<10:21>, 29:8 <10:21>, 25:20 <10:17>, 25:21 <10:20>, 29:2 - 20:8 <10:13>, 22:4
7:17 <10:21>, 30:3
Bo
30:2 <10:21>, 30:5 MONDAY [2] - 1:18 <10:17>, 26:1 <10:18>, needs [2] <09:53> - order [18] <09:52> -
<10:23>, 31:15 <09:49>, 1:1 26:10 <10:18>, 26:13 4:22 <09:54>, 4:23 3:23 <10:02>, 12:11
Mare [1] <10:02> - morning [8] <09:49> - <10:18>, 26:24 <10:18>, never [1] <10:12> - <10:05>, 15:10 <10:06>,
12:25 1:5 <09:56>, 7:11 27:4 <10:19>, 27:21 21:7 16:8 <10:08>, 18:8
MARE [1] <10:02> - <10:21>, 29:9 <10:21>, New [1] <10:13> - <10:08>, 18:14 <10:17>,
<09:57>, 7:17 <09:57>,
12:25 8:7 <09:58>, 8:18 29:15 <10:21>, 29:17 21:18 26:6 <10:18>, 26:22
og
materials [2] <10:03> - <10:21>, 29:21 <10:23>, next [2] <10:00> - <10:19>, 27:10 <10:19>,
<10:00>, 10:18 <10:17>,
14:7 <10:04>, 14:8 26:4 <10:18>, 26:20 31:12 <10:23>, 31:14 10:17 <10:03>, 13:19 27:13 <10:20>, 28:9
matter [14] <09:57> - <10:23>, 31:16 <10:23>, nice [1] <10:11> - <10:20>, 28:10 <10:20>,
most [2] <10:09> - 19:7
8:6 <09:58>, 8:20 <10:19>, 27:12
31:23 <10:23>, 32:1 20:11 28:12 <10:20>, 29:5
<10:23>, 32:5 <10:24>, normal [1] <09:50> - <10:22>, 30:17 <10:22>,
<09:58>, 8:21 <09:58>, motion [21] <09:50> -
32:11 <10:24>, 32:12 1:25
F
8:22 <10:00>, 11:10 2:6 <09:50>, 2:7 <09:51>, 30:20 <10:22>, 30:21
<10:04>, 15:2 <10:05>, 2:21 <09:55>, 5:22 MS [43] <09:52> - 3:14 notation [1] <10:10> - <10:22>, 30:25
15:5 <10:06>, 16:20 <09:53>, 4:6 <09:53>, 19:21 ordered [1] <10:16> -
<09:59>, 10:7 <10:01>,
4:10 <09:53>, 4:22 nothing [3] <09:51> - 25:4
he
<10:08>, 18:21 <10:19>, 12:5 <10:01>, 12:10
28:2 <10:20>, 28:6 <09:54>, 5:2 <09:54>, 5:8 2:13 <09:54>, 4:24 ordering [1] <10:23> -
<10:04>, 14:22 <10:04>,
<10:23>, 31:18, 33:10 <09:54>, 5:14 <09:58>, <10:11>, 20:9 31:7
14:23 <10:05>, 15:16
matters [4] <09:56> - <10:14>, 23:1 <10:16>,
9:2 <10:00>, 10:25 notice [1] <10:16> - orders [4] <10:01> -
<10:00>, 11:8 <10:00>, 24:13 11:17 <10:05>, 15:7
6:18 <10:01>, 12:9 25:3 <10:16>, 25:5
<10:05>, 15:17 <10:20>, <10:17>, 25:11 <10:17>,
11:12 <10:01>, 11:16 numerous [2] <09:52> <10:07>, 18:5 <10:17>,
T
<10:01>, 11:22 <10:01>, - 3:25 <10:23>, 31:21 25:16

28:15 25:19 <10:17>, 26:4
mean [2] <10:05> - <10:17>, 26:5 <10:18>,
12:6 <10:08>, 18:9 original [2] <09:51> -
<10:08>, 18:15 <10:08>,
15:21 <10:17>, 25:23 26:25 <10:18>, 27:1 O 3:7 <10:18>, 26:25
meant [1] <10:23> - <10:24>, 32:14 <10:24>,
18:18 <10:09>, 19:14 Orly [11] - 2:8, 2:8
<10:09>, 19:19 <10:11>,
31:15 32:17 <09:49>, 1:12 <09:49>,
of
20:10 <10:11>, 20:14 oath [1] <10:04> -

mediator [2] <10:22> - motions [1] <10:24> - 1:13 <09:52>, 3:15
<10:11>, 20:19 <10:11>, 14:13 <09:56>, 7:11 <09:57>,
31:3 <10:23>, 31:9 32:25
21:1 <10:12>, 21:8 obtained [1] <10:19> - 7:22 <09:58>, 8:19
meeting [1] <10:00> - move [2] <10:24> -
<10:13>, 22:7 <10:13>, 27:25 <10:00>, 10:19 <10:21>,
11:9 32:15 <10:24>, 32:23
22:10 <10:14>, 22:14 occasionally [1] 29:11 <10:21>, 29:12
member [1] <10:07> - moving [1] <10:20> -
<10:14>, 22:19 <10:14>, <10:19> - 27:12
ds
18:6 28:16 outside [1] <10:18> -

23:4 <10:15>, 23:16 occupation [5] 27:1
memory [1] <09:51> - MR [62] <09:49> - 1:5
<10:16>, 24:7 <10:16>, <09:53> - 4:6 <09:53>,
3:6 <09:49>, 1:8 <09:49>, overstated [1] <10:00>
24:12 <10:16>, 24:17 4:13 <09:53>, 4:16 - 10:19
meruit [2] <10:18> - 1:11 <09:51>, 2:15
<10:16>, 24:23 <10:16>, <09:54>, 5:9 <09:54>,
27:2 <10:21>, 29:18 <09:51>, 2:19 <09:55>, overstepped [2]
25:3 <10:17>, 25:7 5:10
5:24 <09:55>, 6:3 <09:58> - 8:19 <10:02>,
ien
Mexico [1] <10:13> -

<10:17>, 25:9 <10:17>, office [6] <09:50> -
21:18 <09:56>, 7:1 <09:56>, 7:9 12:20
25:12 <10:18>, 27:7 1:20 <09:52>, 3:20
microphone [1] <09:57>, 7:21 <09:57>, own [4] <09:54> - 5:2
<10:19>, 27:16 <10:19>, <09:52>, 3:23 <10:12>,
<10:00> - 11:14 7:25 <09:57>, 8:6 <10:05>, 15:15 <10:17>,
28:1 <10:20>, 28:21 21:14 <10:13>, 21:20
might [9] <09:55> - 6:9 <09:58>, 8:13 <09:58>, 25:16
<10:20>, 29:2 <10:15>, 23:9
<09:57>, 7:14 <10:06>, 8:17 <09:58>, 9:7
must [2] <09:51> - 2:12 Offices [4] - 2:4, 2:8
16:11 <10:08>, 18:18 <09:58>, 9:10 <09:58>,
<10:18>, 26:22 <09:49>, 1:13 <10:21>,
P
Fr
<10:10>, 19:24 <10:11>, 9:13 <09:59>, 9:17

<09:59>, 10:4 <09:59>,
29:11
20:19 <10:21>, 29:22
10:9 <10:00>, 10:13, often [1] <10:21> - PA [1] - 2:5
<10:23>, 31:8 <10:23>,
10:15 <10:00>, 10:17 29:16 PADDOCK [2] - 1:24,
31:9
once [1] <09:58> - 9:7

7
m
33:14 <10:14>, 22:14 pretrial [1] <10:21> - 30:21 22:18
page [2] <09:57> - 7:23 perjury [4] <10:13> - 30:9 progress [1] <10:18> - reached [1] <10:20> -
<10:22>, 30:16 22:4 <10:14>, 22:20 PRETRIAL [1] - 1:17 26:18 28:22
co
papers [6] <10:00> - <10:14>, 23:4 prevented [2] <09:53> promoted [1] <10:24> - read [13] <09:56> - 7:7
10:21 <10:03>, 13:8 permanent [1] <09:52> - 4:7 <09:53>, 4:17 32:19 <09:57>, 7:19 <09:57>,
<10:03>, 13:17 <10:07>, - 3:24 preview [1] <09:55> - proper [2] <10:14> - 8:2 <09:57>, 8:9 <09:59>,
18:5 <10:09>, 19:4 petition [2] <09:50> - 6:8 23:1 <10:15>, 23:10 10:11 <10:00>, 10:23
<10:16>, 24:8 1:23 <10:01>, 11:23 previous [1] <10:11> - proposal [1] <10:19> - <10:00>, 11:1 <10:03>,
paralegal [2] <10:01> - ph [1] <10:02> - 12:25 20:17 27:24 13:17 <10:03>, 14:1
w.
11:25 <10:01>, 12:1 Philip [3] - 2:3, 2:4 private [4] <09:58> - propose [3] <10:18> - <10:07>, 18:4 <10:16>,
parallels [1] <10:21> - <09:49>, 1:8 8:22 <09:58>, 9:6 26:17 <10:20>, 28:25 24:8 <10:16>, 24:9
30:1 philjberg@gmail. <10:02>, 12:21 <10:04>, <10:21>, 29:7 <10:23>, 31:20
part [10] <09:58> - 9:7 com [1] - 2:6 14:14 proposed [1] <10:20> - reading [2] <09:57> -
<10:00>, 10:17 <10:01>, phrased [1] <10:06> - pro [26] <09:49> - 1:9 28:17 7:16 <10:05>, 15:24
Bo
11:24 <10:02>, 12:20 16:18 <09:50>, 1:24 <09:56>, prosecution [1] ready [2] <09:57> -
<10:02>, 12:21 <10:02>, place [1] <10:22> - 6:21 <09:59>, 10:7 <09:51> - 2:13 7:15 <09:57>, 7:18
12:24 <10:03>, 13:10 30:10 <10:01>, 12:5 <10:01>, protective [2] <09:55> reality [1] <10:19> -
<10:03>, 13:11 <10:03>, Plaintiff [1] <09:49> - 12:10 <10:02>, 13:1 - 6:14 <09:55>, 6:15 27:16
14:1 <10:07>, 17:19 1:8 <10:03>, 13:8 <10:03>, proven [2] <10:07> - realize [1] <09:57> -
parte [4] <09:56> - 7:3 PLAINTIFF [1] - 2:3 13:16 <10:04>, 14:22 17:5 <10:07>, 17:22 7:14
og
<09:56>, 7:8 <09:57>, Plaintiff(s [1] - 1:8 <10:04>, 14:24 <10:07>, provide [4] <10:00> - recently [1] <10:10> -
8:10 <09:58>, 8:20 planning [4] <10:00> - 17:21 <10:07>, 17:25 11:4 <10:00>, 11:6 19:22
particular [1] <10:10> - 10:25 <10:00>, 11:2 <10:07>, 18:4 <10:09>, <10:01>, 11:17 <10:01>, reconsideration [1]
20:1 <10:00>, 11:12 <10:01>, 19:4 <10:10>, 20:5 11:18 <10:05> - 15:16
particularly [1] 11:17 <10:10>, 20:8 <10:11>, provided [6] <09:54> - record [2] <10:03> -
F
<10:15> - 23:24 plead [1] <10:21> - 20:20 <10:11>, 20:25 4:25 <10:00>, 11:5 14:2 <10:04>, 15:1
parties [7] <10:00> - 29:22 <10:16>, 24:6 <10:16>, <10:01>, 11:22 <10:01>, recorded [1] - 33:9
11:3 <10:15>, 23:19 pleadings [1] <10:12> 24:11 <10:16>, 24:12 11:23 <10:01>, 11:25 reduction [1] - 33:12
<10:17>, 26:6 <10:20>, <10:16>, 24:16 <10:17>,
he
- 21:10 <10:14>, 23:5 reflect [1] <10:13> -
28:20 <10:22>, 30:25 point [4] <09:55> - 25:19 <10:23>, 31:18 providing [1] <10:10> - 22:5
<10:23>, 31:7 <10:24>, 6:17 <10:03>, 13:19 <10:24>, 32:8 20:2 regarding [1] <10:02> -
33:1 <10:13>, 21:22 <10:23>, probation [4] <10:09> - public [11] <09:58> - 13:3
party [2] <10:22> - 31:17 19:19 <10:12>, 21:4 8:21 <09:58>, 9:6 regards [2] <10:00> -
31:3 <10:23>, 31:9 possibilities [1] <10:12>, 21:15 <10:12>, <09:58>, 9:8 <09:58>, 11:4 <10:01>, 11:19
T
pay [1] <09:56> - 7:4 <10:23> - 31:8 21:17 9:12 <09:59>, 9:22 regularly [1] <10:13> -
paying [1] <09:55> - possible [4] <10:06> - problem [6] <09:56> - <09:59>, 9:24 <10:02>, 22:5
6:2 16:19 <10:06>, 16:23 7:10 <09:57>, 7:20 12:21 <10:02>, 12:22 regulations [1] -
Paz [1] - 2:9 <10:06>, 16:24 <10:08>, <09:57>, 7:21 <09:59>, <10:04>, 15:1 <10:08>, 33:13
pending [3] <09:50> - 9:17 <10:03>, 13:20 18:19 <10:08>, 18:23
of
18:13 Reinhardt [1] <10:23>

1:23 <10:04>, 15:2 posted [1] <10:09> - <10:19>, 28:2 published [1] <10:04> - 31:24
<10:16>, 25:5 19:1 proceeding [3] - 14:9 related [2] <10:12> -
Pennsylvania [18] postpone [1] <10:20> - <10:04> - 15:2 <10:05>, pursuant [1] <10:01> - 21:11 <10:13>, 21:20
<09:58> - 8:24 <10:01>, 29:2 15:11 <10:14>, 22:15 11:17 relevant [4] <09:54> -
11:20 <10:06>, 16:2 postponed [1] <10:10> proceeding's [1] puzzled [1] <09:51> - 5:4 <09:54>, 5:17
ds
<10:08>, 18:10 <10:09>, <09:59> - 9:15 2:12 <10:01>, 12:9

- 20:2
19:16 <10:10>, 19:22 practice [4] <10:06> - PROCEEDINGS [1] - remain [1] <09:51> -
<10:10>, 19:25 <10:12>, 16:11 <10:06>, 17:2 1:17 Q 2:18
21:11 <10:12>, 21:15 <10:08>, 18:7 <10:09>, proceedings [10] remember [3] <09:59>
<10:12>, 21:16 <10:13>, 19:12 <09:58> - 8:23 <09:58>, - 10:4 <09:59>, 10:10
21:20 <10:14>, 22:23 9:1 <09:58>, 9:5 <09:58>, quantum [2] <10:18> -
ien
practicing [1] <10:04> <10:07>, 17:4

<10:15>, 23:8 <10:15>, 9:12 <10:02>, 12:20 27:2 <10:21>, 29:18
- 15:3 REPORTER [2] -
23:13 <10:16>, 24:20 <10:04>, 14:14 <10:08>, quarter [1] <09:53> -
prejudge [1] <10:05> - 1:25 <10:00>, 11:13
<10:18>, 27:8 <10:19>, 18:19 <10:09>, 19:14 4:2
15:21 REPORTER'S [1] -
27:17 <10:19>, 28:5 <10:24>, 33:5, 33:10
preload [1] <10:05> - 1:17
people [2] <10:13> - 15:21 process [3] <10:07> - R representing [1]
22:2 <10:15>, 24:2 present [1] <10:00> - 17:6 <10:07>, 17:7 <09:52> - 3:15
Fr
perhaps [1] <10:22> - <10:07>, 17:8

11:3 raising [1] <09:57> - request [7] <10:03> -
31:6 presented [1] <09:52> produce [2] <10:22> - 13:12 <10:03>, 13:18
8:3
perjured [3] <10:12> - - 3:19 30:18 <10:03>, 14:3 <10:03>,
ran [1] <09:52> - 3:20
21:13 <10:13>, 22:11 PRESIDING [1] - 1:4 produced [1] <10:22> - 14:4 <10:03>, 14:6
rather [1] <10:14> -

8
m
<10:04>, 14:19 <10:04>, ruled [1] <10:16> - 18:20 sort [2] <10:13> - submission [1]
14:24 24:25 see [5] <09:55> - 6:5 21:22 <10:16>, 24:21 <10:23> - 31:19
requested [3] <09:56> rules [3] <10:08> - 18:9 <10:01>, 12:9 <10:15>, sorts [1] <09:53> - submit [2] <10:18> -
co
- 7:5 <10:02>, 12:24 <10:08>, 18:11 <10:22>, 24:2 <10:16>, 24:10 4:19 27:9 <10:19>, 27:13
<10:02>, 13:3 30:19 <10:20>, 28:16 sounds [1] <10:00> - submitted [2] <10:04>
requires [2] <09:55> - ruling [7] <09:49> - 1:9 seek [1] <10:17> - 26:7 10:14 - 14:23 <10:19>, 27:17
6:15 <09:55>, 6:17 <09:57>, 8:4 <09:57>, 8:8 send [1] <09:50> - 1:19 specifically [1] submitting [1] <10:17>
reside [3] <09:54> - <10:06>, 16:25 <10:06>, sent [2] <10:03> - <10:16> - 24:13 - 25:24
4:23 <10:12>, 21:17 17:3 <10:07>, 17:23 13:23 <10:03>, 13:24 spread [1] <10:04> - subordinating [1]
w.
<10:15>, 23:8 <10:19>, 27:20 serve [1] <10:05> - 14:9 <10:14> - 22:20
resident [3] <09:52> - rulings [2] <09:56> - 15:16 stand [1] <09:57> - 8:8 substituting [1]
3:24 <09:52>, 4:1 6:18 <09:56>, 6:19 set [7] <09:50> - 2:1 standard [1] <10:09> - <09:49> - 1:12
<09:53>, 4:22 run [1] <09:52> - 3:23 <09:52>, 3:9 <09:52>, 19:13 substitution [2]
resides [1] <09:51> - 3:11 <10:20>, 29:5 standing [14] <10:04> - <09:49> - 1:14 <09:50>,
Bo
2:25 S <10:21>, 29:6 <10:21>, 15:3 <10:05>, 15:7 1:17
residing [2] <09:54> - 30:7 <10:24>, 32:9 <10:05>, 15:9 <10:05>, succeed [1] <10:24> -
5:1 <09:54>, 5:15 settle [1] <10:22> - 15:12 <10:05>, 15:22 32:24
resolution [3] <09:59> SACV [3] - 1:10, 2:2 31:6 <10:06>, 16:8 <10:06>, suggested [1] <10:09>
<09:49>, 1:2
- 10:11 <10:22>, 31:1 settlement [1] <10:22> 16:12 <10:06>, 16:17 - 19:16
<10:24>, 32:16
sanction [8] <09:54> - - 31:4 <10:06>, 16:21 <10:06>, Suite [2] - 2:4, 2:9
og
resolved [6] <09:58> - 5:6 <10:05>, 15:7 17:1 <10:08>, 18:7
shake [1] <09:58> - 9:3 sum [1] <10:03> - 13:7
<10:05>, 15:10 <10:06>,
8:22 <10:04>, 15:2 Shakes [1] <09:58> - <10:08>, 18:12 <10:08>, superior [1] <10:01> -
<10:06>, 16:4 <10:10>,
16:12 <10:07>, 18:5 18:14 <10:09>, 19:12
9:2 11:20
<10:08>, 18:8 <10:08>,
20:6 <10:20>, 28:7 shortly [1] <10:23> - start [2] <10:21> - 30:4 supply [1] <10:02> -
<10:23>, 31:8
18:14 <10:08>, 18:18
31:19 <10:21>, 30:5 12:11
sanctioned [4]
F
resources [1] <10:05> showing [1] <09:52> - state [15] <09:52> - support [1] <10:13> -
<09:53> - 4:2 <10:11>,
- 15:17 3:24 3:17 <09:53>, 4:3 21:22
responded [1] <10:14> 20:15 <10:11>, 20:21
shown [2] <09:59> - <09:53>, 4:12 <09:53>, supposed [1] <10:16>
<10:19>, 27:23
he
- 22:24 10:2 <09:59>, 10:3 4:14 <09:54>, 4:23 - 24:24
sanctions [4] <10:04> <09:54>, 5:8 <09:54>, 5:9
response [4] <09:51> - shows [2] <09:54> - Supreme [3] <10:08> -
- 14:17 <10:10>, 20:4 <09:54>, 5:11 <09:54>,
3:3 <10:02>, 12:17 5:2 <10:12>, 21:11 18:10 <10:09>, 19:15
<10:11>, 20:17 <10:17>,
<10:02>, 12:23 <10:17>, sides [1] <10:20> - 5:12 <09:55>, 6:12 <10:10>, 19:21
25:12 <09:56>, 6:18 <09:56>,
25:21 28:16 surprised [1] <10:15> -
SANTA [2] - 1:17 6:19 <10:08>, 18:18
RESPONSE [1] signed [1] <09:49> - 23:22
T
<09:49>, 1:1
<10:24> - 33:2 1:16 <10:09>, 19:12 survive [1] <09:55> -
scenario [3] <10:24> - State [1] <09:52> -
responses [1] <10:02> simplified [1] <10:24> 5:22
32:21 <10:24>, 32:22 3:21
- 12:14 - 32:15 survives [1] <09:55> -
scheduled [2] <09:58> statement [4] <10:05>
responsibility [1] six [4] <10:20> - 28:18 6:6
- 9:7 <09:58>, 9:9 - 15:23 <10:08>, 18:24
<10:12> - 21:7
of
<10:21>, 29:19 <10:21>, sworn [3] <10:01> -

scheduling [11] <10:14>, 23:6 <10:15>,
results [1] <10:11> - 29:23 <10:21>, 30:7 11:25 <10:14>, 22:21
<09:50> - 1:25 <09:59>,
20:18 six-day [1] <10:20> - 23:8 <10:14>, 22:22
10:8 <10:01>, 12:10 STATES [1] - 1:1
review [1] <10:03> - 28:18 system [1] <10:11> -
<10:18>, 26:17 <10:20>,
13:8 Sloan [1] <10:02> - States [2] <10:07> - 20:15
28:13 <10:20>, 29:3 17:5 <10:07>, 17:22
RICO [6] <09:50> - 2:7 12:25 Systems [2] <09:49> -
<10:21>, 29:6 <10:22>,
ds
<09:50>, 2:9 <09:51>, solely [1] <10:18> - states [2] <10:01> - 1:4 <09:49>, 1:7
30:17 <10:22>, 30:21
2:19 <09:51>, 2:22 26:24 12:1, 33:13 SYSTEMS [1] - 1:13
<10:22>, 30:24 <10:22>,
<09:55>, 5:22 <09:55>, someone [4] <09:54> - status [3] <10:01> -
30:25
6:5 11:18 <10:02>, 13:3
seal [7] <09:56> - 7:7
5:19 <10:09>, 19:11 T
rights [1] <10:15> - <10:12>, 21:6 <10:14>, <10:09>, 19:5
<09:57>, 8:11 <09:58>,
ien
23:21 22:18 stenographically [1]

8:12 <09:58>, 8:15 tabbed [1] <10:16> -
RMR [2] - 1:24, 33:14 somewhat [1] <10:12> - 33:9
<09:59>, 9:19 <09:59>, 24:10
Ross [4] - 2:15 - 21:11 step [2] <10:00> -
9:23 <09:59>, 10:2 TAITZ [43] <09:52> -
<09:49>, 1:6 <10:18>, somewhere [1] 11:14 <10:00>, 11:15
sealed [1] <09:56> - 3:14 <09:53>, 4:6
26:14 <10:24>, 32:10 <10:23> - 31:20 still [4] <09:51> - 2:22
7:5 <09:53>, 4:10 <09:53>,
ROSS [6] <09:49> - 1:5 soon [2] <09:55> - 6:3 <09:53>, 4:19 <09:55>,
sealing [1] <09:59> - 4:22 <09:54>, 5:2
<10:18>, 26:13 <10:18>, <10:24>, 32:16 6:5 <10:04>, 15:3
10:3
Fr
26:24 <10:18>, 27:4 street [1] <09:55> - <09:54>, 5:8 <09:54>,

sorry [4] <10:01> -
second [2] <09:55> - 5:14 <09:58>, 9:2
<10:19>, 27:21 <10:24>, 12:8 <10:02>, 12:12 6:13
5:22 <10:21>, 29:13 <10:00>, 10:25 <10:00>,
32:11 <10:08>, 18:15 <10:24>, subject [1] <09:49> -
secretary [1] <10:08> - 11:8 <10:00>, 11:12
rule [1] <10:23> - 31:19 32:9 1:9

9
m
<10:01>, 11:16 <10:01>, thinking [1] <09:55> - turn [3] <09:56> - 6:21 19:4 <10:10>, 20:5 <10:12>, 21:14 <10:13>,
11:22 <10:01>, 12:6 6:10 <10:07>, 18:3 <10:20>, <10:10>, 20:8 <10:11>, 21:20
<10:08>, 18:9 <10:08>, third [3] <09:53> - 4:2 28:13 20:20 <10:11>, 20:25 World [1] - 2:12
co
18:15 <10:08>, 18:18 <10:22>, 31:3 <10:23>, twice [2] <10:11> - <10:16>, 24:6 <10:16>, worst [2] <10:24> -
<10:09>, 19:14 <10:09>, 31:9 20:15 <10:11>, 20:21 24:11 <10:16>, 24:12 32:21
19:19 <10:11>, 20:10 thorough [1] <10:16> - two [4] <09:51> - 2:20 <10:16>, 24:16 <10:17>, worst-case [2] <10:24>
<10:11>, 20:14 <10:11>, 24:9 <09:55>, 5:23 <10:01>, 25:19 <10:23>, 31:19 - 32:21
20:19 <10:11>, 21:1 thoughts [2] <09:56> - 12:9 <10:17>, 25:9 <10:24>, 32:8 write [1] <10:21> - 30:9
<10:12>, 21:8 <10:13>, 6:20 <09:59>, 10:9 type [2] <09:53> - 4:6 Viejo [1] - 2:9 writing [1] <10:00> -
w.
22:7 <10:13>, 22:10 thousands [1] <09:55> <09:53>, 4:16 view [1] <09:55> - 6:17 11:2
<10:14>, 22:14 <10:14>, - 6:1 violated [1] <10:04> - written [2] <10:01> -
22:19 <10:14>, 23:4 thread [1] <09:50> - U 14:13 11:16 <10:09>, 19:4
<10:15>, 23:16 <10:16>, 2:10 volume [1] <10:18> - wrong [2] <09:51> -
24:7 <10:16>, 24:12 Thursday [1] <10:02> - 26:19 3:6 <10:15>, 23:11
Bo
<10:16>, 24:17 <10:16>, U.S [1] - 1:25 voluminous [2]
12:12
24:23 <10:16>, 25:3 ultimately [1] <10:20>
today [7] <09:50> -
- 28:11
<10:07> - 18:5 <10:19>, Y
<10:17>, 25:7 <10:17>, 1:22 <09:57>, 7:16 28:4
25:9 <10:17>, 25:12 <09:57>, 7:17 <10:01>,
under [3] <10:04> - vs [1] - 1:10
<10:18>, 27:7 <10:19>, 12:10 <10:02>, 12:23 14:19 <10:19>, 27:19 year [4] <09:52> - 3:21
27:16 <10:19>, 28:1 <10:23>, 31:19 <09:54>, 5:15 <10:09>,
<10:07>, 17:14 <10:23>, W
og
<10:20>, 28:21 <10:20>, 32:6 undermines [1] 19:8 <10:14>, 23:1
29:2 <10:13> - 21:25 years [1] <10:04> -
topic [1] <09:56> - 7:9
Taitz [21] - 2:8, 2:8 UNITED [1] - 1:1 wait [2] <10:00> - 11:6 15:4
towards [1] <10:05> -
<09:49>, 1:6 <09:49>, United [2] <10:07> - <10:19>, 27:11 yes-or-no [1] <10:09> -
15:14
1:12 <09:49>, 1:13 17:5 <10:07>, 17:22 waiting [2] <09:50> - 19:17
track [2] <09:59> - 10:6
<09:52>, 3:15 <09:56>, united [1] - 33:13 1:18 <10:21>, 29:13 Yosef [2] <09:49> - 1:6
F
<10:20>, 28:8
7:11 <09:57>, 7:22 unless [2] <09:59> - Walker [1] - 2:12 <10:18>, 26:14
Trade [1] - 2:12
<09:58>, 8:19 <10:00>, 10:2 <10:22>, 31:2 wants [1] <10:09> -
traditionally [1]
10:19 <10:00>, 10:22 unnecessary [1] 19:5
he
<09:56> - 6:19
<10:02>, 12:14 <10:02>, <10:18> - 26:21 weary [1] <10:05> -
TRANSCRIPT [1] -
12:18 <10:02>, 12:24 unpublished [1] 15:13
1:17
<10:17>, 25:22 <10:17>, <10:05> - 15:19 Website [1] <10:09> -
transcript [2] - 33:9,
26:4 <10:18>, 26:12 unravel [1] <10:03> - 19:1
33:11
<10:18>, 26:14 <10:21>, 13:14 week [1] <10:02> -
transcripts@
T
29:12 <10:21>, 30:1 up [6] <09:51> - 2:23 12:12

ocrecord.com [1] -
take [5] <10:04> - <10:03>, 13:7 <10:18>, weekend [1] <09:57> -
1:25
14:19 <10:15>, 23:17 26:21 <10:24>, 32:15 7:16
travel [2] <10:00> -
<10:22>, 30:10 <10:23>, <10:24>, 32:16 <10:24>, weeks [2] <09:51> -
11:8 <10:08>, 18:22
31:11 <10:23>, 31:18 32:23 2:20 <10:17>, 25:9
of
trial [13] <09:50> - 2:1

taken [2] <10:07> - update [1] <10:02> - Western [1] <10:17> -
<10:20>, 28:17 <10:20>,
17:12 <10:20>, 28:15 13:3 25:14
28:19 <10:20>, 29:1
ten [1] <10:14> - 23:7 urge [1] <10:22> - whole [2] <10:07> -
<10:20>, 29:5 <10:21>,
tendency [1] <10:03> - 30:20 17:4
29:6 <10:21>, 30:5
13:14 William [2] - 2:11
<10:21>, 30:8 <10:22>,
V
ds
tens [1] <09:55> - 6:1 31:2 <10:23>, 31:10 <09:49>, 1:11

terms [1] <10:12> - <10:24>, 32:9 <10:24>,
willing [1] <10:18> -
21:16 32:16 <10:24>, 32:23 27:9
Texas [11] <09:51> - version [1] <10:01> - wish [1] <09:57> - 8:5
trials [1] <10:21> - 30:4 11:16
2:25 <09:53>, 4:3 tried [2] <09:54> - 5:8 wishes [1] <09:58> -
<09:53>, 4:13 <09:53>,
versus [1] <10:06> - 8:14
ien
<10:20>, 28:17
4:14 <09:53>, 4:15 16:1 woman [6] <10:09> -
troubled [1] <10:17> - vice [26] <09:49> - 1:9
<09:54>, 4:23 <09:54>, 19:9 <10:12>, 21:12
26:3 <09:50>, 1:24 <09:56>,
5:1 <09:54>, 5:9 <09:54>, <10:12>, 21:17 <10:13>,
troubling [1] <10:09> - 6:21 <09:59>, 10:7
5:11 <10:17>, 25:14 21:23 <10:13>, 22:13
19:7 <10:01>, 12:5 <10:01>,
theft [1] <10:14> - 23:7 <10:14>, 23:6
true [4] <10:08> - 12:10 <10:02>, 13:1
therefore [4] <09:56> - words [1] <10:08> -
18:25 <10:15>, 23:15 <10:03>, 13:8 <10:03>,
Fr
7:6 <09:58>, 8:15 18:8

<10:23>, 31:22, 33:8 13:16 <10:04>, 14:22
<10:16>, 24:14 <10:16>, work [1] <09:54> - 5:10
try [1] <09:54> - 5:7 <10:04>, 14:25 <10:07>,
24:23 working [4] <10:01> -
Tuesday [2] <10:21> - 17:21 <10:07>, 17:25
thin [1] <09:50> - 2:10 12:2 <10:09>, 19:8
30:2 <10:21>, 30:4 <10:07>, 18:4 <10:09>,

LINCOLN V DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, Et Al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - DCCD Guilford 10d Lincoln - PDF - Merged

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LINCOLN V DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, Et Al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - DCCD Guilford 10d Lincoln - PDF - Merged

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

m

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL INFORMATION

REPORTER'S DAILY TRANSCRIPT OF PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS

IN BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF: Philip J Berg

IN BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT: Orly Taitz:

3 Charles Edward Lincoln, III v Daylight Chemical Information

09:49 5 MR. ROSS: Good morning, Your Honor.

6 Jonathan Ross on behalf of Defendants Yosef Taitz

8 MR. BERG: Philip Berg on behalf of the Plaintiff,

09:49 10 Your Honor.

12 substituting in on behalf of Lewis Brisbois for Orly Taitz

13 and the Law Offices of Orly Taitz.

14 I apologize to the court. The substitution was

16 department, so I don't think that you have the signed

18 THE CLERK: We're just waiting for the e-mail

19 copies, Judge. He was going to send it when he got back to

095020 his office.

21 THE COURT: All right. We have a couple of items

23 I would like to address the pending petition for

24 pro hac vice admission.

095025 I also want to engage in our normal scheduling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3 And before I do that, I would like to ask what is

6 Mr. Berg, there was a motion to dismiss brought

8 leave to amend. If -- if this is in federal court, only

0950 10 thin thread.

13 malicious prosecution claim, which I think would have nothing

14 to do with federal jurisdiction.

0951 15 MR. BERG: You're right and I apologize,

17 THE COURT: So what is the likelihood that this

18 will remain in my court?

19 MR. BERG: If the RICO claim -- we have to file an

0951 20 amended complaint. We have two more weeks to do that,

21 Your Honor, and I anticipate a motion to dismiss after that.

22 If the RICO claim is out, then we still have a case

23 here -- and I wasn't up on it last time -- based on

24 diversity, Your Honor.

0951 25 Charles Lincoln resides in Texas and the other

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3 THE COURT: Any response from the defense about

09:51 5 And to be honest, let me say this. I'm going from

6 memory now, Mr. Berg, so I could be wrong. I don't think

8 defense anticipated a diversity claim and kind of talked

12 weren't facing diversity issues.

14 MS. TAITZ: I didn't have a chance to introduce

0952 15 myself, and I'm Orly Taitz and I'm representing

17 I would like to state that diversity was not in the

18 complaint; it was not in the first amended complaint either.

21 the State of California last year when he filed his

23 In order to run for office, he had to file a -- the

24 document's showing he's the permanent resident of California.

095225 Additionally, he filed numerous legal actions as a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3 of a million dollars in the state of Texas. 150,000

6 MS. TAITZ: His main occupation is filing this type

8 THE COURT: My understanding of diversity you're

0953 10 MS. TAITZ: If I -- if I can get leeway of just a

12 He is not allowed to file any lawsuits in the state

13 of Texas. His main occupation is filing lawsuits, so he has

14 no job in the state of Texas; he has no business in the state

0953 15 of Texas. He is not allowed to file his -- his -- his only

16 occupation is filing these type of frivolous lawsuits. He