Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Letter to Data Protection Commissioner Re Garda Blocking Proposals

Letter to Data Protection Commissioner Re Garda Blocking Proposals

Ratings: (0)|Views: 27,219 |Likes:
Published by TJ McIntyre
This is a letter from Digital Rights Ireland to the Data Protection Commissioner in relation to the privacy issues raised by Garda proposals to introduce internet filtering in Ireland.
This is a letter from Digital Rights Ireland to the Data Protection Commissioner in relation to the privacy issues raised by Garda proposals to introduce internet filtering in Ireland.

More info:

Published by: TJ McIntyre on Mar 29, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/10/2013

pdf

text

original

 
D I G I T A L R I G H T S I R E L A N D L T D .
REGISTERED NUMBER 410355
REGISTERED OFFICE: 10 CASTLE HILL, BENNETTSBRIDGEROAD, KILKENNY 
EMAIL: INFO@DIGITALRIGHTS.IE
DIRECTORS: TJ MCINTYRE, COLM MACCARTHAIGH, ANT
OIN O’LACHTNAIN
 
Mr. Billy HawkesData Protection CommissionerCanal HouseStation RoadPortarlingtonCo. Laoisvia post and emailSaturday, 26 March 2011
Re: Garda Proposals for Internet Blocking and Monitoring of Internet Use
Dear Mr. HawkesIt has recently emerged that the Garda Síochána has written in private to Irish internet serviceproviders asking them to put in place a system of internet blocking of sites which are allegedto contain child pornography, and a copy of one such letter is enclosed.While well intentioned, such systems raise significant privacy and data protection issueswhich have not been addressed, particularly as what is envisaged is a purely self-regulatorysystem with no legislative basis or judicial oversight.As you are already aware, the European Data Protection Supervisor recently considered theissues presented by blocking systems in his opinion of 10 May 2010 on the proposal for aDirective of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating the sexual abuse,sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, repealing Framework Decision2004/68/JHA. In that opinion, he noted that
appropriate safeguards are needed to ensure thatmonitoring and/or blocking will only be done in a strictly targeted way and under judicialcontrol, and that misuse of this mechanism is prevented by adequate security measures
. In thiscase
, however, no such controls are proposed.
 
Page
2
of 
3
 Indeed, one particularly unusual feature of the Garda proposals seeks to monitor internet usewithout any legislative basis whatsoever. Although acknowledging that a
customer may haveaccessed a [blocked] site inadvertently
the proposals go on to request that in such cases ISPsshould provide
details of other websites visited by the user, along with other technicaldetails
.As you know, disclosure of such information would not be permitted under theCommunications (Retention of Data) Act 2011 and indeed the disclosure of browsinghistories without Ministerial approval would appear to be an offence under section 98 of thePostal and Telecommunications Services Act 1983. It is, therefore, quite remarkable thatdisclosure of this information is being sought on an entirely non-legislative basis and withoutany reference to the legislation which is already in place in this area.Such disclosure would also give rise to very serious data protection concerns, particularly asit is very often possible to identify users based on details of the URLs which they havevisited, and the other
technical details
sought will make identification easier again.It should also be noted that the designation of URLs to be blocked itself gives rise tosignificant data protection issues. Domain names or URLs often identify individuals. In somecases
– 
e.g. www.EndaKenny.ie or www.example.com/users/JohnDoe
– 
the domain name orURL on its own will identify an individual. In other cases, the publicly available WHOISinformation will identify the owner of a domain.Consequently, a decision to block a particular domain name or URL can amount to a veryserious accusation indeed against an identifiable individual. This is particularly so given thatvisitors to that domain name or URL will be presented with a
STOP page
stating that thispage
has been documented by the Garda Síochána as having been used in the distribution of material depicting the sexual abuse of children
. If, for example, a user tries to accesswww.example.com/users/JohnDoe and is presented with such a page, it is very likely thatthey will infer that John Doe has been involved in the distribution of child pornography.In summary, therefore, it appears to Digital Rights Ireland that the Garda proposals forblocking present very serious data protection issues and we would request that before any

Activity (4)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->