Paid for by Ed Martin for US SenateAs a matter of general understanding, I offer these observations:The U.S. Constitution and the sovereignty of the people of MissouriI understand that the United States Constitution and our founders intended a very specificrelationship between the federal government and the states. By ratifying the Constitution, thestates were ceding to the federal government a subset of roles or powers that, under normalcircumstances, would be the purview of a sovereign nation. For example, states do not go towar, mint currency, or levy tariffs on imported goods. The 10
th
amendment makes it clear, inany honest reading, that the states have the sovereign authority to manage their affairs for theircitizens in all but a limited number of situations as clearly spelled out. That this is poorly
understood is a failure in education and a willful disregard of what our nation’s founders and
founding documents enacted.Over the years, and particularly in the first half of the 20
th
century, the federal government
began encroaching upon the states’ sovereign prerogatives, typically in pursuit of a progressive
economic agenda (expansion of the Commerce Clause, e.g.). These insults to state sovereigntywere great and small, and, it must be admitted, they were advanced under both Republican and
Democrat leadership. Nearly every department of the President’s cabinet, for example, creates
some measure of havoc at the state level either through regulation or funding offered with a
rat’s nest of strings attached. These realities have brought us to this point where we the states
and the people are becoming broke and hobbled.Respective states have a right and duty to stand be
tween the federal government and the state’s
citizens in some circumstances. When the federal government
–
which derives its authorityfrom the states
–
oversteps its boundaries, the state must interpose itself between the federalgovernment and the people.
This is not a time for choosing: interposition is aREQUIREMENT of our system of government.
This defense of the state ought to begin with each United States Senator whose task is to put to
rest any encroachment upon his fellow citizens’ rights and so
vereignty. That senator should
work in consultation and concert with the people’s representatives at home, to keep the Feds
tending to Federal tasks and leaving the states to their business. I do not think the role of a U.S.
Senator is to be a “super representative” or some sort of associate President to help burden
states and their citizens with new programs or regulations.
Add a Comment