Cause TroubleEverywhere: A De-fense of Direct Ac-tion at the 2008RNC
I’m a wobbly because I don’t like work.
I reject thedignity of waged-labor and believe in a fighting unionfor the liberation from rather than of work.
Work under capitalism enables the boss to steal our laborpower and imposes hierarchical and divisive forms of social organization.
It is true that we are exploited onthe job.
It is also true that the capitalist class is para-sitic and unnecessary and therefore requires work asan instrument of social organization.
Workplace organizing is necessary to alter the balanceof power between workers and bosses.
Withoutworkplace organizing our jobs would be even moredefeatingthan theyare now.However,it is notclear thatthe strate-gies weuse toorganizeour work-places arethe in-strumentsof revolution.
History teaches that ruptures and socialtransformations do not actually follow the linear modelof workplace to industry to general strike.
Instead, asStaughton Lynd explained at the 2002 IWW GeneralAssembly, “in the moments of revolution or near-revolution during the past century and a half we findthat poor and working people did not conduct strugglethrough organizations already in existence when thecrisis began…they acted through new institutions, cre-ated for the purpose at hand.”
Furthermore, organizing on the job is meant to alterthe balance of power between workers and bosses, notto prefigure a world beyond capitalism.
We should notblame it for not doing what it does not set out to do.
We should push our organizing strategies beyond our jobs to force a confrontation with the reproduction of exploitation through our social relations.
This confron-tation may be expressed as a refusal to transform thepower of our living labor into capital, or simply as therefusal of work.
In this sense, we evolve from the or-ganization of our workplaces to the disorganization of work.
Mass convergence protests fromthe millennial “Battle of Seattle”to the 2008 Republican NationalConvention express a commonrefusal of the social organizationof life according to capitalistcommand.
This refusal is ex-pressed in a number of ways: anti-capitalist blocs, the formation of autonomous zones, claiming anddefending territory, the destruc-tion of property, expropriation,and other forms of socialtrouble-making.
Such forms of action do more than signify orpublicize the cause of the workingclass—they actively build our ca-pacity to struggle in common fora world beyond capitalism.
These convergences share acommon history with the revolu-tionary tendencies of the IWWwhich challenge the entire socialorder—our his-tory as a revolu-tionary union.
We organizeworkers to startacting like a un-ion on the job;we should startacting revolu-tionary as aunion.
Today,revolutionaryunionism doesnot mean layingsiege to cities anddisrupting the capitalist class fromplanning their liberation fromworkers (as our enemies will bedoing in St. Paul during the RNC).
But one day I hope it will.
I hopewe will be prepared as a revolu-tionary union to use all weaponsin the workers arsenal.
If another world is possible, hell, if this world is possible, it is a worldbeyond capitalism—beyondbosses, beyond the social normsof profit, beyond the democraticfaçade of electoral politics, beyondwork.
And so, during the RNC, asrevolutionary workers, we shouldliberate our desire from the fan-tasy of mastering and dominatingcapitalism solely through industrialstrength.
Instead, cause troubleeverywhere.
-FW Matt May
TheStruggleContinuesin theStarbucksCampaign
Today marks one month sinceworkers at the Mall of AmericaStarbucks donned red-and-black pins and declared their affiliationwith the IWW Starbucks WorkersUnion. Our struggle has just be-gun, but already we have won im-portant victories.There are many issues in ourworkplace that demonstrate man-agement’s disregard for the well-being of the workers. We make apoverty wage, and don’t have anyguarantee of work hours fromweek to week. Chronic under-staffing leaves us scrambling todeal with the workload put on us.With a company the size of Star-bucks, how can we as a union winour demands?
We decided to address our griev-ances one by one, starting withproblems that can be fixed bystore-level management. Foryears, workers at our store havebeen complaining about the heatlevel in the shop during the sum-mer months. After several hoursof cranking out Frappucinnos,baristas are drenched in sweat.The heat level is not only uncom-fortable, it’s unsanitary and unsafe.This is a problem that could beremedied very easily. All manage-ment would need to do is buy usa fan. We asked them to do thisrepeatedly, and were told that itwould be “too expensive” or thathaving a fan would violate healthcode. We got tired of their ex-cuses, and decided to take action.On Monday August 4th, for unionbaristas walked into the back room to talk with our Manager.They told him that they were giv-ing him one last chance- eitherManagement could buy a fan for
THE ORGANIZER
3
Add a Comment