Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.4.5 In the event of any material proving unsatisfactory, 1.7.2 Heat treatment is to be carried out in properly
during subsequent working, machining or fabrication, such constructed furnaces which are efficiently maintained and
material is to be rejected, notwithstanding any previous have adequate means for control and recording of
certification. temperature. The furnace dimensions are to be such as to
allow the whole item to be uniformly heated to the necessary
temperature. In the case of very large components which
1.5 Alternative survey procedure require heat treatment, alternative methods will be specially
considered.
1.5.1 Where materials are manufactured in quantity by
semi-continuous or continuous processes under closely 1.7.3 The manufacturer is to maintain the records,
controlled conditions, an alternative system for testing and including the temperature charts of all heat treatments for at
inspection may be adopted, subject to the approval of LR. least seven years.
1.6.7 The manufacturer is to maintain for at least seven 1.10.1 The dimensions, number and direction of test
years records of all chemical analyses and these are to be specimens are to be in accordance with the requirements of
made available to the Surveyor when required. Chapter 2 and the specific requirements for the product.
1.10.3 In the Rules, mechanical properties are specified in 1.11.5 When a batch of material is rejected, the remaining
SI units, but alternative units may be used for acceptance items or pieces in the batch may be resubmitted individually
testing. In such cases, the specified values are to be for test, and those which give satisfactory results may be
converted in accordance with the appropriate conversions accepted.
given in Table 1.1.1. It is preferred that test results be
reported in SI units, but alternative units may be used 1.11.6 At the option of the manufacturer, rejected material
provided that the test certificate gives, in the same units, the may be resubmitted as another grade and may then be
equivalent specification values. accepted, provided that the test results comply with the
appropriate requirements.
Table 1.1.1 Conversions from SI units to metric 1.11.7 When material which is intended to be supplied in
and Imperial units the ‘as-rolled’ or ‘hot finished’ condition fails test, it may be
suitably heat treated and resubmitted for test. Similarly
1 N/mm2 or MPa = 0,102 kgf/mm2 materials supplied in the heat treated condition may be reheat
1 N/mm2 or MPa = 0,0647 tonf/in2 treated and resubmitted for test. Unless otherwise agreed by
1 N/mm2 or MPa = 0,145 x 103 lbf/in2 the Surveyor, such reheat treatment is to be limited to one
1J = 0,102 kgf m repeat of the final heat treatment cycle.
1J = 0,738 ft lbs
1 kgf/mm2 = 9,81 N/mm2 or MPa
1 tonf/in2 = 15,45 N/mm2 or MPa 1.12 Visual and non-destructive examination
1 lbf/in2 = 6,89 x 10–3 N/mm2 or MPa
1.12.1 Prior to the final acceptance of materials, surface
1 kgf m = 9,81 J
inspection, verification of dimensions and non-destructive
1 ft lbf = 1,36 J
examination are to be carried out in accordance with the
requirements detailed in subsequent Chapters of these Rules.
1.11 Re-test procedures 1.12.2 When there is visible evidence to doubt the
soundness of any material or component, such as flaws in
1.11.1 Where the result of any test, other than an impact test specimens or suspicious surface marks, the manufac-
test, does not comply with the requirements, two additional turer is expected to prove the quality of the material by any
tests of the same type may be made. For acceptance of the suitable method.
material, satisfactory results are to be obtained from both of
these additional tests.
1.13 Rectification of defective material
1.11.2 Where the results from a set of three impact test
specimens do not comply with the requirements, an 1.13.1 Small surface imperfections may be removed by
additional set of three impact test specimens may be tested mechanical means provided that, after such treatment, the
provided that not more than two individual values are less dimensions are acceptable, the area is proved free from defects
than the required average value and, of these, not more than and the rectification has been completed in accordance with
one is less than 70 per cent of this average value. The results any applicable requirements of subsequent Chapters of these
obtained are to be combined with the original results to form Rules and to the satisfaction of the Surveyor.
a new average which, for acceptance, is to be not less than
the required average value. Additionally, for these combined 1.13.2 The repair of defects by welding can be accepted
results, not more than two individual values are to be less than only when permitted by the appropriate specific requirements
the required average value and, of these, not more than one and provided that the agreement of the Surveyor is obtained
is to be less than 70 per cent of this average value. before the work is commenced. When a repair has been
agreed it is necessary in all cases to prove by suitable
1.11.3 The additional tests detailed in 1.11.1 and 1.11.2 methods of non-destructive examination that the defects have
are, where possible, to be made on material adjacent to the been completely removed before welding is commenced.
original samples. For castings, where insufficient material Welding procedures and inspection on completion of the
remains in the original test samples, the additional tests may repair are to be in accordance with the appropriate specific
be made on other test samples representative of the castings. requirements and are to be to the satisfaction of the Surveyor.
See also Chapter 2 for discarding of test specimens.
1.11.4 When unsatisfactory results are obtained from tests 1.14 Identification of materials
representative of a batch of material, the item or piece from
which the tests were taken is to be rejected. The remainder 1.14.1 The manufacturer is to adopt a system of identification
of the material in the batch may be accepted provided that which will enable all finished materials to be traced to the
two further items or pieces are selected and tested with original cast, and the Surveyors are to be given full facilities for
satisfactory results. If the tests from one or both of these tracing the material when required. When any item has been
additional items or pieces give unsatisfactory results, the identified by the personal mark of a Surveyor, or his deputy,
batch is to be rejected. this is not to be removed until an acceptable new identification
mark has been made by a Surveyor. Failure to comply with
this condition will render the item liable to rejection.
1.14.2 Before any item is finally accepted it is to be clearly 2.2 Qualifications for approval
marked by the manufacturer in at least one place with the
particulars detailed in the appropriate specific requirements. 2.2.1 Applications for approval under this Scheme will
generally be considered only from manufacturers who are well
1.14.3 Hard stamping is to be used except where this may known to LR and where experience has shown their products
be detrimental to the material, in which case stencilling, to be of a consistently high standard. Works manufacturing
painting or electric etching is to be used. Paints used to steel or aluminium alloys must previously have been approved
identify alloy steels are to be free from lead, copper, zinc or tin, by LR in accordance with the requirements of 1.3. Special
i.e. the dried film is not to contain any of these elements in consideration will be given to any new works applying for
quantities of more than 250 ppm. approval.
1.14.4 Where a number of identical items are securely 2.2.2 The manufacturer is to demonstrate that the firm
fastened together in bundles, the manufacturer need only has experience consistent with the technology and complexity
brand the top item of each bundle. Alternatively, a durable of the product type for which approval is sought and that the
label giving the required particulars may be attached to each firm’s products have been of a consistently high standard.
bundle.
2.3.5 Products for which approval is sought. A detailed 2.4.6 Management review. The Quality System
specification for each product, grade and thickness or weight established in accordance with the requirements of this
range for which approval is requested. This is to include the Section is to be systematically reviewed at appropriate
following: intervals by the manufacturer to ensure its continued currency
• De-oxidation and, where appropriate, grain refining and effectiveness. Records of such management reviews are
practices. to be maintained and made available to the Surveyors.
• Chemical composition.
• Frequency of ladle or other samples for chemical 2.4.7 Contract review. The manufacturer is to establish
analysis. and implement a system for conducting a contract review
• Condition of supply. prior to and after acceptance to ensure that:
• Specified mechanical properties and frequency of tests. (a) the requirements of the contract are adequately defined
• Tolerances on important dimensions. and documented;
• Standards for the acceptance of surface and internal (b) any requirements differing from those specified in the
imperfections. original enquiry/tender are resolved; and
• Frequency of non-destructive testing. (c) the manufacturer has the capacity to meet and verify
The Rule requirements are to be observed and, where these compliance with the specified requirements.
give options, the manufacturer must clearly indicate which The manufacturer is to describe how amendments are
optional condition will be used in production. identified and reviewed and how the amendments are
conveyed to the works’ functions concerned.
2.3.6 Data. Collated test data for a period of at least
three months. Such test data need not necessarily relate to 2.4.8 Quality System documentation and change
products previously certified by LR and is, if possible, to cover control. The Quality System is to be documented in a Quality
each product, grade, thickness or weight range and condition Manual which is to have its own documented control system.
of supply for which approval is requested. The data is to be The control system is to ensure that:
presented in a suitable statistical form showing at least the (a) documents are reviewed and approved for adequacy by
number of samples, minimum, maximum and average values authorized personnel prior to use, are uniquely identified,
and the standard deviation. This data is required for all include indication of approval and revision status and are
elements in the specified chemical composition, including available at the appropriate locations;
grain refining elements if these are used, and for all specified (b) all changes to documentation are in writing and are
mechanical properties. For higher tensile ship steels, the controlled in a manner that precludes the use of
carbon equivalent values are also required. Similar data is superseded or otherwise inapplicable documents; and
also required for significant dimensions (usually thickness) and (c) provision is made for the prompt removal of obsolete
for rejections due to surface defects, internal unsoundness or documentation from all points of issue or use.
other reasons. Rejections during manufacture and after Documents and data may be maintained on any type of
delivery are to be shown separately. media, e.g. hard copy or electronic media.
2.4.4 Resources. The manufacturer is to provide 2.4.11 Purchase orders. Each purchase order is to
adequate resources including trained personnel and suitable contain a clear description of the material or service ordered
equipment to perform management, production and including as applicable, the following:
verification activities in compliance with the Quality System. (a) The type, class, grade or other precise identification.
(b) The title or other positive identification and applicable
2.4.5 Management representative. The manufacturer issue of specifications, drawings, process requirements,
is to appoint a management representative preferably inspection instructions and other relevant data.
independent of other functions, who is to have defined All purchase orders are to be reviewed and approved for
authority and responsibilities for the implementation and adequacy prior to release.
maintenance of the quality system.
2.4.12 Verification of purchased material and services. (a) all activities defined in the specification, quality plan or
The manufacturer is to ensure that the Surveyors are afforded other documented procedure have been completed;
the right to verify at source or upon receipt that purchased and
material and services conform to specified requirements. (b) all inspections and tests that should have been
Verification by the Surveyor does not relieve the manufacturer conducted at earlier stages have been completed and
of his responsibility to provide acceptable material nor does it that the data is acceptable.
preclude subsequent rejection. No products shall be dispatched until all requirements of the
specification have been met and all activities defined in the
2.4.13 Identification. The manufacturer is to establish a quality plan or other documented procedures have been
system for identification and subsequent traceability of raw completed unless, in exceptional circumstances, the product
materials, semi-finished and finished products. is released under the written authorisation of the Surveyors.
In all cases, the inspection record is to identify the inspection
2.4.14 Manufacturing control. The manufacturer is to authority responsible for the release of the product.
ensure that those operations which directly affect quality are
carried out under controlled conditions. These include, but 2.4.19 Inspection equipment. The manufacturer is to be
are not restricted to, the following: responsible for providing, controlling, calibrating and
(a) Written work instructions that prescribe the communica- maintaining the inspection, measuring and test equipment
tion of specified requirements and the performance of necessary to demonstrate the conformance of material and
tasks wherever the absence of such instructions could services to the specified requirements or required by 2.4.12 to
adversely affect quality. These should define the method 2.4.18 and for maintenance of the records of the calibration.
of monitoring and control of product characteristics. The calibration is to be carried out at prescribed intervals
(b) Established criteria for workmanship through written against certified equipment having a known valid relationship
standards or representative samples. to nationally recognized standards. If no such standard
(c) Suitable maintenance of critical equipment to ensure exists, the basis of calibration is to be documented.
continued process capability.
2.4.20 Inspection and test status. The manufacturer is
2.4.15 Special processes. Those processes where to establish and maintain a system for the identification of
effectiveness cannot be verified by subsequent inspection inspection status of all material and products by suitable
and test of the product are to be subjected to continuous means which distinguish between conforming, non-conforming
monitoring in accordance with documented procedures in and uninspected items.
addition to the requirements specified in 2.4.14.
2.4.21 Control of non-conforming material. The manu-
2.4.16 Receiving inspection. The manufacturer is to facturer is to establish and maintain a system to ensure that
ensure that all incoming material will not be used or material that does not conform to the specified requirements
processed until it has been verified as conforming to specified is controlled to prevent inadvertent use, mixing or dispatch.
requirements. In establishing the amount and nature of Repair, rework or concessions on non-conforming material
receiving inspection, consideration is to be given to the and reinspection is to be in accordance with documented
control exercised by the supplier and documented evidence procedures. Records clearly identifying the material, the
of quality conformance provided. Where incoming product is nature and extent of non-conformance and the disposition are
released for urgent production prior to verification being to be maintained.
carried out, it is to be positively identified and recorded for
immediate recall. 2.4.22 Corrective and preventive action. The manufac-
turer is to establish and maintain a documented system for
2.4.17 In-process inspection. The manufacturer is to: the review of non-conformances and their disposition. These
(a) perform inspection during manufacture on all should provide for:
characteristics that cannot be inspected at a later stage; (a) analysis of concessions granted, customer complaints
(b) inspect, test and identify products in accordance with and material scrapped or reworked to determine causes,
specified requirements; the corrective action required and to identify the
(c) establish product conformance to specified require- preventive action necessary to avoid recurrence;
ments by use of process monitoring and control (b) monitoring of processes, work operations and inspection/
methods where appropriate; test results and analysis of records to detect and
(d) hold products until the required inspections are eliminate potential causes of non-conforming material;
completed and verified, (unless released under a (c) the initiation of appropriate action with suppliers or
positive recall situation); and sub-contractors with regard to receipt of non-conforming
(e) clearly identify non-conforming products to prevent materials; and
unauthorized use, shipment, or mixing with conforming (d) verifying that corrective and preventive actions in (a) to
material. (c) are effective.
2.4.18 Final inspection. The manufacturer is to perform 2.4.23 Handling, storage and delivery. The manufacturer
all inspections and tests on the finished product necessary to is to establish and maintain a system for the identification,
complete the evidence of conformance to the specified preservation, segregation and handling of all material from the
requirements. The procedures for final inspection and test are time of receipt through the entire production process. The
to ensure that: system is to include methods of handling that prevent abuse,
misuse, damage or deterioration. Secure storage areas are to
be provided to isolate and protect material pending use. To 2.5.3 If the survey of the works confirms that the
detect deterioration at an early stage, the condition of material Quality System procedures are satisfactory, LR will issue to
is to be periodically assessed. The manufacturer is to arrange the manufacturer a Quality Assurance Approval Certificate
for the protection of the quality of the product during transit. which will include details of the products for which approval
The manufacturer is to ensure, in so far as it is practicable, the has been given. This Certificate will be valid for three years,
safe arrival and ready identification of the product at destination. with renewal subject to satisfactory performance and to a
satisfactory triennial re-assessment.
2.4.24 Records. The manufacturer is to develop and
maintain a system for collection and filing of quality records, 2.5.4 At the discretion of LR, an extension of approval in
including manufacturing data and test results. The period of respect of products may be given, without any additional
retention of such records is to be established in writing and is survey.
subject to agreement by LR. Records may be in the form of
any type of media, i.e. hard copy or electronic.
2.6 Maintenance of approval
2.4.25 Internal audit. The manufacturer is to conduct
scheduled internal audits of the entire Quality System, to 2.6.1 The arrangements authorized at each works are to
ensure continued adherence to the documented require- be kept under review by the Surveyors in order to ensure that
ments. An audit programme is to be established with audit the Quality System is being maintained in a satisfactory
frequencies scheduled on the basis of the status and manner. This is to be achieved by carrying out the under-
importance of the activity and adjusted on the basis of noted series of product-based audits:
previous results. The auditors are to be suitably trained and (a) regular and systematic audits;
independent of the functions being audited. (b) intermediate audits at intervals of six months;
(c) triennial re-assessment of the entire Quality System.
2.4.26 Training. The manufacturer is to follow a policy for
recruitment and training which provides an adequate labour 2.6.2 For the purpose of regular and systematic auditing,
force with such skills as are required for each type of office or the Surveyors will visit the works at intervals determined by
work operation. Appropriate records are to be maintained to the type of product, the rate of production and the standards
demonstrate that all personnel performing manufacturing or of the works’ Quality System procedures. The Surveyors will
Quality System activities have appropriate experience or immediately advise the manufacturer’s quality representative
training. or his nominated deputy in regard to any matter with which
they are not satisfied.
2.4.27 Sampling procedures. Where sampling techniques
are used by the manufacturer to verify the acceptability of 2.6.3 When minor deficiencies in the approved
groups of products, the procedures adopted are to be in procedures are disclosed during the systematic surveillance,
accordance with the specified requirements or are to be the Surveyors may, at their discretion, apply more intensive
subject to agreement by the Surveyors. supervision, including the direct inspection of products.
2.4.28 Statistical techniques. The manufacturer is to 2.6.4 Minor alterations in the approved procedures may
establish and maintain documented procedures to implement be permitted, provided that the Surveyors are advised and
and control the use of any statistical techniques utilized for their prior concurrence obtained.
controlling process capability or for verifying product
characteristics. 2.6.5 Collated test data and other information are to be
submitted to the Surveyors at agreed intervals. This data is
generally to be as described in 2.3.6.
2.5 Assessment and approval
2.6.6 In addition to the regular visits by the Surveyors, an
2.5.1 After receipt and appraisal of the information intermediate audit is to be carried out every six months. This
requested in 2.3 an assessment of the works is to be carried will normally be carried out by Surveyors other than those
out by the Surveyors, to examine in detail all aspects of regularly in attendance at the works. This audit is to consist
production and of the Quality System. of an examination of part of the manufacturer’s Quality
System. An audit plan will be established indicating those
2.5.2 The Surveyors will not specify in detail acceptable areas of the Quality System which will be examined during
procedures, but will consider the arrangements proposed by every intermediate audit and the frequency of examination of
the manufacturer in relation to the Quality System. Where the other areas such that all areas are subject to audit before
proposed procedures are considered to be inadequate the re-assessment is due.
Surveyors may, after consultation with Headquarters, advise
as to how these may be revised to be acceptable to LR. 2.6.7 The Surveyors are to be allowed access at all
reasonable times to those parts of the works concerned with
the manufacture of the products detailed in the Quality
Assurance Approval Certificate.
2.7 Suspension or withdrawal of approval 2.9.4 Modifications to the text of the declarations in
2.9.3, and to the procedure for signing shipping statements or
2.7.1 When Surveyors have drawn attention to significant test certificates may be agreed at the time of initial approval to
faults or deficiencies in the Quality System procedures and suit particular circumstances or national practices.
these have not been rectified within a reasonable time,
approval of the works will be suspended. In these circum-
stances, the manufacturer will be notified in writing of LR’s
reasons for the suspension of approval.