Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
1Activity

Table Of Contents

1. YouTube’s legitimate founding purpose and operations
2. YouTube’s efforts to help copyright owners
3. Quantity and diversity of videos on YouTube
4. Plaintiffs’ story is not supported by the record
B. Viacom And The Putative Class Plaintiffs
C. The Clips-In-Suit
D. The DMCA Safe Harbors
E. Summary Judgment Proceedings
I. YouTube Is Entitled To DMCA Protection
A. YouTube Meets The Threshold DMCA Qualifications
B. YouTube Did Not Have Disqualifying Knowledge
b. Plaintiffs “evidence” does not show willful blindness
a. Plaintiffs have no evidence of specific knowledge
C. YouTube Properly Responds To Takedown Notices
1. The DMCA Does Not Codify Vicarious Liability
a. The DMCA rejects the “draw” test
II. PLAINTIFFS MAKE NO VIABLE INDUCEMENT CLAIM
1. YouTube Never Encouraged Infringement
2. YouTube Actively Worked To Stop Infringement
3. YouTube Is Full Of Non-Infringing Material
4. Plaintiffs’ Evidence Does Not Satisfy Grokster
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
youtube+filing

youtube+filing

Ratings: (0)|Views: 13|Likes:
Published by BeltsyNY

More info:

Published by: BeltsyNY on Apr 02, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/02/2011

pdf

text

original

You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 4 to 10 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 14 to 76 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 80 to 103 are not shown in this preview.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->