Africa

Asia
Middle East
Other Areas
THE WORLD

RATIOS
The absolute number of poor people in recipient countries (millions)
BILATERAL aid £ spent/numbers living in poverty in recipient countries
% BILATERAL aid spent on poor countries - LICs
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries of the new bottom billion - MICs

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as “Not Free” by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as “Partly Free” by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as "Free” by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as “Fragile” under the Fragile States Index
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with high ‘commitment to poverty reduction’
(average CPIA score 5-6 out of 6)[14]
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium high ‘commitment to poverty
reduction’ (average CPIA score 4-5 out of 6)[14]
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium ‘commitment to poverty reduction’
(average CPIA score 3-4 out of 6)[14]
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with low ‘commitment to poverty reduction’
(average CPIA score 0-3 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with high corruption under the Corruption
Perceptions Index as per Transparency International (2010) (score of 2.9/10 and
below)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium corruption under the Corruption
Perceptions Index as per Transparency International (2010) (score of 3.0-4.9 out of
10)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with low corruption under the Corruption
Perceptions Index as per Transparency International (2010) (score of 5.0/10 and
above)
 DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral
Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl
Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian
Assistance) 10/11 Assistance) 11/12 Assistance) 12/13 Assistance) 13/14 Assistance) 14/15
('000) ('000) ('000) ('000) ('000)
1,680,000 1,891,000 1,995,000 2,343,000 2,428,000
1,017,000 1,098,000 1,110,000 1,377,000 1,406,000
134,000 155,000 155,000 165,000 178,000
79,000 62,000 112,000 111,000 111,000
2,910,000 3,206,000 3,372,000 3,996,000 4,123,000

AFRICA
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15
273.85 273.85 267.7 267.7 264.6
£ 4.75 £ 5.28 £ 5.72 £ 6.77 £ 7.15
81% 80% 80% 78% 79%
19% 20% 20.5% 22% 21%

44% 45% 45% 45% 48%

49% 49% 49% 49% 47%

7% 6% 6% 6% 5%

70% 73% 73% 76% 76%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

77% 77% 77% 77% 77%

23% 23% 23% 23% 23%

80% 81% 81% 83% 83%

20% 19% 19% 17% 17%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
 DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral
Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl
Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian
Assistance) 10/11 Assistance) 11/12 Assistance) 12/13 Assistance) 13/14 Assistance) 14/15
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
58% 59% 59% 59% 59%
35% 34% 33% 34% 34%
5% 5% 5% 4% 4%
3% 2% 3% 3% 3%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

ASIA
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15
669.5 669.5 669.5 669.5 665.8
£ 1.17 £ 1.28 £ 1.29 £ 1.67 £ 1.71
44% 45% 46% 47% 46%
56% 55% 54% 53% 54%

28% 24% 23% 19% 18%

43% 49% 50% 59% 62%

29% 27% 28% 22% 21%

64% 69% 69% 77% 79%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

5% 3% 2% 1% 1%

54% 54% 55% 53% 52%

41% 43% 43% 46% 47%

72% 74% 74% 79% 80%

28% 26% 26% 21% 20%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
 Sub-
Continent continent Country
Africa South of SahAngola
Africa South of SahBurkina Faso
Africa South of SahBurundi
Africa South of SahCameroon
Africa South of SahCape Verde
Africa South of SahChad
Africa South of SahCongo (Dem Rep)
Africa South of SahEthiopia
Africa South of SahGambia
Africa South of SahGhana
Africa South of SahGuinea
Africa South of SahKenya
Africa South of SahLesotho
Africa South of SahLiberia
Africa South of SahMalawi
Africa South of SahMozambique
Africa South of SahNiger
Africa South of SahNigeria
Africa South of SahRwanda
Africa South of SahSenegal (information removed because it is in a net repayment position)
Africa South of SahSierra Leone
Africa South of SahSouth Africa
Africa South of SahTanzania
Africa South of SahUganda
Africa South of SahZambia
Subtotal South of Sahara countries (complete info)

Total poverty headcount of South of Sahara countries (consisting of 43 countries with data, excludes 11 countries without data)

Africa South of SahZimbabwe

Africa South of SahSomalia
Africa South of SahSt Helena & Dependencies
Africa South of SahSudan
Subtotal South of Sahara countries (incomplete info)

Total South of Sahara countries

Africa South of SahEast African Community

Africa South of SahSouthern Africa
Africa South of SahSouth of Sahara regional
Africa North of SahNorth of Sahara Regional
Africa Africa regionAfrica regional
Total Regional Communities

TOTAL AFRICA

TOTAL WORLD

ADDITIONAL DATA
 RATIOS
The absolute number of poor people in recipient countries (millions)
BILATERAL aid £ spent/numbers living in poverty in recipient countries
% BILATERAL aid spent on poor countries - LICs
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries of the new bottom billion - MICs

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as “Not Free” by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as “Partly Free” by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as "Free” by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as “Fragile” under the Fragile States Index
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with high ‘commitment to poverty
reduction’ (average CPIA score 5-6 out of 6)[14]
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium high ‘commitment to
poverty reduction’ (average CPIA score 4-5 out of 6)[14]
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium ‘commitment to poverty
reduction’ (average CPIA score 3-4 out of 6)[14]
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with low ‘commitment to poverty
reduction’ (average CPIA score 0-3 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with high corruption under the

Corruption Perceptions Index as per Transparency International (2010)
(score of 2.9/10 and below)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium corruption under the

Corruption Perceptions Index as per Transparency International (2010)
(score of 3.0-4.9 out of 10)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with low corruption under the

Corruption Perceptions Index as per Transparency International (2010)
(score of 5.0/10 and above)

[2] Source: Bilateral Aid Review: Technical Report (DFID, 2011)

[3] Low income countries are countries with 2009 gross national income (GNI) per capita, calculated using the World Bank Atlas method, equals $995 or less. Source: W
[4] Source: The Failed States Index 2010 (The Fund For Peace, 2010) found at: http://www.fundforpeace.org/web/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=452
[5] Source: Freedom in the World 2010 (Freedom House, 2010) found at: http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=276
[6] Source: Latest figures from the World Development Indicators
[8] Poverty headcount of Mongolia and Kyrgyzstan appears low against a poverty headcount of 36.1% and 43.1% of the population living below national poverty lines,
[10] Collier, P. (2007) The Bottom Billion
[13] Source: DFID (2011) found at: http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Media-Room/News-Stories/2010/Spending-Review-2010
[14] Average of CPIA gender equality rating; building human resources rating; equity of public resource use; social protection rating; policies for social inclusion/equity.
[15] % taken as a proportion of total bilateral aid spend – to countries only.
[16] Calculations based on bilateral aid to countries with complete information on the indicator in question.
[17] Source: Corruption Perceptions Index 2010 (Transparency International, 2010)
 DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral
Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl
Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian Income Income
Assistance) 10/11 Assistance) 11/12 Assistance) 12/13 Assistance) 13/14 Assistance) 14/15 group (Jan group (Jan
('000)[2] ('000)[2] ('000)[2] ('000)[2] ('000)[2] 11)[3] 11)
Lower middl MIC
Low income LIC
12,000 10,000 Low income LIC
Lower middl MIC
Lower middl MIC
Low income LIC
133,000 147,000 165,000 220,000 258,000 Low income LIC
241,000 290,000 300,000 345,000 390,000 Low income LIC
Low income LIC
85,000 85,000 90,000 100,000 100,000 Low income LIC
Low income LIC
86,000 100,000 110,000 150,000 150,000 Low income LIC
Lower middl MIC
10,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Low income LIC
72,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 98,000 Low income LIC
88,000 80,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 Low income LIC
Low income LIC
141,000 180,000 210,000 305,000 305,000 Lower middl MIC
70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 90,000 Low income LIC

54,000 58,000 58,000 77,000 77,000 Low income LIC

17,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Upper middl MIC
150,000 150,000 160,000 165,000 168,000 Low income LIC
90,000 100,000 105,000 95,000 90,000 Low income LIC
53,000 55,000 55,000 62,000 63,000 Low income LIC
1,302,000 1,447,000 1,530,000 1,811,000 1,893,000
85% 85% 85% 85% 86%
countries without data)

70,000 80,000 84,000 94,000 95,000 Low income LIC

26,000 44,000 46,000 80,000 80,000 Low income LIC
Not classifie Not classifie
132,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 Lower middl MIC
228,000 264,000 270,000 314,000 315,000
15% 15% 15% 15% 14%

1,530,000 1,711,000 1,800,000 2,125,000 2,208,000

91% 90% 90% 91% 91%

Not classifie Not classified

Not classifie Not classified
Not classifie Not classified
Not classifie Not classified
150,000 180,000 195,000 218,000 220,000 Not classifie Not classified
150,000 180,000 195,000 218,000 220,000
9% 10% 10% 9% 9%

1,680,000 1,891,000 1,995,000 2,343,000 2,428,000

52% 59% 62% 73% 76%

3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000

 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 Total / Denominator
273.8 273.8 267.7 267.7 264.6 Subtotal South of Sahara coun
£ 4.75 £ 5.28 £ 5.72 £ 6.77 £ 7.15 Subtotal South of Sahara coun
81% 80% 80% 78% 79% [16] Total South of Sahara cou
19% 20% 21% 22% 21% [16] Total South of Sahara cou

44% 45% 45% 45% 48% [16] Total South of Sahara cou

49% 49% 49% 49% 47% [16] Total South of Sahara cou

7% 6% 6% 6% 5% [16] Total South of Sahara cou

70% 73% 73% 76% 76% [16] Total South of Sahara cou

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% [16] Only countries with comp

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% [16] Only countries with comp

77% 77% 77% 77% 77% [16] Only countries with comp

23% 23% 23% 23% 23% [16] Only countries with comp

80% 81% 81% 83% 83% [16] Total South of Sahara cou

20% 19% 19% 17% 17% [16] Total South of Sahara cou

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% [16] Total South of Sahara cou

hod, equals $995 or less. Source: World Bank (2011)

=com_content&task=view&id=452&Itemid=900

iving below national poverty lines, respectively (UNDP, 2010).

policies for social inclusion/equity.

 Poverty
Collier's Freedom Corruption headcount
Bottom FCA/ Non-FCA House CPIA score Perceptions (millions)
Billion [10] (FSI 2010)[4] 2011[5] [6] Index [17] [6]
Yes Non-FCA NF 2.88 1.9 7.8
Yes FCA PF 3.62 3.1 7.3
Yes FCA PF 3.36 1.8 6.2
Yes FCA NF 3.12 2.2 5.3
No Non-FCA F 4.46 5.1 0.1
Yes FCA NF 2.48 1.7 5.8
Yes FCA NF 2.86 2 36.0
Yes FCA NF 3.72 2.7 29.1
Yes Non-FCA PF 3.26 3.2 0.5
Yes Non-FCA F 3.98 4.1 6.7
Yes FCA PF 3.1 2 6.2
Yes FCA PF 3.5 2.1 7.1
Yes Non-FCA PF 3.36 3.5 0.8
Yes FCA PF 2.6 3.3 3.0
Yes FCA PF 3.5 3.4 9.8
Yes Non-FCA PF 3.36 2.7 14.8
Yes FCA PF 3.12 2.6 8.6
Yes FCA PF 3.24 2.4 88.6
Yes Non-FCA NF 3.98 4 6.1
…
Yes FCA PF 3.22 2.4 2.5
No Non-FCA F … 4.5 11.5
No Non-FCA PF 3.74 2.7 30.2
Yes FCA PF 3.76 2.5 14.8
Yes Non-FCA PF 3.5 3 7.4
316.3

357.5

Yes FCA NF 1.52 2.4 …

Yes FCA NF … 1.1 …
No Not classified Not classifie … Not classified …
Yes FCA NF 2.36 1.6 …
…

Not classified Not classified Not classified

Not classified Not classified Not classified
Not classified Not classified Not classified
Not classified Not classified Not classified
Not classified Not classified Not classified
Total / Denominator
Subtotal South of Sahara countries (complete info)
Subtotal South of Sahara countries (complete info)
[16] Total South of Sahara countries, excluding St Helena which is not classified
[16] Total South of Sahara countries, excluding St Helena which is not classified

[16] Total South of Sahara countries, excluding St Helena which is not classified

[16] Total South of Sahara countries, excluding St Helena which is not classified

[16] Total South of Sahara countries, excluding St Helena which is not classified

[16] Total South of Sahara countries, excluding St Helena which is not classified

[16] Only countries with complete CPIA information, so excludes South Africa, Somalia and St Helena (and Senegal)

[16] Only countries with complete CPIA information, so excludes South Africa, Somalia and St Helena (and Senegal)

[16] Only countries with complete CPIA information, so excludes South Africa, Somalia and St Helena (and Senegal)

[16] Only countries with complete CPIA information, so excludes South Africa, Somalia and St Helena (and Senegal)

[16] Total South of Sahara countries, excluding St Helena which is not classified

[16] Total South of Sahara countries, excluding St Helena which is not classified

[16] Total South of Sahara countries, excluding St Helena which is not classified
Continent Sub-continent Country
Asia South Asia Bangladesh
Asia South Asia India
Asia South Asia Nepal
Asia South Asia Pakistan
Asia South Asia Sri Lanka
Asia Far East Asia Cambodia
Asia Far East Asia China
Asia Far East Asia Indonesia
Asia Far East Asia Laos
Asia Far East Asia Mongolia
Asia Far East Asia Philippines
Asia Far East Asia Thailand
Asia Far East Asia Vietnam
Asia Central Asian RepublKyrgyzstan
Asia Central Asian RepublTajikistan
Subtotal Asia (complete info)

Total poverty headcount of Asian countries (consisting of 19 countries with data, excludes 5 countries without data, excludes the M

Asia South Asia Afghanistan

Asia South Asia Burma
Asia South Asia Maldives
Subtotal Asia (incomplete info)

Total Asia countries

Asia South Asia South & Central Asia

Asia Asia Regional Asia Regional
Total Regional Communities

TOTAL ASIA

TOTAL WORLD

ADDITIONAL DATA

RATIOS

The absolute number of poor people in recipient countries (millions)

BILATERAL aid £ spent/numbers living in poverty in recipient countries

% BILATERAL aid spent on poor countries - LICs

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries of the new bottom billion - MICs

 % BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as “Not Free” by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as “Partly Free” by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as "Free” by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as “Fragile” under the Fragile States Index
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with high ‘commitment to
poverty reduction’ (average CPIA score 5-6 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium high ‘commitment

to poverty reduction’ (average CPIA score 4-5 out of 6)[14]
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium ‘commitment to
poverty reduction’ (average CPIA score 3-4 out of 6)[14]
% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with low ‘commitment to
poverty reduction’ (average CPIA score 0-3 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with high corruption under the

Corruption Perceptions Index as per Transparency International
(2010) (score of 2.9/10 and below)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium corruption under

the Corruption Perceptions Index as per Transparency International
(2010) (score of 3.0-4.9 out of 10)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with low corruption under the

Corruption Perceptions Index as per Transparency International
(2010) (score of 5.0/10 and above)

[2] Source: Bilateral Aid Review: Technical Report (DFID, 2011)

[3] Low income countries are countries with 2009 gross national income (GNI) per capita, calculated using the World Bank Atlas method, equals $995 or less. Source: Worl
[4] Source: The Failed States Index 2010 (The Fund For Peace, 2010) found at: http://www.fundforpeace.org/web/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=452&It
[5] Source: Freedom in the World 2010 (Freedom House, 2010) found at: http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=276
[6] Source: Latest figures from the World Development Indicators
[8] Poverty headcount of Mongolia and Kyrgyzstan appears low against a poverty headcount of 36.1% and 43.1% of the population living below national poverty lines, resp
[10] Collier, P. (2007) The Bottom Billion
[13] Source: DFID (2011) found at: http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Media-Room/News-Stories/2010/Spending-Review-2010
[14] Average of CPIA gender equality rating; building human resources rating; equity of public resource use; social protection rating; policies for social inclusion/equity.
[15] % taken as a proportion of total bilateral aid spend – to countries only.
[16] Calculations based on bilateral aid to countries with complete information on the indicator in question.
[17] Source: Corruption Perceptions Index 2010 (Transparency International, 2010)
 DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral DFID Bilateral
Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl Programme (excl
Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian Humanitarian Income Income Collier's
Assistance) 10/11 Assistance) 11/12 Assistance) 12/13 Assistance) 13/14 Assistance) 14/15 group (Jan group Bottom
('000)[2] ('000)[2] ('000)[2] ('000)[2] ('000)[2] 11)[3] (Jan 11) Billion [10]
157000 200000 210000 290000 300000 Low incomeLIC No
280000 280000 280000 280000 280000 Lower middlMIC No
57000 60000 60000 100000 103000 Low incomeLIC Yes
215000 267000 267000 412000 446000 Lower middlMIC No
Lower middlMIC No
16000 10000 9000 4000 Low incomeLIC Yes
Lower middlMIC No
9000 10000 20000 15000 5000 Lower middlMIC No
Low incomeLIC Yes
Lower middlMIC Yes
Lower middlMIC No
Lower middlMIC No
50000 28000 21000 14000 7000 Lower middlMIC No
Low incomeLIC Yes
Low incomeLIC Yes
784,000 855,000 867,000 1,115,000 1,141,000
79% 80% 80% 83% 83%
untries without data, excludes the Middle East)

178000 178000 178000 178000 178000 Low incomeLIC Yes

32000 36000 36000 55000 58000 Low incomeLIC Yes
Lower middlMIC No
210,000 214,000 214,000 233,000 236,000
21% 20% 20% 17% 17%

994,000 1,069,000 1,081,000 1,348,000 1,377,000

98% 97% 97% 98% 98%

15000 14000 14000 14000 14000 Not classifieNot classified

8000 15000 15000 15000 15000 Not classifieNot classified
23,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000
2% 3% 3% 2% 2%

1,017,000 1,098,000 1,110,000 1,377,000 1,406,000

32% 34% 35% 43% 44%

3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000

10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 Total / Denominator

669.5 669.5 669.5 669.5 665.8 Subtotal Asia (complete info)

£ 1.17 £ 1.28 £ 1.29 £ 1.67 £ 1.71 Subtotal Asia (complete info)

44% 45% 46% 47% 46% [15] Total Asia countries

56% 55% 54% 53% 54% [15] Total Asia countries

 28% 24% 23% 19% 18% [15] Total Asia countries

43% 49% 50% 59% 62% [15] Total Asia countries

29% 27% 28% 22% 21% [15] Total Asia countries

64% 69% 69% 77% 79% [15] Total Asia countries

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% [16]Only countries with complete CPIA infor

5% 3% 2% 1% 1% [16]Only countries with complete CPIA infor

54% 54% 55% 53% 52% [16]Only countries with complete CPIA infor

41% 43% 43% 46% 47% [16]Only countries with complete CPIA infor

72% 74% 74% 79% 80% [15] Total Asia countries

28% 26% 26% 21% 20% [15] Total Asia countries

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% [15] Total Asia countries

od, equals $995 or less. Source: World Bank (2011)

com_content&task=view&id=452&Itemid=900

ng below national poverty lines, respectively (UNDP, 2010).

licies for social inclusion/equity.

 Corruption Poverty
FCA/ Non-FCA Freedom House Perceptions headcount
(FSI 2010)[4] 2011[5] CPIA score [6] Index [17] (millions)[6]
FCA PF 3.72 2.4 76.0
Non-FCA F 3.74 3.3 455.8
FCA PF 3.75 2.2 14.7
FCA PF 2.88 2.3 35.2
FCA PF 3.86 3.2 2.6
Non-FCA NF 3.36 2.1 3.7
Non-FCA NF … 3.5 207.6
Non-FCA F 3.67 2.8 66.1
Non-FCA NF 3.28 2.1 2.5
Non-FCA F 3.60 2.7 0.1
Non-FCA PF … 2.4 19.7
Non-FCA PF … 3.5 1.3
Non-FCA NF 4.10 2.7 18.0
Non-FCA PF 3.72 2 0.2
Non-FCA NF 3.48 2.1 1.4
905

917.7

FCA NF 2.62 1.4 …

FCA NF … 1.4 …
Non-FCA PF 3.76 2.3 …
…

Not classified Not classified …

Not classified Not classified …

tal Asia (complete info)

tal Asia (complete info)

otal Asia countries

otal Asia countries

otal Asia countries

otal Asia countries

otal Asia countries

otal Asia countries

nly countries with complete CPIA information, so excludes Burma, China, Phillippines and Thailand.

nly countries with complete CPIA information, so excludes Burma, China, Phillippines and Thailand.

nly countries with complete CPIA information, so excludes Burma, China, Phillippines and Thailand.

nly countries with complete CPIA information, so excludes Burma, China, Phillippines and Thailand.

otal Asia countries

otal Asia countries

otal Asia countries

 MIC v LIC split Commitment
90% Hi
100%
80%77%77% 77%
77% 77% co
90%
81% 80% 80% 78% 79% 70% (a
80%
Row 64 60% sc
70%
60%
Countries of the 50% 6)
50%
new bottom 40% M
%

billion - MICs

%
40% 30% 23% 23%
23% 23%
23% co
30%
20% (a
21% 22% 21%
20%
19% 20% 10%
0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%
sc
10%
0% 6)
1 3 5
0% /1 /1 /1
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 10 1 2 1 4

Civil and political freedoms C

100% 100%
90% 90% 83%
83%
Hi
81%
81%
80%
80% 80% (In
70% Not Free 70% 0-2
60% Partly Free 60%
49% 49% 48%
49% 45%
49% 45%
50% 44% 45% 47%
Free 50% Lo

%
%

40% 40% (In

30% 30%
20%
19%
19%
5.0
20% 20% 17%
17%
10% 7% 6% 6% 6% 5% 10%
0%
0%0%
0%0%
0% 0%
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 12345

Fragile States The absolute

100%
90%
recipient cou
80% 73% 73% 76% 76% 301.0 273.8
70%
70%
251.0
60% Fragile states
50% 201.0
%

Millions

40% 151.0
30%
20% 101.0
10% 51.0
0%
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 1.0
10/11
 80% 73% 76% 76% 301.0 273.8
70% 73%
70%
251.0
60% Fragile states
50% 201.0

Millions
40% 151.0
30%
20% 101.0
10% 51.0
0%
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 1.0
10/11

BILATERAL ai
poverty in re
$8.00
$7.00
$6.00
$5.00 $4.75
$4.00
$3.00
$2.00
$1.00
$-
10/11
 Commitment to poverty reduction
90% High Medium high
80%77%77% 77%
77% 77% commitment commitment
70% (average CPIA (average CPIA
60% score 5-6 out of score 4-5 out of
50% 6) 6)
40% Medium Low
%

30% 23% 23%

23% 23%
23% commitment commitment
20% (average CPIA (average CPIA
10%
0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%
score 3-4 out of score 0-3 out of
0% 6) 6)
1 3 5
/1 /1 /1
10 1 2 1 4

Corruption
100%
90% 83%
83%
High corruption Medium
81%
81%
80%
80% (Index score of corruption
70% 0-2.9 out of 10 (Index score of
60% 3.0-4.9 out of 10
50% Low corruption
%

40% (Index score of

30%
20%
19%
19%
5.0-10 out of 10
20% 17%
17%
10%
0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%
12345

The absolute number of poor people in

recipient countries (millions)
301.0 273.8 273.8 267.7 267.7 264.6
251.0

201.0
Millions

151.0

101.0

51.0

1.0
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15
 301.0 273.8 273.8 267.7 267.7 264.6
251.0

201.0

Millions 151.0

101.0

51.0

1.0
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15

BILATERAL aid £ spent/numbers living in

poverty in recipient countries
$8.00
$7.15
$7.00 $6.77

$6.00 $5.72
$5.28
$5.00 $4.75
$4.00
$3.00
$2.00
$1.00
$-
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15
 MIC v LIC split Commitment
100% Hi
100%
90% co
90%
Poor countries - 80% (a
80%
LICs 70% sc
70% 55%
60%54%54% 53%
52% 6)
60% 56% 55% 54% 53% 54% Countries of the 50%41%43%
47%
46%
43%
50% 44% 45% 46% 47% 46% new bottom 40%
M
%

%
40% billion - MICs 30% co
30% 20% (a
20% 10%5%3%2%1%1%
0%0%0%0%0%
sc
10%
0% 6)
1 3 5
0% /1 /1 /1
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 10 12 1 4

Civil and political freedoms C

100%
100%
90% High
90% 80%
79%
80%72%74%
74%
80% 70%
(ind
70% Not Free 60% 0-2.
59% 62%
60% Partly Free 50%
49% 50%
50% 43% Free 40% Low

%
%

28%
40% 30% 26%
26%
21%
20% (ind
29% 20%
30% 28% 24%
27%
23%
28% 10 o
19%22% 18%21% 10%
0%
0%
0%
00%%
20%
0%
10% 1 4
/1 /1
0% 10 13
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15

Fragile States
100%
90%
77% 79%
80%
69% 69%
70% 64%
60% Fragile states
50%
%

40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15
 80% 77%
69% 69%
70% 64%
60% Fragile states
50%

%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15

The absolute number of poor people in

recipient countries (millions)
800.0
700.0 669.5 669.5 669.5 669.5 665.8
600.0
500.0
Millions

400.0
300.0
200.0
100.0
-
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15
 Commitment to poverty reduction
100% High Medium high
90% commitment commitment
80% (average CPIA (average CPIA
70% score 5-6 out of score 4-5 out of
60%54% 55%
54% 53%
52% 6) 6)
50%41% 47%
46%
43%
43%
40%
Medium Low
%

30% commitment commitment

20% (average CPIA (average CPIA
10%5%3%2%1%1%
0%0%0%0%0%
score 3-4 out of score 0-3 out of
0% 6) 6)
1 3 5
/1 /1 /1
10 12 1 4

Corruption
100%
90% High corruption Medium
80%
79%
80%72%74%
74%
70%
(index score of corruption
60% 0-2.9 out of 10) (index score of
50% 3.0-4.9 out of 10)
40% Low corruption
%

28%
30% 26%
26%
21%
20% (index score 5.0-
20%
10 out of 10)
10%
0%
00
%%0%
0%
0%
1 4
/1 /1
10 13

BILATERAL aid £ spent/numbers living in

poverty in recipient countries
$1.80 $1.67 $1.71
$1.60
$1.40 $1.28 $1.29
$1.17
$1.20
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
 BILATERAL aid £ spent/numbers living in
poverty in recipient countries
$1.80 $1.67 $1.71
$1.60
$1.40 $1.28 $1.29
$1.17
$1.20
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$-
10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15