Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
11-04-07 Press Release: Lomas v BofA (KC059379) – California Judge Peter Meeka is Requested to Restore Due Process, Declare Any Benefits from BofA

11-04-07 Press Release: Lomas v BofA (KC059379) – California Judge Peter Meeka is Requested to Restore Due Process, Declare Any Benefits from BofA

Ratings: (0)|Views: 148|Likes:
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

Human Rights Alert

11-04-07 Lomas v BofA (KC059379) – California Judge Peter Meeka is Requested to Restore Due Process, Declare Any Financial Benefits to Him by BofA

The case is opined as Fraud on the Court through collusion of California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, and BofA

Los Angeles, April 7
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

Human Rights Alert

11-04-07 Lomas v BofA (KC059379) – California Judge Peter Meeka is Requested to Restore Due Process, Declare Any Financial Benefits to Him by BofA

The case is opined as Fraud on the Court through collusion of California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, and BofA

Los Angeles, April 7

More info:

Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Apr 07, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/12/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Human Rights Alert 
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
 
Blog:
 Scribd: 
11-04-07
Lomas v BofA
(KC059379) – California Judge Peter Meeka is Requested to Restore DueProcess, Declare Any Financial Benefits to Him by BofA
The case is opined as Fraud on the Court through collusion of California Judge Peter Meeka,Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, and BofA
Los Angeles, April 7 
- In
Lomas v Bank of America
(KC059379) Plaintiff Susan Lomas tries to protect her rights througha Quiet Title action against alleged fraud by Bank of America
 
and others in foreclosure procedures.“The case is opined as Fraud on the Court through collusion of California Judge PETER MEEKA, Clerk of the CourtJOHN A CLARKE, and BofA, aimed to dispossess Plaintiff Susan Lomas, while denying her Due Process and access toan honest court”, said Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO).A hearing on applications by Plaintiff Susan Lomas for restoration of Due Process and for a declaration by Judge Peter Meeka regarding financial benefits, if any, from BofA, is scheduled for 8:30am on Friday, April 8, 2011, in the PomonaCourthouse, Department “O”.
i
A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case: [ ]
None of the minutes were certified by the Deputy Clerk of the Court;
None of the minutes were noticed and served by the Court;
Multiple proceedings were secretly listed in the minutes as “
off of the record 
”;
No Initial Case Management Conference was ever held;
Plaintiff has been repeatedly denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket), where thetrue registration of the proceedings (or lack thereof) would be discerned;
An invalid online “Case Summary” is published by the Court, which would lead a naïve reader toconclude that valid and effectual proceedings have been held and rulings have been entered by the court.
Attorney Mark Asdourian appears in the case for BofA, while refusing to provide certificate of Attorneyof Record. Attorney Asdourian has filed false and deliberately misleading banking records as “Request for Judicial Notice”, which was granted by Judge Peter Meeka.Now, Plaintiff Susan Lomas has noticed applications for:1. Restoration of Due Process notice and service of Minutes of the proceedings, certified by the Clerk of theCourt,2. Restoration of Due Process access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) to inspect and tocopy, and
 
Page 2/3 April 7, 2011
3. Declaration by Judge Peter Meeka regarding financial benefits, if any, to him, or to family membersresiding with him from BofA, its subsidiaries, affiliates, executives, or employees.The denial of Due Process service and notice of certified minutes is a common practice in the Los AngelesSuperior Court. It permits the judges to conduct proceedings that are never certified by the Clerk of the Court,which are considered by the judges themselves as invalid court records, but are enforced nevertheless. The denialof access to Registers of Actions (California civil dockets) in the Los Angeles Superior Court is a commonpractice as well.On March 4, 2009, the 70 year old former US Prosecutor Attorney Richard Fine was arrested in the Los AngelesSuperior Court, in the city of Los Angeles, after he had exposed and rebuked widespread corruption of the judgesof the Los Angeles Superior Court. He was later held in solitary confinement for 18 months under false records,stating that he was arrested and imprisoned on location and by authority of the non-existent “Municipal Court of San Pedro”. No Minutes were ever certified for his purported “sentencing hearing”. Moreover, throughout thepurported review of his Habeas Corpus petition in the US District Court, Central District of California, US Courtof Appeals, 9
th
Circuit, and US Supreme Court (and to this date) access to the Register of Actions (docket) in thecase was denied.Bribing of state and US judges by financial institution must be a real concern. Under similar circumstances, thefollowing judges were previously asked and refused to provide declarations regarding financial benefits, if any, byBofA:
California Judge Terry Friedman;
US Judge Virginia Phillips;
US Magistrate Carla Woehrle.Recent media reports described the current wave of foreclosures in the United States as fraught by sloppy or invalid banking records. “The true situation is collusion by corrupt judges, attorneys, and banking institutions indispossession of the People of the United States on a scale never seen before”, said Dr Zernik, “and refusal of theUS government to provide Equal Protection”.Fraud in the court by Countrywide Financial Corporation (today a subsidiary of BofA) has been detailed in courtsacross the United States:
In January 2008 the collapse of Countrywide Financial Corporation followed the publication of a report bythe New York Times regarding the filing of “Recreated Letters” as evidence in the US Bankruptcy Court inPennsylvania. [
]
In March 2008 the Hon Jeff Bohm entered a Memorandum Opinion in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas,referring to a year long study of the litigation practices of Countrywide in courts across the United Statesand documenting various litigation fraud methods employed by the bank and its attorneys, which weresummarized as “disregard for the professional and ethical obligations of the legal profession and judicialsystem”. (p8) [
]
Evidence of racketeering in the courts by Countrywide and BofA,including direct involvement by Brian Moynihan (BofA President) was filed with US law enforcement. [
,
v
]Real estate fraud under the guise of court actions in the Los Angeles Superior Court, going back for over a decade,was key to the 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert (NGO) to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of theUnited Nations. The submission was later incorporated into the official Staff Report of the HRC, with referenceto “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California”.
 LINKS

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->