Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Comparison of Government’s Lokpal Bill with Civil Society’s Lokpal Bill

Comparison of Government’s Lokpal Bill with Civil Society’s Lokpal Bill

Ratings: (0)|Views: 145|Likes:
Published by Shaji Mullookkaaran
Comparison of Government’s Lokpal Bill with Civil Society’s Lokpal Bill.pdf
Comparison of Government’s Lokpal Bill with Civil Society’s Lokpal Bill.pdf

More info:

Published by: Shaji Mullookkaaran on Apr 08, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





 Comparison of Government’s Lokpal Bill with Civil Society’s Lokpal Bill
S No
Government’s proposal
Civil Society proposal
 1. Lokpal will not have any power to either initiate action suomotu in any case or even receive complaints of corruptionfrom general public. The general public will make complaintsto the speaker of Lok Sabha or chairperson of Rajya Sabha.Only those complaints forwarded by Speaker of Lok Sabha/ Chairperson of Rajya Sabha to Lokpal would be investigatedby Lokpal. This not only severely restricts the functioning of Lokpal, it also provides a tool in the hands of the ruling partyto have only those cases referred to Lokpal which pertain topolitical opponents (since speaker is always from the rulingparty). It will also provide a tool in the hands of the rulingparty to protect its own politicians.Lokpal will have powers to initiate investigationssuo moto in any case and also to directly entertaincomplaints from the public. It will not needreference or permission from anyone to initiateinvestigation into any case.2 Lokpal has been proposed to be an advisory body. Lokpal,after enquiry in any case, will forward its report to thecompetent authority. The competent authority will have finalpowers to decide whether to take action on Lokpal’s report ornot. In the case of cabinet ministers, the competent authorityis Prime Minister. In the case of PM and MPs the competentauthority is Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha, as the case may be. Inthe coalition era when the government of the day dependsupon the support of its political partners, it will be impossiblefor the PM to act against any of his cabinet ministers on thebasis of Lokpal’s report. For instance, if there were such aLokpal today and if Lokpal made a recommendation to thePM to prosecute A. Raja, obviously the PM will not have thepolitical courage to initiate prosecution against A. Raja.Likewise, if Lokpal made a report against the PM or any MPof the ruling party, will the house ever pass a resolution toprosecute the PM or the ruling party MP? Obviously, theywill never do that.Lokpal is not an advisory body. It will have thepowers to initiate prosecution against any one aftercompletion of investigations in any case. It will alsohave powers to order disciplinary proceedingsagainst any government servant.3 The bill is legally unsound. Lokpal has not been given policepowers. Therefore Lokpal cannot register an FIR. Thereforeall the enquiries conducted by Lokpal will tantamount to“preliminary enquiries”. Even if the report of Lokpal isaccepted, who will file the chargesheet in the court? Who willinitiate prosecution? Who will appoint the prosecutionlawyer? The entire bill is silent on that.Lokpal would have police powers. It will be able toregister FIR, proceed with criminal investigationsand launch prosecution.4 The bill does not say what will be the role of CBI after thisbill. Can CBI and Lokpal investigate the same case or CBIwill lose its powers to investigate politicians? If the latter istrue, then this bill is meant to completely insulate politiciansfrom any investigations whatsoever which are possible todaythrough CBI.That part of CBI, which deals with cases of corruption, will be merged into Lokpal so that thereis just one effective and independent body to takeaction against corruption.5 There is a strong punishment for “frivolous” complaints. If any complaint is found to be false and frivolous, Lokpal willhave the power to send the complainant to jail throughsummary trial but if the complaint were found to be true, theLokpal will not have the power to send the corrupt politiciansto jail! So the bill appears to be meant to browbeat, threatenand discourage those fighting against corruption.Deterrence has been provided against frivolouscomplaints in the form of financial penalties againstthe complainant, however, Lokayukta is empoweredto prosecute the corrupt and take disciplinary actionagainst them.6 Lokpal will have jurisdiction only on MPs, ministers and PM.It will not have jurisdiction over officers. The officers andpoliticians do not indulge in corruption separately. In any caseof corruption, there is always an involvement of both of them.So according to government’s proposal, every case wouldneed to be investigated by both CVC and Lokpal. So now, ineach case, CVC will look into the role of bureaucrats whileLokpal will have jurisdiction over politicians,officials and judges. CVC and the entire vigilancemachinery of government will be merged intoLokpal.

Activity (6)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
Nithin Ramakrishnan added this note
great work ji...
virendhemre liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->