Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword or section
Like this
P. 1


Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,863 |Likes:
Published by Pearltrees2

More info:

Published by: Pearltrees2 on Apr 09, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Durham E-Theses
Derrida and a Theory of Irony: Parabasis and Parataxis
How to cite:
LONG, MAEBH (2010)
Derrida and a Theory of Irony: Parabasis and Parataxis.
Doctoral thesis, DurhamUniversity. Available at Durham E-Theses Online:http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/665/
Use policy
The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission orcharge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes provided that:
a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source
alinkis made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses
the full-text is not changed in any wayThe full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult thefull Durham E-Theses policyfor further details.Academic Support Office, Durham University, University Office, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HPe-mail: e-theses.admin@dur.ac.uk Tel: +44 0191 334 6107http://etheses.dur.ac.uk
Derrida and a Theory of Irony: Parabasis and Parataxis
Maebh Long
This thesis presents a theory of structural irony gleaned from the irony theorisedand performed in the texts of thinkers whose works operate on the border of the(non)propositional: Plato, Friedrich Schlegel, Maurice Blanchot, Paul de Man,Emmanuel Levinas and Jacques Derrida. While focusing on the irony performedin the texts of Jacques Derrida, and using his engagements with these thinkers as
a frame, this is not a theory of “Derridean” irony, but an irony (primarily)
elaborated through a deconstructive approach and vocabulary. Structural irony isseen to take the form of the transgressive step/counter-step of parabasis and thenon-hierarchical disorder of parataxis. It is an anacoluthic force/weakness, andexhibits the conjunctive/disjunctive trait of hyphenation. It is neither of cynical,aesthetic distance nor humorous, parodic engagement, but is a productivemovement of (impossible) negotiation between terms. Irony is an expression of the
beyond, within
, and this reworking of borders and limits is performed in the
fragment/aphorism. The (ir)responsible step taken in Derrida‟s texts is
understood as a mode of structural irony, and it is proposed that the stylistic
changes that occurred in Derrida‟s “later” texts were in part due to the
autoimmunity cause
d by an overexposure to the “laws of the interview”.
Throughout the thesis styles that manipulate the unmasterable excesses of irony
are investigated, and each chapter ends with a reading of one of Derrida‟s more“literary” or “performative” texts, while r 
ecognising and playing with the falsityof such generic makers or divisions. Inscribing Derrida within a tradition of thinkers of the non-thetic both extends readings of that tradition and of ironyitself, while affording a valuable way of approaching the
“structures” withinDerrida‟s texts. Irony is not presented as the transcendental signifier of 
deconstruction, but as a profitable way of understanding deconstruction and itsrelation to other writers.
Derrida and a Theory of Irony:Parabasis and Parataxis
Maebh LongPh.D.Department of English StudiesDurham University2010

Activity (19)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Shari West liked this
derory liked this
VE-ZA liked this
mollc liked this
Amalia Istrate liked this
Ben Mtatuka liked this
shreesha2010 liked this
shreesha2010 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->