Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
8Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Supreme Court Notice to Invoke Jurisdiction ROMAN PINO vs the BANK of NEW YORK

Supreme Court Notice to Invoke Jurisdiction ROMAN PINO vs the BANK of NEW YORK

Ratings: (0)|Views: 8,400|Likes:
Published by Foreclosure Fraud
4closureFraud.org
4closureFraud.org

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Foreclosure Fraud on Apr 11, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/20/2011

pdf

text

original

 
\ 
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF ;FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ROMANPINO,APPEAL NO: 4DIO-378L.T. Case No.: 50 2008 CA 031691AppellantlPetitioner
XXXXMB
v.
THE BANK OF NEW YORKl\ffiLLONFIKIA THE BANK OF NEWYORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
NOTICE
TO
INVOKE
CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT,.
DISCRETIONARY
INC. ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST
J U R I S D I C T I ~ 
o:J
r
.....,
2006-0C8, MORTGAGE
_<
f'T1
9
--'I
::0
::r.:
PASSTHROUGH CERTIFI
:::-::
:I>
0
-0
3:."
UJ
:0
>_
SERIES 2006-0C8, et aI.,
~
I
U)r
~
co
~ r r 1
Appellee/Respondent,
:.t:
"'0
:r;O
f'T1:p
---------t.=;;;;I_IDJaIu:·
.
1li6iR
QUAl
Of
___
--.I
g
Cf.1
r
-c _
r
NOTICE IS GIVEN that AppellantiPetitioner, ROMAN
~ I N c F , i n v l : 1 l e s 
thediscretionary jurisdiction
of
the Supreme Court to review the decision
of
this Courtrendered March 30, 2011, upon the granting
of
a timely motion for clarification
enbane
of
the decision issued by this Court on February 2, 2011,
en bane.
The Supreme Court has discretionary jurisdiction under Fla. R. App. P.9.030(a)(2)(A)(v) and Fla.
R.
App.
P.
9.120 because a majority
of
the judges
of
........ 
this Court certified that the decision in this case passed upon a question
of
greatpublic importance.
....
...
 
I hereby certify
fl1at
the above and
foregoing
is
a
true
copy
of
instrument
filed
in
my
oOice.
MARILYNBEUTTENMULLER,
CLERK.DISTRICT COURT OF
APPEAL
OFFLORlDA,FOU H DISTRICT
-.
~ ;
 
/l!-'
:"
APPEAL NO: 4DIO-378Copies
of
this Court's decision granting clarification
en bane,
the
Appellee's
motion for clarification, and the Court's previous decision
en bane
are attached
to
this notice
as
exhibits
"A,"
"B," and "C," respectively.Dated: April 7, 2011.
ICE
LEGAL,
P.A.Counsel for Appellant1015 N. State Road 7, Suite DRoyal Palm Beach, FL 33411Telephone(
561
)729-0530Facsimile (866) 507-9888
B Y : 2 ~ 
ENRIQUE NIEVESFlorida
Bar
No. 41736
CERTIFICATE
O.F
SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy
of
the foregoing wasserved
by
mail this April 7, 2011 to all parties
on
the attached service list.
ICE
LEGAL,
P.A.Counsel for Appellant1015
N.
State Road 7, Suite DRoyal Palm Beach, FL 33411Telephone(561 )729-0530Facsimile (866) 507-9888By:
~ n
~ ~ N I E V E S 
Florida Bar No. 417362 

Activity (8)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Paul Heidemann liked this
wiquida3213 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->