Human Rights Alert
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog:
Scribd:
11-04-12 California Judge Peter Meeka Refuses to Disclose Financial Benefits to Him by Bankof America, Accord Due Process
Bribing of state and US judges by Bank of America must be a serious concern.
Los Angeles, April 12
- In
Lomas v Bank of America
(KC059379) Plaintiff Susan Lomas is tryingto protect her rights through a Quiet Title action against alleged fraud by Bank of America
andothers in foreclosure procedures. The case is opined as Fraud on the Court through collusion of BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, California Judge PETER MEEKA, Clerk of the CourtJOHN A CLARKE, and Attorney MARK ASDOURIAN, aimed to dispossess Lomas, whiledenying her due process and access to an honest court.In the latest episode in this case, Lomas appeared in court on Friday, April 8, 2011, with requestsfor:
•
Due process notice and service of minutes and access to court records.
•
A statement on therecord by Judge Meeka regarding financial benefits to him, if any, byBank of America. [
]In response, Lomas was subjected to what is opined as another instance of Fraud on the Court:Lomas was told that her requests were denied, but no minutes at all were produced for theproceeding (see copy of the minutes below). The records, which Lomas received from the Officeof the Clerk as “minutes” showed a date of “00/00/00”, with no evidence of a hearing by anyJudge of the Court and no evidence of any hearing or ruling at all.Bribing of state and US judges by Bank of America must be a serious concern. Under similarcircumstances, the following judges responded in the same manner:
•
US Judge Virginia Phillips;
•
US Magistrate Carla Woehrle, and
•
California Judge Terry Friedman.A pattern of false anddeliberately misleading court records is found in the case of
Lomas v Bank of America
all along: [
]
•
None of the minutes were certified by the Deputy Clerk of the Court;
Page 2/2 April 12, 2011
•
None of the minutes were noticed and served by the Court;
•
Multiple proceedings were secretly listed in the minutes as "
off of the record"
;
•
No Initial Case Management Conference was ever held;
•
Plaintiff has been repeatedly denied access to the Register of Actions (California civildocket), where the true registration of the proceedings (or lack thereof) would be discerned;
•
An invalid online "Case Summary" is published by the Court, which would lead a naivereader to conclude that valid and effectual proceedings have been held and rulings have beenentered by the court.
•
Attorney Mark Asdourian appears in the case for BofA, while refusing to provide certificateof Attorney of Record. Attorney Asdourian has filed false and deliberately misleadingbanking records as "Request for Judicial Notice", which was granted by Judge Peter Meeka.
•
No declaration or any other record signed by Bank of America authorized person was everfiled in the case.Conduct of Bank of America in this case is inconsistent with the Bank of America
Code of Ethics
and
Outside Counsel Procedures
, which prohibit appearances by unauthorized attorneys andobstructionist conduct in litigation. [
]The conduct of Judge Meeka and Clerk John A Clarke must also be deemed as violations of theHuman, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of Plaintiff Susan Lomas.
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
11-04-12 PRESS RELEASE: Bribing of State and US Judges by Bank of America Must be a Serious Concern!
Bribing of state and US judges by Bank of America must be a serious concern.
California Judge Peter Meeka Refuses to Disclose Financial Benefits to Him by Bank of America, Accord Due Process
Under similar circumstances,… (More)
California Judge Peter Meeka Refuses to Disclose Financial Benefits to Him by Bank of America, Accord Due Process
Under similar circumstances,… (More)
2.6K
Reads
23
Readcasts
2
Embed Views
More From This User
Notes
Load more
