Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
7Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
11-04-17 PRESS RELEASE: Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) – Fraud turns into Extortion in the Los Angeles Superior Court

11-04-17 PRESS RELEASE: Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) – Fraud turns into Extortion in the Los Angeles Superior Court

Ratings: (0)|Views: 62|Likes:
The case should be properly considered now Extortion, and no longer Fraud. All sides are now fully cognizant of the true nature of the litigation. Given the number of cases of this kind that have been recorded in the Los Angeles Superior Court, the Court should be properly considered a racket.
The case should be properly considered now Extortion, and no longer Fraud. All sides are now fully cognizant of the true nature of the litigation. Given the number of cases of this kind that have been recorded in the Los Angeles Superior Court, the Court should be properly considered a racket.

More info:

Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Apr 17, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/12/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Human Rights Alert 
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
 
Blog:
 Scribd: 
11-04-17
Lomas v Bank of America 
– Fraud Turns into Extortion in the Los AngelesSuperior Court
The case should be properly considered now Extortion, and no longer Fraud. All sides are now fully cognizant of the true nature of the litigation. Given the number of cases of this kind that have been recorded in the Los Angeles Superior Court, the Court should be properly considered a racket.
 
 Los Angeles, April 17 
- In
 Lomas v Bank of America,
Plaintiff Susan Lomas is trying to protect her rightsagainst alleged fraud by Bank of America
 
and others in foreclosure procedures. The litigation was previouslyopined by Dr Zernik as Fraud on the Court through collusion of BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,California Judge PETER J MEEKA, and Clerk of the Court JOHN A CLARKE, aimed to dispossess Lomas,while denying her due process and access to an honest court. [
i
]Once Plaintiff Lomas figured out the fraud, she filed on April 14 a “Disqualification for a Cause” of JudgePeter Meeka, citing the routine falsification of court records by Judge Meeka as the cause. Judge Meekaroutinely created secret “Minutes”, where he listed court proceedings as “off of the record”. In parallel, thesame proceedings were listed in the online “Case Summary” in a manner that would lead a naïve reader toconclude that a true litigation was underway in the Court.
]In the April 17, 2011 copy of the online “Case Summary” the falsification of court records continues: [
The Disqualification for a Cause, which was filed by Plaintiff Lomas on April 14, was falsely listed as“Peremptory”. “Peremptory Challenge” is one that is filed by a party on a new judge in a case, beforea judge took any actions. That was not the case here at all.
Attorney Mark Asdourian was listed as filing on April 14 a “Notice” of purported ruling, whileAttorney Asdourian, Bank of America and its President Brian Moynihan refuse to state that AttorneyAsdourian is authorized as Attorney of Record for Bank of America in the case. Only Attorney of Record is permitted to appear in court and file papers on behalf of a client. Appearances of unauthorized attorneys for Countrywide, and later for Bank of America has been recorded as a routinefraud in the courts in the United States.“The case should be properly considered now Extortion, and no longer Fraud”, said Dr Zernik. In Fraud, thevictim is in position of reliance on false and deliberately misleading information provided by the perpetrators.Here, all sides are now fully cognizant of the true nature of the litigation: Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk JohnClarke, Defendant Bank of America and its President Brian Moynihan, Attorney Mark Asdourian, andPlaintiff Susan Lomas know that the court is falsifying the litigation. Therefore, according to Dr Zernik, thestate of affairs in the case should be considered Extortion, where the court is using its power to perpetratecriminality on Plaintiff Susan Lomas.
 
Page 2/4 April 18, 2011
Dr Zernik has previously filed a criminal complaint regarding this case with FBI and the US Attorney’sOffice. “I don’t expect the US Attorney’s Office and FBI to take action. It is business as usual in the LosAngeles Superior Court”, says Dr Zernik. “Given the number of cases of this kind that have been recorded inthe Los Angeles Superior Court, the Court should be considered a racket”.Dr Zernik has uncovered and reported to FBI and the US Attorney’s office a series of cases of financial fraudunder the guise of litigation in the Los Angeles Superior Court, going back almost two decades. [
]Even after Congressional Inquiries on FBI and US Attorney General by Senator Dianne Feinstein andCongresswoman Diane Watson, the US government permits such conduct by the LA-JR (alleged Los AngelesJudiciary Racket) to continue.Human Rights Alert (NGO) submitted in 2010 a report to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations,describing conditions in the Los Angeles Superior Court – the largest county court in the United States.Consequently, the 2010 Staff Report of the Human Rights Council noted “corruption of the courts and thelegal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California”. [
]Dr Zernik also filed a request for help in the case of 
 Lomas v Bank of America
with Bet Tzedek – the LosAngeles “House of Justice”. Sandor Samuels, former Chief Legal Officer of Countrywide and formerAssociate General Counsel of Bank of America, who was responsible for establishing such fraud litigationpractices in the courts from coast to coast, is now President of Bet Tzedek. Samuels has recently professed hiscommitment to “repairing the world”. [
v
]
LINK
i
[1] 11-03-20 PRESS RELEASE Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Bank of America Continues Racketeering in the Los Angeles SuperiorCourtHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/51160102/ H[2] 11-03-20 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles online “Case Summary” andMinutesHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/51157264/ H[3] 11-04-05 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – Fraud on the Court in a QuietTitle ActionHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52336989/ H[4] 11-04-06 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) “Request[s] for Judicial Notice”- Additional Evidence of Fraud on the Court in ForeclosureProcedure sHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52420585/ H[5] 11-04-07 Press Release: Lomas v BofA (KC059379) – Judge Meeka is Requested to Restore Due Process, Declare Any Benefits fromBofAHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52494342/ H[6] 11-04-08 PRESS RELEASE: Complaint filed against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, Bank of America andits President Brian Moynihan, and Attorney Mark Asdourian – for Public Corruption and RacketeeringHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52602364/ H[7] 11-04-08 US Attorney Office and FBI Complaint against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk John Clarke, BofA and its President BrianMoynihan - Public Corruption and Racketeering in Lomas V Bank of America (KC059379)Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52601871/ H[8] 11-03-31 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Request and Response for Certification of Authority as Attorney of Record sHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52516705/ H[9] 11-04-07 Request for Help by Sandor Samuels, President of Bet Tzedek - "The House of Justice"- in Re Lomas v Bank of America(KCD59379)-sHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52521210/ H[10] 11-04-07 PRESS RELEASE: Bet Tzedek – “The House of Justice” – President Sandor Samuels is asked to help in stopping fraud byBank of America against a homeowner in the Los Angeles Superior CourtHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52525314/ H[11] 11-04-08 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379): Ex Parte Applications for Due Process and for a Statement by California Judge Peter JMeeka Regarding Financial Benefits to Him by Bank of AmericaHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52844251/ H[12] 11-04-12 PRESS RELEASE: Bribing of State and US Judges by Bank of America Must be a Serious Concern!Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52846502/ HHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52846502/ H[13] 11-04-12 Lomas v BofA (KC059379) Brian Moynihan and General Counsel of BofA are asked to disclose Attorney of RecordHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52914197/ H[14] 11-04-13 Press Release: Lomas v BofA - BofA, Brian Moynihan Are Asked to Name Their Attorney of Record in the Los Angeles SuperiorCourtHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52921960/ H[15] 11-04-14 PRESS RELEASE: Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler has been asked to review the evidence of large-scale computerfraud in the courts
 
Page 3/4 April 18, 2011
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52993968/ H[16] 11-04-14 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Plaintiff Susan Lomas’s Disqualification for a Cause of Judge Peter J MeekaHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/53044411/ H[17] 11-04-08 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) 2nd “Minutes” for the Ex Parte Applications for Due Process and Statement by CaliforniaJudge Peter J Meeka RE: Financial Benefits to Him by Bank of AmericaHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/53046565/ H[18] 11-04-15 Press Release: Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) - Lomas files for disqualification of Judge Meeka, calls “quits” tocharades in the Los Angeles Superior CourtHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/53071727/ H
ii
11-04-17 Lomas v Bank of America - Additional False Notations in the Online "Case Summary"Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/53209167/ H
iii
[1] 10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket)Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/39383792/ H[2] 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice toTake ActionHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/ H
iv
10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rightsin the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
H
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/ 
H
v
11-04-07 Request for Help by Sandor Samuels, President of Bet Tzedek - "The House of Justice"- in Re Lomas v Bank of America(KCD59379)-sHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52521210/ H11-04-07 PRESS RELEASE: Bet Tzedek – “The House of Justice” – President Sandor Samuels is asked to help in stopping fraud by Bank ofAmerica against a homeowner in the Los Angeles Superior CourtHhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52525314/ H ___ Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State ofCalifornia and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized casemanagement systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States. _______ Hhttp://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ H
Flag Counter: 118H
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ H
Total Reads:329,929Followers:481H
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_AlertHHhttpH ://twitter.com/HinproperinlaH Hhttp://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 
Total Item Views:
 
294,025
 Hhttp://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-ExaminerH
 _____________________________ WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
*"...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/ HProf Paul Krugman, MIT (2011) _____________________________ 
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
*"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/ H*"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people areconvicted."Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/ H*"Innocent people remain in prison"*"...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->