INTHECIRCUITCOURTOFTHE11THJUDICIALCIRCUITINANDFORMIAMIDADECOUNTY,FLORIDAGENERALJURISDICTIONDIVISION
177_
7230
le'll
CASENO:
f1
7
Jf
I
MARKS.GOLDPlaintiff
"._
.:c:
o
:",0
r>-
r__
r:...,
c'
>:
v.
TlTItNTABLEENTERT~NTANDPRODUCTIONCOMPANY,
d/bla
GOLDRUSH
--------------------------------------------1
COMPLAINTAND
DEMAND
FOR
JlJRY
TRIAL
COMESNOW,ThePlaintiff,MARKGOLD,(hereinafter"GOLD"),byandthroughundersignedcounsel,andsues,Defendant,TURNTABLEENTERT~NTANDPRODUCTIONCOMPANY
d/bla/GOLD
RUSH(hereinafter"GOLDRUSlf'),andalleges:1.ThisisanactionfordamagesinexcessofFifteenThousandDollars
p
($15,000),andwithinthejurisdictionofthisCourt.
2.TheincidentgivingrisetotheclaimshereinoccurredinMiami-DadeCounty,Florida.3.Atalltimesmaterialhereto,Plaintiff,GOLD,wasandisaresidentofMiami-DadeCounty,Florida,isovertheageofeighteen,andisotherwise
sui-juris.
4.Atalltimesmaterialhereto,Defendant,GOLDRUSH,wasandisacorporationorganizedandexistingunderthelawsoftheStateofFlorida,withitsprincipalplaceofbusinessinMiami-DadeCounty.
,
abilitytoenterintolawfulcontractsoragreements.5.OnoraboutNovember27,throughandincludingNovember28
th,
2010,Plaintiff,GOLD,enteredlawfullyuponthepremisesofdefendant,GOLDRUSH,asapatron,guest,and/orbusinessinvitee.6.Atalltimesmaterialhereto,theactsofdefendant,GOLDRUSH,and/orit'sagents,ostensiblyagents,servants,representativesand/oremployeesas
I
allegedhereinoccurredduringthecourseandscopeofthedefendant'sGOLDRUSH'sagency,servitude,representation,and/oremployment.7.Atthetimeandplace,DefendantGOLDRUSH,knowinglyandcontinuouslyservedplaintiffalcoholicbeveragestotheextentthathewa~renderedintoxicated,partiallyortemporarilyunconscious,andfurthertotheextentthathehadacompletelossofjudgment,rationalthought,orthe
"
8.Defendant,GOLDRUSH,havingknowinglycausedPlaintiffsirrationalstateofmind,continuedtoplyhimwithliquor,inordertochargehiscreditcardexcessiveamounts,totheextentof$18,930.009.Defendantknew,orshouldhaveknown,ofplaintiff'sintoxicatedstate,havingcausedit.10.Thatthe"contract"forthepurchasesofgoodsandservices,towit,whateverdefendantclaimswasdeliveredasaresultoftheexcessivecreditcardchargesof$18,930.00isvoidable,astoPlaintiff,sincetheDefendant
«
knew,orshouldhaveknown,ofthePlaintiffsintoxicatedmentalstate.11.Plaintiffservedofdefendantanoticeofavoidanceofcontract,anddemandedthereturnofthemoneypaid,butsaiddemandwasrefused.12.Allconditionsprecedenttothisactionhavebeensatisfied.13.PlaintiffhasbeendamagedasaresultofDefendantsactionsasmorefullysetforthabove.WHEREFORE,PlaintiffGOLDdemandsjudgmentagainstdefendantGOLDRUSH,forcompensatorydamagesintheamountof$18,930.00,plusinterest,cost'sandattorneys'feespursuanttoFS57.105,andanyotherfurtherreliefthisCourtdeemsjust.
_.
COUNTII:UNFAIRANDDECEPTIVETRADEPRACTICES
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
