April26,2011Re:PostalServiceProposedRulePage2of10ThePostalService'sstateddesireto"improve"andto"harmonize"itsproceduresfordiscontinuing(i&.,closing)postofficesandotherfacilities,andtopromote"transparency"forcustomersiscertainlyunderstandable.Theproposedrule,however,effectivelyremovesoneofthetwogroundsavailabletocommunitiestoseekreviewofsuchactionsatthePostalRegulatoryCommission;similarly,itremovesanessentialelementfromthecoredefinitionof"postoffice;"anditcounterstheCongressionalintentincreatinganappealprocessandinmandatingservice"toallcommunities"anda"maximumdegree"ofservice"toruralareas,communities,andsmalltownswherepostofficesarenotselfsustaining."39U.S.C.
§
101(a),(b).
I."CONSOLIDATION"ERASED
Recognizingtheimportanceofpostalservicestolocalcommunities,Congressprovidedtwodistinctcircumstances--closingorconsolidatingpostoffices-wherecommunitiescouldpresenttheirfirst-handknowledgeoftheimpactofthosedecisionsupontheirlocal"commercial,cultural,andsociallife,"
I
andifnecessary,appealthePostalService'sdecisiontothePostalRegulatoryCommission.DespitethePostalService'sclaimthat"consolidation"isill-defined,Congress,courtsandeventhePostalServicehaveprovidedconsistentdefinitionsofthisterm.ByimplementingtheProposedRule,thePostalServicewoulderasecommunityinvolvementinconsolidationdecisions,withpotentiallyfar-reachingconsequences;theProposedRulewouldalsoerasestatutoryandproceduralprotectionsCongressintendedtoprovidetothepublic.
A.CONGRESSADDS"CONSOLIDATION"TOTHESTATUTES
In1976Congressaddedasubsectionto39U.S.C.
§
404creatingaprocedurefornotice,communityinput,andarightofappealtothePostalRegulatoryCommissionwheneverthePostalServicedetermined"tocloseorconsolidateapostoffice."Thatprocedure,originallycodifiedasSection404(b),subsequentlybecameSection404(d).Thatsinglesubsectionrefersto"closingorconsolidation"ofanypostofficeeleventimes.Congress,thecourts,andthePostalServicehaveallevincedaclearunderstandingofthemeaninganddistinctionbetweenthe"closing"andthe"consolidation"ofapostoffice.InKnappv.UnitedStatesPostalService,449F.Supp.158(E.D.Mich.,1978),theCourtpointedtothelegislativehistoryindefining"consolidation:""SenatorRandolph,whenheproposedthelegislationdestinedtobecome39U.S.C.
§
404(b)[now(d)]ontheflooroftheSenate,madeitclearthathisinterestwastodealwiththeproblemofthephysicalclosureofapostofficeorthephysicalconsolidationofpostoffices,particularlyasthisrelatestopostalservicesinrural
I
H.R.Rep.No.94-391,94thCong.,1stSess.3(1975).
Add a Comment