Muslim’s Articles of faith and

Qadiani’s claims:
Recitation of Kalima

Preface
Qadianis especially Lahori Qadianis always use this excuse
that they recites Kalima and perform prayers, therefore,
Muslims should not consider and declare them as non-
Muslims.

This excuse is not based on honesty; it is based rather on

mischief, a hallmark of Qadianis. In this article we will
expose their dishonesty and prove that they are not
Muslims by any stretch of the imaginations. Muslims have
rightly declared them as non-Muslims and out side the
pale of Islam.

Instead of re-producing the evidence already displayed in

our previous articles, which is valid and relevant for this
article, we will explain why the recitation of Kalima or
offering the prayers is not enough to be a Muslim. These
are two important articles of faith, no doubt, but these
articles of faith in themselves not enough for some one to
be a Muslim. To be a Muslim one has to follow other
articles of faith, not accepting one article, or purposefully
distorting or altering one of the article render one as non-
Muslim.

We have divided this expose’ in two segments, the first

segment dealt in this article, it deals with the evidence
from the Holy Quran that recitation of Kalima is not
enough to be a Muslim. In this segment another lie of
Lahori Qadiani’s, to claim that Mirza never claimed
prophet hood, is exposed from undeniable internal
evidence, together with another claim “73rd and only
saved sect”.

Second segment deals with the issue of finality of Prophet

Hood on Prophet SAW, this segment will be dealt
separately in another article. This is the thorny issue for
the Qadianis, and one of the main reasons the Muslims
declare them non-Muslims. We will tackle the second
segment in completely different way then done by other
writers and commentators.

As a matter of fact, even though the second issue always

grab the headlines, but apart from this issue, there is
plenty in the writings of Mirza which renders him as non-
believer i.e. Kafir.

Articles of Faith
Recently, on forums, we engaged in discussion on
different topics with an official of Lahori Qadianis. This
interaction started almost two years ago, after the
publications of our first article on our Web log.

During our first encounter with the so called Scholar of

Lahori cult, he boldly tried to put the following suggestions
to us instead of discussing the main thrust of the first
article, Mirza’s use of the verses from Surah Al-Jin, that
“he is given the knowledge of the Unseen” by Allah SWT,
like the true Prophets, according to his claims.

Scholar’s invitations
In his response to our invitation to discuss and debate the
main topic of the article, the Scholar in September 2008
wrote:

September 4th, 2008 at 5:45 pm

Other topics could be:

1. Was Hazrat Mizra sahib a Muslim according to Islam?

2. Did he do any service to Islam or none whatsoever?

3. Are members of the AAIIL Muslims according to Islam?

4. Has AAIIL done any service to Islam or none?

As on his blog on the first page he writes that we falsely

claim that Iqbal was sympathetic to our Movement, let us
make that a topic. In fact, just that topic might suffice
because he regards Iqbal as a great authority on Islam.

Mr Crank… could also get us a promise from the anti-

Ahmadiyya ulama that if I prevail in these debates, they
will campaign publicly to have Ahmadis declared as
Muslim in Pakistan.

We subsequently tried to engage the Scholar in a

discussion and debate on these topics; but he is quite
reluctant to engage in very topics he so proudly wanted to
discuss back in 2008. Recently, he did engage briefly, but
that’s another story.

Conditions set by the Scholar and AAIIL

In 2001 a user belonging to the mainstream Qadiani
faction asked the Scholar following questions:

“You still not get my point, you recite Kalima but reject
prophet of Allah (swt) what kind of Muslim is this now??
Allah (swt) says in Quran to accept my prophet who
rejects them is a kafir, why Allah (swt) didnt say ONLY
kalima is enuff, you dont anything else!!!!
Can I reject all prophets of allah and recite kalima, am I
still muslim?? as muslim belive is to belive in all
prophets!!, btw the kalima thing is in Hadith and not Holy
Quran, dont mean I dont belive in this, BUT only saying
Kalima and then rejecting a prophet of Allah(swt), playin
with Islam or what??”

In a nutshell, what the mainstream Qadiani follower of

Mirza was trying to ask is that the Lahori’s can not be
Muslims by rejecting the claims of Prophet Hood of Mirza.
He clearly stated his position that recitation of the Kalima
is not the only requirement.
To his questions the Scholar responded;

Posts: 789

(11/30/01 10:03:19)

Could you then tell us what in addition to the Kalima a

person has to believe or do in order to be a Muslim?

Secondly, if someone recites the Kalima, accepts

everything in the Quran, says that he accepts every
prophet who is in the Quran (e.g. Ibrahim, Musa,
Isa, etc.), he believes in Allah, angels, Allah's books, and
the last day, he prays, fasts, gives zakat, goes for the hajj,
then please tell us: would you regard him as a Muslim or
not? If not, what extra do you want him to believe or do?

Therefore, we have absolute proofs what the Lahori’s

Scholar thinks and what he is written are the conditions to
be a Muslim, according to him.

AAIIL official position:

1- Writings of Muhammad Ali
A book “The Ahmadiyya Doctrine” was written by
Muhammad Ali in 1932. He is considered to be a stalwart
by the Lahori’s, it is useful to quote what he has written on
this subject; only the relevant passages from the book are
quoted.

Muhammad Ali writes;

“The Ahmadis are called kafir by some fanatical Mullahs.

To remove all misunderstanding on this point I give below
a summary of the beliefs we hold and leave it to the
reader to see for himself whether a person holding these
beliefs is a Muslim or a kafir (non-Muslim).”

Two categorical statements are produced first by the

alleged Scholar and second from Muhammad Ali. Also Sher
Muhammad writings are included in later parts of this
article. Their statements and the writings of Mirza will be
analysed in the light of the teachings of the Holy Quran
and off course from the internal evidence from their
resources to expose their deceptions.

After judging Mirza’s writings with the teachings of the

Holy Quran, we will pose the questions in the light of the
evidence displayed in line with the conditions set by these
three writers of Lahori Qadianis. Even though their
writings are addressed in this article, but it holds true for
other groups and other factions of the Qadianis.

Muhammad Ali then written their beliefs,

once again the relevant information is
displayed.
1- We believe in the absolute unity of God. La ilaha illallah
(there is no God but Allah) is the first doctrine of our faith.

2- We believe in the prophethood and apostleship of

Hazrat Muhammad, may peace and the blessings of God
be upon him. Muhammad-ur-Rasul-ullah is the second
doctrine of our faith.

3- The third doctrine listed by Muhammad Ali is their

belief in the finality of Prophet Hood on Prophet SAW,
which will be subject of a separate article. In our first
article this topic was discussed as the claim of Prophet
Hood by Mirza. Lahoris deny that Mirza ever made this
claim. But unfortunately Lahoris have not produced any
intelligent or reasonable argument to substantiate their
positions on the claim of Prophet Hood by Mirza.

4-We believe that the Holy Quran is the Word of God and
that it is the final Law revealed for the guidance of
humanity so that no law shall be revealed after it.

5- We believe that every word of the Holy Quran shall

remain in force till the day of the judgment and that not a
word contained in the Holy Quran has been or shall ever
be, abrogated.
6- We believe in all the prophets of God whose names are
mentioned in the Holy Quran and also in the fact that
there is no nation in which a prophet was not raised.

7- We believe in the books revealed by God to His

Prophets in different ages and among various nations.

8- We believe in angels.

Muhammad Ali wrote 10 Beliefs we have listed 7 above, in

this article we will leave out point 3 and 5, which would be
discussed, in separate articles in the future, God willing.

The purpose of this exhaustive exercise is to produce

evidence, which is irrefutable; this evidence can be used
to judge their claims.

By following Mirza, his writings and his teachings, if they

failed to adopt these conditions according to the teachings
of the Holy Quran then their own evidence counts against
them.

2- Writings of Mirza
In response to hypothetical questions posed by the Lahori
Qadianis that Muslims consider Qadianis as Kaffirs. In the
answer a quote from Mirza’s book “Ayyam Sulh” is
produced,

"We believe in the five pillars of Islam ... We believe that

there is no god besides God, and that Muhammad is His
Messenger and the last of the prophets. We believe that
whoever adds to, or detracts from, the
Islamic Shari'ah even one whit, is excluded from Islam.
And we instruct our community that they believe in laa
ilaaha ill-Allah Muhammadur rasul Allah; and they consider
as their
duties salaat [prayer], saum [fasting], zakaat [charity],
hajj [pilgrimage], and other obligations imposed by God
and His Prophet, and act according to Islam. It is
incumbent to believe in all those things which, according
to the ijmaa' [unanimity] of the Ahl-Sunnah (i.e., the
orthodox), constitute Islam" (Ayyam Sulh).
Therefore, we have a full set of quotes from different
Qadianis including Mirza. We proceed to anlayse and
expose Mirza and his followers in the light of their own
writings. There is no better way to prove one’s guilt in his
words and deeds.

Exploring Quranic Evidence

1- Nature of Man: ever-true faith, Islam

In the Holy Quran, Allah SWT has decreed in very clear

terms, the true nature of human and purpose of their
creation, true faith of human, i.e. Islam, one and only true
faith acceptable to Allah SWT, because the nature of
human is set on this faith. Hence Muslim’s belief that
every human is born as a Muslim and takes the faith of his
parents due to the social conditions.

30:30 AND SO, set thy face steadfastly towards the [one
ever-true] faith, turning away from all that is false, in
accordance with the natural disposition which God has
instilled into man: [for,] not to allow any change to corrupt
what God has thus created this is the [purpose of the one]
ever-true faith; but most people know it not.

2- Islamic faith
22:78And strive hard in God’s cause with all the striving
that is due to Him: it is He who has elected you [to carry
His message], and has laid no hardship on you in
[anything that pertains to religion, [and made you follow]
the creed of your forefather Abraham. It is He who has
named you in bygone times as well as in this [divine writ]
– “those who have surrendered themselves to God”, so
that the Apostle might bear witness to the truth before
you, and that you might bear witness to it before all
mankind. Thus, be constant in prayer, and render the
purifying dues, and hold fast unto God. He is your Lord
Supreme: and how excellent is this Lord Supreme, and
how excellent this Giver of Succour!

The hardship in the religion of Islam is absence due to

many factors;

(1) It is free of any dogma or mystical proposition which

might make the Quranic doctrine difficult to understand or
might even conflict with man’s innate nature described in
the above verse. Even though Holy Quran decreed that
Islam is free of dogma and stigmatism, Mirza in the
condition of Prophet Hood after Prophet Muhammad SAW,
said that it is not possible for any nominal Muslim to
become a Prophet. This evidence is displayed in our first
article.

(2) Islam avoids all complicated ritual or system of

taboos, which would impose undue restrictions on man’s
everyday life; but Mirza still followed rituals like throwing
beans in the well and ordering his followers not to look
back.

(3) Islam rejects all self-mortification it forbids suicide, a

hint for the followers of Mirza who keeps bringing political
issues more frequently at present due to the geopolitical
situation around the World. It rejects exaggerated
asceticism, which must unavoidably conflict with mans
true nature described in this verse.

Abraham is designated as "our forefather" not only

because he was, in fact, an ancestor of the prophet
Muhammad SAW, to whom we the Muslims follow, but also
because he is a model and thus, the spiritual "forefather"
of all the Muslims; who consciously "surrender themselves
to God".

The term Muslim signifies "one who surrenders himself to

God"; correspondingly, Islam means "self-surrender to
God". Both of these terms are applied in the Qur’an to all
those who believe in One God and affirm this belief by an
unequivocal acceptance of His revealed messages.
Therefore, it is not we the Muslims but all the followers of
earlier Prophets whoever fulfilled these conditions and
surrendered their selves to the One True God. It is
obligatory for the Muslims to accept all the earlier true
Prophets of God and the revelations vouchsafed to them.
Without this fundamental condition, no one can claim to
be a Muslim.

Mirza due to his jealousy to Prophet Isa As, and in his

desires to compete with him As; and for him to be
accepted as “ Promised Messiah” violated this command
of the Holy Quran, by hurling false accusations against Isa
As and his As family. We have covered this with evidence
in our earlier article, but relevant points would be included
briefly in this article.

3- Islamic Articles of faith

For the followers of Mirza to suggest and claim that

because they recite Kalima therefore, they automatically
qualify as Muslims, their claims are ill founded. Quran is
full of verses on the conduct of the hypocrites and
repeatedly decreed that they are destined to the hellfire.

At the time of Prophet Muhammad SAW and during the

period of Quranic revelations, these hypocrites recited the
Kalima, but Allah SWT repeatedly rejected their claims of
being Muslims only on the basis of them reciting the
Kalima. We will not dwell too much on the subject of
hypocrites; there is plenty of evidence in the writings of
Mirza, which is enough proof of his kuffar. Nevertheless,
the point that the hypocrites were not accepted as
Muslims in the Holy Quran is relevant to prove that the
recitation of Kalima on its own is not enough to be a
Muslim.

A – Hypocrites were not Muslims

9:74[The hypocrites] swear by God that they have said

nothing [wrong]; yet most certainly have they uttered a
saying which amounts to a denial of the truth, and have
[thus] denied the truth after [having professed] their self-
surrender to God: for they were aiming at something
which was beyond their reach. And they could find no fault
[with the Faith] save that God had enriched them and
[caused] His Apostle [to enrich them] out of His bounty!
Hence, if they repent, it will be for their own good. But if
they turn away, God will cause them to suffer grievous
suffering in this world and in the life to come, and they will
find no helper on earth, and none to give [them] succour.
This verse is damning evidence against the lies and claims
of Qadianis in general and lies of the Lahori Qadianis in
particular.

In this verse no ambiguity is left it is a clear demonstration

that in Islam recitation of Kalima is not the only
requirement to be Muslims. This verse says, they utter
denials and kuffar (Kalimatul kuffar), they have became
Kaffirs after accepting Islam (Ba’ad Islamahum), and if
they repent not, i.e. became Muslims again by rejecting
the kuffar they are uttering, and correcting their beliefs
and deeds, then grievous suffering awaits them.

B- List of Articles of faith

The Shahada itself is not the only Article of faith for
Muslims, but it is one of many, we have to follow all the
articles of faith to be considered and remain Muslims.

1- Believe in God, in oneness of God i.e. Tauheed

2- Believe in the revelations from God, i.e. Quran and

earlier revelations in their true form, which unfortunately
does not exist anymore due to the corruption of the
scriptures.

3- Believe in the Angels of God

4- Believe in Prophets of God; all the True Prophets of God,

not a selection based on your personal choice or rejection
based on your personal animosity.

5- Believe in resurrection day; with all its implications.

6- Believe in Divine Decree

C - Description of Shahada (disambiguation)

Shahda in itself is a comprehensive issue, and not simply
constitute recitation of the Kalima. Its closest translation
in English is disambiguation, i.e. to be clear of any
ambiguity, in recognizing and proclaiming we the Muslims
follow one true God.
 • Al-`Ilm: Knowledge of the meaning of the Shahadah,
its negation and affirmation. Negating there is no
other deity worthy of the worship but Allah SWT,
affirming that we surrender only to Allah SWT.
• Al-Yaqeen: Certainty – perfect knowledge of it that
counteracts suspicion and doubt. To have certainty in
our beliefs that Allah SWT has the perfect knowledge
of what exists in the universe, nothing escapes His
SWT’s unfathomable knowledge. And only He SWT is
worthy of our worship.
• Al-Ikhlaas: Sincerity which negates shirk. Sincerity
with the unity of Allah SWT, Who is above the need of
having any partners, He SWT Begets not nor He SWT
is Begotten. He SWT is beyond the need to call
someone son, even as a figure of speech (claimed by
Mirza).
• Al-Sidq: Truthfulness that permits neither falsehood
nor hypocrisy.
• Al-Mahabbah: Love of the Shahadah and its
meaning, and being happy with it.
• Al-Inqiad: Submission to its rightful requirements,
which are the duties that must be performed with
sincerity to God (alone) seeking His pleasure.
• Al-Qubool: Acceptance that contradicts rejection.

The second part of the Shahada carries several conditions

as well:

• To believe in the Prophet SAW and in whatever he

said and conveyed in his message as the seal of the
prophets.
• To obey him in whatever he commanded.
• To stay away from or avoid whatever he commanded
Muslims not to do.
• To follow or emulate him in our 'ibadah (worship),
akhlaq (manners), and way of life.
• To love him more than you love yourself, your family
and anything else in this world.
• To understand, practice, and promote his Sunnah in
the best way possible, without creating any chaos,
enmity or harm. (source Wiki)

D - Islamic Articles of faith: Quranic evidence

First the description of articles of faith in the Holy Quran;

2:285 THE APOSTLE, and the believers with him, believe in

what has been bestowed upon him from on high by his
Sustainer: they all believe in God, and His angels, and His
revelations, and His apostles, making no distinction
between any of His apostles; and they say: We have
heard, and we pay heed. Grant us Thy forgiveness, O our
Sustainer, for with Thee is all journeys' end!

We the Muslims make no distinction between any of His

SWT apostles these words are put, as it were, in the
mouths of the believers. Inasmuch as all the apostles were
true bearers of God's messages, there is no distinction
between them, albeit some of them have been "endowed
more highly than others". But nonetheless, they all were
the true bearers of God’s messages.

Quran is continuity and culmination of the revelations;

2:4 And who believe in that which has been bestowed

from on high upon thee, [O Prophet,] as well as in that
which was bestowed before thy time: for it is they who in
their innermost are certain of the life to come!

This verse is reference to one of the fundamental

doctrines of the Holy Quran. The doctrine of continuity of
divine revelations; vouchsafed to earlier Prophets and
culminated in the Quranic revelations. Life, especially the
spiritual life, Qur'an teaches us, is not a series of
unconnected jumps but a continuous, organic process, to
which man's religious experience (in its cumulative sense)
is a part. Thus Islam, the religion of the Qur'an can be
properly understood only against this background, of the
great monotheistic faiths. Even though these faiths
claimed to be different by their followers, but according to
the Holy Quran, all the Prophets of Allah SWT were
adherent to one and only religion Islam, acceptable to
Allah SWT, Islam, self surrender to Allah SWT. According to
Muslim belief, Quranic revelations culminate and achieve
final formulation of the faith of Islam.

E- Articles of faith: Evidence from Ahadiths

The first Hadith in the first book of Muslim deals with the
issue of Articles of faith. That hadith is quite lengthy but
there is another hadith in the same book, which is slightly
shorter, it still too lengthy to quote in full for the purpose
of this article. Therefore, we are only quoting appropriate
portion from it.

Muslim; Book 001, Number 0004:

Abu Huraira reported: One day the Messenger of Allah

(may peace be upon him) appeared before the public that
a man came to him and said: Prophet of Allah, (tell me)
what is Iman. Upon this he (the Holy Prophet) replied: That
you affirm your faith in Allah, His angels, His Books, His
meeting, His Messengers and that you affirm your faith in
the Resurrection hereafter. He (again) said: Messenger of
Allah, (tell me) what does al-Islam signify. He (the Holy
Prophet) replied: Al-Islam signifies that you worship Allah
and do not associate anything with Him and you establish
obligatory prayer and you pay the obligatory poor-rate
(Zakat) and you observe the fast of Ramadan.

The remaining part of the Hadith deals with the topic of

Day of Judgment and its signs. It may be useful in a future
article on this issue.

Are Qadianis 73rd and saved sect?

It provides us opportunity to expose another claim of
Qadianis. They claimed that they are the 73rd and the only
saved sect in Islam. Beside the fundamental question of
them to be Muslims first and foremost, their claim is false,
like many other claims, it is proven from the Holy Quran.

1- Mirza created a new Sect in Islam

Their claims are based on heresies of Mirza. Mirza in

Arbaeen after stating that he was named Ibrahim in
Braheen writes:

“In every respect follow his (Mirza’s) example, as it is

written in the Verse “ Wa Mubashara Bir Rasool yati min
baadi asma Ahmed” (V 7 Surah Al saf) that Prophet
Muhammad SAW will appear in the last days (Mirza as a
Barooz). Meaning it will be a hand of his (SAW) whose
name in the heaven is Ahmed he will spread the religion,
in the guise of Messih. Similar is the verse 'Wa Attakhozu
Men Maghame Ibrahim Masla'. It contains a hint that at a
time when the Ummah of Muhammad (SAW) will become
divided into many groups, then during the last era an
Ibrahim (Mirza) will be born and out of all the groups that
group will be saved which follows this Ibrahim."

(Arbain V3 P 32, RK 17:57 P421)

Mirza killed many birds with one stone in this quotation.

 1- He became the real Ahmed, instead of Ghulam of
Ahmed. Who to argue with him if Allah SWT names him as
Ahmed in the heavens? (A separate article on this very
topic is in the pipeline).

2- He also became a Burooz of Prophet Isa AS as Messiah

(again this topic needs full attention in a new article).

3- He also became Prophet Ibrahim too, because he was

named as such in Braheen. Is Braheen a divine book?
What if there are errors in Braheen? Will Qadianis accept
that these mistakes are committed by Allah SWT
(nauzobillah)?

4- Last but not least he became a Burooz of Prophet SAW.

2- Muhammad Ali on Sects

Before we examine Mirza’s claims from the Holy Quran, it
is useful to look at the comments of Muhammad Ali in his
article in point 3 of “what is sectarianism”, he writes;

“Some people, by neglecting the distinction between

sectarianism and difference of opinion, regard all
differences of opinion as an attempt at creating
disharmony and discord in Islam. The Quran says:

As for those who split up their religion and became sects,

thou hast no concern with them (6:160).

The meaning of splitting up the unity of religion and

becoming divided into sects is obvious, but some people
have a wrong understanding of this verse. It does not and
could not mean that Muslims should not differ with one
another in any respect. It was, however, not surprising to
find differences of opinion in a nation that was spread all
over the world. The Holy Prophet had declared difference
of opinion to be a mercy for his ummah, which shows that
in difference is also hidden the secret of the progress of
the ummah.”

The hypocrisy of Muhammad Ali is quote apparent, it is

obvious from above quote he knew that the Holy Quran
forbid creation of sects in the religion of Islam, but he
ignored the writings of Mirza on this crucial issue,
purposefully. He being the “Scholar” of this cult ought to
have known the evidence displayed above, which surely
he did, and its implications on anyone who divide the
religion in to sects. We find further proofs in the writings of
Sher Muhammad that the elders of Lahori’s indeed were
aware of Mirza’s writings.

3- Quranic Evidence: Creation of Sects is

forbidden
We quote two verses from Surah An’am; first verse is
relevant for the topic under discussion, and the second
proves the Qadiani’s claims wrong of being the 73rd and
saved sect.

6:158 Do they, perchance, wait for the angels to appear

unto them, or for thy Sustainer [Himself] to appear, or for
some of thy Sustainers’ [final] portents to appear? [But]
on the Day when thy Sustainers’ [final] portents do
appear, believing will be of no avail to any human being
who did not believe before, or who, while believing, did no
good works. Say: "Wait, [then, for the Last Day, O
unbelievers:] behold, we [believers] are waiting, too!"

A fundamental fact has appeared in the above verse; on

the Day of the Judgment even the believers, who did not
do the good works would be treated exactly like un-
believers. Those believers must have recited Kalima to
become believers, but that would be no avail to them,
unless they have performed good deeds too.
As a side note, Mirza claim Allah SWT did appeared to him
in the shape of a man (Tamseel) and even to another
person to testify the truthfulness of Mirza. This evidence is
displayed in our earlier articles.

In the quotation above, Mirza claimed he received the

revelations that his sect would be the saved sect. There is
no better barometer then the Holy Quran to judge Mirza’s
truthfulness.

6:159 VERILY, as for those who have broken the unity of

their faith and have become sects - thou hast nothing to
do with them. Behold, their case rests with God: and in
time He will make them understand what they were doing.

According to the commentators this is a reference

primarily, to the Jews and the Christians, who have
departed from the fundamental religious principles of
Islam, remember, all the Prophets of Allah SWT only
taught religion of Islam to their followers. They originally
shared the same religion but with passage of time have
gone different ways in respect of doctrine and ethics.

Beside this "primary" reference, this verse expresses a

condemnation of all sectarianism arising out of people's
intolerant, mutually exclusive claims to being "the only
true exponents" of the Quranic teachings.

Thus, when asked about the implications of this verse, the

Prophet's Companion Abu Hurayrah is reported to have
answered, "It has been revealed with reference to this
[our] community" (Tabari).

This verse connects logically with verse 153 of the Surah.

6:153And [know] that this is the way leading straight unto
Me: follow it, then, and follow not other ways, lest they
cause you to deviate from His way. [All] this has He
enjoined upon you, so that you might remain conscious of
Him.

There are no ambiguities in these verses “Firqawa”

meaning they became sects, implying the condition of the
followers of earlier Prophets. And “Fa’tafraqa” is used in
6:153 giving a warning to the Muslims not to become
sects and repeat the errors of the earlier communities.
Thus, unity of the faith of Islam, rejecting the practice of
sects and splitting of the community leading straight to
Allah SWT, this indeed is the right path.

21:92 VERILY, [O you who believe in Me,] this community

of yours is one single community, since I am the Sustainer
of you all: worship, then, Me [alone]!

The verse 6:159 is addressing Prophet SAW and his SAW

followers in general; even he SAW has nothing to do with
the people who break the unity of their faith by becoming
sects, either the followers of earlier Prophets and
revelations or the Muslims followers of the Holy Quran and
Prophet Muhammad SAW. Muslims should consider this
fact, when Prophet Muhammad SAW has no say in it, but
those who split up the religion of Islam in to sects their
affair is with Allah SWT and Him SWT alone. Then it does
not matter who started the sects in Islam, they are
responsible to Allah SWT on the day of the Judgment.
It proves yet another lie of Mirza, exposed by direct
evidence from the Holy Quran. There should be absolutely
no doubt Mirza was a liar, he never received any
revelations. His claims to be called Ibrahim or Burooz of
Isa As or Prophet Muhammad SAW are bogus; without any
merits, Quranic evidence is against his claims. We will
expose his other claims in our future articles.

Quran, uses the term sects for the followers of earlier

scriptures, hence the decree that Islam is the only religion
acceptable to Allah SWT, preached by all the earlier
Prophets too. It only culminated and completed through
Quranic revelations.

19:37And yet, the sects [that follow the Bible] are at

variance among themselves [about the nature of Jesus
Woe, then, unto all who deny the truth when that
awesome Day will appear!

This verse is quite useful to expose other lies of Mirza,

which indeed would be exposed in future articles,
Inshallah.

Distortion of truth and falsehood is

forbidden

4:135O YOU who have attained to faith! Be ever steadfast

in upholding equity, bearing witness to the truth for the
sake of God, even though it be against your own selves or
your parents and kinsfolk. Whether the person concerned
be rich or poor, God's claim takes precedence over [the
claims of] either of them. Do not, then, follow your own
desires, lest you swerve from justice: for if you distort [the
truth], behold, God is indeed aware of all that you do!

Considering the amount of lies written by Mirza

throughout his life, some of his lies presented in our
earlier articles. It is not difficult to comprehend in the light
of the Quranic teachings how Allah SWT will treat Mirza on
the day of the Judgment.

2:136 "We Believe in God, and in that which has been

bestowed from on high upon us, and that which has been
bestowed upon Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob
and their descendants, and that which has been
vouchsafed to Moses and Jesus; and that which has been
vouchsafed to all the [other] Prophets by their Sustainer:
we make no distinction between any of them. And it is
unto Him that we surrender ourselves."

1- First condition, we believe in God. Mirza did not believe

in God. He persistently lied and attributed white lies to
Allah SWT, regularly through out his life. Plenty of
evidence was displayed in our previous articles.

2- Second Condition, to believe in the revelations

bestowed on the true Prophets of Allah SWT, forget about
revelations received by other Prophets he even lied about
the Quranic evidence and attributed white lies to the Holy
Quran. Once again evidence can be found in our previous
articles.
 3- Third condition, no distinction between any of the
Prophets. Mirza attacked Prophet Isa As of the Holy Quran.
All his life, he attributed lies to Prophet Isa As, he
associated lies to the verses of the Holy Quran to belittle
and curse a mighty Prophet of Allah SWT.

4- Only by adhering to all these conditions one becomes a

Muslim, as the last part of this verse declares “We make
no distinctions amongst any of the Messenger of Allah
SWT; we are the Muslims, we surrender ourselves to Allah
SWT.”

5- Not accepting one Messenger of Allah SWT renders one

out of the pale of Islam, without shadow of any doubts.

Ironically, Qadianis do not realise that the excuse they use

against the Muslims is already taken care of by All
Knowing Allah SWT in the Holy Quran.

There are other indications in the Holy Quran that belief in

all the Prophets is part of our Iman and accepting all the
Messengers of Allah SWT mentioned by name in the Holy
Quran is obligatory for the Momins.

2:177 True piety does not consist in turning your faces

towards the east or the west - but truly pious is he who
believes in God, and the Last Day; and the angels, and
revelation and the prophets; and spends his substance -
however much he himself may cherish - it - upon his near
of kin, and the orphans, and the needy, and the wayfarer,
and the beggars, and for the freeing of human beings from
bondage; and is constant in prayer, and renders the
purifying dues; and [truly pious are] they who keep their
promises whenever they promise, and are patient in
misfortune and hardship and in time of peril: it is they that
have proved themselves true, and it is they, they who are
conscious of God.

Asad explains

In this context, the term "revelation" (al-kitab) carries,

according to most of the commentators, a generic
significance: it refers to the fact of divine revelation as
such. As regards belief in angels, it is postulated here
because it is through these spiritual beings or force's
(belonging to the realm of al-ghayb, i.e., the reality which
is beyond the reach of human perception) that God
reveals His will to the prophets and, thus, to mankind at
large.

Allah SWT decreed that true piety is not turning your face
towards east or west, i.e. performing prayers, but true
pious is one who follows the commands contained in
above verse.

Mirza failed the tests set in the above verse on the

following grounds;

1- He attacked Prophet Isa As of the Holy Quran

therefore he is denier of the Prophets.

2- He tried to abolish starving in the cause of Allah, a

Quranic decree therefore he is denier of the “Al-Kitab, i.e.
Quranic revelations.

3- There are indications that in his life he did not give

Zakat regularly, he surely practically replaced the Zakat
with different chanda’s for the benefit of his family,
ignoring the commands of Allah SWT in the Holy Quran.

4- He also regularly committed acts of Shirk in his life.

To hide his shirk he lied about the verses of the Holy
Quran. He claimed that Jews were allowed to call
themselves Sons of God in the Holy Quran. He also wrote
that Prophet SAW was allowed to call the followers his
(SAW) “aba'di”. Once again a blatant lie against Holy
Quran, the Word of Allah SWT. Evidence was produced in a
previous article.

Mirza disqualified being a Muslim by attacking Prophet Isa

As, by lying about the revelations in the Holy Quran, he
simply cannot be a Muslim let alone a Prophet of any kind
or descriptions. Many other examples and reasons were
given in our previous articles to prove that he is not
remotely Muslim. Preponderance of evidence is against
him. To put it simply he is just not credible as a person,
due to his lies.

Mirza a Muslim?
We move on to other evidence from the writings of Mirza
to prove that he cannot be a Muslim some of this evidence
is from our earlier articles. It is re-produced here because
it is vitally important to the issues dealt in this article.

Our strategy was and is to include in each article little

material to show the thinking of Mirza, which is completely
against the Quranic and Islamic teachings. To gradually
build up the case against Mirza that he is not credible,
reliable or scholarly sound character, even if we leave the
theological aspect on one side. An analysis of his writings
point by point is done to pose the questions can he be a
Muslim?

1- Mirza didn’t believe in Unity of Allah SWT

First a look at the evidence, did Mirza believed the first

article of faith, la ilaha ilalllah, there is but One God.

The Islamic concept of One God not only limited to

proclaiming that He SWT is One God, but practically
adopting this concept as a practice in our lives. To believe
and practice that certain characteristics are of God’s
Domain only and the creature cannot under any
circumstances claim any share of His SWT Divine Powers.
 A- To hide his Shirk where he claimed that he has been
called Son by Allah SWT, on Page 105 in Kitab al-bariya,
Mirza written that Prophet Muhammad SAW was allowed
to call his followers his “abadi” creation by quoting the
Holy Quran. We have already produced Quranic evidence
(HQ 39:53) that Mirza blatantly lied; in the verse Allah
SWT is addressing believers and not Prophet SAW.

B- On the same page, Mirza gave different reasons to the

Christians, comparing himself with Jesus As. Mirza argued
that he received these revelations from Allah SWT, in
which he says he created heavens and earth. He also
claimed that his condition moved from Kashaf to Ilham
and he started to recount, “I wished and created Adam, I
created man”. Mirza using his canned logic argued that
the powers given to him in his ilhams are far superior to
that given to Jesus As therefore his own “divinity” is
proven better than “Jesus As”.

Mirza has copied his ilham from the verse 67:5

67:5 And, indeed, We have adorned the skies nearest to
the earth with lights, and have made them the object of
futile guesses for the evil ones [from among men]: and for
them have We readied suffering through a blazing flame –

Very clearly, Mirza Kazzab has changed the verse of the

Holy Quran and became the creator by placing “Ana” in
front of “zeena” in the above verse. Therefore, instead of
Allah SWT in the Holy Quran, Mirza became the god and
creator (nauzobillah).

Another verse in the Holy Quran had the word “Ina” for
Allah SWT, Mirza just mixed the two verses, and claimed
divinity for himself.

37:6 We have indeed decked the lower heaven with

beauty (in) the stars,-

C- Qadianis especially Lahoris make excuses and provide

weird reasoning by digging up in the books of others who
have made similar claims. But they purposefully ignore
the lies of Mirza, lies he attributed to the Holy Quran that
Prophet Muhammad SAW was allowed to call his followers
as “Abadi”. (Evidence in the article “Attack on ISA As”)
also at the end of above page.

D- Evidence from Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi Page 267 was

presented in the same article, in which Mirza claimed to
have written the fate or future, and after writing
“Taqdeer” he presented it to Allah SWT for signature.
Mirza claimed he saw Allah SWT in Tamseel as a “human”.
E- Mirza In Haqeeqatul Wahi wrote another incredible
piece, this evidence from Tadkirah is produced with
English translation.

This blasphemous piece is claimed to be a revelation from

Allah SWT, copied directly from the Holy Quran and
slightly changed by Mirza to claim divinity yet again.
Similarly fashion to the evidence displayed above.

6:82 His Being alone is such that when He wills a thing to

be, He but says unto it, “Be” — and it is.

Mirza just made slight changes to it; for example he

changed “amara” to “amraka” and “arada” to “aradat” in
the alleged revelations and as a consequence “yaqool”
has become “Taqool”.

It is quite evident that this Charlatan was playing with the

Word of God, with the revelations received by Prophet
Muhammad SAW. He was showing his true colours by
writing the most heinous blasphemy imaginable to any
Muslim, by declaring that he has been given the creative
powers by God, exactly the powers which are only
ascribed to Allah SWT, the All-Knowing and All-Powerful.

Asad explains this Majestic domain of the Creator in these

words, “This is the meaning of the phrase innama amruhu
- the term amr being synonymous, in this instance, with
shan ("state [or "manner"] of being"). The exclusiveness of
God’s creative Being is stressed by the restrictive particle
innama.

These kinds of ilhams cannot be from Allah SWT but from

the accursed.

Mirza writes in ZTG P20

“Secondly; Khuda Talla appeared to him in Tamseel (in

Human Form); said to him, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed is
truthful (Haq) or on right path. Then why people deny him
(do not believe him)?”

Mirza is claiming that Allah SWT appeared in human form

to confirm that Mirza is truthful. A Muslim can never make
such a claim, it is strictly forbidden in Islam. We have
already showed the evidence in our previous article, what
the agenda of Mirza was and whose dirty work he was
carrying out. This kind of evidence put to rest Mirza’s
claims and of his followers that he was a Champion of
Islam. He is doing the bidding of his opponents rather then
defending Islam with such heresies. All of these ideas of
human having the creative powers; being Son or Sons of
God, seeing God face to face, God visiting the earth in
human form are Judo Christian's distorted teachings. They
have nothing to do with the Holy Quran and Islamic
teachings.

Quranic Evidence against Mirza’s lies

Even though the Qadianis desperately try to justify the
shirk of Mirza by insisting that the whole purpose of Mirza
was to show to the Christians that there is one amongst
the Muslims (not that he was a Muslim) who has given this
honour too by Allah SWT.

This is canned logic; there should be absolutely no doubt

in anyone’s mind that these revelations could not have
come from Allah SWT, but indeed were the lies of Mirza
and inspiration if there were any, which we doubt very
much, they were from Iblis the accursed.

We find that Allah SWT in the Holy Quran very

categorically denied any such ideas. Even to think such
ideas is a heresy in Islam.

19:88 As it is, some assert, "The Most Gracious has taken

unto Himself a son„!.

This verse is alluding to the Christians beliefs, they

claiming Jesus As is “the son of God”. And in general to
the beliefs of others, who believe in God’s “incarnations”
on earth, where created being takes up the theme
mentioned in the Verse 19:81;

19:81 For [such as] these have taken to worshipping

deities other than God, hoping that they would be a
source of strength for them.

The deification of powers to the beings other than Allah

SWT with a view and belief that those beings could be
source of strength, for those who turn towards them. This
verse is referring to those who either deny Allah SWT or
attribute powers to other deities.

The passage in 19:88 refers to those who, even though

claiming to believe in God, still deify others. This
deification is against the principle of Allah’s SWT
transcendent nature; His SWT Oneness and Uniqueness.
These deifications breach the bond between The Creator
and the creation, and thus constitute an unforgivable and
unpardonable sin.

Mirza used downright lies and shameful excuses that him

being called a son by Allah SWT but only in metaphorical
sense. Allah SWT in the Holy Quran rejects his excuses
and lies, it is inconceivable. The idea that Allah SWT could
have a son either real, or metaphorical, it would denote
innate likeness to Allah SWT, but we know from the
teachings of the Holy Quran that Allah SWT indeed is
Unique and nothing could be compared to Him
SWT(112:4) . We have already quoted this verse in our
previous article.

Secondly, this preposterous idea of having a “progeny” in

real or in imaginations or metaphorically, implies that
there is an organic continuation of the being of Allah SWT,
or part of Him SWT, in another being, thus, it shows a
degree of incompleteness of Allah SWT. This inconceivable
idea of incompleteness in any sense, negate the very
concept of Allah SWT.

Even if this idea of “Son” is considered blasphemous in

Islam, it amounts to an attempt to define Allah SWT, who
is exalted and beyond anything men may devise to define
Him SWT. This idea is described in 6:100 in the Holy
Quran;

6:100 And yet, some [people] have come to attribute to all

manner of invisible beings a place side by side with God -
although it is He who has created them [all]; and in their
ignorance they have invented for Him sons and daughters!
Limitless is He is His glory, and sublimely exalted above
anything that men may devise by way of definition:

A clear reference to the Pagan practice of calling Angels

“daughters” of Allah SWT, the Most Gracious. Similarly it
could be true for the Christians calling Jesus As “Son” of
God and the practice by the Jews who also called
themselves “Sons of God” even though they applied
different meanings then the Christians, but indeed they
had this practice too. It is inconceivable for men to devise
the being of God in way of definition.

2- Mirza didn’t believe in Quranic

revelations
Mirza never believed in Allah SWT, Prophet Muhammad
SAW and in the Quranic evidence, some proofs of his lies
against the Holy Quran were produced in our earlier
articles. We produce few more examples of his lies, to
enhance our claims that he was in fact a non-believer.

A-Lie that all the Prophecies in the divine

revelations are not fulfilled

Mirza wrote;” Allah SWT decreed in the Holy Quran (wrote

v29 of Surah Al-Muminun, which is wrong) meaning if this
Nabi is a Kazib then he would self-destruct, but if he is
truthful, then some of his prophecies would be fulfilled. It
is not being said (decreed) that all (the prophecies) would
be fulfilled. Thus in this place (verse) it is clearly said
(decreed) by Khuda (Allah SWT), it is not necessary that all
the prophecies foretold would be fulfilled. Some may be
postponed (or cancelled). If this was not the Will (Will of
Allah SWT) then Khuda Talla (Allah SWT) would have said,
(Arabic quotations translated as) “he is truthful, all his
prophecies are fulfilled”, but it is not been said (decreed).”

In previous article “Mirza a false Prophet” we have

produced evidence on Mirza claims that he is addressee of
the Quranic verse and if he associated a lie to Allah SWT
Allah SWT would have severed his jugular veins. Here he is
paddling the same lies, and also his lies that the Will of
Allah SWT is not fulfilled all the times, this evidence from
HW is produced below in this article.

We turn to the Holy Quran to judge truthfulness of Mirza;

40:28 At that, a believing man of Pharaoh’s family, who
[until then] had concealed his faith, exclaimed: “Would
you slay a man because he says, ‘God is my Sustainer’ -
seeing, withal, that he has brought you all evidence of this
truth from your Sustainer? Now if he be a liar, his lie will
fall back on him; but if he is a man of truth, something [of
the punishment] whereof he warns you is bound to befall
you: for, verily, God would not grace with His guidance
one who has wasted his own self by lying [about Him].

Firstly, Mirza misquoted the name of the Surah; this verse

is from Surah Ghafir and not from Surah Muminun.

Secondly, Mirza is up to his dirty tricks, this is not a direct

decree of Allah SWT but it is from the story of Moses,
where a Mumin, who concealed his faith due to
persecution, spoke to the Pharaoh and to the gathered
crowd.

Thirdly, Mirza wrote in “Correction of a Mistake” that he

was given the knowledge of the unseen.

We waited long enough but no one amongst the Qadianis

has until now successfully defended Mirza on his use of
Verses 26/27 from Surah Al-Jin. In the Holy Quran Allah
SWT has relayed some brief stories of the past Prophets
and generations. It is indeed true that Prophet SAW was
unaware of the facts related to these stories. Some people
erroneously think this constitutes knowledge of the
unseen.

It is not strictly speaking knowledge of the Unseen, which

is only with Allah SWT. Let us clarify our statement and
what was written in our previous article. If we take above
example, this incident happened in the court of Pharaoh;
there were many witnesses to this incident. They had the
knowledge of what happened and what was discussed.
This knowledge was lost due to passage of time, but it was
human knowledge after all, not the knowledge of the
unseen.

An Egyptian, who was a believer but concealed his faith

for fear of persecution, makes the above statement
according to the decree in the Holy Quran. A point is made
in this verse for a mighty Messenger of Allah SWT, that if
he As was a liar, he would have wasted himself “Musrif”.
The anonymous believer put his testimony and backing for
Moses to argue that the message brought forward by
Moses is so convincing, the message in itself is a proof
that Moses is not wasting himself in a lie.

B- Prophet SAW received Persian ilhams ?

In Malfozat it is stated that “once Prophet SAW was asked,

did he SAW ever received a Persian revelations from Allah
SWT? He SAW responded, yes once one sentence was
revealed (quotations of the actual revelations in Persian).

This lie is displayed in one of the articles on official

Qadiani website, but the source of this absurd claim is
Mirza.

There is no evidence of any such revelations received by

Prophet SAW. This is height of Mirza’s lies and his
shameful nature that he purported such lies without any
fear of Allah SWT or shame on his own person. Only Mirza
and his cronies can write such a lie without giving any
reference whatsoever. Nevertheless, it demonstrates that
Mirza was not a believer on Prophet Muhammad SAW or
the Holy Quran and Allah SWT. Remember, this lies is
against Allah SWT because Mirza said, Allah SWT revealed
the Persian revelation to Prophet SAW.

3 – Mirza didn’t believe in the True Prophets

We have produce plenty of evidence of Mirza’s lies and
heresies against Prophet Isa As, in which Mirza attack
Prophet Isa As of the Holy Quran and not the imaginary
Jesus of the Bible as he claimed.

We are producing few more examples of his lies and

heresies against Prophet Isa As, this is not exhaustive list,
but just few examples, otherwise Mirza’s lies and heresies
both against Isa As and the Holy Quran are many.

It is also not correct to say he only written against Isa As

of the Holy Quran, because he has written many lies
against the Holy Quran, which in effect shows his
disrespect to Prophet Muhammad SAW, and against Allah
SWT too. By virtue of attacking and lying about the
revelations of the Holy Quran, Mirza has proven that he
did not have beliefs on any Prophet of Allah SWT, not only
Prophet Isa As.

A quotation from Mirza.

HW Page 173 RK 22-80

In Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi Mirza writes, “the purpose of the

verses in the Holy Quran is not that salvation can be
achieved without beliefs on the Prophet(s). But to stress
that the salvation cannot be achieved without having the
beliefs on Unity of God and on the Judgment Day. The
beliefs on Allah (SWT) can only be achieved by having
beliefs on His Prophets”.

The first point to have beliefs in the Unity of Allah SWT is

already exposed earlier; together with his lies against the
Holy Quran now let’s turn to produce more evidence
against his beliefs on Prophets of Allah SWT.

In Kisthi Nooh Mirza writes;

Use of Alcohol has cause untold damage to (the health) of

European people. The reason for this (use of Alcohol)
damage is that Isa As was used to drink Alcohol, may be
because of some ailment or he was a habitual drinker, but
O’ Muslims, your Prophet AS (Muhammad SAW) was an
innocent, without habit of using any substance. He (SAW)
was innocent; whom do you follow by calling yourself
Muslims? Unlike Bible, (Holy) Quran does not declare
Alcohol Halal. Under what books (of revelations) do you
declare Alcohol Halal? Why are you not mindful of death
(and punishment in hereafter)?

Beautiful speech indeed from a liar, didn’t he declare

using Alcohol inside the four walls of the resident as Halal?
We have produced this evidence in our earlier article.

In this quotation Mirza has used “Isa As” a term only used
by the Muslims, therefore, it is clear he is not addressing
imaginary Jesus of the Bible. Also the context is quite
clearly centered on Muslims; therefore there is no
ambiguity in his subject matter and the addressee of Mirza
in this quotation.

Not surprisingly he addressing the Muslims, mentioning

the Holy Quran and using the Islamic name and salutation
for Jesus As. But he is basing his attacks from the facts
obtained either from the Bible or from Christian’s writings.
Shamefully, now he has forgotten completely about that
imaginary Jesus (as) he claimed he was attacking, now the
lines are blurred, it is okay to attack a mighty Messengers
of Allah SWT by using questionable and unreliable
material.

There is no such description of Isa As in the Holy Quran.

In his book Ayam-e-Saleh, Mirza writes; (After quoting

Quranic verse) Our Prophet SAW did not receive education
from the teachers, but Isa As and Moses As attended
(religious) Schools. Hazrat Isa (as) learned whole of the
Torah from a Jewish teacher. Thus, in this respect, our
Prophet SAW was not taught by a teacher, and God was
his SAW teacher. In the beginning, Allah SWT said to him
“Iqra” read, not anyone else said it.”

What does Quranic evidence says in this regard?

5:110 Lo! God will say: "O Jesus, son of Mary! Remember
the blessings which I bestowed upon thee and thy mother-
how I strengthened thee with holy inspiration, so that thou
couldst speak unto men in thy cradle, and as a grown
man; and how I imparted unto thee revelation and
wisdom, including the torah and the Gospel; and how by
My leave thou didst create out of clay, as it were, the
shape of [thy followers'] destiny, and then didst breathe
into it, so that it might become, by My leave, [their]
destiny ; and how thou didst heal the blind and the leper
by My leave, and how thou didst raise the dead by My
leave; and how I prevented the children of Israel from
harming thee when thou camest unto them with all
evidence of the truth, and [when] those of them who were
bent on denying the truth were saying, `This is clearly
nothing but deception!"'

This verse takes care of many lies purported by Mirza

against Isa As. Firstly, it clearly says Allah SWT imparted
unto Isa As the revelations and Wisdom including the
Torah and the Gospel. There are many verses in the Holy
Quran, which clearly say that Allah SWT taught Isa As the
Torah.

3:48 and He will impart unto thy son revelation, and

wisdom, and the torah, and the gospel,

Proof that this glad tiding was given to Mary the Mother of
Jesus As before he As was born that God will impart unto
him As the knowledge of the Torah.

There is another proof in the above verse, which we will

explore in the future. The verse mentions that God will
teach Jesus As, the Book; Asad translates this as
revelations.

Asad used the term revelations because he is one of those

Muslims who believe Jesus As has died. Thus his use of
revelations for the word “Al-Kitab”. We do not agree with
this translation, if from the word “Al-Kitab” this verse is
pointing towards the revelations received by Prophet Jesus
As, which in fact is described as “Injeel” in the Holy Quran.
The mention of “Injeel” separately in this verse is
indications that from “Al-Kitab” the verse is in fact relating
to the Holy Quran, which is widely known as “Al-Kitab” by
the Muslims, a belief directly derived from this phrase
used in the Holy Quran.

By virtue of Mirza slating Prophet Isa As of the Holy Quran,

Mirza has proven without shadow of any doubts that he
did not have any belief in God, according to his own
writings.

End Games for Lahori Qadianis:

1- Lies and Deceptions on Mirza’s claims of

Prophet hood exposed
In the first article, first proof was provided that Mirza did
claim Prophet Hood by quoting Verses 26/27 from Surah
Al-Jin that he was given the knowledge of the unseen like
the Prophets according to his claims. Despite best efforts,
in last two years no Lahori Qadiani has given a plausible
explanations and answers to our questions and proven
that Mirza didn’t meant that he was a prophet.

In this article the case of the hypocrisy of the Lahori

Qadianis is further exposed through undeniable evidence.

A – Writings of Muhammad Ali

Muhammad Ali in the introduction of his little booklet
“Promised Messiah” wrote;

In this small book, I have gathered all the points which

relate to the claims of the Founder of the Ahmadiyya
Movement so that our Muslim brethren should reflect on
them in a cool and dispassionate manner, and see that the
path towards which he wants to direct the attention of the
Muslim ummah is the path of righteousness and is not in
any way a deviation from the religion of Islam, even by a
hair's breadth.

We can assure our readers we intend to do precisely this

and look at the claims of Mirza, analyse his writings, the
arguments put forward by the Lahori Qadianis and then
present the evidence to expose their hypocrisy,
deceptions and lies.
Please also keep in mind the quotations from the books of
Muhammad Ali provided earlier in this article.

B- Writings of Sher Muhammad

Sher Muhammad wrote a booklet “True Facts Ahmadiyya
Movement” in response to an article written by Mr.Tayo
from Trinidad.

On page 7 Sher Muhammad writes;

We Believe:

1- After our Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and

blessing of Allah be upon him) Allah has completely barred
the appearance of a Prophet, old or new.

2- After Muhammad SAW, Gabriel can never descend and

bring Prophetic Revelations (wahy Nubuwwah) to any
person.

3- If Gabriel were to descend with one word of Prophetic

Revelation (Wahy Nubuwwah) on any person, it would
contradict the two complementary verses: Holy Quran.

“This day have I perfected your Religion for you” (5:3);

“He is the Messenger of Allah and the Last (Seal) of the

Propehts” (33:40).

On Page 27 PDF he continued and issued a challenge;

A Challenge

There are scores of other similar reference where Hazrat

Mirza Sahib has clarified that wahy Nabuwwah ceased
after the Holy Prophet; and that his own revelation is wahy
wilayah. We challenge Mr. Tayo to produce even a couple
of extracts from Hazrat Mirza Sahib’s books where he
should claim that his revelation is not wahy wilayah but
wahy nubuwwah. He can never meet this challenge!
Put these two quotes together, one has to provide simple
proof that according to Mirza Gabriel indeed brought him
the revelations.

On P35 PDF Sher Muhammad further writes quoting an

advertisement by Mirza on 4 November 1900;

“Since it has been arranged in this census that each sect

that is distinguished from other sects by its beliefs should
be entered separately, and the name that a sect selects
for itself shall be the one used for it in official documents…
the name that is suitable for this Movement, and which we
select for our Community is Muslims of the Ahmadiyya
Section.. We ask the government to use this name in its
documents for our section… This sect has been named
Muslims of Ahmadiyya Sect because our Holy Prophet had
two names: Muhammad and Ahmad (peace and blessing
of God be upon him). For this reason it is fitting to name
this sect the Amadiyya Sect.”

We can only thank the followers of Mirza; they keep

proving Mirza a liar. Muhammad Ali off course knew that
sects are forbidden in the Holy Quran. But didn’t he know
that Mirza himself announced that the Government should
call them as Ahmaddiyya sect?

Evidence from two stalwart of Lahori Qadianis, proving

that Mirza has gone against the clear-cut decree of the
Holy Quran and created a sect. The Quranic concept and
decrees are discussed in detail earlier according to which,
the affair of Mirza is indeed with Allah SWT.

2- Mirza claimed Prophet Hood: Irrefutable

Proof
We have presented comprehensive analysis and
irrefutable proofs that the Lahori’s believes and claim that
Mirza never claimed Prophet Hood. They falsely claim that
whenever, he claimed Prophet Hood he always meant and
professed that he is not a Prophet in real sense of the
Word but only a prophet in metaphorical sense, or due to
him annihilating himself in the love of Prophet Muhammad
SAW. Fact of the matter is, he was nothing like Prophet
Muhammad SAW in his character or personality; he had
absolutely no love for the Prophet in his heart. He made
fun of the Quranic revelations whenever it suited him.

RK 3 P8 Azala-e-Auham P511

In Azala-e-Auham Mirza writes; 4- The Holy Quran

declared that there could be no Prophet after Prophet SAW
the “Khatim-un-Nabeen”, either new or old. The Prophet
received the religions education (wahi) through Gabriel.
The descend of Gabriel to bring the prophetic revelations
is closed. It is therefore, impossible that a Prophets comes
to the world without the prophetic revelations.

Mirza clearly said that descend of Gabriel is forbidden to

bring revelations after Prophet SAW. The same excuse is
used by the Lahori Qadianis to claim that Mirza was not a
Prophet and he never claimed Prophet hood. Evidence of
their claims are produced in this article and before too.

We got confirmations from different resources of Lahori

Qadianis that in fact the revelation through Gabriel is not
possible after the advent of the Last Prophet Muhammad
SAW, of Allah SWT. If Gabriel to bring one word of the
revelation to anyone, then the seal of the finality of
Prophet Hood is broken, which contradicts the Quranic
teachings and the beliefs on the finality of Prophet Hood
on our beloved Prophet Muhammad SAW (may peace and
blessing of Allah SWT, His Angels and all human be upon
him) is broken.

3- Proof Mirza received Prophetic Revelations

through Gabriel
After all the claims by the Lahoris lets look an incredible
piece of evidence from the writings of Mirza, which proves
that Mirza did claim prophet hood without any shadow of a
doubt and that Lahoris are hypocritical liars to claim
otherwise.

In Haqeeqat- Ul- Wahi Mirza writes; “ I will give answers

with the Prophet, I will leave my resolves sometimes and
sometimes I will fulfil my promises. They will say, “Who
gave you this status”? Say (to them) “God shows
miracles”. Ail came to me and he has chosen me, he
pointed out with his finger that the promise of God is here
(Mirza). Thus lucky is one who seeks and finds him
(Mirza).”

In the footnotes to this alleged revelations Mirza writes;

“ The overt meanings of this revelations are that I (God)

will commit mistakes (or forgo) at times and fulfil
sometime. Meanings at times I will do (things) and other
time I will not, sometimes My Promise will be fulfilled and
sometimes it wouldn’t. These kinds of words are often find
in the Word of God, it is written in Ahadiths, I (God)
hesitate at the time of ceasing the soul of righteous
person, even though God is beyond the capacity to
hesitate. Similar is this revelations of God that sometimes
My Will is fulfilled and other times it remains unfulfilled. It
means that I (God) sometimes cancel my Will and Pre-
destination (for creations) and sometimes act on them.

At this place (in these revelations) God has given

Gabriel the name “Ail” because he (Gabriel) is
constantly in communication (with Mirza).

Without shadow of any doubt according to this passage

Mirza indeed claimed Prophet Hood. He said Gabriel
constantly brought revelations to him and chosen him as a
Prophet (supposedly on the orders of God).

The claims of Lahori Qadianis are based on deceptions and

word twisting, they deliberately ignore this clear-cut
evidence that according to Mirza he did received the
revelations from Gabriel. Not only this claim is included in
the writings of Mirza that he received revelations from
Gabriel, but it is claimed to be alleged Wahi received by
Mirza, in other words it is the Word of God coming to
Mirza.

How Lahori can deny such evidence of alleged revelations

to Mirza? Simple answer is they are hypocritical dishonest
people, who falsely try to claim that because they
consider Prophet SAW as last Prophet therefore they
should be treated as Muslims. Their claim that Mirza never
claimed prophet hood is a blatant lie, he did claim he
received revelations from Gabriel this evidence in fact is
answer to all their deliberate lies and concoctions. After all
it is their own claims that if Gabriel brings even one world
of Prophetic revelations; the seal of the Prophet Hood is
broken. Mirza said Gabriel approached him again and
again and selected him as a Prophet to receive the
revelations.

Hypocrisy of Qadianis: They Declared

Muslims Kaffirs
Qadianis make a great fuss that the Muslims are unjustly
declaring them Kaffirs. This is hypocrisy by them; they
themselves have declared Muslims Kaffirs. Even though
Lahoris try to portray themselves to be innocent of such
charge, but they are as guilty as the other Qadianis.
1- Mirza’s hypocrisy and canned logic, he
declares Muslims Kaffirs
Mirza used canned logic all his life he used similar logic in
declaring Muslims kaffirs.

Mirza writes; “When Jesus (As) was asked for a miracle,

Jesus (As) said, these ill-gotten (bastards) and bad
character people are asking from me a miracle. They
would not be shown any miracle. How Jesus (As) cleverly
pre-planned his defence, one has to admit or declare that
he is ill gotten (bastard) and of bad (or immoral)
character, before asking for a miracle. A mischievous and
deceptive person who has the nature of Jesus (as)
announced, I can teach a spell by chanting it one can see
God on first night. Provided the chanter is not a bastard.
Now who will accept that he is a bastard, and say he didn’t
see God after chanting the spell? In the end every chanter
had to say he has seen God.

We have to be appreciative of the forward thinking

of Jesus (as) (a sarcastic remark by Mirza).”

After slating the non-existing Jesus As, according to Mirza.

Mirza adopted the same practice, he accused the
imaginary Jesus.
 Mirza writes, “Questioner asked; you wrote in Tariaq-e-
Qaloob (and other books) a person does not become kafir
by not accepting you, now you wrote, by denying me one
becomes kafir.

Answer (given by Mirza); It is strange, you consider one

who calls me a Kaffir and one who denies me as two
separate entities. In the eyes of God they are one and the
same. The one who does not (believes) accept me, doesn’t
believes because he considers me a liar. But Allah SWT
decreed the one who associate lies to Allah SWT is worst
then the Kaffirs, like it is Decreed (quoted Verse of the HQ)
there are two kind of Kaffirs, one who associate lies to
Allah SWT and the other who make fun of the word of God.
In this sense I am not only a Kaffir but also a Grand Kaffir.
But if I am not a liar then that Kuffar would be associated
to him (my denier).

Mirza further writes as a note at the bottom of the page:

 “Here “zalim” means Kaffir. One who associates
lies to the Book of God (Holy Quran) is called a
“Zalim” compare to a liar. Without any doubts a
person who makes fun of Word of God (Holy Quran)
is a Kaffir. Thus, a person, who does not accept me
and calls me a liar and a Kaffir, by calling me a
Kaffir he becomes a Kaffir.”

1- Mirza, without shadow of a doubt has made fun of the

Holy Quran, the Word of Allah SWT he has associated
white lies to the Holy Quran. Proofs of these lie and
disrespect for the Holy Quran are shown in this article and
in our previous articles. According to his own words Mirza
is proven not only a Kaffir but also a Grand Kaffir. His
followers off course have a choice to prove that the
evidence is wrong. But they face an uphill or dare we say
an impossible task.

2- Mirza is using the canned logic on grand scale here. His

logic is I am going to associate white lies to the Holy
Quran, make claims, which are completely against the
teachings of the Holy Quran; make fun of mighty Prophets
of Allah SWT. But if someone calls me a liar or due to my
lies call me a Kaffir then that person becomes Kaffir.
Didn’t he accuse Imaginary Jesus AS of the Holy Bible of
the same?

2- Muhammad Ali declaring Muslims Kaffirs

Muhammad Ali in line with the writings of Mirza and by
quoting a Hadiths calls every Muslim a Kaffir, who does
not believe in the lies of Mirza and rightly call him as
Kazib.

“A man who calls the Promised Messiah a Kafir, or Kazib or

Dajjal, under the verdict of Hadith, he becomes a kafir
apart from these people there are those who have not
accepted his claim, or they have not yet yielded the
pledge of faith and loyalty, they do not become kafirs, just
because they denied the claim (P39, Radd-i-Takfir-Ahl-i-
Qabila,)
Muhammad Ali, who is considered to be a Scholar by the
Lahori Qadianis should have known the writings of Mirza
and if he knew Quran like his and Qadianis claims, then he
should have no doubt about the character of Mirza and
should have known his lies in the light of the teachings of
the Holy Quran.

By following Mirza he is confirming the absurd logic of

Qadianis to used weird explanations (taweels) to cover up
the lies of Mirza against the Holy Quran, against Prophets
Etc.

Conclusion
In this article we exposed some of the fundamental issues,
which are quite a regular feature of the arguments put
forward by the followers of Mirza in general and Lahori
Qadianis in particular.

First to show that their claims they are Muslims because

they recite Kalima is utter non-sense. There is more to
being a Muslim then just to recite the Kalima or offer
prayers. Muslims have to adhere to different articles of
faith in their entirety and whole heartedly, without using
conjecture to be called and claim being Muslims.

In the second segment, we produced a detail analysis of

the meanings used by Mirza and his followers, particularly
Lahori Qadianis that Mirza did not claim Prophet Hood and
they believe in the finality of Prophet Hood on Prophet
Muhammad SAW. Then we introduced a quotation from
Mirza, which destroy their arguments completely.

In between Qadiani’s claim to be 73rd and only saved sects

based on the writings of Mirza, was destroyed with the
help of evidence from the Holy Quran. We also
demonstrated that Lahori stalwart like Muhammad Ali
knew that creating sects in Islam is forbidden in the Holy
Quran, but he deliberately ignored the claims and writings
of Mirza, which contradicted a very clear cut decree of the
Holy Quran. Where as Sher Muhammad proudly presented
the evidence from Mirza obviously he either didn’t
understand the Quranic commands in this regard or
deliberately ignorned it, exactly like Muhammad Ali.

To double the misery for his followers, the heresy of Mirza

to receive the revelations from Gabriel and selected by
Gabriel is introduced as divine revelations by Mirza.
Therefore, they have to produce evidence from the Holy
Quran to clear Mirza. Quoting from the books of someone
will not absolve Mirza. We also remind them of the
writings of Sher Muhammad quoted above, this claim of
Mirza in fact is against the two verses of the Holy Quran,
i.e. completion of relgion of Islam and finality of
Prophethood on our beloved Prophet Muhammad SAW.

In the end we leave with this message of the Holy Quran

for those Qadianis, either the mainstream or Lahori, the
silent majority who had been lied to, betrayed and taken
advantage of, by Mirza and then by his followers in the
places of authority.

34:31And [yet,] those who are bent on denying the truth

do say, “We shall never believe in this Qur’an, and neither
in whatever there still remains of earlier Revelations!” But
if thou couldst only see [how it will be on Judgment Day,]
when these evildoers shall be made to stand before their
Sustainer, hurling reproaches back and forth at one
another! Those [of them] who had been weak [on earth]
will say unto those who had gloried in their arrogance:
“Had it not been for you, we would certainly have been
believers!”

Please do not end up as people described in this verse of

the Holy Quran, “Had it not been for you, we would
certainly have been believers”. May Allah SWT guide you
to the right path, Amen.
All rights reserved © 2010