2other real world phenomena will not be described for their own stake; here, they are perceptible surfaces created to represent their esoteric affinities with the primordialIdeals.” (Ibid.) Though Moréas published the manifesto of the emerging movement,Mallarmé, who lectured extensively on the philosophy of the movement, is considered itsleading theoretician. The symbolist poetics was further elucidated in the writings of PaulVerlaine (1844-1896), Arthur Rimbaud (1854-1891), and Gustave Kahn (1859-1936).At the end of the nineteenth century, Symbolism lost it dominance in France. Yet,the movement’s popularity increased and spread to continental Europe, England, Russia,the United States, and South America. The symbolists’ experimental methods appealed tomany English, Irish and American poets like W.B. Yeats (1865-1939), Ezra Pound(1885-1972), T. S. Eliot (1888-1965), and Wallace Stevens (1879-1955). Additionally,some critics argue that at this point the English language was a fertile ground for the basic principles of symbolism: free verse, dense syntax, figurative language, and rhythm.Translations of the French symbolist poets emerged in England during the 1890s.The Irish writer George Moore (1852-1933) was the first to write about the Symbolists inEnglish. Moore, who studied art in Paris, renders his accounts of Verlaine, Rimbaud,Mallarmé and Jules Laforgue in
Impressions and Opinions
(1891). In 1893, EdmundGosse (1849-1928) published three essays on Mallarmé, whom he afterward dismissed as“hardly a poet.” [Wellek, 340.] Evidently, the onset of Symbolism in English literaturewas clouded with skepticism and to some degree unfavorable criticism. Even so, thanksto Oscar Wilde (1854-1900), W.B. Yeats, John Millington Synge (1871-1909), and JamesJoyce (1882-1941), French Symbolism had an immeasurable impact on modernistEnglish and American literature.Responding to Arthur Symons’
The Symbolist Movement in Literature
(1899),William Butler Yeats, who won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1923, published anessay entitled “The Symbolism of Poetry” (1900). Yeats admits that in his previousarticle “Symbolism in Painting,” he failed to describe “the continuous indefinablesymbolism which is the substance of all style.” (“The Symbolism of Poetry,” II.) Yeatsdefines the symbolist poem as a short lyric, perpetuating an emotion that is thentransformed into “some great epic,” empowered by symbols, and compared to a “ringwithin ring in the stem of an old tree.” (Ibid.) According to Yeats, poetry is a powerful