How To Review A Research Article?

How To Review A Research Article?
– A Black
Book To Become A Smart Reviewer by
TigerHATS
www.tigerhats.org
Research, Innovation, Education, Ideas
TigerHATS © 2009-2011
Monzur Morshed (TigerHATS)
m.monzur@gmail.com, monzur@tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh
How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

TigerHATS
www.tigerhats.org
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
In this book, you may find some techniques and ideas to become a
smart reviewer. Every researcher can write research article but only
few can review the article as it needs analytical thinking, creativity,
literature skill and finally research experience.
The best way of using this book is to read the whole article. After
that select one research article from IEEE, ACM or any eminent
journal and go through the whole article. Now sit back and relax to
use your reviewing skill.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 1
It seems interesting for readers.
Or, The paper is interesting and good to accept.
Or, Reasonable work and interesting and fits within the scope.
However, the paper can be enhanced by sticking with the following changes.
- A more comprehensive and clearer conclusion is expected.
- The paper can be further improved and proper analysis can be shown to prove the strength of
the approach.
- More description of the technical details will help to improve the quality.
- Improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve the quality of
the final paper in the final camera-ready version.
- Including some discussions with existing method which could prove the proposed method
effectiveness will improve the quality of the paper.
- The approach can be discussed with some other existing techniques.
- Sentences / English polishing will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the final
camera-ready version.
- The references in this manuscript are somewhat out-of-date.Include more recent researches in
this field.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 2
The paper looks good to accept in general.
Although the idea is interesting, I recommend to improvement article with some comments as
below:
- More description for experiments should be done.
- The method can be explained in a clearer way.Try to explain the theory more detailed in
discussion.
- The references in this manuscript are somewhat out-of-date.In clude more recent researches in
this field.
- The manuscript has not been carefully written.
- Some figures can not show on my computer, such as fig.2 and fig.3.
- There are many grammar mistakes as well, eg the first sentences of the fifth paragraph.
- The reason of using certain parameters in the experiments should be discussed in more details.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 3
Overall concept of the paper is enough to accept for conference.
However, there are some issues needed some improvements:
-- To improve the quality of the paper, please check your sentences and / or
English one more time.
-- Also author can describe more technical descriptions and it will help to
improve the quality.
-- Including some discussions with existing method which could prove the
proposed method effectiveness will improve the quality of the paper.
-- The contribution of the paper can be enhanced if it would discuss the
advantages of using the proposed method.
-- Generally reasonable paper, but when you submit your final version to the
system, to improve the quality of the paper, please check your sentences and / or English
one more time.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 4
This paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
But too short, more extension will help to improve the quality and contribution of the paper.
the approach.
- English and sentences polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the
final camera-ready version.
- There should be a review of the writing to effect minor corrections.
Final Decision: Acceptable
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 5
The authors present a good technical paper with relevant topic and proper research methodology.
I consider that it is a very interesting paper and matches well to the conference session.
According to these factors, my recommendation is ACCEPT.
In conclusion, the paper is well written and its structure is well organized. Some of the works are
described in details. My recommendation is accept. But some revisions of English sentences will
improve the quality of the paper.
Review: 6
The work is solid and the paper is well written and the simulations results are good. I consider
that it is a very interesting paper and matches well to the conference session. According to these
factors, my recommendation is ACCEPT.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 7
Good Work. Overall it is a well written paper.
The authors presented ………
The author focused on ……..
In this paper, the author presents …….
The paper is well presented by the authors.
However, some modifications should be made to improve the paper organization, as follows:
Review: 8
Reasonable work and interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
Overall, the work proposed is useful, the paper is organized well and the presentation is clear, I
suggest that it should be accepted by the conference.
Or,
Overall, the work proposed is useful and interesting: Accept.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 9
This is a good work.
-- The paper does not adhere with the standard formatting style sheet for the
proceedings.The paper uses a different template as of provided by the conference, so need
to be changed accordingly.
Review: 10
This paper is acceptable and interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
Or, This paper is interesting and good to accept.
the final paper in the final camera-ready version
the approach.
- Sentences / English polishing will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the final
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 11
I think this paper is acceptable and interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
the approach.
- Sentences / English polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the
Review: 12
(The Abstract Theory and experiment results: partial correction requested)
There is a good introduction, extensive explanation of the methods and a detailed research
results.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 13
But sentence and / or English polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper
in the final camera-ready version.
-- The paper can be further improved and proper analysis can be shown to prove
the strength of the approach.
-- More description of the technical details will help to improve the quality.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 14
(The Abstract Theory and experimental results: the structure portion of the request correction)
There is a good introduction, extensive explanation of the methods and a detailed research
results.
the approach.
- The contribution of the paper can be enhanced if it would discuss the advantages of using the
proposed method.
- Sentences polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the final
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 15
(Theory-oriented Abstract: Partial correction requested)

There is a good introduction, extensive explanation of the methods.
-- Improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve
the quality of the final paper in the final camera-ready version.
-- But sentences including English polishing a little will help to improve the
quality of the final paper in the final camera-ready version.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 16
(Design-centric and do not experiment Abstract: Compared to other studies, required)
The presentation is clear and neat.
-- discussing with other works will improve the quality of the final version.
-- improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve
-- English and sentences polishing will help to improve the quality of the final
paper in the final camera-ready version.
Final decision: Acceptable
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 17
This paper has proper and good significance of theoretical and practical.However, the study may
be more reasonable if the author had considered the following situation:
-- improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve
Review: 18
The quality of the paper is acceptable, and the topic is interesting and suitable for the conference.
But some revision with reviewers' comments will help to improve the quality of the paper in the
final camera ready version.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 19
(Nice sentence polishing Abstract Request)

There is a good introduction, extensive explanation of the method and a detailed research results.
But Sentence polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the final
But improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve the quality of
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 20
The context of this paper is organized properly. The goal of this paper is clear and also the
justification of the proposed idea.
-- The paper makes a good impression with a clear structure.

-- The paper is well presented and the idea is clear, interesting and promising.
-- The algorithms are discussed in detail, as well as some related work.
-- The paper addresses an important research issue in the research scope.
-- The contribution of the paper can be enhanced if it would discuss the advantages of using the
proposed method.
Generally well written paper, but when you submit your final version to the IEEE system, to
improve the quality of the paper, please check your sentences and / or English one more time.
In conclusion, the paper is well written and its structure is well organized. Some of the works are
described in details. My recommendation is accept. But some revisions of English sentences will
improve the quality of the paper.
However, if the following revisions are considered in the future version, the improvements could
be helpful to enhance the content of this article.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 21
It is important to check the (English) writing of the paper. There are many writing errors that do
not help the reader to concentrate and focus on the subject.
(Compared with more traditional research)

The discussion or comparison between the proposed method and previous well known methods
is expected to be added into the paper.
(Yet to let a comment)

But some revision with reviewers' comments will help to improve the quality of the paper in the
final camera ready version.
(English and sentence at the end of this submission is to let one more reviews)
When you submit your final version to the IEEE system, to improve the quality of the paper,
please check your sentences and / or English one more time.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 22
Authors present good technical paper with proper research methodology.
(Short Abstract reinforcement required)

I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference. But too short, more
extension will help to improve the quality and contribution of the paper.
English and sentences polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the
Review: 23
There is a good introduction, extensive explanation of the method and a detailed experimental
result.
I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
The presentation is clear and neat.
But English polishing will help to improve the quality of the final paper.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 24
It is very practical. Some English sentences of the paper may need some revisions. The
presentation is clear and neat. Experimental results show that the approach is very effective. If
possible, including some comparison table with other methods would make this paper more
convincible. If possible, more detailed description would make this paper more convincible.
Review: 25
This is very practical level papers about ....
More description about theoretical implication or meaning of core technologies needed ....
Review: 26
The paper is technically well written and polished, providing a detailed explication of theoretical
aspects such as conditions and theorems, and practical issues like algorithms, rules and possible
applications. I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
Review: 27
I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference. But more analysis in
the experimental results will improve the quality of the paper.
Some English sentences of the paper may need some revisions.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 28
I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference. The results of system
are promising.But more experimental data will improve the paper's contribution.
Review: 29
But authors are encouraged to provide more detailed comment for some sentences and figures to
improve the quality of the final version.
Review: 30
The paper is technically well written and polished, providing a detailed explication of design and
application aspects. I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
Review: 31
The model proposed in the paper has merits which are worthy of being accepted for presentation
at the conference.However, the authors require including some discussion to justify the claims
made about the proposed model.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 32
(Short Abstract reinforcement required)
Review: 33
Authors have to clarify what is the issue to address; in Introduction section, only applied method
was presented.What is the goal of the work and why is it important to achieve?
Some revision will help to improve the quality of the paper in the final camera ready version.
Review: 34
I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference but need to clarify
what is goal of the paper more clearly. Authors just suggest without any result. I encourage
authors to put some advantages and analysis of the proposed methods.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 35
The paper is technically well written and polished, providing a detailed explication of theoretical
and analysis aspects. I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
But some revisions of English sentences will improve the quality of the paper.
Review: 36
Although there is a need to expand the literature review, but the recent presentation is enough for
conference publication. Overall, it is a valuable academic paper in this field.
Review: 37
The paper is very interesting and good to accept.
In my opinion this paper is in the scope of the Conference, is well written (despite some minor
typos) and presented and the subject under study is interesting.Therefo re, in my opinion, this
paper should be accepted for the Conference.
Nice work and interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 38
I think this paper is acceptable and interesting and fits within the scope. But some revision with
reviewers' comments will help to improve the quality of the paper in the final camera ready
version.
-- Clarity of presentation: Writing style is concise and explicit.Image quality is
satis factory.And table is detailed.
-- Significance to theory and application: The contribution of the paper to
research and practice in the field is fair.
-- Generally reasonable paper, but when you submit your final version to the
system, to improve the quality of the paper, please check your sentences and / or English
one more time.
-- The discussion with previous another method (or other methods) will be
improved the quality of the paper (just recommendation).
-- Including some discussions with existing method will improve the quality of
the paper.
--
Dhaka, Bangladesh
-- Improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve
-- Please follow the format.
-- The paper does not adhere with the standard formatting style sheet for the
proceedings.The paper uses a different template as of provided by the conference, so need
to be changed accordingly.
The quality of the paper is acceptable, and the topic is interesting and suitable for the
conference.Therefore, it can be accepted for the conference. However, it is suggested that the
authors check the paper again and improve the wordings.
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 39
But authors are encouraged to provide more detailed comment for some sentences and figures to
improve the quality of the final version.
My recommendation is accept. But some revisions of English sentences will improve the quality
of the paper.
Review: 40
When you submit your final version to the system, to improve the quality of the paper, please
check your sentences and / or English one more time.
Review: 41
(Just a nice phrase)
I think this paper is interesting and fits within the scope of the conference.
There is a good introduction, extensive explanation of the proposed method.
But improving the presentation to emphasize the author's goal will help to improve the quality of
Dhaka, Bangladesh

TigerHATS
Review: 42
(Short Abstract reinforced request)

English and sentences polishing a little will help to improve the quality of the final paper in the

How To Review A Research Article? - A Black Book To Become A Smart Reviewer by TigerHATS

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

How To Review A Research Article? - A Black Book To Become A Smart Reviewer by TigerHATS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Research, Innovation, Education, Ideas

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

(Theory-oriented Abstract: Partial correction requested)

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

Final decision: Acceptable

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

(Nice sentence polishing Abstract Request)

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

-- The paper makes a good impression with a clear structure.

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

(Compared with more traditional research)

(Yet to let a comment)

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

(Short Abstract reinforcement required)

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

- The approach can be discussed with some other existing techniques.

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

How To Review A Research Article? – A Black

(Short Abstract reinforced request)

You might also like