No. 03-1027
I
N
THE
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense,
P
etitione
r
,
v.JOSE PADILLA and DONNA R. NEWMAN,as next of friend of Jose Padilla,
R
espondents.
O
n
W
r
i
t
of
C
e
r
t
io
r
a
r
i
t
o
t
h
e U
n
i
t
e
d
S
t
a
t
es
C
o
u
r
t
of A
p p
e
a
lsfo
r
t
h
e Seco
n d
C
i
r
c
u
i
t
B
R
I
E F
O
F
J
AN
E T
R E
N
O
,
E
T
A
L.
,A
M
I
C
I
C
U
R
I
A
E
I
N SU
P P
O
R T
O
F
R E
S
P
O
ND
E
N
T
S
R
OBERT
S. L
ITT
Counsel o
f
R
eco
r
d
T
HEODORE
D. F
RANK
C
HRISTOPHER
S. R
HEE
E
LIZABETH
L
EISE
A
RNOLD
& P
ORTER
LLP555 12th Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20004(202) 942-5000
Counsel
f
o
r
A
m
ici Cu
r
i
a
e
April 12, 2004
SKIP TO PAGE 15 OF THE PDF
- i -
T
AB
L E
OF
C O
N
T E
N
T
S
INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE...........................................1SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT..............................................1ARGUMENT..........................................................................3I.THE GOVERNMENT HAS A VASTARRAY OF TOOLS TO PROTECTTHE UNITED STATES FROMTERRORIST ATTACK..............................................3A.Existing Tools To Gather IntelligenceAbout Terrorism..............................................41.Physical Surveillance..........................52.Electronic Surveillance.......................63.Physical Searches..............................104.Obtaining Records............................115.Interrogation......................................12B.Existing Tools toApprehend Terrorists....................................14C.Existing Tools to ProtectClassified Information..................................19II.THE SWEEPING POWER THEPRESIDENT CLAIMS ISUNWARRANTED...................................................21CONCLUSION.....................................................................30
- ii -
T
AB
L E
OF
AU
TH O R
I
T
I
E
S
C
AS
E
S
A
guil
a
r
-
A
y
a
l
a
v
.
R
ui
z
,973 F.2d 411 (5th Cir. 1992).......................................18
A
t
w
a
te
r
v
. Cit
y
o
f
L
a
go
V
ist
a
,532 U.S. 318 (2001).....................................................14
B
a
con
v
. United
S
t
a
tes
,449 F.2d 933 (9th Cir. 1971).................................17, 18
B
l
a
i
r
v
. United
S
t
a
tes
,250 U.S. 273 (1919).....................................................11
B
r
a
x
ton
v
. United
S
t
a
tes
,500 U.S. 344 (1991).....................................................17
C
r
a
w
f
o
r
d
v
.
W
a
shington
,-- U.S. -- , 124 S. Ct. 1354 (2004)...............................20
Dunc
a
n
v
.
K
a
h
a
n
a
m
o
k
u
,327 U.S. 304 (1946).....................................................27
E
x
p
a
r
te
M
illig
a
n
,71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2 (1866)...........................................27
E
x
p
a
r
te Qui
r
in
, 317 U.S. 1 (1942)...................................28
F
lo
r
id
a
v
.
R
o
y
e
r
, 460 U.S. 491 (1983)..............................13
Ge
r
stein
v
.
P
ugh
, 420 U.S. 103 (1975)..............................27
H
a
m
di
v
.
R
u
m
s
f
eld
,316 F.3d 450 (4th Cir. 2003).......................................28
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
ABL Mark-up of Holder Amicus Brief Re Padilla Case
390
Reads
0
Readcasts
8.6K
Embed Views
Notes
Load more
