Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng
Abstract
A sardine surimi product was studied, based on three experimental factors: (a) control of pH-value (2 levels) (b) improvement of
protein solubility (2 levels) and (c) cryoprotectants (3 levels). Samples were frozen at 20 C and kept at this temperature for 25
days. All samples were then partially thawed, mixed with 2 g kg 1 sodium chloride and heated at 90 C for 90 min. The combination
of sorbitol (40 g kg 1) with the salt mixture (sodium chloride 0.45 g kg 1 calcium chloride 0.3 g kg 1 and ammonium chloride 1.25
g kg 1) led to the hardest and more elastic products. Protein loss during the processes was relatively small (6.9% on a dry weight
basis), and its solubility remained at high levels. The overall product recovery was 200 g kg 1. The use of different batches led in
statistically significant differences among the final products. The concentration of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic fatty acids
showed that under-utilized sardine could be an important source of polyunsaturated fatty acids and MaxEPA products.
2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0260-8774/$ - see front matter 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.06.003
304 C.A. Bentis et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 68 (2005) 303–308
could be improved by leaching of mince with hydroper- sodium tripolyphosphate was added to all sugar solu-
oxide or sodium percarbonate or by adding some fat/ tions in order to optimise the cryoprotection of the pro-
casein material to mask the colour (Chen et al., 1997). tein matrix (Suzuki, 1981; Lanier, 1992). Surimi was
In Greece fish (mainly small fish) are processed by packed into polyethylene bags (350 g), frozen down to
salting, drying, smoking, canning, etc. However, the fish 25 C and stored at the same temperature for 25 days.
are often too small for processing and thus have no com-
mercial value and are usually dumped. Thus in Greece 2.2. Surimi gel preparation
the lack of utilization of small fish may also have an ad-
verse effect on the environment. The 350 g surimi sample was partially thawed at
Thus, the aim of this investigation is to introduce an room temperature, cut into small pieces and chopped
application for the Greek industry to use such fish spe- with an ordinary domestic cutter for 4 min with 20
cies. Therefore, the possibility of producing surimi prod- g kg 1 sodium chloride. The paste was stuffed in stain-
ucts from small pelagic fish, such as sardine, was studied less steel tubes, 2.5 cm in diameter and 10 cm in length
by leaching the fish flesh-mince, modifying the pH- and was heated at 90 C for 60 min.
value, enhancing the gel forming ability and finally
stabilising the product using sugar solutions as cryopro-
2.3. Moisture
tectant agents during freezing and frozen storage.
Moisture content was determined by the CEC (Com-
mission of European Communities) recommended
2. Materials and methods
method ISOR 1442 (CEC, 1979).
Approximately 21 kg (three batches, 7 kg at three dif-
ferent times) of fresh sardines (Sardinops pilchardus) 2.4. Protein analysis
were purchased, 2–3 h after catching, from the local fish
market of Thessaloniki. All fish had an average length of The method used for salt soluble protein (SSP) was
13 ± 2.13 cm. They were iced for up to 6 h before that of Cowie and Mackie (1968). In the procedure
processing (immediately after purchase). The whole adopted, salt soluble nitrogen, non-protein nitrogen
process was performed by hand (due to the lack of the (NPN), and total nitrogen (TN) were determined. SSP
necessary equipment) at the laboratories of the Thes- was calculated as follows (SSN-NPN/TN-NPN · 100).
saloniki Institute of Technology, Department of Food
Technology.
2.5. Lipid extraction and analysis
2.1. Frozen surimi
The lipid content was determined by the Bligh and
Dyer (1959) method as modified by Hanson and Olley
Samples of raw sardine from each batch, were
(1963). The fatty acid profile was performed according
washed, gutted, head and bones removed, minced and
to a simple and quick method of Humberside Polytech-
then split into two parts (A & B). Part A was washed
nic as described in Zotos (1991). Peroxide value (PV)
with water (0–5 C) while part B was washed with a 5
was determined according to the method of AOAC
g kg 1 solution of sodium bicarbonate in order to stabi-
(1984).
lize the pH value of the mince (Suzuki, 1981; Lanier,
1992). The duration of both washings was 30 min. After
adequately dewatering the mince, both parts were 2.6. Instrumental analysis
washed with a 100 g kg 1 solution of hydrogen peroxide
for 5 min at 0–5 C. Then, parts A & B were split in half The instrumental analysis was performed using an In-
(A1–A2 & B1–B2). A1–B1 were washed with a 2 g kg 1 stron UTM analyser, model 1140 (Instron Ltd. UK)
sodium chloride solution while A2–B2 was washed with with a flat probe of 6 cm diameter. The 12 different sam-
2 g kg 1 salt-mixture solution (consisting from 0.45 ples of surimi were cut in a cylinder form with an ana-
g kg 1 NaCl, 0.3 g kg 1 CaCl2 and 1.25 g kg 1 NH4Cl) logue device (2.25 cm in height and diameter).
to investigate the interaction of a transglutaminase en- Firmness, elasticity and juiciness were measured by a
hancer (CaCl2) and inhibitor (NH4Cl) (Morales, Rami- compression test using a 10 kg weight, at 10 mm/min
rez, Vivanco, & Vazquez, 2001). After dewatering the speed and a compression limit of 70%. Juiciness was
mince again, all four fore-mentioned parts were once measured by placing the samples on a dried and pre-
again split into three parts (C, D, E). Each part was weighed filter paper. A pressure of 10 kg was then
washed with a 40 g kg 1 sorbitol solution, 40 g kg 1 mal- applied for 1 min. After accurately re-weighing the fil-
tose solution and 40 g kg 1 sorbitol-maltose (1:1) solu- ter paper, the loss of water from each sample was
tion, respectively. A small amount 0.2 g kg 1 of calculated.
C.A. Bentis et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 68 (2005) 303–308 305
Table 1
Encoding and analysis of the three experimental factors
Water (P1) Sodium bicarbonate (P2)
Sodium chloride (L1) S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3
Salt mixture (NaCl, Ca2Cl & NH4Cl) (L2) S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3
Code S1 stands for washing the mince with 4% sorbitol solution, S2 with 4% maltose and S3 with 4% sorbitol:maltose 1:1 mixture. A 0.02% sodium
tripolyphosphate solution was also included in every treatment.
306 C.A. Bentis et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 68 (2005) 303–308
Table 2
Proximate analysis of sardine flesh and surimi found in this investigation as well as results from other study
Raw material-product Species Moisture Protein Protein Lipid Lipid
g kg 1 g kg 1 g kg 1 (on dry weight basis) g kg 1 g kg 1 (on dry
weight basis)
Sardine Sardinops pilchardus 833.0 (23.0) 147.0 (22.7) 880.0 (102.0) 19.7 (4.0) 118.0 (21.1)
(present investigation)
Sardine surimi Sardinops pilchardus 836.0 (23.1) 134.4 (23.2) 819.5 (138.1) 17.7 (2.8) 107.9 (25.9)
(present investigation)
Sardine Sardinops ocellata 760–800 160 12
surimi (Morales et al., 2001)
Values are means of triplicate determinations. Standard deviations are shown in parenthesis.
The results of the ANOVA (Table 3) revealed that During the surimi production process it was observed
washing the mince with sodium bicarbonate (P2) re- that fish originated from various batches, differentiated
duced the weight loss during the heating process (208 in size and spawning period. This observation was con-
g kg 1) with a simultaneous reduction of sensory (5.7 firmed by the proximate analysis of the three different
cm), instrumental firmness (0.45 Nt), increase of pH- batches used in this investigation. The particular inter-
value (7.57) and moisture content (853 g kg 1) of the fi- batch differentiation (as in moisture, protein and lipid
nal product. The salt mixture solution (L2) increased the content, Table 4) had an important effect on the forma-
weight loss during the heating process (331 g kg 1), the tion and the quality of the final product. Sardines from
pH-value from its initial level to 7.5 as well as the PV batches 1 and 2 were probably captured during the pre-
to 10.7 meq O2/kg lipid. Samples treated with sorbitol spawning period, while those from batch 3 were fished
solution (S1) (cryoprotecting agent) were firmer prod- during the post-spawning period, considering that
ucts than all others as assessed by the panellists (8.4 they were caught 1 week after the first two batches.
cm). A similar result has also been reported by Suzuki Kurokawa (1983) has found that sardine muscle origi-
(1981). Furthermore, a synergistic effect was observed nating from samples during the post-spawning period
between sorbitol (S1) and the mixture of salts (L2) lead- had a lower gel forming ability than the pre-spawning
ing to even firmer surimi products (10.8 cm). The inter- ones, an event that was also confirmed in this investiga-
action of the salt mixture (L2) and sodium bicarbonate tion. Samples produced from samples of the 3rd batch,
(P2) also indicated a synergistic effect on the pH-value, showed (a) low levels of sensory firmness: 2nd batch
the PV and moisture. These variables presented their 0.76 Nt = 1st batch 0.58 Nt > 3rd batch 0.37 Nt, (b)
maximum values at that particular combined level higher pH-values 3rd pH 8.03>1st pH 7.08=2nd pH
(P2L2). 6.93, (c) low levels of SSP 1st 71.30%=2nd
Table 3
ANOVAÕs statistically significant results of factors on the variables under study
Factor Affected variable F-Value p-Value Levels
1 2 3
Washing (P) Weight loss (WL) (g kg 1) 59.70 0.016 309.5 207.9
PH 37.29 0.026 7.00 7.57
Moisture (g kg 1) 61.49 0.016 818.6 853.4
Sensory firmness (cm) 63.38 0.015 9.0 5.7
Instrumental firmness (Nt) 6.38 0.030 0.69 0.45
Salt (L) WL (g kg 1) 121.47 0.008 186.3 331.2
PH 48.58 0.049 7.08 7.48
PV (meq O2/kg lipid) 37.91 0.025 4.67 10.73
Sugar (S) Sensory firmness (cm) 21.48 0.044 8.4 5.7 8.2
Combined levels Combined levels
Salt · sugar (L2 · S1) Sensory firmness (cm) 28.57 0.034 10.8
Washing · salt (P1 · L2) WL (g kg 1) 103.8 0.009 449
Washing · salt (P2 · L2) pH 33.03 0.029 8.03
Moisture (g kg 1) 26.47 0.036 868.9
PV (meq O2/kg lipid) 41.69 0.023 15.94
C.A. Bentis et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 68 (2005) 303–308 307
Table 4
Proximate analysis of sardines from the three batches
1 1 1 1
Batch Species Moisture g kg Protein g kg Protein g kg (on dry weight basis) Lipid g kg Lipid g kg 1
(on dry weight basis)
1st Sardinops pilchardus 825.9 (10.9) 154.5 (11.5) 887.9 19.4 (5.3) 111.5
2nd Sardinops pilchardus 812.5 (6.1) 165.8 (6.2) 883.8 21.5 (0.8) 116.2
3rd Sardinops pilchardus 867.5 (6.5) 113.1 (7.2) 860.7 18.3 (2.6) 139.3
Values are means of triplicate determinations, except from 1st batch which is six fold. Standard deviations are shown in parenthesis.
66.70% > 3rd 37.70% and (d) higher susceptibility to li- plains 61.4% of the total variance, the 2nd axis explains
pid oxidation PV: 3rd 15.94 meq/kg lipid > 2nd 5.51 16.5% and the 3rd one 13.8%, summing to a total of
meq/kg lipid=1st 4.69 meq/kg lipid. 90.7%. Variable effects are represented with arrows in
It was also observed that the samples produced from Fig. 1, commencing from the centre of the three-dimen-
sardines of batch 2 lost the greater amount of water dur- sional space. Variable correlations are represented by an-
ing heating: water loss: 2nd 157.17 g kg 1 > 3rd 74.70 gles formed between each couple of arrows. An oblique
g kg 1=1st 65.20 g kg 1. angle between two variables reflects a positive action,
an obtuse angle shows a negative (opposing) effect and
3.4. Correlation of sensory and instrumental variables a vertical angle shows no correlation. Treatments that
are close to a variable exert a strong influence on it.
Sensory and instrumental firmness correlated fairly PCA (Fig. 1) reveals that raw material (three different
(Pearson correlation r = 0.74, p = 0.006) while sensory batches) is a very important parameter on the profile
and instrumental elasticity correlated sufficiently formation of the product, as also noticed by other scien-
(r = 0.85, p < 0.001). A strong correlation was observed tists (Okada, 1992; Suzuki, 1981). Treatments 10, 11 and
between instrumental elasticity and firmness (r > 0.97, 12 from the 3rd batch are characterized by high mois-
p < 0.001). ture content, pH-value and peroxide value (PV), and
low values of total protein (TP), salt soluble protein
3.5. Principal component analysis (PCA) (SSP), weight loss (WL) and functional properties (such
as instrumental firmness –IF and elasticity –IE) (Fig. 1).
Variables that showed statistically significant differ- Treatments of that particular batch were produced with
ences from the ANOVA, as well as those, which mostly the combination of factor levels L2 and P2 (Table 1).
contributed to the formation of the first three major The 2nd batch (treatments 7, 8 & 9) revealed high
component axes were studied. The 1st major axis ex- functional properties (apart from treatment 8) and low
Fig. 1. Principal component analysis showing the first three major axes.
308 C.A. Bentis et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 68 (2005) 303–308