Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1


Ratings: (0)|Views: 932|Likes:
Published by Steve Peachey

More info:

Published by: Steve Peachey on May 16, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





A Ham's Guide to RFI, Ferrites, Baluns, and Audio Interfacing
Revision 3 24 Apr 08©
Entire Contents Copyright 2007-8 The Audio Systems Group, Inc., except Appendices 2, 3, and 4, which areproperty of the cited authors, and product data, which is copyright by Fair-Rite Products. All Rights Reserved
by Jim Brown K9YC
 Audio Systems Group, Inc.http://audiosystemsgroup.comThe basis of this tutorial is a combination of my engineering education, 53 years in ham radio, mywork as vice-chair of the AES Standards Committee working group on EMC, and extensive re-search on RFI in the pro audio world where I’ve made my living. That work is documented in tech-nical papers and tutorials that can be downloaded from the publications section of my website.
Chapter 1 – Some Fundamentals
To solve interference problems, we must understand them. So we'll begin by describing the waysthat RF interference is coupled into equipment and detected. There are several principal mecha-nisms at work.
Detection at Semiconductor Junctions
Every semiconductor junction, whether part of a diode,transistor, or integrated circuit, is quite nonlinear, especially in the voltage region where it is be-ginning to conduct. In analog circuits, we prevent this non-linearity from causing distortion byproperly biasing the circuitry, by using lots of negative feedback, and by preventing the signal frombeing large enough to cross into the cutoff region.Thanks to this non-linearity, every semiconductor junction functions as a
square law detector
, de-tecting any RF signal it sees. A good designer prevents detection by shielding the equipment andits wiring, by filtering input and output wiring, and even by bypassing the junction by a capacitor.Since virtually all detection that causes RFI follows square law, the strength of the signal detectedby audio equipment, telephones, and other equipment will increase (or decrease) as the square of any increase (or decrease) in RF level at the detector.
In other words, the strength of the detectedRF changes by twice the number of dB that the RF signal changes.
This means that if we manage toreduce the interfering RF signal by 6 dB, the detected audio will drop by 12 dB. This is a very use-ful thing – it means that we may not need "an elephant gun" to solve many interference problems.
Antenna Action
The most fundamental cause of radio interference to other systems is the fact thatthe wiring for those systems, both inside and outside the box, are antennas. We may call them"patch cables" or "speaker cables" or "video cables" or "Ethernet cables," or printed circuit traces,but Mother Nature knows that they are antennas! And Mother Nature always wins the argument.When we transmit, some of the RF from our transmitter is picked up by those unintentional anten-nas, and RF current flows on them. What happens to that current determines whether there will beinterference, and how severe it will be. We know that antennas work in both directions – that is,they follow the principle of 
– so when RF trash from inside the box flows on those an-tennas, it is radiated as noise and we hear it on the ham bands.Fig 1 shows a simple antenna we’ve all used,probably with our first radio receiver. We con-nected a random wire to our receiver, and theantenna current flowed through the receiver toa "ground" that might have been a driven rod,but was more likely the safety ground of the ACpower line (the third pin on the AC socket,known in North America as the "green wire").Even if the radio was double insulated so that itdidn't require the green wire connection, RFcurrent still flowed through the stray capaci-tance of the power transformer to the powerline and made the radio work.Fig 1 – A simple random wire antennaRF picked up on the antennas we call loudspeaker wiring, video cables, the coax from the cable TVsystem or a rooftop TV antenna, flows through equipment to get to the AC power system safetyground. Hams understand that some antennas are more effective than others. An antenna that is
Understanding and Solving RF Interference Problems Page 2
close to resonance will work better than one that is not. Long antennas tend to pick up more RFthan short ones. Think about these fundamental principles when trying to diagnose which cablesare bringing your RF into a given system (or radiating their trash into your receiving antenna). A path to "ground" or the power system is not always needed to produce antenna action. The whipantenna on our VHF and UHF handheld radios uses the radio, capacity-coupled to our hand thatholds it, as a counterpoise (that is, to provide "the other half of the antenna"). All that is requiredfor this to work is that the size of the counterpoise must be a significant fraction of a quarter wave(or larger) so that it can "sink" the antenna current.
Common Mode and Differential Mode Signals
signal is one that exists be-tween the conductors of a cable. At any given point along the cable, current flowing on one con-ductor is precisely balanced by current flowing in the other direction on the other conductor. Theintentional signals carried by cables are differential mode signals – the audio or video signal in ahome audio system, Ethernet signals on CAT5/6 cable, and the RF signal carried by the feedlineconnecting our antennas to our transceivers. A 
common mode
signal is one that places equal voltage on all conductors – that is, the voltage be-tween the two ends of the cable are different, but there is no voltage between the conductors. An-tenna action produces a
common mode voltage
and current along a cable. The antenna currentinduced on audio and video wiring is a
common mode
signal. That is, with "ideal" cable, there is nodifferential voltage between the signal conductors as a result of this antenna action. If the cable isshielded, nearly all of this current flows on the shield (and skin effect causes it to flow on the out-side of the shield). If the shield is ideal (that is, if the current is distributed with perfect uniformityaround it), the field inside the shield will be zero, and thus none of this antenna current will flowinside the cable. Conversely, when a cable shield is carrying differential mode current, as in thecase of coax, skin effect will cause that differential mode current to flow on the inside of the shield.The real world is not ideal, so most interfering signals will simultaneously exist in both commonmode and differential mode, but in most real world conditions, one or the other mode dominates.Several cable defects (essentially manufacturing tolerances) certainly can and do convert this"common mode" antenna current to a differential signal (that is, a voltage between the signal con-ductors), but that is rarely the most powerful coupling mechanism. One common defect that af-fects both balanced and unbalanced cables is imperfect construction of cable shields. In even thebest "real world" balanced twisted pair cables, there are imbalances in the capacitance between"red" and "black" conductors to the shield on the order of 5%. [B. Whitlock, JAES, June 1995] Inbalanced paired cables that use "foil/drain" shields, there is even more imbalance in the inductivecoupling between each conductor and the shield. Noise (or RFI) coupled by this mechanism iscalled "shield-current-induced noise," or SCIN. [N. Muncy, JAES, June 1995] All three of thesemechanisms convert shield current to a differential signal at system input and output terminals.If the cable is an unshielded pair (loudspeaker cable, for example), RF will be induced approxi-mately equally on both conductors (but, depending what the input circuit of the equipment lookslike at RF, current flow into the equipment may not be equal on both conductors). This can alsoproduce a differential voltage at the input (or output) terminals.
Output Wiring is Important Too!
It is well known, for example, that RF interference is often cou-pled into the output stage of audio equipment – for example, the power amplifiers that feed loud-speakers or headphones. There is always feedback around that output stage, so RF present at theoutput will follow the feedback network to the input of a gain stage, where it will be detected andamplified. This problem is made much worse when parallel wire cable (zip cord) is used to feedthe loudspeakers or headphones, and can usually be solved simply by replacing the zip cord with atwisted pair of POC (plain ordinary copper). [Pseudo-scientific advertising hype for exotic cablesnotwithstanding, it was shown nearly 30 years ago that #12 copper twisted pair (or #10 for verylong runs) is a nearly ideal loudspeaker cable.] [R. A. Greiner, "Amplifier Loudspeaker Interfacing,” JAES Vol 28 Nr 5, May 1980] As we will discuss later, the twisting of a pair greatly reduces thelevel of RF that the wiring couples to circuitry.
Power Supply and Control Wiring
can also act as antennas. When I bought the house I owned in
Understanding and Solving RF Interference Problems Page 3
Chicago, I upgraded the electrical wiring and put all of it in steel conduit (EMT). This shielded thewiring, so that only the short power cords between equipment and the wall outlets could act asantennas. The house I recently bought in California is wired with no conduit, using unshieldedparallel conductors. Thanks to its length, and the fact that it is not shielded, this wiring acts as aneffective receiving antenna for the RF I am transmitting, and an effective transmitting antenna forthe RF trash generated by computer equipment, power supplies for low voltage lighting fixtures,and even battery chargers.
Current Returns to its Source
Current flows in a complete circuit that includes the source of thecurrent. The circuit will couple noise inductively, and also by antenna action. The cause of manyRFI and noise problems, as well as the solution to them, lies in identifying and controlling thesecircuits.
Always ask, "Where does the noise (or RFI) current flow?"
Loop Area
One of the most fundamental laws of electrical circuits is that the current that is mag-netically induced between two circuits is proportional to the loop area of each circuit. Making theloop area small also minimizes the extent to which the wiring can act as an antenna. When we usea closely coupled pair of conductors to form a transmission line, we are reducing the loop area,which reduces the total current induced in the loop by an interfering signal, and the total magneticfield produced by current in that loop. The transmission line, of course, has other useful proper-ties. More on this later on.The equipment designer can also use multilayer printed circuit techniques to place a "ground" (ref-erence) plane next to all signal wiring, turning each circuit trace into an unbalanced transmissionline, where the return current is carried on the reference plane under wiring. A single referenceplane makes a very large reduction in the ability of that circuit trace to receive interference; sand-wiching it between two such planes virtually eliminates it. These techniques, called microstrip (oneplane), or stripline (the sandwich), are widely used by better designers. They reject noise couplingboth inside and outside the equipment by drastically reducing the loop area of the current path(and have the additional benefit of making high speed data circuits behave better because they aretransmission lines).
Loaded Words That Cause Misunderstandings
One of the most overused and misunderstoodwords in electronics is "ground" (or "earth" in British English). There are several important andcommon uses of the words. One meaning is an actual connection to mother earth. Some commonearth connections include the steel structure of a building, a buried conductive water pipe, a con-crete encased grounding electrode (called a Ufer, after its inventor, Herbert Ufer), and, of course,one or more conductive rods driven into the earth. [Concrete mixes vary widely in their conductiv-ity – most we are likely to encounter are highly conductive, but some are effective insulators.] Theprimary function of this earth connection is lightning protection. A second common use of the word "ground" (or "earth" in British English) is a third conductor thatis part of the power system wiring that should never carry current (except in the case of a fault) butconnects the conductive enclosures of equipment to a common point within the power system.This "green wire" or third pin in the outlet in North American power systems, is called the "equip-ment ground" (or "protective earth" in British English). The green wire is required to be connectedto all exposed conductive parts of electrical equipment "that might be energized" in the event of equipment failure. The purpose of this connection is to provide a sufficiently robust current paththat a fuse will blow or circuit breaker will trip in the event of equipment or wiring failure thatcauses the chassis to be "hot," thus protecting people from electrical shock and preventing fires. A third common use of the word "ground" (or "earth" in British English) is to describe "circuit com-mon" or "circuit reference" within equipment. Circuit common should nearly always be connectedto the power supply reference, and to the shielding enclosure of the equipment. If the source of noise is within equipment, circuit common is reference for the noise voltage (and current), and it isthe point to which that noise current wants to return. A fourth common use of the word "ground" is as the "return" for an unbalanced antenna like a ver-tical or long wire. In this application, the antenna needs some conductor to be a low impedance"sink" for the antenna current. The radials for an elevated or ground-mounted vertical antenna

Activity (6)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
royneal liked this
Vincent Lee liked this
ee369 liked this
ee369 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->