Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
RSA Power Lines

RSA Power Lines

Ratings: (0)|Views: 8,914|Likes:
Published by The RSA
This paper follows on from the RSA’s Connected Communities report, deepening the analysis to look at networks of power and influence, and in particular those who are isolated in the community.
This paper follows on from the RSA’s Connected Communities report, deepening the analysis to look at networks of power and influence, and in particular those who are isolated in the community.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research
Published by: The RSA on May 18, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Power lines
Gaia Marcus, Thomas Neumark and Steve Broome
May 2011
about the rsa
For over 250 years the Royal Society or the encouragement o Arts,Manuactures and Commerce (RSA) has been a cradle o enlightenmentthinking and a orce or social progress. Our approach is multi-disciplinary,politically independent and combines cutting edge research and policydevelopment with practical action.We encourage public discourse and critical debate by providing platormsor leading experts to share new ideas on contemporary issues. Ourprojects generate new models or tackling the social challenges o todayand our work is supported by a 27,000 strong Fellowship — achieversand inuencers rom every feld with a real commitment to progressivesocial change.
Gi M
is a Researcher or theConnected Communities projectandthe social network analysis champion or RSA Projects as a whole. Herocus is examining the role o social networks in building resilient,empowered communities; in promoting mental well-being; and in buildinghuman capabilities in everything rom education to social entrepreneurship.Prior to joining the RSA, Gaia worked as a Research Associate and onlinecommunity manager or theSpace Makers Agency.
tm Nm
is Associate Director or theConnected Communities project at the RSA, examining the role o online and oine socialnetworks in building resilient, empowered communities and promotingmental well-being. Prior to joining the RSA, Thomas worked as a policylead on community empowerment at theCommunity DevelopmentFoundation. There he produced reports on inormal approaches tocitizenship education, culture change within public sector organisations,subjective eelings o empowerment and an evaluation o the impact o the government’s community empowerment programmes.
sv bm
is Director o Research at the RSA and oversees ourConnected Communities programme, which includes work on drug servicesand recovery, and social network research methods. Steve has 12 yearsexperience o researching community regeneration and economicdevelopment agendas. He specialises in understanding impact throughmixed methods research designs. He previously worked on a London NewDeal or Communities programme, where he led evaluation and strategy,community saety and community development programmes.
In 2010, the RSA published
Connected Communities: How social networks power and sustain the Big Society
, which explored a new approach tocommunity regeneration based on an understanding o the importanceo social networks.
It argued that such an approach has the potential tobring about signifcant improvements in eorts to combat isolation andto support the development o resilient and empowered communities.This paper ollows on rom that report, deepening the analysis to look atnetworks o power and inuence, and in particular those who are isolatedin the community. The paper argues that the government’s eorts tobuild the Big Society are too ocused on citizen-led service delivery. Anapproach based on utilising and building people’s social networks, whichlargely determine our ability to create change and inuence decisions thataect us, may prove more eective.
Rowson, J., Broome, S., & Jones, A., 2010. Connected Communities:How social networks power and sustain the Big Society.London: RSA. [http://www.thersa.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/333483/ConnectedCommunities_report_150910.pdf ]
1. INtroductIoN
More oten than not, participation is defned too narrowly.
Consequently,there is a ocus on so-called ‘active’ citizens (typically labelled the ‘usualsuspects’), identifed through their contacts with local councillors, votingbehaviour in elections, vocal membership o local groups, or writtenresponses to local consultations. Such citizens represent our vision o what it is to be empowered and to have inuence. This paper argues thatto increase access to local power — understood as the ability to get thingsdone and change one’s circumstances and local community — the ocusmust frst be on ostering overall social connections and neighbourliness.The Coalition government has declared that:
“We need to create communities with oomph — neighbourhoods who are incharge of their own destiny, who feel if they club together and get involved theycan shape the world around them.” 
With the publication o the Localism Bill we now have some idea o howthey intend to go about creating these communities. Sadly, the vision o how to empower communities is ar too ocused on engaging memberso the public in the delivery o public services.
 A better — and possibly complementary
— strategy or osteringneighbourhoods that are in charge o their own destiny would be to ocuson building denser and more varied connections within theseneighbourhoods. This is difcult, unpredictable work, but the potentialreturns are enormous.
There are structural reasons why certain peoplecurrently have ewer or more uniorm connections than others. As thispaper will show, those who are unemployed, retired, or who live in areasthat have thinner social networks overall, all tend to have ewer localconnections. These groups, who are at risk o isolation, need to bea particular ocus in eorts to build more empowered communities.The prospect o running a school or a library or even a community pubcan leave most people nonplussed. Ipsos MORI’s polling has ound thatonly about 5% o people express even a nominal interest in becomingactively involved in the delivery o public services.
On the other hand ourresearch has ound that even those who are currently poorly connectedshow an interest in being able to shape their networks and connect morewhen given the appropriate tools and orum.Attempting to get more people and community groups involved in theprovision o public services will not, by itsel, create neighbourhoodswhere people eel that they can shape the world around them. Fosteringsupport and exchange through inormal connections may be an importantway to ‘achieve’ outcomes that many public services aim or. We haveound that the more connected someone is, the more likely they are tobelieve in neighbourliness.
The less connected someone is, the less likelythey are to perceive their connections as being o use to them in eectingthe change they would like to see.Further complicating matters, those who do participate in this way —the so-called ‘civic core’ o predominantly well educated, middle-agedproessionals
— do not eel in charge o their own destiny: the majorityo community activists say that they cannot inuence decisions in theirlocal area.
This is compounded by our research that has shown thatthese so-called ‘usual suspects’ oten eel used by local services as ‘reelabour’ or to legitimise a particular policy or action.
2 Secker, E., 2009. Expanding the concept of participatory rights.
The International Journal of Human Rights, Routledge.
3 Cameron, D., 2010. Big Society Speech. [http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2010/07/big-society-speech-53572]4 Communities and local Government, 2010. A plain Englishguide to the localism bill. [http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/1818597.pdf ]5 Neumark, T., 2011. Consultation. [http://projects.rsablogs.org.uk/2011/02/consultation/]6 Ormerod, P., 2010. N squared: public policy and the power of networks. London, RSA. [http://www.thersa.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/330258/RSA_Pamphlet-publicpolicy.pdf ]7 Ipsos MORI, 2010. Public Policy poll for the economist.[http://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/poll-public-policy-poll-for-the-economist-may2010-charts.pdf ]8 Rowson, J., Broome, S., & Jones, A., 2010, op. cit.9 Mohan, J., 24 August 2010. Big society threatened bylack of volunteers. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/joepublic/2010/aug/24/big-society-lack-of-volunteers]10 Urban Forum, 2010. Citizens and local decision making: Whatdrives feelings of inuence? [http://www.urbanforum.org.uk/files/citizens_and_local_decision_making_full_report_2010_03.pdf ]

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->