J.L. Yániz et al. / Animal Reproduction Science 122 (2010) 142–149
143
motility through sperm adhesion and agglutination (Wolff etal.,1993;MongaandRoberts,1994),causesmorphologi-calchangesatthelevelofthemidpiece,plasmamembrane,and acrosome (Diemer et al., 2000),alters sperm function,
andincreasesphosphatidylserinetranslocation(Villegasetal., 2005).In animal species, a variety of bacteria from dif-ferent genera have been identified after aerobic culture of extended semen samples, and certain bacteria had detri-mental effects on semen quality during low temperaturestorage (Althouse et al., 2000; Aurich and Spergser, 2007;Akhter et al., 2008).Limited information is currently available describingthe bacterial contamination of ejaculated semen samplesin fertile rams. The aim of this study was to determinethe degree and type of bacterial contamination of ejacu-lated semen samples in fertile rams and its consequenceson sperm quality during storage at 15
◦
C.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Experiment 1 2.1.1. Animals, semen collection and preparation of samples
All animal procedures were performed in accor-dance with the Spanish Animal Protection RegulationRD223/1988, which conforms to European Union Regula-tion 86/609. A total of 68 ejaculates were collected from36 genitally healthy adult Rasa Aragonesa rams (2–6 yearsold)usingsterilizedartificialvaginasandglasstubes.RamswerefromtheonlyinseminationcentreforRasaAragonesa(25 rams) and from a public regional research centre (11rams),andwereselectedonthebasisofasuccessfulrepro-ductive history and healthy appearance during generalexploration and local examination of the genital organs.The undiluted semen was evaluated for motility undera phase contrast microscope at 400
×
(Olympus BX40,Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Japan) and sperm concentra-tioncalculatedbyloading6
lintoaNeubauer(Marienfeld,Germany)chamberinduplicate,andcountingunder200
×
magnification.Thesemenfromeachejaculatewasdividedinto two aliquots, one of which was used for bacterial cul-ture(storedat5
◦
Cinsterileglasstubes),andtheotherwasdilutedinlong-life,ultra-heat-treated(UHT)milk(0.7%fat)without antibiotics to 800
×
10
6
sperm/ml, kept in sterileglasstubesandstoredinarefrigeratorat15
◦
C.At0,24and48h after dilution, semen samples were carefully mixedanddilutedto50
×
10
6
sperm/mlinacitrate–glucosesolu-tion to assess plasma membrane integrity and motility.
2.1.2. Bacterial culture
Cultures were taken from single-sire whole ejaculatealiquots (
n
=68; 36 rams) within 2h after recovery. Eachsample was plated on blood agar, chocolate agar and Mac-Conkey agar, and the plates were incubated in aerobicconditions at 37
◦
C. Aerobic cultures were inspected andbacterial growth recorded after 24 and 48h of incubation.Bacterial contamination (expressed as colony-formingunits—CFU/ml)wascategorizedintofourgroupsforstatis-tical analysis: <100, 100–999,
≥
1000. Nonenteric bacteriawere identified using the API 20NE system (BioMérieuxS.A., Madrid, Spain), and enteric bacteria were identifiedusing the API 20E (BioMérieux S.A., Madrid, Spain) or BBLEnterotube II (Becton Dickinson S.A., Madrid, Spain) sys-tems. Antibiotic sensitivities were performed using theKirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Method (BectonDickinsonS.A.,Madrid,Spain)followingestablishedguide-lines (Watts, 1999).
2.1.3. Assessment of stored semen samples 2.1.3.1. Assessment of plasma membrane integrity.
Spermviability (membrane integrity) was assessed as describedbyYániz et al. (2008).Briefly, semen samples diluted in
a citrate-based extender (80.6mM sodium citrate titratedto pH 7.0 using a 1M citric acid solution, 55.6mM glu-cose) to 50
×
10
6
sperm/ml. Aliquots (0.5ml) of dilutedsamples were pipetted into 1ml Eppendorf centrifugetubes, and 5
l of PI solution (0.5mg/ml in PBS) wereadded to the samples. Each aliquot was incubated for8min in the dark at 30
◦
C, and spermatozoa were immobi-lized with formaldehyde at a final concentration of 0.35%.Spermatozoa were examined and photographed underan Olympus BX40 fluorescence microscope at 100
×
. Twopictures where taken of each field under negative-phasecontrast and fluorescence microscopy (Olympus BX40,Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Japan; UMWIG3 filter block)using a digital camera adapted to the microscope (CanonEos 400D controlled using the computer through a remotecontrol program). The images were processed using UTH-SCSA Image-Tool open software (Version 3.0, availableon-line athttp://ddsdx.uthscsa.edu/dig/download.html).The percentage of membrane-damaged spermatozoa wascalculatedasthenumberofpropidium-iodidepositivecells(inthefluorescencemicroscopyimage)dividedbythetotalnumber of cells in the same field (negative-phase contrastmicroscopy image). At least 500 cells were examined persample.
2.1.3.2. Sperm motility determination by CASA (computer-assisted sperm analysis).
Computer-assisted sperm anal-yser (ISAS
®
, Version 1.0, PROISER, Valencia, Spain) wasused to assess sperm motility, as described byYániz etal. (2008).Briefly, sample aliquots (5
l) were placed ina pre-warmed Makler chamber, and at least 500 spermcells were analysed by CASA for each sample. The semenvariables recorded were motility percentage (MS, %), pro-gressive motility percentage (PS, %), straight line velocity(VSL,
m/s),curvilinearvelocity(VCL,
m/s),averagepathvelocity(VAP,
m/s);linearity(LIN,asameasureofacurvi-linear path, VSL/VCL), straightness (STR, as the linearity of theaveragepath,VSL/VAP),wobble(WOB,oscillationmea-sure of the actual path about the average path, VAP/VCL),and amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH,
m).
2.2. Experiment 2
A total of 16 ejaculates were collected from 6 genitallyhealthy rams from an experimental centre as describedpreviously,usingmeticuloushygienemeasurestodecreasebacterial contamination. The minimum visual motility cri-terion was 80%. Native semen was checked for bacterialcontamination immediately after collection as in experi-
Leave a Comment